AzTrials
AzTrials

Handedness and Upper Extremity FunctionNCT07699068

Comparison of Upper Extremity Functions of Physiotherapy Students

An observational study of Handedness and Upper Extremity Function, run by Özge Mine Yilmaz.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this cross-sectional, comparative study is to comprehensively evaluate and compare upper extremity functions among physiotherapy students with different hand preferences. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 25 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Handedness and Upper Extremity Function
How many people
42 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Aug 2026to 5 Sep 2026
How long will I take part?
1 Day
Phase
Observational

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 25 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Study population: The study population consists of undergraduate students studying in the Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, who are healthy volunteers and stratified into groups based on their hand preferences (right-handed vs. left-handed).

Who may be able to join

  • Being a student currently enrolled in the Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation.
  • Being aged 18 years or older.
  • Voluntary participation with signed informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Having a history of orthopedic surgery, severe trauma, or structural deformity in the upper extremities.
  • Diagnosis of any neurological, rheumatological, or systemic disease that permanently affects upper extremity motor functions or muscle strength.
  • Presence of acute pain, injury, or active inflammatory conditions in the dominant or non-dominant upper extremity within the last 3 months.
  • Sensory deficits or uncorrected visual impairments that prevent understanding or performing the functional tests.

About this study

Official title: Comparison of Upper Extremity Functions of Physiotherapy Students With Different Hand Preferences

The purpose of this cross-sectional, comparative study is to comprehensively evaluate and compare upper extremity functions among physiotherapy students with different hand preferences. Handedness is a fundamental neuromotor characteristic that significantly influences upper extremity functions, including muscle strength, motor skills, coordination, and movement speed. These differences in motor performance can have prominent implications in professional fields like physiotherapy and rehabilitation, which demand a high level of manual dexterity, hand-eye coordination, and precise motor control during clinical applications.

While previous literature has predominantly focused on isolated measures such as grip strength, multi-dimensional studies that concurrently evaluate hand preference, objective motor performance, strength, and self-reported functional status remain limited. This study aims to fill this gap by determining whether significant differences exist in strength, performance, and functional levels between right-handed and left-handed individuals within a specialized student population.

A total of 42 physiotherapy and rehabilitation students aged 18 and older will be recruited through convenient sampling. Hand preference and lateralization will be objectively determined using the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory, categorizing participants based on their Laterality Quotient (LQ). Upper extremity functional levels, manual dexterity, and strength will be thoroughly evaluated. Self-reported upper extremity disability will be measured using the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire. Performance-based manual dexterity and functional capacity will be objectively assessed using the Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test, which measures the time taken to complete seven simulated activities of daily living. Gross grip strength will be measured with a Jamar hand dynamometer, and fine pinch strength will be quantified using a pinchmeter. All assessments will be performed under standardized environmental conditions with dedicated, trained assessors to ensure high measurement reliability. The outcomes will provide critical insights into neuromotor control strategies and potential ergonomic adjustments needed for left-handed students during their clinical training.

Keywords
Hand Preference, Manual Dexterity, Grip Strength, Physiotherapy Students

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT07699068
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Right-handed Physiotherapy StudentsNot described
Left-handed Physiotherapy StudentsNot described

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Manual Dexterity and Hand Function

    Assessed using the Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test (JTHFT), which consists of seven subtests simulating daily activities (writing, card turning, picking up small objects, stacking checkers, simulated eating, moving light objects, and moving heavy objects). The completion time for each subtest is recorded in seconds, with shorter times indicating better functional performance.

    Measured: At baseline (single session assessment)

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Grip and Pinch Strength

    Gross grip strength is measured in kilograms using a Jamar hand dynamometer, and fine pinch strength is quantified using a pinchmeter. The average of three trials for each measurement is recorded

    Measured: At baseline (single session assessment)

  2. Self-Reported Upper Extremity Disability

    Assessed using the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire. It is an 11-item self-report tool where total scores are converted to a scale ranging from 0 to 100. A score of 0 indicates no disability (best possible outcome), while a score of 100 represents the most severe upper extremity disability (worse outcome). Higher scores mean worse functional limitation.

    Measured: At baseline (single session assessment)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Jul 2026
  2. Study start1 Aug 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion30 Aug 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion5 Sep 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
42 participants (estimated)
Target duration
1 Day
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07699068
Sponsor's protocol ID
IstanbulAUu
Status last verified
Jul 2026
First submitted
7 Jul 2026
Last updated
14 Jul 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in