AzTrials
AzTrials

Achilles Tendinopathy (AT)NCT07685509

Achilles Tendinopathy; the Effect of Shockwave Treatment

A study testing individually tailored exercises and Radial Shockwave and Individually tailored exercises in people with Achilles Tendinopathy (AT) and Achilles Tendon, run by Vastra Gotaland Region.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

BACKGROUND Achilles tendinopathy-pain in the Achilles tendon-is a common and often long-lasting condition that limits physical activity and performance, and also affects work capacity and quality of life. The pain is localized either to the mid- portion of the tendon or at its insertion into the calcaneus. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
individually tailored exercises and Radial Shockwave and Individually tailored exercises
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
200 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Sep 2026to 31 Dec 2031
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Women and men over 18 years of age who seek care for load-related pain in the midportion of the Achilles tendon or at the Achilles tendon insertion at a Physiotherapy Clinic in Primary Care, at the Physiotherapy Department at Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Mölndal, or at the Orthopedic Department at Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Mölndal.
  • Symptoms must have been present for one month or longer.
  • Symptoms may be present in one or both Achilles tendons.

Who cannot join

  • Unwillingness to receive shockwave therapy.
  • Previous shockwave therapy for Achilles tendon pain within the past year.
  • Neurological disease, significant cardiac conditions, increased bleeding tendency, treatment with anticoagulant medication, pregnancy, or presence of a tumor in the foot.
  • Corticosteroid injection in the foot within the past six months.
  • Reduced sensation, acute inflammation, or any wound around the heel.
  • Inability to understand or speak Swedish.

About this study

Official title: Comparison of Two Treatment Methods for Achilles Tendon Pain With a Focus on Pain, Function, Vascular Ingrowth, Immune Cell Response, and Cell Composition

BACKGROUND Achilles tendinopathy-pain in the Achilles tendon-is a common and often long-lasting condition that limits physical activity and performance, and also affects work capacity and quality of life. The pain is localized either to the mid- portion of the tendon or at its insertion into the calcaneus. Although individually tailored exercise is the first-line treatment, symptoms persist in many patients, highlighting the need for adjunctive therapies.

AIM This interdisciplinary and innovative research project aims to evaluate the effect of shockwave therapy in Achilles tendinopathy, both in cases where the pain is located in the mid-portion of the tendon and where it is situated at the tendon's insertion. In addition to assessing effects on pain and function, the study will examine the impact on calcifications, neovascularization (evaluated via Doppler ultrasound), and-uniquely-systemic immunological effects, with a focus on NK cells in the blood, an area that remains largely unexplored. METHOD This is a randomized controlled trial (RCT) with four arms, including 200 patients divided into two groups based on pain location. Half of the participants will receive adjunctive shockwave therapy in six sessions, in addition to exercise following the protocol by Silbernagel et al. The primary outcome measure is self-reported pain assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) 0-10 at 12 months.

Read more

Secondary outcomes include function, assessed through patient-reported outcomes (Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Achilles Swedish version, VISA-AS), calf muscle strength and endurance, and jumping ability using a validated test battery. Neovascularization and tendon cross-sectional area will be evaluated using ultrasound/Doppler.

In a sub-cohort, immune cell composition in blood will be analyzed using flow cytometry before and after treatment. For patients undergoing surgery, tissue samples will also be collected for cellular composition analysis.

SIGNIFICANCE This project has the potential to improve treatment strategies, reduce the need for surgery, and generate entirely new knowledge about the relationship between local tissue pathology and systemic immune responses.

Read the detailed description

Pain in the Achilles tendon, Achilles tendinopathy, is a common musculoskeletal condition affecting adults of all ages. The condition is characterized by localized pain and swelling in the Achilles tendon, particularly during tendon loading, functional limitations, and, in chronic cases, pathological neovascularization. Achilles tendinopathy is considered a typical overuse injury, and the diagnosis is made clinically. The incidence is reported to be 2/1000 per year, which would mean that approximately 1,400 individuals are affected each year in the Gothenburg area alone. A recent study from the United Kingdom has also shown that the typical patient is not physically active-as many clinical guidelines are designed for-but rather between 50 and 60 years old, has a high BMI, and often presents with comorbidities such as hypertension and diabetes. This highlights the need to review current clinical guidelines and evaluate the evidence for alternative treatments.

The pain is usually load-related and located either in the midportion of the Achilles tendon or at its insertion on the calcaneus. The condition is often long-lasting despite adequate treatment, and in addition to limiting physical activity, it can also affect work ability and quality of life. Non-operative treatment with heel-raise exercises and load management-appropriately dosed exercise-is the first-line standard, although long-standing or treatment-resistant cases may require adjunct therapies. Among these, extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT), administered either radially (rESWT) or focally (fESWT), has emerged as a promising intervention in several studies, although it has been questioned in others. Shockwave therapy targets both pain relief and restoration of function, but its effects on pain, function, tendon morphology, and immune cell levels remain largely unexplored.

Recent systematic reviews have emphasized the need for higher-quality studies to determine whether adding shockwave therapy is beneficial for patients with Achilles tendinopathy. Evidence remains limited regarding whether shockwave therapy provides comparable pain relief for midportion versus insertional pain. Furthermore, it is unclear whether shockwave therapy must be combined with heel-raise exercises and load management or whether it can function as a standalone treatment.

Doppler ultrasound is commonly used to quantify neovascularization in the tendon. Some studies have shown that shockwave therapy induces transient increases in neovascularization that coincide with clinical improvement, while others have found no effect on neovascularization. Tendon thickness and the effect of shockwave therapy on intratendinous calcifications have also been investigated, but no consensus has been reached. Much of this research area remains unexplored due to the small number of studies and limited sample sizes.

Despite a growing evidence base suggesting that appropriately dosed exercise combined with shockwave therapy may be beneficial for tendon injuries, several areas remain under-investigated. Notably, no publications have been found on whether the micro-injuries potentially induced by shockwave therapy may cause systemic effects and thereby alter immune cell levels. Unpublished data from our research group have shown that early loading of a ruptured Achilles tendon increases circulating NK-cell levels, but whether this also applies to a painful tendon with potential tendinosis changes is unknown.

The aim of this project is to evaluate two different treatment methods for patients with Achilles tendinopathy-appropriately dosed exercise alone or appropriately dosed exercise combined with shockwave therapy-with a focus on:

Pain and muscle function

Neovascularization and calcifications in the tendon

Systemic changes in immune cell composition in the blood, with a focus on NK cells and CD8+ T cells

Hypotheses Appropriately dosed exercise combined with shockwave therapy leads to reduced pain and improved function compared with appropriately dosed exercise alone.

Appropriately dosed exercise combined with shockwave therapy reduces neovascularization and calcifications in the tendon.

Appropriately dosed exercise combined with shockwave therapy induces micro-injuries in the tendon that generate a systemic immune response (higher levels of NK cells and CD8+ T cells).

Appropriately dosed exercise combined with shockwave therapy has similar effects regardless of whether the pain is located in the midportion of the Achilles tendon or at its insertion.

Significance This project has the potential to improve the treatment of Achilles tendinopathy by identifying which patients benefit from shockwave therapy and by increasing the understanding of the biological effects of different treatment methods. The results may contribute to more individualized treatment and reduce the need for surgical interventions.

Being tested
individually tailored exercises and Radial Shockwave, Individually tailored exercises
Keywords
Achilles Tendinopathy, Shockwave, Insertional Achilles Tendinopathy, Exercise, Heel-rise
Medical subject headings
Motor Activity

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • individually tailored exercises and Radial ShockwaveDevice

    Shockwave: 5-6 treatments with radial shockwave, 10 bar, 2000-4000 pulses as an additional treatment to individually tailored exercises.

  • Individually tailored exercisesOther

    Individually tailored exercises

Study groups in NCT07685509
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Achilles Tendinopathy, exercise therapy and additional treatment with shockwaveExperimentalPatients with Achilles Tendinopathy receiving exercise therapy with regular follow-ups and additional treatment with shockwave.
Receives: Device: individually tailored exercises and Radial Shockwave
Achilles Tendinopathy, exercise therapyActive comparatorPatients with Achilles Tendinopathy receiving exercise therapy with regular follow-ups
Receives: Other: Individually tailored exercises
Insertional Achilles Tendinopathy, exercise therapy and additional treatment with shockwaveExperimentalPatients with Insertional Achilles Tendinopathy receiving exercise therapy with regular follow-ups and additional treatment with shockwave.
Receives: Device: individually tailored exercises and Radial Shockwave
Insertional Achilles Tendinopathy, exercise therapyActive comparatorPatients with Insertional Achilles Tendinopathy receiving exercise therapy with regular follow-ups
Receives: Other: Individually tailored exercises

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in self-reported pain from baseline to 12 months after treatment start

    Zero is equivalent to no pain and 10 indicates the worst possible pain.

    Measured: At baseline and after 12 months after enrollment

Secondary outcomes (12)
  1. Change in self-reported pain 3 and 6 months after treatment start

    Zero is equivalent to no pain and 10 indicates the worst possible pain.

    Measured: At baseline and after 3 and 6 months after enrollment

  2. Rate of blood vessels in the Achilles tendon

    Rate of blood vessels (n) (neovascularization) will be measured with Ultrasound in Doppler mode and compared with the healthy side.

    Measured: At baseline and after 3, 6, and 12 month

  3. Achilles Tendon cross-sectional area

    Achilles Tendon cross-sectional area in square centimeters will be evaluated with ultrasound in the midportion of the tendon

    Measured: At baseline and after 3, 6 and 12 months

  4. Physical Activity Scale (PAS)

    A patient reported outcome used for the purpose to evaluate the patients self estimated physical activity level. The scale is from 1 to 6 and the higher score, the better outcome.

    Measured: At baseline and after 3,6 and 12 months

  5. VISA-AS

    A valid and reliable questionnaire developed for patients with an Achilles Tendinopathy with a purpose to evaluate patient reported outcome in terms of symptoms and function. The values can be between 0 and 100 and the higher score, the better outcome

    Measured: At baseline and after 3, 6 and 12 months

  6. Heel-rise height during heel-rise work test

    Evaluation of heel-rise height (cm) during heel-rise work test. Comparison between groups in heel-rise height Limb Symmetry Index (LSI) - injured side/healthy side *100 expressed in percent. The range in LSI is between 0-100% and the higher value, the better outcome

    Measured: At baseline and after 3, 6 and 12 months

  7. Evaluation of lower leg endurance with heel-rise work (Joule)

    Evaluation of lower leg endurance with heel-rise work (Joule) during heel-rise work test. Comparison between groups in heel-rise work Limb Symmetry Index (LSI) - injured side/healthy side *100 expressed in percent. The range in LSI is between 0-100% and the higher value, the better outcome

    Measured: At baseline and after 3, 6 and 12 months

  8. Numbers of heel-rises during heel-rise work test

    Evaluation of numbers of heel-rises during heel-rise work test. Comparison between groups in numbers of heel-rises Limb Symmetry Index (LSI) - injured side/healthy side *100 expressed in percent. The range in LSI is between 0-100% and the higher value, the better outcome

    Measured: At baseline and after 3, 6 and 12 months

  9. Calf muscle power

    Evaluation of calf muscle power in a weight training machine expressed in watt (Newton x meter /seconds). Comparison will be performed between groups and limbs in power (LSI)- injured side/healthy side *100 expressed in percent.The range in LSI is between 0-100% and the higher value, the better outcome

    Measured: At baseline and after 3, 6 and 12 months

  10. Drop Countermovement Jump

    Drop Countermovement Jump: Evaluation of vertical jumping height after jumping from a 20 cm high box. The outcome will be measured as the height the patient can perform in jump height after landing in cm. Comparison between groups and limbs in jump height will be presented as Limb Symmetry Index (LSI)- injured side/healthy side *100 expressed in percent. The range in LSI is between 0-100% and the higher value, the better outcome.

    Measured: At baseline and after 3, 6 and 12 months

  11. Hopping

    Evaluation of series of jumps as in jumping ropes. The outcome measurement will be mean jumping height in cm and elasticity ratio in 20 jumps. Comparison between groups and limbs in jump height and elasticity ratio will be presented as Limb Symmetry Index (LSI)- injured side/healthy side *100 expressed in percent. The range in LSI is between 0-100% and the higher value, the better outcome

    Measured: At baseline and after 3, 6 and 12 months

  12. Range of motion in the ankle

    Range of motion in both ankles will be measured with an inclinometer in degrees both with the knee bent and with the knee straight. Comparison between groups and limbs in jump height will be presented as Limb Symmetry Index (LSI)- injured side/healthy side *100 expressed in percent. The range in LSI is between 0-100% and the higher value, the better outcome.

    Measured: At baseline and after 3, 6 and 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Jul 2026
  2. Study start1 Sep 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2029 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2031 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
200 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07685509
Sponsor's protocol ID
2026-01721-01
Other IDs
P2026-0030, 2026-01721-01
Status last verified
Jun 2026
First submitted
25 Jun 2026
Last updated
6 Jul 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Silbernagel KG, Thomee R, Karlsson J. Cross-cultural adaptation of the VISA-A questionnaire, an index of clinical severity for patients with Achilles tendinopathy, with reliability, validity and structure evaluations. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2005 Mar 6;6:12. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-6-12.

    PubMed 15748297
  • Silbernagel KG, Gustavsson A, Thomee R, Karlsson J. Evaluation of lower leg function in patients with Achilles tendinopathy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006 Nov;14(11):1207-17. doi: 10.1007/s00167-006-0150-6. Epub 2006 Jul 21.

    PubMed 16858560
  • Jonsson P, Alfredson H, Sunding K, Fahlstrom M, Cook J. New regimen for eccentric calf-muscle training in patients with chronic insertional Achilles tendinopathy: results of a pilot study. Br J Sports Med. 2008 Sep;42(9):746-9. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2007.039545. Epub 2008 Jan 9.

    PubMed 18184750
  • Farrar JT, Young JP Jr, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole MR. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain. 2001 Nov;94(2):149-158. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00349-9.

    PubMed 11690728
  • Santamato A, Beatrice R, Micello MF, Fortunato F, Panza F, Bristogiannis C, Cleopazzo E, Macarini L, Picelli A, Baricich A, Ranieri M. Power Doppler Ultrasound Findings before and after Focused Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for Achilles Tendinopathy: A Pilot Study on Pain Reduction and Neovascularization Effect. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2019 May;45(5):1316-1323. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.12.009. Epub 2019 Feb 8.

    PubMed 30739723
  • Cheng Y, Zhang J, Cai Y. Utility of Ultrasonography in Assessing the Effectiveness of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in Insertional Achilles Tendinopathy. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:2580969. doi: 10.1155/2016/2580969. Epub 2016 Nov 28.

    PubMed 28004000
  • Gatz M, Schweda S, Betsch M, Dirrichs T, de la Fuente M, Reinhardt N, Quack V. Line- and Point-Focused Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for Achilles Tendinopathy: A Placebo-Controlled RCT Study. Sports Health. 2021 Sep-Oct;13(5):511-518. doi: 10.1177/1941738121991791. Epub 2021 Feb 13.

    PubMed 33586526
  • Charles R, Fang L, Zhu R, Wang J. The effectiveness of shockwave therapy on patellar tendinopathy, Achilles tendinopathy, and plantar fasciitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Immunol. 2023 Aug 16;14:1193835. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1193835. eCollection 2023.

    PubMed 37662911
  • Feeney KM. The Effectiveness of Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy for Midportion Achilles Tendinopathy: A Systematic Review. Cureus. 2022 Jul 18;14(7):e26960. doi: 10.7759/cureus.26960. eCollection 2022 Jul.

    PubMed 35989757
  • Paantjens MA, Helmhout PH, Backx FJG, van Etten-Jamaludin FS, Bakker EWP. Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy for Mid-portion and Insertional Achilles Tendinopathy: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. Sports Med Open. 2022 May 13;8(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s40798-022-00456-5.

    PubMed 35552903
  • Stania M, Mala J, Chmielewska D. The Efficacy of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy as a Monotherapy for Achilles Tendinopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Chiropr Med. 2023 Dec;22(4):294-301. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2023.04.003. Epub 2023 Jun 14.

    PubMed 38205224
  • Pinitkwamdee S, Laohajaroensombat S, Orapin J, Woratanarat P. Effectiveness of Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy in the Treatment of Chronic Insertional Achilles Tendinopathy. Foot Ankle Int. 2020 Apr;41(4):403-410. doi: 10.1177/1071100719898461. Epub 2020 Jan 10.

    PubMed 31924120
  • Mansur NSB, Matsunaga FT, Carrazzone OL, Schiefer Dos Santos B, Nunes CG, Aoyama BT, Dias Dos Santos PR, Faloppa F, Tamaoki MJS. Shockwave Therapy Plus Eccentric Exercises Versus Isolated Eccentric Exercises for Achilles Insertional Tendinopathy: A Double-Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 Jul 21;103(14):1295-1302. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.01826.

    PubMed 34029235
  • Butler JJ, DeClouette B, Azam MT, Walls RC, Jejelava G, Zheng D, Jia N, Kennedy JG. Outcomes After Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy for Chronic Noninsertional Achilles Tendinopathy Compared With Chronic Insertional Achilles Tendinopathy: A Retrospective Review. Orthop J Sports Med. 2024 Sep 4;12(9):23259671241265330. doi: 10.1177/23259671241265330. eCollection 2024 Sep.

    PubMed 39247530
  • Abdelkader NA, Helmy MNK, Fayaz NA, Saweeres ESB. Short- and Intermediate-Term Results of Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy for Noninsertional Achilles Tendinopathy. Foot Ankle Int. 2021 Jun;42(6):788-797. doi: 10.1177/1071100720982613. Epub 2021 Jan 15.

    PubMed 33451253

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing individually tailored exercises and Radial Shockwave and Individually tailored exercises in people with Achilles Tendinopathy (AT) and Achilles Tendon, run by Vastra Gotaland Region.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in self-reported pain from baseline to 12 months after treatment start (time frame: At baseline and after 12 months after enrollment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07685509, which also lists 24 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Jul 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in