Peripheral Arterial DiseasePREMISE-ILIACNCT07672249
Predictors of Major Adverse Limb Events After Endovascular Iliac Stenting: a Real-world Cohort Study
An observational study of Peripheral Arterial Disease and Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease, run by I.R.C.C.S Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
Peripheral arterial disease involving the iliac arteries is a common manifestation of systemic atherosclerosis and a major cause of lifestyle-limiting claudication and chronic limb-threatening ischemia. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Peripheral Arterial Disease, Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease, Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia
- What is being tested?
- Iliac stenting
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 98 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 16 Jun 2026to 16 Jul 2026
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Consecutive adult patients (≥18 years), both male and female, undergoing endovascular stenting for stenotic or occlusive disease of the common and/or external iliac arteries (CIA/EIA) at IRCCS Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, between January 2023 and May 2025, will be retrospectively included. Lesions will be classified according to TASC II, with an expected predominance (~70%) of complex (C-D) lesions.
Who may be able to join
- Adult patients aged ≥18 years, of both male and female sex
- Presence of haemodynamically significant stenosis or occlusion of the common iliac artery (CIA) and/or external iliac artery (EIA), documented by computed tomography angiography, magnetic resonance angiography, or diagnostic angiography
- Symptomatic peripheral artery disease, including lifestyle-limiting intermittent claudication (Rutherford category 2-3) or chronic limb- threatening ischaemia (CLTI; Rutherford category 4-6), refractory to optimal medical therapy
- Treatment with endovascular iliac artery stenting (covered or uncovered; balloon-expandable or self-expanding devices) as the primary revascularisation strategy
- De novo iliac lesions only
- Availability of complet
Who cannot join
- Primary open surgical revascularisation of the iliac axis (e.g., aorto- bifemoral bypass or endarterectomy).
- Previous stenting of the target iliac segment (in-stent restenosis cases excluded).
- Aorto-iliac aneurysmal disease as the primary indication for treatment (including EVAR or fenestrated endografts).
- Hybrid procedures with concomitant infrainguinal bypass surgery.
- Incomplete clinical, procedural, or follow-up data preventing assessment of study endpoints.
- Loss to follow-up without documented clinical outcomes.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Italy1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
IRCCS Galeazzi Sant'Ambrogio Hospital
Milan, Mi, 20157
Elena Cittera Dr., +390283502224, direzionescientifica.ogsa@grupposandonato.it
About this study
Official title: Predictors of Major Adverse Limb Events After Endovascular Iliac Stenting: a Real-world Cohort Study (PREMISE-ILIAC Study)
Peripheral arterial disease involving the iliac arteries is a common manifestation of systemic atherosclerosis and a major cause of lifestyle-limiting claudication and chronic limb-threatening ischemia. Endovascular iliac artery stenting has become the preferred treatment strategy for most iliac lesions, including complex TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus II (TASC II) C and D lesions, owing to high technical success rates and lower perioperative morbidity compared with open surgical reconstruction.
Despite widespread adoption of endovascular treatment, available evidence regarding predictors of major adverse limb events (MALE) after iliac artery stenting remains limited, particularly in unselected real-world populations with substantial comorbidity burden. Patient-related factors, including frailty, may contribute to post-procedural outcomes in addition to lesion-related characteristics.
This retrospective single-center cohort study will evaluate clinical outcomes following endovascular iliac artery stenting in consecutive adult patients treated at IRCCS Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio Hospital, Milan, Italy. The study will assess the occurrence of major adverse limb events (MALE), primary patency, peri-procedural complications, target lesion revascularization, restenosis or occlusion, and all-cause mortality. Clinical, anatomical, and procedural factors associated with adverse limb outcomes, including frailty assessed by the modified five-item Frailty Index (mFI-5), will also be investigated.
Read the detailed description
Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) involving the iliac arteries is a common manifestation of systemic atherosclerosis and represents a frequent cause of lifestyle-limiting intermittent claudication and chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). Over the past two decades, continuous advances in endovascular techniques, stent technology, and peri-procedural imaging have led to a progressive shift from open surgical reconstruction toward an endovascular-first strategy for the treatment of aortoiliac occlusive disease, including anatomically complex lesions classified as TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus II (TASC II) C and D.
Current international guidelines support endovascular treatment for most iliac lesions because of high technical success rates and lower perioperative morbidity compared with open surgical reconstruction. As a result, iliac artery stenting has become the predominant treatment modality in routine vascular practice. However, much of the available evidence is derived from selected patient populations or controlled clinical studies and may not fully reflect outcomes observed in unselected real-world cohorts with substantial comorbidity burden.
Although procedural success and vessel patency after iliac artery stenting have been widely reported, less information is available regarding predictors of clinically meaningful limb-related outcomes, particularly Major Adverse Limb Events (MALE). Furthermore, lesion morphology alone may not adequately explain variability in outcomes after technically successful revascularization. Patient-related factors, including frailty, chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, and advanced age, may significantly influence post-procedural clinical trajectories. Frailty, assessed using the modified five-item Frailty Index (mFI-5), has been associated with adverse outcomes in cardiovascular and vascular surgical populations, but its prognostic role in patients undergoing iliac artery stenting remains insufficiently characterized.
This study is a single-center retrospective observational cohort study conducted at the Division of Vascular Surgery, IRCCS Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio Hospital, Milan, Italy. Consecutive adult patients who underwent endovascular stenting for de novo stenotic or occlusive disease of the common and/or external iliac arteries between January 2023 and May 2025 will be included. Clinical, anatomical, procedural, and follow-up data will be retrospectively extracted from institutional vascular registries, imaging databases, and electronic medical records.
The primary objective is to evaluate MALE-free survival following endovascular iliac artery stenting. Secondary objectives include assessment of primary patency, peri-procedural complications, target lesion revascularization, restenosis or occlusion, and all-cause mortality. The study will also evaluate associations between baseline clinical and anatomical characteristics and adverse limb outcomes, with particular attention to frailty as assessed by the mFI-5.
Follow-up data are derived exclusively from routine clinical surveillance, including outpatient evaluations, ankle-brachial index measurements when available, duplex ultrasound examinations, and additional imaging studies performed according to clinical indications. Outcomes will be analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival methods and Cox proportional hazards regression models to identify factors associated with adverse clinical outcomes after iliac artery stenting in a real-world population.
- Conditions
- Peripheral Arterial Disease, Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease, Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia, Intermittent Claudication
- Being tested
- Iliac stenting
- Keywords
- Peripheral Arterial Disease, Iliac Artery Stenting, Endovascular Revascularization
- Medical subject headings
- Peripheral Arterial Disease, Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia, Intermittent Claudication
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Iliac stentingProcedure or surgery
clinical assessment of symptoms, including intermittent claudication, rest pain, or wound status in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI); physical examination with peripheral pulse assessment and, when available, ankle-brachial index (ABI) measurement; duplex ultrasound imaging of the treated iliac segment and downstream arterial circulation, performed according to institutional surveillance protocols or clinical indication; computed tomography angiography (CTA) or other cross-sectional imaging only in cases of suspected in-stent restenosis, occlusion, or clinical deterioration; documentation of clinically relevant adverse events, including Major Adverse Limb Events (MALE), reinterventions, amputations, and all- cause mortality, retrieved from outpatient records and the institutional electronic health record system.
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants Experiencing Major Adverse Limb Events (MALE) Within 12 Months
MALE is defined as a composite endpoint including: acute limb ischaemia requiring intervention, major amputation (above or below knee), or surgical/endovascular re-intervention on the target iliac vessel. Results will be reported as the number and proportion of participants experiencing at least one MALE event within 12 months of the index procedure. Independent predictors will be identified by multivariable Cox regression, including frailty (mFI-5), lesion complexity (TASC II class), stent type, and cardiovascular comorbidities.
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (5)
Primary Patency of the Treated Iliac Artery Segment
Primary patency defined as freedom from target lesion revascularization and absence of documented iliac artery occlusion during follow-up, assessed by duplex ultrasound or cross-sectional imaging.
Measured: 12 months
Number of Participants With Peri-Procedural Complications
Number of participants experiencing peri-procedural complications within 30 days after iliac stenting, including access-site complications, arterial dissection, perforation, pseudoaneurysm, hematoma formation, contrast-induced nephropathy, hemorrhagic events, and neurological events.
Measured: 30 days
All-Cause Mortality
Number of participants who die from any cause following the index iliac stenting procedure.
Measured: 12 months
Freedom From Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)
Time from the index procedure to the first repeat endovascular or surgical intervention performed on the treated iliac artery segment
Measured: 12 months
Number of Participants With Iliac Artery Restenosis or Occlusion
Number of participants with documented restenosis or occlusion of the treated iliac artery segment detected by duplex ultrasound, computed tomography angiography, or other clinically indicated imaging.
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Jun 2026
- Study start16 Jun 2026
- Primary completion1 Jul 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion16 Jul 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Peripheral Arterial DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by I.R.C.C.S Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'AmbrogioThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 98 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- I.R.C.C.S Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Elena Cittera, I.R.C.C.S Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07672249
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PREMISE-ILIAC
- Acronym
- PREMISE-ILIAC
- Status last verified
- Jun 2026
- First submitted
- 17 Jun 2026
- Last updated
- 30 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Predictors of Major Adverse Limb Events After Endovascular Iliac Stenting: a Real-world Cohort Study (PREMISE-ILIAC Study)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07672249
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PREMISE-ILIAC / PREMISE-ILIAC
- Conditions
- Peripheral Arterial Disease, Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease, Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia, Intermittent Claudication
- Keywords
- Peripheral Arterial Disease, Iliac Artery Stenting, Endovascular Revascularization
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 98 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- I.R.C.C.S Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'AmbrogioUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 16 Jun 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jul 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 16 Jul 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 26 Jun 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Peripheral arterial disease involving the iliac arteries is a common manifestation of systemic atherosclerosis and a major cause of lifestyle-limiting claudication and chronic limb-threatening ischemia. Endovascular iliac artery stenting has become the preferred treatment strategy for most iliac lesions, including complex TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus II (TASC II) C and D lesions, owing to high technical success rates and lower perioperative morbidity compared with open surgical reconstruction.
Despite widespread adoption of endovascular treatment, available evidence regarding predictors of major adverse limb events (MALE) after iliac artery stenting remains limited, particularly in unselected real-world populations with substantial comorbidity burden. Patient-related factors, including frailty, may contribute to post-procedural outcomes in addition to lesion-related characteristics.
This retrospective single-center cohort study will evaluate clinical outcomes following endovascular iliac artery stenting in consecutive adult patients treated at IRCCS Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio Hospital, Milan, Italy. The study will assess the occurrence of major adverse limb events (MALE), primary patency, peri-procedural complications, target lesion revascularization, restenosis or occlusion, and all-cause mortality. Clinical, anatomical, and procedural factors associated with adverse limb outcomes, including frailty assessed by the modified five-item Frailty Index (mFI-5), will also be investigated.
Detailed description
Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) involving the iliac arteries is a common manifestation of systemic atherosclerosis and represents a frequent cause of lifestyle-limiting intermittent claudication and chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). Over the past two decades, continuous advances in endovascular techniques, stent technology, and peri-procedural imaging have led to a progressive shift from open surgical reconstruction toward an endovascular-first strategy for the treatment of aortoiliac occlusive disease, including anatomically complex lesions classified as TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus II (TASC II) C and D.
Current international guidelines support endovascular treatment for most iliac lesions because of high technical success rates and lower perioperative morbidity compared with open surgical reconstruction. As a result, iliac artery stenting has become the predominant treatment modality in routine vascular practice. However, much of the available evidence is derived from selected patient populations or controlled clinical studies and may not fully reflect outcomes observed in unselected real-world cohorts with substantial comorbidity burden.
Although procedural success and vessel patency after iliac artery stenting have been widely reported, less information is available regarding predictors of clinically meaningful limb-related outcomes, particularly Major Adverse Limb Events (MALE). Furthermore, lesion morphology alone may not adequately explain variability in outcomes after technically successful revascularization. Patient-related factors, including frailty, chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, and advanced age, may significantly influence post-procedural clinical trajectories. Frailty, assessed using the modified five-item Frailty Index (mFI-5), has been associated with adverse outcomes in cardiovascular and vascular surgical populations, but its prognostic role in patients undergoing iliac artery stenting remains insufficiently characterized.
This study is a single-center retrospective observational cohort study conducted at the Division of Vascular Surgery, IRCCS Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio Hospital, Milan, Italy. Consecutive adult patients who underwent endovascular stenting for de novo stenotic or occlusive disease of the common and/or external iliac arteries between January 2023 and May 2025 will be included. Clinical, anatomical, procedural, and follow-up data will be retrospectively extracted from institutional vascular registries, imaging databases, and electronic medical records.
The primary objective is to evaluate MALE-free survival following endovascular iliac artery stenting. Secondary objectives include assessment of primary patency, peri-procedural complications, target lesion revascularization, restenosis or occlusion, and all-cause mortality. The study will also evaluate associations between baseline clinical and anatomical characteristics and adverse limb outcomes, with particular attention to frailty as assessed by the mFI-5.
Follow-up data are derived exclusively from routine clinical surveillance, including outpatient evaluations, ankle-brachial index measurements when available, duplex ultrasound examinations, and additional imaging studies performed according to clinical indications. Outcomes will be analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival methods and Cox proportional hazards regression models to identify factors associated with adverse clinical outcomes after iliac artery stenting in a real-world population.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Consecutive adult patients (≥18 years), both male and female, undergoing endovascular stenting for stenotic or occlusive disease of the common and/or external iliac arteries (CIA/EIA) at IRCCS Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, between January 2023 and May 2025, will be retrospectively included. Lesions will be classified according to TASC II, with an expected predominance (~70%) of complex (C-D) lesions.
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Adult patients aged ≥18 years, of both male and female sex
- Presence of haemodynamically significant stenosis or occlusion of the common iliac artery (CIA) and/or external iliac artery (EIA), documented by computed tomography angiography, magnetic resonance angiography, or diagnostic angiography
- Symptomatic peripheral artery disease, including lifestyle-limiting intermittent claudication (Rutherford category 2-3) or chronic limb- threatening ischaemia (CLTI; Rutherford category 4-6), refractory to optimal medical therapy
- Treatment with endovascular iliac artery stenting (covered or uncovered; balloon-expandable or self-expanding devices) as the primary revascularisation strategy
- De novo iliac lesions only
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Primary open surgical revascularisation of the iliac axis (e.g., aorto- bifemoral bypass or endarterectomy).
- Previous stenting of the target iliac segment (in-stent restenosis cases excluded).
- Aorto-iliac aneurysmal disease as the primary indication for treatment (including EVAR or fenestrated endografts).
- Hybrid procedures with concomitant infrainguinal bypass surgery.
- Incomplete clinical, procedural, or follow-up data preventing assessment of study endpoints.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Iliac stentingclinical assessment of symptoms, including intermittent claudication, rest pain, or wound status in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI); physical examination with peripheral pulse assessment and, when available, ankle-brachial index (ABI) measurement; duplex ultrasound imaging of the treated iliac segment and downstream arterial circulation, performed according to institutional surveillance protocols or clinical indication; computed tomography angiography (CTA) or other cross-sectional imaging only in cases of suspected in-stent restenosis, occlusion, or clinical deterioration; documentation of clinically relevant adverse events, including Major Adverse Limb Events (MALE), reinterventions, amputations, and all- cause mortality, retrieved from outpatient records and the institutional electronic health record system. | Procedure or surgery | – |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants Experiencing Major Adverse Limb Events (MALE) Within 12 Months
Time frame: 12 months
MALE is defined as a composite endpoint including: acute limb ischaemia requiring intervention, major amputation (above or below knee), or surgical/endovascular re-intervention on the target iliac vessel. Results will be reported as the number and proportion of participants experiencing at least one MALE event within 12 months of the index procedure. Independent predictors will be identified by multivariable Cox regression, including frailty (mFI-5), lesion complexity (TASC II class), stent type, and cardiovascular comorbidities.
5 secondary outcomes
Primary Patency of the Treated Iliac Artery Segment
Time frame: 12 months
Number of Participants With Peri-Procedural Complications
Time frame: 30 days
All-Cause Mortality
Time frame: 12 months
Freedom From Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)
Time frame: 12 months
Number of Participants With Iliac Artery Restenosis or Occlusion
Time frame: 12 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Jun 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Peripheral Arterial Disease
Active, not recruiting
SUCCESS (SelUtion, Safety, effiCaCy, hEalth economicS and promS) PTA Study
Peripheral Artery Disease
RecruitingPhase 3
Reducing Adverse Vascular Outcomes With Factor XI Inhibition in Adult Participants With Peripheral Artery Disease
Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD)
Recruiting
The THOR IDE Study
Peripheral Artery Disease, Peripheral Artery Stenosis
Not yet recruiting
Daily Stretching to Improve Walking in Older Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease: The STRETCH PAD Study
Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD), Intermittent Claudication
Recruiting
WIN Ratio Analysis to Determine a Strategy of Non- Invasive SUpport for Respiratory Failure in the EmeRgency Department
Acute Hypoxic Respiratory Failure, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Peripheral Arterial Disease and Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease, run by I.R.C.C.S Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Luca Galassi, MD (+393458013083, luca.galassi@unimi.it), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants Experiencing Major Adverse Limb Events (MALE) Within 12 Months (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Jun 2026.