Nursing ProcessNCT07678450
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Pecha Kucha-Supported Microteaching Method in Nursing Process Education
A study testing Pecha Kucha-Supported Microteaching and Traditional Teaching in people with Nursing Process, run by Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
This randomized controlled study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the Pecha Kucha-supported microteaching method in nursing process education among first-year nursing students. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Nursing Process
- What is being tested?
- Pecha Kucha-Supported Microteaching and Traditional Teaching
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 9 Apr 2026to 30 Jun 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- First-year nursing students
- Successfully completed prerequisite nursing courses
- Grade point average (GPA) of 1.80 or higher
- Voluntary agreement to participate in the study
- Providing written informed consent
Who cannot join
- Students repeating the course
- Graduates of Vocational School of Health Services programs
- Withdrawal from the study at any stage
- Failure to complete study assessments or data collection forms
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing
Istanbul, Avcılar, 34310
About this study
This randomized controlled study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the Pecha Kucha-supported microteaching method in nursing process education among first-year nursing students. Participants will be randomly assigned to either an intervention group receiving Pecha Kucha-supported microteaching or a control group receiving traditional instruction. The effects of the intervention on nursing process competencies and learning motivation will be evaluated.
Read the detailed description
The nursing process is a systematic and scientific method that guides nursing care. Developing nursing students' competencies in the nursing process is essential for providing high-quality patient care. Innovative teaching methods may enhance students' learning experiences and improve educational outcomes.
This randomized controlled study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the Pecha Kucha-supported microteaching method in nursing process education among first-year nursing students. Participants will be randomly assigned to an intervention group or a control group. The intervention group will receive Pecha Kucha-supported microteaching, while the control group will receive traditional instruction. Following the educational intervention, students will prepare nursing care plans during their clinical practice.
Outcomes will be evaluated using a Nursing Process Knowledge Form, the Instructional Materials Motivation Survey, and the Quality of Nursing Diagnoses, Interventions and Outcomes (Q-DIO) instrument. The study will assess the effects of the intervention on nursing process competencies and learning motivation.
- Conditions
- Nursing Process
- Being tested
- Pecha Kucha-Supported Microteaching, Traditional Teaching
- Keywords
- Pecha Kucha, Microteaching, Nursing Process
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Pecha Kucha-Supported MicroteachingBehavioural
Nursing students first received a brief refresher lecture on the nursing process. The experimental group, consisting of 50 students, was then divided into five groups of 10 students each. Each group was assigned a case scenario and a nursing diagnosis. Students were asked to prepare a presentation using the Pecha Kucha-supported microteaching method based on the assigned case and nursing diagnosis. One student from each group delivered the presentation on behalf of the group. Feedback sessions were conducted following the presentations. Subsequently, students prepared individual nursing care plans for patients cared for during clinical practice.
Traditional TeachingBehavioural
Nursing students first received a brief refresher lecture on the nursing process. The control group, consisting of 50 students, was then divided into five groups of 10 students each. Each group was assigned a case scenario and a nursing diagnosis. Students were asked to collaboratively prepare a nursing care plan based on the assigned case and nursing diagnosis. Following this activity, students prepared individual nursing care plans for patients cared for during clinical practice.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental Group | Experimental | Nursing students who received a brief refresher lecture on the nursing process and participated in Pecha Kucha-supported microteaching activities based on case scenarios. Students subsequently prepared individual nursing care plans during clinical practice. Receives: Behavioral: Pecha Kucha-Supported Microteaching |
| Control Group | Active comparator | Nursing students who received a brief refresher lecture on the nursing process and prepared group nursing care plans based on case scenarios. Students subsequently prepared individual nursing care plans during clinical practice. Receives: Behavioral: Traditional Teaching |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Quality of Nursing Diagnoses, Interventions and Outcomes
The quality of nursing care plans will be evaluated using the Quality of Nursing Diagnoses, Interventions and Outcomes (Q-DIO) instrument. The Q-DIO is a 29-item instrument designed to assess the quality of nursing documentation, including nursing diagnoses, nursing interventions, and nursing-sensitive patient outcomes. The instrument consists of four domains: Nursing Diagnoses as Process, Nursing Diagnoses as Outcomes, Nursing Interventions, and Nursing-Sensitive Patient Outcomes. Higher scores indicate higher quality and more comprehensive documentation of nursing diagnoses, interventions, and patient outcomes in nursing care plans.
Measured: After completion of the educational intervention (approximately 4 weeks after baseline) and at the end of the clinical practice period (approximately 12 weeks after baseline).
Secondary outcomes (2)
Nursing Process Knowledge Level Assessment Form
Students' knowledge of the nursing process will be evaluated using the Nursing Process Knowledge Level Assessment Form developed by the researcher. The form consists of 25 multiple-choice questions. The questions assess students' knowledge related to the nursing process, including assessment, nursing diagnosis, planning, implementation, and evaluation stages. The form was reviewed by three experts, and necessary revisions were made in line with expert feedback. Higher scores indicate a higher level of knowledge regarding the nursing process.
Measured: At baseline and at the end of the clinical practice period (approximately 12 weeks after baseline).
Instructional Materials Motivation Survey
Students' learning motivation will be evaluated using the Instructional Materials Motivation Survey (IMMS), which is based on Keller's ARCS (Attention, Relevance, Confidence, Satisfaction) motivation model. The survey consists of 24 items and two subscales: Attention-Relevance and Confidence-Satisfaction. The Attention-Relevance subscale evaluates students' interest in and perceived relevance of the instructional content, whereas the Confidence-Satisfaction subscale assesses students' confidence and satisfaction with the learning experience. Responses are rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Total scores range from 24 to 120, with higher scores indicating higher levels of learning motivation.
Measured: At the end of the clinical practice period (approximately 12 weeks after baseline).
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Jul 2026
- Study start9 Apr 2026
- Primary completion30 Jun 2026
- Study completion30 Jun 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Nursing ProcessStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Istanbul University - CerrahpasaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Participants are randomly assigned to either the Pecha Kucha-supported microteaching group or the traditional teaching group and followed in parallel.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Sevim Uzuncan, Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa
- Investigators
- Funda Büyükyılmaz, Professor, Study chair, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07678450
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2025-749
- Status last verified
- Nov 2026
- First submitted
- 23 Jun 2026
- Last updated
- 3 Nov 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Individual participant data will not be shared because the study involves educational data collected from nursing students, and participant confidentiality and privacy will be protected in accordance with ethical approval and institutional regulations.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Nov 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Pecha Kucha-Supported Microteaching Method in Nursing Process Education
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07678450
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2025-749
- Conditions
- Nursing Process
- Keywords
- Pecha Kucha, Microteaching, Nursing Process
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Istanbul University - CerrahpasaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 9 Apr 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Jul 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This randomized controlled study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the Pecha Kucha-supported microteaching method in nursing process education among first-year nursing students. Participants will be randomly assigned to either an intervention group receiving Pecha Kucha-supported microteaching or a control group receiving traditional instruction. The effects of the intervention on nursing process competencies and learning motivation will be evaluated.
Detailed description
The nursing process is a systematic and scientific method that guides nursing care. Developing nursing students' competencies in the nursing process is essential for providing high-quality patient care. Innovative teaching methods may enhance students' learning experiences and improve educational outcomes.
This randomized controlled study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the Pecha Kucha-supported microteaching method in nursing process education among first-year nursing students. Participants will be randomly assigned to an intervention group or a control group. The intervention group will receive Pecha Kucha-supported microteaching, while the control group will receive traditional instruction. Following the educational intervention, students will prepare nursing care plans during their clinical practice.
Outcomes will be evaluated using a Nursing Process Knowledge Form, the Instructional Materials Motivation Survey, and the Quality of Nursing Diagnoses, Interventions and Outcomes (Q-DIO) instrument. The study will assess the effects of the intervention on nursing process competencies and learning motivation.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Participants are randomly assigned to either the Pecha Kucha-supported microteaching group or the traditional teaching group and followed in parallel.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental Group | Experimental | Behavioral: Pecha Kucha-Supported MicroteachingNursing students who received a brief refresher lecture on the nursing process and participated in Pecha Kucha-supported microteaching activities based on case scenarios. Students subsequently prepared individual nursing care plans during clinical practice. |
| Control Group | Active comparator | Behavioral: Traditional TeachingNursing students who received a brief refresher lecture on the nursing process and prepared group nursing care plans based on case scenarios. Students subsequently prepared individual nursing care plans during clinical practice. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- First-year nursing students
- Successfully completed prerequisite nursing courses
- Grade point average (GPA) of 1.80 or higher
- Voluntary agreement to participate in the study
- Providing written informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Students repeating the course
- Graduates of Vocational School of Health Services programs
- Withdrawal from the study at any stage
- Failure to complete study assessments or data collection forms
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Pecha Kucha-Supported MicroteachingNursing students first received a brief refresher lecture on the nursing process. The experimental group, consisting of 50 students, was then divided into five groups of 10 students each. Each group was assigned a case scenario and a nursing diagnosis. Students were asked to prepare a presentation using the Pecha Kucha-supported microteaching method based on the assigned case and nursing diagnosis. One student from each group delivered the presentation on behalf of the group. Feedback sessions were conducted following the presentations. Subsequently, students prepared individual nursing care plans for patients cared for during clinical practice. | Behavioural | Experimental Group |
| Traditional TeachingNursing students first received a brief refresher lecture on the nursing process. The control group, consisting of 50 students, was then divided into five groups of 10 students each. Each group was assigned a case scenario and a nursing diagnosis. Students were asked to collaboratively prepare a nursing care plan based on the assigned case and nursing diagnosis. Following this activity, students prepared individual nursing care plans for patients cared for during clinical practice. | Behavioural | Control Group |
Primary outcome
Quality of Nursing Diagnoses, Interventions and Outcomes
Time frame: After completion of the educational intervention (approximately 4 weeks after baseline) and at the end of the clinical practice period (approximately 12 weeks after baseline).
The quality of nursing care plans will be evaluated using the Quality of Nursing Diagnoses, Interventions and Outcomes (Q-DIO) instrument. The Q-DIO is a 29-item instrument designed to assess the quality of nursing documentation, including nursing diagnoses, nursing interventions, and nursing-sensitive patient outcomes. The instrument consists of four domains: Nursing Diagnoses as Process, Nursing Diagnoses as Outcomes, Nursing Interventions, and Nursing-Sensitive Patient Outcomes. Higher scores indicate higher quality and more comprehensive documentation of nursing diagnoses, interventions, and patient outcomes in nursing care plans.
2 secondary outcomes
Nursing Process Knowledge Level Assessment Form
Time frame: At baseline and at the end of the clinical practice period (approximately 12 weeks after baseline).
Instructional Materials Motivation Survey
Time frame: At the end of the clinical practice period (approximately 12 weeks after baseline).
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Nov 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Individual participant data will not be shared because the study involves educational data collected from nursing students, and participant confidentiality and privacy will be protected in accordance with ethical approval and institutional regulations.
Related trials for Nursing Process
Enrolling by invitation
The Effect Of Chatgpt Use By Final Year Nursing Students in The Nursing Processes On Their Understanding Of Nursing Diagnoses And Critical Thinking Skills
Nursing Students
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Perioperative Nursing Workload, Missed Care, and Near-Miss Events
Missed Nursing Care, Patient Safety
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Implementation of Advanced Practice Nurses for Specific Patient Groups
Evaluate Structures, Processes, and Experiences Related to the Implementation of APN Roles
Recruiting
Blended Learning for Psychosocial Nursing Diagnoses
Nursing Diagnosis, Psychosocial Diagnoses
Not yet recruiting
The Effect of AI-Assisted Nursing Process Training on Nursing Process Competence, Perception and Attitudes Towards Artificial Intelligence in Nurses: A Randomized Controlled Study
Nursing Process Competence, Artificial Intelligence Perception and Attitude
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Funda Büyükyılmaz, Professor study chair
Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Pecha Kucha-Supported Microteaching and Traditional Teaching in people with Nursing Process, run by Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Nov 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Quality of Nursing Diagnoses, Interventions and Outcomes (time frame: After completion of the educational intervention (approximately 4 weeks after baseline) and at the end of the clinical practice period (approximately 12 weeks after baseline).). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Nov 2026.