AzTrials
AzTrials

Emerging Infectious DiseasesSMART-IDNCT07678619

Smart Analysis and Decision-Making for Emerging Infectious Diseases

A study testing Multi-Agent Integrated Smart Toolkit for Emerging Infectious Diseases and Routine Practices in people with Emerging Infectious Diseases and COVID-19, run by Peking University at 1 site in China.

Enrolling by invitation

Enrolling by invitation. The study team selects and invites participants, usually from an existing group of patients.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Emerging infectious diseases, such as COVID-19, mpox, and dengue fever, are characterized by rapid transmission, wide impact, and high uncertainty, posing ongoing threats to global public health. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Emerging Infectious Diseases, COVID-19, Influenza
What is being tested?
Multi-Agent Integrated Smart Toolkit for Emerging Infectious Diseases and Routine Practices
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
108 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
10 Aug 2026to 31 Jul 2027
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Working at a participating district/county-level CDC in one of the five provinces/municipalities (Zhejiang, Guangdong, Hubei, Sichuan, or Shanghai) where at least one emerging infectious disease (COVID-19, mpox, influenza, dengue, chikungunya, or avian influenza) has occurred.
  • Being one of the three designated participants from the participating CDC cluster: one CDC director or relevant leader responsible for infectious disease prevention and control, or one of two professional staff members engaged in acute infectious disease surveillance, risk assessment, decision-making, risk management, or emergency response.
  • Currently responsible for or involved in infectious disease epidemic prevention and control work, including information collection, risk perception, risk assessment, decision-making, risk management, and emergency response at the CDC.
  • Willing to voluntarily participate in this study and provide written informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Under 18 years of age.
  • Diagnosed with severe mental illness or other conditions that impede normal communication.
  • Employed in the current CDC position for less than 1 year.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

China1 site
  • Jue Liu

    Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100191

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: AI-enabled Emergency Clinical Research for Emerging and Re-emerging Infectious Diseases: Protocol for an International Consensus

Emerging infectious diseases, such as COVID-19, mpox, and dengue fever, are characterized by rapid transmission, wide impact, and high uncertainty, posing ongoing threats to global public health. While China achieved significant success in COVID-19 control, the response also revealed key challenges, including fragmented information, delayed risk perception, experience-dependent assessment, and inefficiencies in complex decision-making. This study aims to establish a smart technology system covering the full chain of "risk perception-situational assessment-intelligent decision-making-comprehensive evaluation." Specific objectives include: Constructing a global disease burden database and knowledge graph for emerging infectious diseases; Developing early risk assessment models covering the full transmission spectrum (cross-species, imported, and local outbreak); Building an AI-driven collective intelligence decision-support tool for epidemic control; Developing precise intervention frameworks and comprehensive evaluation indicators for key populations (e.g., elderly, students); Integrating the above technologies into a multi-agent toolkit and evaluating its effectiveness through a cluster randomized controlled trial involving at least 36 district/county-level CDC clusters across five provinces/municipalities (Guangdong, Zhejiang, Hubei, Sichuan, and Shanghai).

Three eligible CDC staff members will be enrolled from each participating cluster, including one CDC director or relevant leader responsible for infectious disease prevention and control and two professional staff members engaged in acute infectious disease surveillance, risk assessment, decision-making, or emergency response. Accordingly, at least 108 participants will be enrolled, and the final anticipated enrollment will be determined by the total number of participating clusters.

The intervention group will use the smart toolkit alongside routine practices, while the control group will follow routine practices only. The primary outcome is response time for epidemic assessment and decision-making (hours from risk perception to decision completion). Secondary outcomes include epidemic control effectiveness, user satisfaction, and socioeconomic benefits. The intervention period is 3 months, starting around July 2026 and ending in December 2027. This study has been approved by the Peking University Biomedical Ethics Committee. The study does not involve individual patient data; all data are aggregated at the district/county level from CDC sources or publicly available data. Anonymous questionnaires do not collect any personal identifiable information.

Read the detailed description

This is a multicenter, cluster-randomized controlled trial (cRCT) with a single-blind design (blinding of statisticians). The study will be conducted across five provinces/municipalities: Guangdong, Zhejiang, Hubei, Sichuan, and Shanghai. At least 36 district/county-level Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDCs) will be selected as study clusters and allocated in an approximately 1:1 ratio to either the intervention group or the control group. Three eligible CDC staff members will be enrolled from each participating cluster, including one CDC director or relevant leader responsible for infectious disease prevention and control and two professional staff members engaged in acute infectious disease surveillance, risk assessment, decision-making, or emergency response.

Randomization Procedure: For the four provinces (Zhejiang, Guangdong, Hubei, and Sichuan), participating district/county-level CDC clusters will be stratified within each province according to socioeconomic level (high, medium, and low), as applicable, and randomly allocated within strata to the intervention or control group. For Shanghai municipality, participating district-level CDC clusters will be stratified by urban functional zone (central urban vs. new/suburban districts) and randomly allocated within strata. Cluster allocation will be maintained in an approximately 1:1 ratio.

Intervention: The intervention group will use a multi-agent integrated toolkit (including data-knowledge agent, assessment agent, decision agent, and evaluation agent) to assist with epidemic risk perception, situational assessment, and emergency decision-making, in addition to routine practices. The control group will follow routine practices only.

Follow-up Plan: The intervention period is 3 months, timed to coincide with peak seasons for specific infectious diseases (winter/spring for respiratory infections; summer/autumn for vector-borne diseases like dengue). Follow-up assessments will occur every 3 months, with the endpoint defined as the conclusion of an emerging infectious disease event.

Sample Size: Using PASS software (two-sided α=0.05, Power=80%, ICC=0.05, CV=0.5, standard deviation=12 hours, and average cluster size m=3), and assuming a 30% reduction in response time in the intervention group, a minimum of 32 evaluable clusters, corresponding to 16 clusters per group and 96 evaluable participants, is required. Because only 3 participants will be enrolled from each cluster and an individual attrition rate of approximately 10% is anticipated, at least 36 clusters and at least 108 participants will be recruited. The final anticipated enrollment will equal three times the actual number of participating clusters.

Data Management: Dual independent data entry will be performed. Data will be stored on Peking University's encrypted servers, with backups on the university cloud platform and offline encrypted hard drives (AES-256 encryption). All data will be physically destroyed after the retention period.

Missing Data: Analysis will follow the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle. Missing primary outcome data will be handled using the last observation carried forward (LOCF) method.

Safety Evaluation: Adverse events include headache and absenteeism, classified using a five-level attribution scale (definitely, probably, possibly, probably not, definitely not related), with the first three categories counted as adverse reaction rates. Any serious adverse event must be reported immediately to the sponsor and/or ethics committee.

Early Termination: The study may be terminated early under the following conditions: (1) identification of serious safety issues; (2) the toolkit proves ineffective or futile; (3) major protocol flaws or implementation deviations; (4) request by the applicant or administrative authority.

Being tested
Multi-Agent Integrated Smart Toolkit for Emerging Infectious Diseases, Routine Practices
Keywords
Emerging Infectious Diseases, Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Risk Assessment, Early Warning, Public Health Emergency
Medical subject headings
Communicable Diseases, Emerging, COVID-19, Influenza, Human, Mpox, Monkeypox, Dengue, Chikungunya Fever, Influenza in Birds

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Multi-Agent Integrated Smart Toolkit for Emerging Infectious DiseasesOther

    Also called SMART-ID Toolkit

    The multi-agent integrated smart toolkit consists of four integrated agents: (1) Data-Knowledge Agent - for early risk perception based on historical event experience; (2) Assessment Agent - for risk assessment and situational analysis; (3) Decision Agent - for emergency decision support; and (4) Evaluation Agent - for effect simulation and comprehensive evaluation. The toolkit is designed to assist CDC staff with epidemic risk perception, situational assessment, and emergency decision-making. It is used alongside routine infectious disease prevention and control practices.

  • Routine PracticesOther

    Routine infectious disease prevention and control practices currently implemented at the CDC, including standard epidemic surveillance, information collection, risk assessment, and emergency response procedures.

Study groups in NCT07678619
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Intervention GroupExperimentalParticipants in this arm will receive the multi-agent integrated smart toolkit, consisting of Data-Knowledge, Assessment, Decision, and Evaluation agents, in addition to routine infectious disease prevention and control practices. The toolkit is designed to assist CDC staff with epidemic risk perception, situational assessment, and emergency decision-making throughout the 3-month intervention period, alongside their routine CDC workflow.
Receives: Other: Multi-Agent Integrated Smart Toolkit for Emerging Infectious Diseases
Control GroupActive comparatorParticipants in this arm will follow routine infectious disease prevention and control practices only, without access to the multi-agent integrated smart toolkit, including standard epidemic surveillance, information collection, risk assessment, and emergency response procedures currently implemented at their respective CDC, and will continue their regular workflow without any additional intervention during the 3-month study period.
Receives: Other: Routine Practices

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Response Time for Risk Assessment Report Generation and Submission

    Response time consists of two components measured in hours: (1) Report generation time - time from the diagnosis of the index case in a cluster outbreak to the system's automatic generation of the first risk assessment report and decision-support recommendations; and (2) Report submission time - time from report generation to its official submission. Measured via electronic questionnaire and CDC reporting logs.

    Measured: Measured at baseline (enrollment) and at the end of the 3-month intervention period

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Consistency of Risk Assessment Results between Multi-Agent Toolkit and Expert Panel

    Measured by the level of agreement (including risk level classification) between the risk assessment outcomes generated by the multi-agent toolkit and those produced by an independent expert panel. Assessed via comparison of risk reports generated during outbreak events.

    Measured: Assessed at the end of the 3-month intervention period

  2. Epidemic Control Effectiveness

    Measured by: (1) duration of each cluster outbreak (days from the first case to the last case); and (2) number of secondary cases generated during the outbreak period. Data are derived from routine surveillance systems and epidemiological investigation reports (de-identified, aggregated data only).

    Measured: Assessed continuously throughout the 3-month intervention period and summarized at the end of the intervention

  3. User Experience and Satisfaction with the Smart Toolkit

    Quantitative evaluation via electronic questionnaire measuring overall user acceptance and integration of the tool among participating CDC staff. Three subscales (user satisfaction, perceived usefulness, and workflow integration) will be assessed, each scored on a Likert scale. The total score will be calculated as the mean of the three subscale scores, ranging from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater overall acceptance and integration.

    Measured: Measured at the end of the 3-month intervention period

  4. Healthcare Resource Consumption

    Assessment of healthcare resource consumption associated with the intervention, measured in monetary value (local currency, CNY), evaluated through Difference-in-Differences (DID) models.

    Measured: Assessed at the end of the 3-month intervention period

  5. Prevention and Control Resource Inputs

    Assessment of resource inputs for prevention and control activities, measured in monetary value (local currency, CNY), evaluated through Difference-in-Differences (DID) models.

    Measured: Assessed at the end of the 3-month intervention period

  6. Reduction in Hospitalization Burden

    Assessment of the reduction in hospitalization burden attributable to the intervention, measured as the number of hospitalizations avoided, evaluated through Markov decision tree models.

    Measured: Assessed at the end of the 3-month intervention period

  7. Reduction in Severe Disease Burden

    Assessment of the reduction in severe disease burden attributable to the intervention, measured as the number of severe cases avoided, evaluated through Markov decision tree models.

    Measured: Assessed at the end of the 3-month intervention period

  8. Cost-Effectiveness Ratio

    Assessment of the cost-effectiveness of the intervention, measured as cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained or cost per disability-adjusted life year (DALY) averted, evaluated through Markov decision tree models.

    Measured: Assessed at the end of the 3-month intervention period

  9. Macroeconomic Impact

    Assessment of the broader macroeconomic impact of the intervention, measured as percentage change in GDP or monetary value in local currency, evaluated through Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) models.

    Measured: Assessed at the end of the 3-month intervention period

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Jul 2026
  2. Study start10 Aug 2026
  3. Primary completion17 Jul 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Jul 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
This is a multicenter, cluster-randomized, parallel-group trial. At least 36 district/county-level Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDCs) across five provinces/municipalities (Guangdong, Zhejiang, Hubei, Sichuan, and Shanghai) will be randomized in an approximately 1:1 ratio to either the intervention group or the control group. Randomization will be stratified within each province/municipality according to socioeconomic level or urban functional zone, as applicable. Three eligible CDC staff members will be enrolled from each participating cluster. The trial follows a single-blind design, with statisticians blinded to group allocation.
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
108 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07678619
Sponsor's protocol ID
PKUINF-2026
Acronym
SMART-ID
Status last verified
Aug 2026
First submitted
24 Jun 2026
Last updated
19 Aug 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Multi-Agent Integrated Smart Toolkit for Emerging Infectious Diseases and Routine Practices in people with Emerging Infectious Diseases and COVID-19, run by Peking University at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: enrolling by invitation, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Response Time for Risk Assessment Report Generation and Submission (time frame: Measured at baseline (enrollment) and at the end of the 3-month intervention period). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Aug 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 26 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in