Melanoma (Skin Cancer)MELCYNCT07691255
MELanoma Brain Metastasis Treated With CYberknife
An observational study of Melanoma (Skin Cancer), run by European Institute of Oncology at 2 sites in Italy.
Trial summary
Melanoma is a type of cancer that can spread to the brain, making the disease harder to treat and worsening both survival and quality of life. In recent years, treatments have improved significantly thanks to advances in surgery, radiotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Melanoma (Skin Cancer)
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesItaly
- Study dates
- 25 Aug 2026to 1 Jan 2030
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients receiving stereotactic radiotherapy for melanoma brain metastases as first local approach. Target therapy and immunotherapy in combination or not will be permitted. Given the descriptive nature of the study, no formal sample size calculation was performed. The planned sample size was predefined according to historical data from the RT Division and reflects the expected number of eligible patients treated at our institution over the planned three-year study period. Based on these data, we anticipate enrolling approximately 50 patients.
Who may be able to join
- Age > 18
- Written informed consent for treatment and research purposes
- Melanoma Brain Metastases (MBM) diagnosed with brain MRI/CT
- MBM treatable with stereotactic radiotherapy
- Systemic therapy (immunotherapy, target therapy, or both) is allowed, as concurrent or non-concurrent treatment with stereotactic radiotherapy
Who cannot join
- Leptomeningeal neoplastic infiltration
- Previous whole-brain radiotherapy or surgical removal of brain metastases
- Patients with histological diagnosis of non-cutaneous melanoma (e.g. uveal melanoma)
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Italy2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Recruiting
European Institute of Oncology, Milan
Milan, Italy, 20141
- Recruiting
European Institute of Oncology, Milan
Milan, Mi, 20141
Samantha Dicuonzo, MD, +39 0257489037, samantha.dicuonzo@ieo.it
Lorenzo Colombi, MD, +39 0257489037, lorenzo.colombi@ieo.it
About this study
Official title: Impact of Stereotactic Radiosurgery With Cyberknife In Patients With Brain Melanoma Metastases In The Era Of New Drugs
Melanoma is a type of cancer that can spread to the brain, making the disease harder to treat and worsening both survival and quality of life.
In recent years, treatments have improved significantly thanks to advances in surgery, radiotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapy. These new treatments have greatly increased survival rates for patients with metastatic melanoma.
Read more
This study focuses on stereotactic radiosurgery, a highly precise form of radiotherapy used to treat brain metastases. Researchers want to better understand how this treatment works when combined with immunotherapy or targeted therapy, and whether the timing and sequence of treatments can improve outcomes.
Between 2026 and 2028, patients treated at the IEO for melanoma brain metastases will be observed and their clinical data collected. The goal is to improve future treatment strategies and help doctors choose the best therapeutic approach for each patient.
Read the detailed description
The therapeutic landscape of metastatic melanoma has undergone a radical transformation in the last decade, largely due to the recent introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (IT) and targeted therapies (TTs), and advances in surgery and radiotherapy (RT), which have changed the outlook of patients with melanoma brain metastasis.
Radiation therapy has been and remains an important component of treatment for patients with melanoma brain metastases.
Particularly, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), highly precise RT technique, for single or a small number of metastases, has emerged as a crucial component in the management of melanoma brain metastases, with whole brain RT usually reserved for selected patients who have widespread intracranial metastatic disease. SRS relies on the delivery of concentrated, high doses of radiation to one or more metastatic brain lesions of otherwise radio-resistant tumors such as melanoma, providing effective local control (LC) of the disease while minimizing damage to surrounding healthy tissue. SRS can be employed both as an independent primary local therapy, allowing a swifter transition to systemic therapy compared to classic surgical resection and as a salvage procedure after ineffective systemic treatment when the number of MBMs remains below 5-10 and their size is below 3 cm.
A recent systematic review of RT alone for MBMs reported a median survival of 7.5 months (IQR-6.7-9.0-months) after SRS and 3.5 months (IQR-2.4-4.0-months) after whole brain RT.
Although these advances have successfully improved the outcomes of patients with metastatic melanoma, its management remains challenging and complex, requiring a multidisciplinary approach that integrates surgery, systemic therapy, and RT to optimize patient outcomes.
Ongoing investigations in this field are now focused on determining the best strategies to combine RT modalities with systemic therapies (IT and TT), emphasizing the potential for synergistic effects that enhance treatment efficacy. However, data on optimal sequencing and toxicity management, particularly in the context of radiosurgery, remain limited and require careful evaluation. The approach of combining RT with IT or TT has therefore become established in practice but this strategy has not been evaluated in randomized controlled trials. Clinical guidelines vary in the strength of their recommendations for combining different treatments. Studies differ in terms of patient selection, the extent of extracranial disease, the number of lesions treated, and the definitions of concurrent versus non-concurrent therapies. These differences make it challenging to draw definitive conclusions about the optimal treatment strategy for melanoma brain metastases.
In this prospective observational study, the investigators aim to analyse the impact of RT in a well selected population of patient receiving SRS at the European Institute of Oncology- IRCCS- Milan- as first local approach for MBMs, in combination with different type and timing of systemic treatment.
By analysing data from patients treated with CyberKnife from 2026 to 2028, the investigatorsseek to provide insights into the effectiveness of SRS according LC, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in this patient population.
The investigators aim to investigate also potential prognostic factors including demographic, clinical, and therapeutic factors, with a focus on the influence of concurrent versus non-concurrent systemic therapies.
Through this prospective observational study, the investigators aim both to contribute to the growing body of evidence supporting the use of SRS as a viable treatment option for patients with MBMs and to identify factors that may enhance treatment efficacy and improve patient outcomes.
- Conditions
- Melanoma (Skin Cancer)
- Keywords
- Stereotactic radiotherapy, Brain metastases
- Medical subject headings
- Melanoma, Brain Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Fifty patients receiving radiotherapy as first local approach for melanoma brain metastases | Patients will receive stereotactic radiotherapy as first local approach for melanoma brain metastases in combination with target therapy and/or immunotherapy. Patients will be followed every three months after the end of radiotherapy in order to collect oncological outcome, side effects and Quality of life data. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Intracranial in-field progression-free survival (IIFPFS)
The primary objective of the study is to estimate the 1-year intracranial in-field progression-free survival (IIFPFS). Based on results from a retrospective analysis conducted on patients treated at our institution, we expect a 1-year IIFPFS of approximately 57%. With a sample size of 50 patients, the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the 1-year IIFPFS is expected to have an approximate width of 27% (i.e. 43.5-70.5%).
Measured: From the end of radiotherapy through study completion, every three months.
Secondary outcomes (9)
Overall survival (OS)
Defined as the time from the end of radiotherapy to death
Measured: From the end of radiotherapy through study completion, every three months.
Progression-free survival (PFS)
Defined as the time from the end of radiotherapy to disease progression (either global intracranial or extracranial) or death, whichever occurred first.
Measured: From the end of radiotherapy through study completion, every three months.
Intracranial out-field progression free survival (IOFPFS)
defined as the time from the end of radiotherapy to intracranial out-field progression
Measured: From the end of radiotherapy through study completion, every three months.
Overall intracranial progression free survival (OIPFS)
defined as the time from the end of radiotherapy to the global intracranial progression
Measured: From the end of radiotherapy through study completion, every three months.
Extracranial progression free survival (EPFS)
defined as the time from the end of radiotherapy to the extracranial progression
Measured: From the end of radiotherapy through study completion, every three months.
Local control (LC)
Defined as the absence of local progression (complete response, partial response, or stable disease) at the last radiological assessment. The LC rate was calculated among evaluable lesions and reported as a proportion with its 95% confidence interval (CI).
Measured: From the end of radiotherapy through study completion, every three months.
Adverse events
Stereotactic radiotherapy related adverse events according CTCAE V5.0 and data about radionecrosis will be systematically collected allong the follow up (every trhee months)
Measured: From the end of radiotherapy through study completion, every three months.
Quality of Life data (QoL) - EORTC QLQ BN20
For EORTC QLQ BN20, 20 items will be completed (score 1-4)
Measured: From the baseline (start of radiotehrapy), to the end of study (12 months), every three months.
Quality of Life data (QoL) - EORTC QLQ C30 questionnaires.
For EORTC QLQ C30, 30 items will be completed (score 1-4).
Measured: From the baseline (start of radiotehrapy), to the end of study (12 months), every three months.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Jul 2026
- Study start25 Aug 2026
- Primary completion1 Jan 2030 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Jan 2030 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Melanoma (Skin Cancer)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by European Institute of OncologyThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- European Institute of Oncology
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Accuray Incorporated
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Samantha Dicuonzo, MD, Principal investigator, European Institute of Oncology
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07691255
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- UID 4996
- Other IDs
- L2-594
- Acronym
- MELCY
- Status last verified
- Aug 2026
- First submitted
- 14 May 2026
- Last updated
- 10 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Impact of Stereotactic Radiosurgery With Cyberknife In Patients With Brain Melanoma Metastases In The Era Of New Drugs
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07691255
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MELCY / UID 4996
- Conditions
- Melanoma (Skin Cancer)
- Keywords
- Stereotactic radiotherapy, Brain metastases
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- European Institute of OncologyUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Accuray Incorporated
- Study start
- 25 Aug 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jan 2030 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Jan 2030 (estimated)
- First posted
- 8 Jul 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Melanoma is a type of cancer that can spread to the brain, making the disease harder to treat and worsening both survival and quality of life.
In recent years, treatments have improved significantly thanks to advances in surgery, radiotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapy. These new treatments have greatly increased survival rates for patients with metastatic melanoma.
This study focuses on stereotactic radiosurgery, a highly precise form of radiotherapy used to treat brain metastases. Researchers want to better understand how this treatment works when combined with immunotherapy or targeted therapy, and whether the timing and sequence of treatments can improve outcomes.
Between 2026 and 2028, patients treated at the IEO for melanoma brain metastases will be observed and their clinical data collected. The goal is to improve future treatment strategies and help doctors choose the best therapeutic approach for each patient.
Detailed description
The therapeutic landscape of metastatic melanoma has undergone a radical transformation in the last decade, largely due to the recent introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (IT) and targeted therapies (TTs), and advances in surgery and radiotherapy (RT), which have changed the outlook of patients with melanoma brain metastasis.
Radiation therapy has been and remains an important component of treatment for patients with melanoma brain metastases.
Particularly, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), highly precise RT technique, for single or a small number of metastases, has emerged as a crucial component in the management of melanoma brain metastases, with whole brain RT usually reserved for selected patients who have widespread intracranial metastatic disease. SRS relies on the delivery of concentrated, high doses of radiation to one or more metastatic brain lesions of otherwise radio-resistant tumors such as melanoma, providing effective local control (LC) of the disease while minimizing damage to surrounding healthy tissue. SRS can be employed both as an independent primary local therapy, allowing a swifter transition to systemic therapy compared to classic surgical resection and as a salvage procedure after ineffective systemic treatment when the number of MBMs remains below 5-10 and their size is below 3 cm.
A recent systematic review of RT alone for MBMs reported a median survival of 7.5 months (IQR-6.7-9.0-months) after SRS and 3.5 months (IQR-2.4-4.0-months) after whole brain RT.
Although these advances have successfully improved the outcomes of patients with metastatic melanoma, its management remains challenging and complex, requiring a multidisciplinary approach that integrates surgery, systemic therapy, and RT to optimize patient outcomes.
Ongoing investigations in this field are now focused on determining the best strategies to combine RT modalities with systemic therapies (IT and TT), emphasizing the potential for synergistic effects that enhance treatment efficacy. However, data on optimal sequencing and toxicity management, particularly in the context of radiosurgery, remain limited and require careful evaluation. The approach of combining RT with IT or TT has therefore become established in practice but this strategy has not been evaluated in randomized controlled trials. Clinical guidelines vary in the strength of their recommendations for combining different treatments. Studies differ in terms of patient selection, the extent of extracranial disease, the number of lesions treated, and the definitions of concurrent versus non-concurrent therapies. These differences make it challenging to draw definitive conclusions about the optimal treatment strategy for melanoma brain metastases.
In this prospective observational study, the investigators aim to analyse the impact of RT in a well selected population of patient receiving SRS at the European Institute of Oncology- IRCCS- Milan- as first local approach for MBMs, in combination with different type and timing of systemic treatment.
By analysing data from patients treated with CyberKnife from 2026 to 2028, the investigatorsseek to provide insights into the effectiveness of SRS according LC, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in this patient population.
The investigators aim to investigate also potential prognostic factors including demographic, clinical, and therapeutic factors, with a focus on the influence of concurrent versus non-concurrent systemic therapies.
Through this prospective observational study, the investigators aim both to contribute to the growing body of evidence supporting the use of SRS as a viable treatment option for patients with MBMs and to identify factors that may enhance treatment efficacy and improve patient outcomes.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Fifty patients receiving radiotherapy as first local approach for melanoma brain metastases | – | –Patients will receive stereotactic radiotherapy as first local approach for melanoma brain metastases in combination with target therapy and/or immunotherapy. Patients will be followed every three months after the end of radiotherapy in order to collect oncological outcome, side effects and Quality of life data. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients receiving stereotactic radiotherapy for melanoma brain metastases as first local approach. Target therapy and immunotherapy in combination or not will be permitted. Given the descriptive nature of the study, no formal sample size calculation was performed. The planned sample size was predefined according to historical data from the RT Division and reflects the expected number of eligible patients treated at our institution over the planned three-year study period. Based on these data, we anticipate enrolling approximately 50 patients.
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Age > 18
- Written informed consent for treatment and research purposes
- Melanoma Brain Metastases (MBM) diagnosed with brain MRI/CT
- MBM treatable with stereotactic radiotherapy
- Systemic therapy (immunotherapy, target therapy, or both) is allowed, as concurrent or non-concurrent treatment with stereotactic radiotherapy
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Leptomeningeal neoplastic infiltration
- Previous whole-brain radiotherapy or surgical removal of brain metastases
- Patients with histological diagnosis of non-cutaneous melanoma (e.g. uveal melanoma)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Intracranial in-field progression-free survival (IIFPFS)
Time frame: From the end of radiotherapy through study completion, every three months.
The primary objective of the study is to estimate the 1-year intracranial in-field progression-free survival (IIFPFS). Based on results from a retrospective analysis conducted on patients treated at our institution, we expect a 1-year IIFPFS of approximately 57%. With a sample size of 50 patients, the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the 1-year IIFPFS is expected to have an approximate width of 27% (i.e. 43.5-70.5%).
9 secondary outcomes
Overall survival (OS)
Time frame: From the end of radiotherapy through study completion, every three months.
Progression-free survival (PFS)
Time frame: From the end of radiotherapy through study completion, every three months.
Intracranial out-field progression free survival (IOFPFS)
Time frame: From the end of radiotherapy through study completion, every three months.
Overall intracranial progression free survival (OIPFS)
Time frame: From the end of radiotherapy through study completion, every three months.
Extracranial progression free survival (EPFS)
Time frame: From the end of radiotherapy through study completion, every three months.
Local control (LC)
Time frame: From the end of radiotherapy through study completion, every three months.
Adverse events
Time frame: From the end of radiotherapy through study completion, every three months.
Quality of Life data (QoL) - EORTC QLQ BN20
Time frame: From the baseline (start of radiotehrapy), to the end of study (12 months), every three months.
Quality of Life data (QoL) - EORTC QLQ C30 questionnaires.
Time frame: From the baseline (start of radiotehrapy), to the end of study (12 months), every three months.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Sep 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Melanoma (Skin Cancer)
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1
IL-17 Blockade to Decrease irAEs (REPLAY)
Metastatic Melanoma
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 1
A Feasibility Study Utilizing Immune Recall to Increase Response to Checkpoint Therapy
Melanoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Study of Dapansutrile Plus Pembrolizumab in Patients With PD-1 Refractory Advanced Melanoma
Melanoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Samantha Dicuonzo, MD principal investigator
European Institute of Oncology
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Melanoma (Skin Cancer), run by European Institute of Oncology at 2 sites in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Samantha Dicuonzo, MD (+39 0257489037, samantha.dicuonzo@ieo.it), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Intracranial in-field progression-free survival (IIFPFS) (time frame: From the end of radiotherapy through study completion, every three months.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Sep 2026.