AzTrials
AzTrials

Hemodynamic MonitoringNCT07692139

Comparison of I-gel and SaCoVLM in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

An observational study of Hemodynamic Monitoring and Laryngeal Mask Success Rate, run by Samsun University.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This prospective observational study aims to compare the ventilation performance and safety of the i-gel and SaCoVLM supraglottic airway devices in adult patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 70 years
How many people
80 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
24 Jun 2026to 31 Dec 2026
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: The study population will consist of adult patients aged 18-70 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III who are scheduled to undergo elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia at Samsun City Hospital. Eligible patients who provide written informed consent and meet the study inclusion criteria will be consecutively enrolled during the study period.

Who may be able to join

  • Age between 18 and 70 years.
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III.
  • Patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
  • Patients undergoing general anesthesia.
  • Patients who provide written informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • -

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Hatice Selçuk Kuşderci contact

505 215 98 96

drkusderci@hotmail.com

About this study

Official title: Comparison of Airway Performance Between I-gel and SaCoVLM in Patients Undergoing Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective Observational Study

This prospective observational study aims to compare the ventilation performance and safety of the i-gel and SaCoVLM supraglottic airway devices in adult patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ventilation-related parameters, airway sealing performance, insertion characteristics, and perioperative complications will be evaluated.

Read the detailed description

Laparoscopic surgery requires the creation of pneumoperitoneum and frequently involves patient positioning changes, both of which can increase intrathoracic and airway pressures. These physiological changes may affect the performance of supraglottic airway devices and challenge effective ventilation.

Second-generation supraglottic airway devices are increasingly used as alternatives to endotracheal intubation in laparoscopic procedures because they provide effective ventilation while reducing airway-related complications. The i-gel is widely used due to its ease of insertion, integrated gastric drainage channel, and favorable safety profile. The SaCoVLM (Video Laryngeal Mask) is a novel supraglottic airway device that enables direct visualization of laryngeal structures during placement, allowing confirmation of optimal positioning and potentially improving airway management.

This prospective observational study will compare the i-gel and SaCoVLM in adult patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia. Ventilation performance, airway sealing pressure, insertion success, ease of placement, hemodynamic responses, and perioperative airway-related complications will be assessed. The findings may provide further evidence regarding the clinical performance and safety of these devices during laparoscopic surgery.

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT07692139
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group I: i-gel groupPatients receiving airway management with the i-gel supraglottic airway device
Grup II: SaCoVLMPatients receiving airway management with the SaCoVLM supraglottic airway device

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure (OLP)

    Oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) will be measured and compared between the i-gel and SaCoVLM groups to evaluate airway sealing performance during elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy..

    Measured: After device insertion and after pneumoperitoneum creation during surgery.

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. First-Attempt Insertion Success Rate

    The proportion of patients in whom the supraglottic airway device is successfully inserted on the first attempt.

    Measured: During device insertion procedure

  2. Device Insertion Time

    The time required for successful placement of the supraglottic airway device, measured from device insertion into the oral cavity until effective ventilation is achieved.

    Measured: During device insertion procedure

  3. Gastric Tube Insertion Success Rate

    The proportion of patients in whom the gastric tube is successfully inserted through the gastric drainage channel of the device.

    Measured: Immediately following successful placement of the supraglottic airway device before initiation of mechanical ventilation

  4. Peak Airway Pressure (PAP)

    Peak airway pressure values measured during mechanical ventilation and compared between study groups

    Measured: 5 minutes after pneumoperitoneum is established.

  5. End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide (EtCO₂)

    End-tidal carbon dioxide values measured during surgery and compared between study groups.

    Measured: Throughout laparoscopic surgery.

  6. Hemodynamic Parameters

    Heart rate (beats per minute [bpm]) will be recorded at baseline, immediately after supraglottic airway device placement, 5 minutes after device placement, 5 minutes after pneumoperitoneum, 15 minutes after pneumoperitoneum, and at the end of surgery. Mean heart rate values will be compared between the i-gel and SaCoVLM groups.Systolic blood pressure (millimeters of mercury [mmHg]) will be recorded at baseline, immediately after supraglottic airway device placement, 5 minutes after device placement, 5 minutes after pneumoperitoneum, 15 minutes after pneumoperitoneum, and at the end of surgery. Mean systolic blood pressure values will be compared between the i-gel and SaCoVLM groups.Mean arterial pressure (millimeters of mercury [mmHg]) will be recorded at baseline, immediately after supraglottic airway device placement, 5 minutes after device placement, 5 minutes after pneumoperitoneum, 15 minutes after pneumoperitoneum, and at the end of surgery. Mean arterial pressure values will be

    Measured: Baseline, immediately after device placement, 5 minutes after device placement, 5 minutes after pneumoperitoneum, 15 minutes after pneumoperitoneum, and at the end of surgery.

  7. Postoperative Sore Throat

    The incidence of postoperative sore throat following removal of the supraglottic airway device.Postoperative sore throat severity assessed using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)

    Measured: Within 24 hours after surgery.

  8. Hoarseness

    The incidence of postoperative dysphagia following airway device use.

    Measured: Within 24 hours after surgery.

  9. Blood Staining and Mucosal Trauma

    The incidence of blood staining on the device and evidence of mucosal trauma after device removal.

    Measured: Immediately after device removal.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Jul 2026
  2. Study start24 Jun 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
80 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07692139
Sponsor's protocol ID
GOKAEK 2026/11/18
Status last verified
Jul 2026
First submitted
24 Jun 2026
Last updated
21 Jul 2026
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Hemodynamic Monitoring and Laryngeal Mask Success Rate, run by Samsun University.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Hatice Selçuk Kuşderci (505 215 98 96, drkusderci@hotmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure (OLP) (time frame: After device insertion and after pneumoperitoneum creation during surgery.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Jul 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in