Diagnosis of CancerEMBEDNCT07711080
Eortc MoBilE Device (EMBED)
An observational study of Diagnosis of Cancer, run by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTC.
Trial summary
This study is a longitudinal observational study that will investigate the feasibility of using mobile devices for the assessment of HRQoL and physical activity in adult cancer patients undergoing treatment. Patients will complete a set of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), and wear a smartwatch (min. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Diagnosis of Cancer
- How many people
- 137 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2026to 1 Sep 2028
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Adult cancer patients prior to the start of a new treatment without restrictions related to gender, cancer site or cancer stage.
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of cancer
- Age≥18
- Starting a first or new anticancer treatment within one month following enrolment
- Literacy in the target language
- Ability to understand and fill out questionnaires
- Ability to operate a smartphone
Show all 9Show fewer
- In possession of a smartphone allowing for an internet connection and willing to use this device to submit data
- Written informed consent
- Life expectancy>3 months
Who cannot join
- Exclusively receiving palliative care
- Start of cancer-related treatment < 1 week from time of screening
- Any psychological, familial, sociological or geographical condition potentially hampering compliance with the study protocol and follow-up schedule; those conditions should be assessed and discussed with the patient before enrolment in this study.
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
About this study
Official title: Eortc MoBilE Device (EMBED) - Implementation of Smart Devices for the Assessment of Quality of Life, Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) and Physical Functioning and Activity in EORTC Clinical Trials: A Feasibility Study.
This study is a longitudinal observational study that will investigate the feasibility of using mobile devices for the assessment of HRQoL and physical activity in adult cancer patients undergoing treatment. Patients will complete a set of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), and wear a smartwatch (min. 10 hours per day for one week), at baseline, and at weeks 4, 8 and 12 after treatment start.
Read the detailed description
Rationale:
The EORTC currently does not have experience in implementing mobile devices for the remote assessment of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Physical Activity (PA) in cancer clinical trials. The feasibility and logistics related to such assessment methodologies might be challenging in many regards. To anticipate these challenges, a first-hand experience in the conduct of a study involving the implementation of mobile devices in cancer clinical settings appears as the most efficient approach. The current study aims at building the first blocks of an implementation strategy for the incorporation of HRQoL and PA measurements into the world of digital health and remote assessment in cancer patients and to prepare the EORTC and the Quality of Life Group (QLG) to face the emergence of these new technologies in the field of cancer clinical trials.
Objective(s):
Main objective: • Assessing the general feasibility of implementing mobile devices for the assessment of HRQoL and PA over a period of 12 weeks in cancer patients undergoing treatment, identifying its major human and operational factors Secondary objectives: • Assessing the patients' compliance with the PRO assessments • Assessing the patients' compliance with the wearable passive assessments • Assessing the patients' and health care providers' (HCPs) experience related to the protocol Exploratory objectives: • Exploring the association between feasibility and user experience and patients' individual characteristics • Exploring the association between device-reported PA data (wearable) and HRQoL, self-reported PA and patient individual characteristics .
Study design:
A longitudinal observational study to investigate the feasibility of using mobile devices for the assessment of HRQoL and PA level in adult cancer patients undergoing treatment will be performed. Patients will be invited to complete a set of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) at study inclusion, at the end of baseline week (a 1-week period following inclusion into the study, which should fall within 1 month prior to the start of treatment) and end of weeks 4, 8 and 12 and to wear a smartwatch (min. 10 hours per day) for a week at baseline and during weeks 4, 8, 12. At the end of the study (end of week 12), a subsample of patients (20%) will be invited to participate to semistructured interviews which will occur within within one month following the 12-week follow-up assessment. Study duration Study accrual is expected to last 24 months. Each patient will be followed for 12 to 16 weeks (depending on time between baseline and treatment start). Total study duration is therefore 2 years and 4 months from first patient enrolled. End of study End of study will be declared when all enrolled patients have completed their end of study assessment (which is expected to occur 12 to 16 weeks after last patient enrolled) and the study database is mature for all prespecified analyses.
Number of patients:
The study is powered to ensure the recruitment of a representative sample of cancer patients for the assessment of the feasibility and user experience related to the patient reported outcomes and wearable follow-up. We considered that a final sample of 100 patients with completed follow-up information would satisfy this criterion. According to literature [1], cancer patients' compliance to such protocols varies between 73% and 92%. Taking a conservative approach, we estimated that the recruitment of 137 patients would yield a minimum of 100 patients with completed follow-up (i.e., N=137x[73/100]=100.01).
Study population:
Adult cancer patients prior to the start of a new treatment without restrictions related to gender, cancer site or cancer stage. Recruitment will be stratified by recruitment sites and monitored twice a year by the study steering committee. Main inclusion criteria • Diagnosis of cancer • Age≥18 • Starting a first or new anticancer treatment within one month following enrolment • Literacy in the target language • Ability to understand and fill out questionnaires • Ability to operate a smartphone • In possession of a smartphone allowing for an internet connection and willing to use this device to submit data • Written informed consent • Life expectancy>3 months Main exclusion criteria • Exclusively receiving palliative care
Statistical analyses:
Feasibility and user experience mean levels: • Analyses of variance (ANOVAs) with pairwise comparisons will be conducted for weekly compliance with PRO and wearable passive assessments to evaluate potential burden effects experienced by the patients over time (baseline vs week 4; baseline vs week 8; baseline vs week 12; week 4 vs week 8; week 4 vs week 12; week 8 vs week 12). • Mean score to the user experience questionnaire will be examined.
Quality of Life:
Quality of life will be assessed 4 times over the duration of the study (end of baseline, week 4, week 8 \& week 12) using the following measures: • EORTC QLQ-C30 (30 items) • EORTC CAT Core Pain, Fatigue and Physical Functioning (10 items)
- Conditions
- Diagnosis of Cancer
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Assessing the general feasibility of implementing mobile devices for the assessment of HRQoL and PA over a period of 12 weeks in cancer patients undergoing treatment, identifying its major human and operational factors
General feasibility index (GFI)
Measured: baseline assessment week, week 4, week 8, week 12 and overall
Secondary outcomes (3)
To assess the compliance with the Patient Reported Outcome remote assessment
PROM completion rate will be determined for each assessment point (baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12) as the proportion of patients with a successful PRO assessment divided by the total number of patients participating to the study at that time point.
Measured: baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12
To assess the compliance with the physical activity remote assessment
Wearable wear-time rate will be determined for each assessment period (baseline week and weeks 4, 8 and 12) as the proportion of patients with a successful wearable assessment divided by the total number of patients participating to the study at that time point. A wearable assessment will be successful if it was worn for at least 4 days out of 7 for >10 hours per day.
NOTE: for the following point another outcome measure needs to be added, differentiating between end-of-study user experience and interviews
Measured: baseline assessment week, week 4, week 8, week 12 and overall
To assess the patients' user experience related to the Patient Reported Outcome and physical activity remote assessment
User experience (quantitative): Mean score to end-of-study user experience as assessed by a customized questionnaire at week 12.
User experience (qualitative): Summary qualitative results of the post-study (within one month following week 12) interviews' verbatim as assessed through a thematic analysis.
Measured: Within 1 month after Week 12
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Jul 2026
- Study start1 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion1 Sep 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Sep 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Diagnosis of CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTCThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 137 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- Research network
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07711080
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EORTC 2124-QLG
- Acronym
- EMBED
- Status last verified
- Jul 2026
- First submitted
- 13 May 2026
- Last updated
- 17 Jul 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Jul 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Eortc MoBilE Device (EMBED) - Implementation of Smart Devices for the Assessment of Quality of Life, Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) and Physical Functioning and Activity in EORTC Clinical Trials: A Feasibility Study.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07711080
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EMBED / EORTC 2124-QLG
- Conditions
- Diagnosis of Cancer
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 137 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTCResearch network
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 1 Sep 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Sep 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 17 Jul 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is a longitudinal observational study that will investigate the feasibility of using mobile devices for the assessment of HRQoL and physical activity in adult cancer patients undergoing treatment. Patients will complete a set of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), and wear a smartwatch (min. 10 hours per day for one week), at baseline, and at weeks 4, 8 and 12 after treatment start.
Detailed description
Rationale:
The EORTC currently does not have experience in implementing mobile devices for the remote assessment of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Physical Activity (PA) in cancer clinical trials. The feasibility and logistics related to such assessment methodologies might be challenging in many regards. To anticipate these challenges, a first-hand experience in the conduct of a study involving the implementation of mobile devices in cancer clinical settings appears as the most efficient approach. The current study aims at building the first blocks of an implementation strategy for the incorporation of HRQoL and PA measurements into the world of digital health and remote assessment in cancer patients and to prepare the EORTC and the Quality of Life Group (QLG) to face the emergence of these new technologies in the field of cancer clinical trials.
Objective(s):
Main objective: • Assessing the general feasibility of implementing mobile devices for the assessment of HRQoL and PA over a period of 12 weeks in cancer patients undergoing treatment, identifying its major human and operational factors Secondary objectives: • Assessing the patients' compliance with the PRO assessments • Assessing the patients' compliance with the wearable passive assessments • Assessing the patients' and health care providers' (HCPs) experience related to the protocol Exploratory objectives: • Exploring the association between feasibility and user experience and patients' individual characteristics • Exploring the association between device-reported PA data (wearable) and HRQoL, self-reported PA and patient individual characteristics .
Study design:
A longitudinal observational study to investigate the feasibility of using mobile devices for the assessment of HRQoL and PA level in adult cancer patients undergoing treatment will be performed. Patients will be invited to complete a set of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) at study inclusion, at the end of baseline week (a 1-week period following inclusion into the study, which should fall within 1 month prior to the start of treatment) and end of weeks 4, 8 and 12 and to wear a smartwatch (min. 10 hours per day) for a week at baseline and during weeks 4, 8, 12. At the end of the study (end of week 12), a subsample of patients (20%) will be invited to participate to semistructured interviews which will occur within within one month following the 12-week follow-up assessment. Study duration Study accrual is expected to last 24 months. Each patient will be followed for 12 to 16 weeks (depending on time between baseline and treatment start). Total study duration is therefore 2 years and 4 months from first patient enrolled. End of study End of study will be declared when all enrolled patients have completed their end of study assessment (which is expected to occur 12 to 16 weeks after last patient enrolled) and the study database is mature for all prespecified analyses.
Number of patients:
The study is powered to ensure the recruitment of a representative sample of cancer patients for the assessment of the feasibility and user experience related to the patient reported outcomes and wearable follow-up. We considered that a final sample of 100 patients with completed follow-up information would satisfy this criterion. According to literature [1], cancer patients' compliance to such protocols varies between 73% and 92%. Taking a conservative approach, we estimated that the recruitment of 137 patients would yield a minimum of 100 patients with completed follow-up (i.e., N=137x[73/100]=100.01).
Study population:
Adult cancer patients prior to the start of a new treatment without restrictions related to gender, cancer site or cancer stage. Recruitment will be stratified by recruitment sites and monitored twice a year by the study steering committee. Main inclusion criteria • Diagnosis of cancer • Age≥18 • Starting a first or new anticancer treatment within one month following enrolment • Literacy in the target language • Ability to understand and fill out questionnaires • Ability to operate a smartphone • In possession of a smartphone allowing for an internet connection and willing to use this device to submit data • Written informed consent • Life expectancy>3 months Main exclusion criteria • Exclusively receiving palliative care
Statistical analyses:
Feasibility and user experience mean levels: • Analyses of variance (ANOVAs) with pairwise comparisons will be conducted for weekly compliance with PRO and wearable passive assessments to evaluate potential burden effects experienced by the patients over time (baseline vs week 4; baseline vs week 8; baseline vs week 12; week 4 vs week 8; week 4 vs week 12; week 8 vs week 12). • Mean score to the user experience questionnaire will be examined.
Quality of Life:
Quality of life will be assessed 4 times over the duration of the study (end of baseline, week 4, week 8 \& week 12) using the following measures: • EORTC QLQ-C30 (30 items) • EORTC CAT Core Pain, Fatigue and Physical Functioning (10 items)
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Adult cancer patients prior to the start of a new treatment without restrictions related to gender, cancer site or cancer stage.
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Diagnosis of cancer
- Age≥18
- Starting a first or new anticancer treatment within one month following enrolment
- Literacy in the target language
- Ability to understand and fill out questionnaires
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Exclusively receiving palliative care
- Start of cancer-related treatment < 1 week from time of screening
- Any psychological, familial, sociological or geographical condition potentially hampering compliance with the study protocol and follow-up schedule; those conditions should be assessed and discussed with the patient before enrolment in this study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Assessing the general feasibility of implementing mobile devices for the assessment of HRQoL and PA over a period of 12 weeks in cancer patients undergoing treatment, identifying its major human and operational factors
Time frame: baseline assessment week, week 4, week 8, week 12 and overall
General feasibility index (GFI)
3 secondary outcomes
To assess the compliance with the Patient Reported Outcome remote assessment
Time frame: baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12
To assess the compliance with the physical activity remote assessment
Time frame: baseline assessment week, week 4, week 8, week 12 and overall
To assess the patients' user experience related to the Patient Reported Outcome and physical activity remote assessment
Time frame: Within 1 month after Week 12
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Jul 2026.
Related trials for Diagnosis of Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
International PPB/DICER1 Registry
Pleuropulmonary Blastoma, Sertoli-Leydig Cell Tumor
Recruiting
68Ga-XMFH01 PET/Fluorescence Imaging in Prostate Cancer
Prostate Cancer (Diagnosis), ACP3
Recruiting
MRD Monitoring in Colorectal Cancer Using ctDNA
Colorectal Neoplasms, Colorectal Cancer (Diagnosis)
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Investigation of an Intelligent Centre-adaptive Multi-modal Fusion Framework (Cad- MMFF) to Overcome Unnecessary Prostate Biopsies and Optimize MRI Utilization
Prostate Cancer (Diagnosis)
RecruitingPhase 2
Analgesic Efficacy and Safety of Topical VMD-3866 Gel in Management of Pain Induced by Chemotherapy (CIPN)
Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neuropathy, Chemotherapy-induced Neuropathic Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Diagnosis of Cancer, run by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTC.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact EORTC HQ (+32 2 774 1611, 2124@eortc.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Assessing the general feasibility of implementing mobile devices for the assessment of HRQoL and PA over a period of 12 weeks in cancer patients undergoing treatment, identifying its major human and operational factors (time frame: baseline assessment week, week 4, week 8, week 12 and overall). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Jul 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 27 Oct 2026.