Carbohydrate Intake and Exercise PerformanceNCT07668726
Carbohydrate Availability and Running Performance in Professional Male Footballers
A study testing High-Carbohydrate Beverage in people with Carbohydrate Intake and Exercise Performance, run by Göteborg University at 1 site in Sweden.
Trial summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn how different daily carbohydrate intakes affect training performance in professional male football players during a pre-season training week. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, men onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Carbohydrate Intake and Exercise Performance
- What is being tested?
- High-Carbohydrate Beverage
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 17 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSweden
- Study dates
- 1 Apr 2026to 1 May 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Men only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Professional male football player
- Outfield player
- Member of the recruited professional football team
- Available to take part in the pre-season training period
- Able to follow the study diet and beverage protocol
- Able to wear a global positioning system device during training
- Provided written informed consent
Who cannot join
- Goalkeeper
- Injured at the start of the study period
- Expected to leave the team on loan during the study period
- Unable to complete both dietary conditions
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Sweden1 site
Center for Health and Performance, Department of Food and Nutrition, and Sport Science University of Gothenburg, Sweden
Gothenburg, 40530
About this study
Official title: The Effect of Varying Carbohydrate Intake on Training Performance in Professional Football Players
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn how different daily carbohydrate intakes affect training performance in professional male football players during a pre-season training week.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Read more
- Does a higher carbohydrate intake affect how much high-speed running and sprinting players complete during football training?
- Does a higher carbohydrate intake affect players' jumping performance, perceived effort, recovery, and daily readiness?
Researchers will compare two carbohydrate intakes. In one condition, participants will consume a moderate-carbohydrate diet. In the other condition, participants will consume the same base diet plus carbohydrate drinks. The drinks will look and taste similar, but only one type will contain extra carbohydrate.
Participants will complete both conditions during two pre-season training weeks. The order of the conditions will be randomized. This means participants will be assigned by chance to start with either the moderate-carbohydrate condition or the higher-carbohydrate condition.
During the study, participants will:
- Follow a standardized diet during each training week
- Drink three study beverages per day during each condition
- Take part in their regular team football training
- Wear a global positioning system device during training to measure running activity
- Complete countermovement jump tests during the training weeks
- Report their perceived effort, recovery, and daily readiness
This study will help researchers understand whether changing carbohydrate intake during a normal football training week affects training output and recovery-related measures in professional football players.
Read the detailed description
This study used a single-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized crossover design to examine the effects of different levels of daily carbohydrate availability during a pre-season training microcycle in professional male football players.
The study was conducted in an applied professional football environment during two consecutive pre-season training weeks. Each participant completed both dietary conditions. The order of the two conditions was randomized and counterbalanced. The training schedule and overall training content were matched between the two intervention weeks as part of the club's regular training program.
The two dietary conditions were designed to provide different daily carbohydrate intakes. In both conditions, participants followed a standardized food-based diet that provided 4 grams of carbohydrate per kilogram of body mass per day. In the higher-carbohydrate condition, participants also consumed three carbohydrate-containing study beverages per day, providing an additional 3 grams of carbohydrate per kilogram of body mass per day. This resulted in a total target intake of 7 grams of carbohydrate per kilogram of body mass per day. In the moderate-carbohydrate condition, participants consumed similar placebo beverages without added carbohydrate, resulting in a total target intake of 4 grams of carbohydrate per kilogram of body mass per day.
The study beverages were prepared from water and an artificially sweetened concentrate. In the higher-carbohydrate condition, maltodextrin was added to the beverage. In the moderate-carbohydrate condition, no maltodextrin was added. Beverages were provided in non-transparent bottles to support participant blinding. Participants were not informed of the carbohydrate content of the study beverages.
Dietary targets were individualized according to body mass. Breakfast and snacks were individualized according to participant preferences but standardized for carbohydrate content. Lunch was provided through the club's restaurant and adjusted to meet the carbohydrate target. Dinner targets were communicated using an image-based portion guide to support consistent carbohydrate intake outside the training facility. Participants were instructed to maintain their habitual protein and fat intake across both conditions.
Adherence to supervised meals and beverages at the training facility was monitored by study staff. Evening beverages were distributed for home consumption and returned the following morning so that remaining contents could be inspected. Dietary intake outside the training facility was not fully controlled.
External training load was monitored during football training sessions using a global positioning system device worn by each participant. The same device was used by each participant throughout the study to reduce measurement variation. The training monitoring system was used to quantify running and movement demands during the intervention period.
Neuromuscular function was assessed using countermovement jump testing on repeated occasions during the two training weeks. Self-reported measures were collected to assess perceived exertion after training, perceived recovery before training, and daily readiness upon waking.
The study was designed to compare the two carbohydrate conditions within the same participants while preserving the normal structure of a professional football training environment. This design allowed the researchers to examine whether changing carbohydrate availability during regular team training influenced training-related performance and recovery measures under applied conditions.
- Being tested
- High-Carbohydrate Beverage, placebo beverage
- Keywords
- Exercise Performance, Football, Carbohydrate Intake
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
High-Carbohydrate BeverageDietary supplement
Also called H-CHO, High-carbohydrate condition, High carbohydrate availability
Participants consumed three daily maltodextrin-containing beverages in addition to a standardized food-based diet providing 4 grams of carbohydrate per kilogram of body mass per day. The beverages provided an additional 3 grams of carbohydrate per kilogram of body mass per day, resulting in a total target intake of 7 grams of carbohydrate per kilogram of body mass per day.
placebo beverageDietary supplement
Also called M-CHO, Moderate-carbohydrate condition, Placebo beverage condition
Participants consumed three daily placebo beverages without added carbohydrate in addition to the same standardized food-based diet providing 4 grams of carbohydrate per kilogram of body mass per day. The total target intake was 4 grams of carbohydrate per kilogram of body mass per day.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| High-Carbohydrate First Sequence | Experimental | Participants completed the high-carbohydrate condition during the first pre-season training week, followed by the moderate-carbohydrate condition during the second pre-season training week. Receives: Dietary Supplement: High-Carbohydrate Beverage; Dietary Supplement: placebo beverage |
| Moderate-Carbohydrate First Sequence | Experimental | Participants completed the moderate-carbohydrate condition during the first pre-season training week, followed by the high-carbohydrate condition during the second pre-season training week. Receives: Dietary Supplement: High-Carbohydrate Beverage; Dietary Supplement: placebo beverage |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
High-Speed Running Distance
Distance covered at speeds >19.8 km·h-¹ during football training sessions, measured in meters using a global positioning system device.
Measured: During each football training session in each of the two 1-week intervention periods
Number of Sprints
Number of sprint efforts performed during football training sessions, measured using a global positioning system device.
Measured: During each football training session in each of the two 1-week intervention periods
Sprint Distance
Distance covered at speeds >25.2 km·h-¹ during football training sessions, measured in meters using a global positioning system device.
Measured: During each football training session in each of the two 1-week intervention periods
Secondary outcomes (10)
Total Distance Covered
Total distance covered during football training sessions, measured in meters using a global positioning system device.
Measured: During each football training session in each of the two 1-week intervention periods
High Metabolic Load Distance
Distance covered at high metabolic load >25 W·kg-¹ during football training sessions, measured in meters using a global positioning system device.
Measured: During each football training session in each of the two 1-week intervention periods
Acceleration Distance
Distance covered during accelerations >3 m·s-² during football training sessions, measured in meters using a global positioning system device.
Measured: During each football training session in each of the two 1-week intervention periods
Number of Accelerations
Number of acceleration events >3 m·s-² during football training sessions, measured using a global positioning system device.
Measured: During each football training session in each of the two 1-week intervention periods
Deceleration Distance
Distance covered during decelerations <-3 m·s-² during football training sessions, measured in meters using a global positioning system device.
Measured: During each football training session in each of the two 1-week intervention periods
Number of Decelerations
Number of deceleration events <-3 m·s-² during football training sessions, measured using a global positioning system device.
Measured: During each football training session in each of the two 1-week intervention periods
Countermovement Jump Height
Countermovement jump height, measured in centimeters using [force platform Hawkin Dynamics, Gen 5, USA].
Measured: Three times during each 1-week intervention period: baseline, mid-week, and end-week
Session Rating of Perceived Exertion
Rating of perceived exertion after each football training session, measured using the Borg CR10 scale.
Measured: After each football training session in each of the two 1-week intervention periods
Perceived Recovery
Perceived recovery assessed before football training sessions using single-item 0 to 10 scale, where 0 indicates complete exhaustion and 10 full recovery
Measured: Before each football training session in each of the two 1-week intervention periods
Perceived Readiness
Perceived readiness assessed using Hooper Index.
Measured: Daily upon waking during each of the two 1-week intervention periods
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Jun 2026
- Study start1 Apr 2026
- Primary completion1 May 2026
- Study completion1 May 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Carbohydrate Intake and Exercise PerformanceStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Göteborg UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 17 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Göteborg University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Stefan Pettersson, Göteborg University
- Investigators
- Stefan Pettersson, PhD, Associate Professor, Principal investigator, Department of Food and Nutrition, and Sport Science, Göteborgs universitet, Gothenburg, Sweden
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07668726
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Göteborg University
- Status last verified
- Jun 2026
- First submitted
- 9 Jun 2026
- Last updated
- 25 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Individual participant data will not be made publicly available due to the small sample size and the specific professional team context. These factors may increase the risk of participant identification, even after de-identification of the data.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Varying Carbohydrate Intake on Training Performance in Professional Football Players
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07668726
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Göteborg University
- Keywords
- Exercise Performance, Football, Carbohydrate Intake
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 17 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Göteborg UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Apr 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 May 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 May 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Jun 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn how different daily carbohydrate intakes affect training performance in professional male football players during a pre-season training week.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Does a higher carbohydrate intake affect how much high-speed running and sprinting players complete during football training?
- Does a higher carbohydrate intake affect players' jumping performance, perceived effort, recovery, and daily readiness?
Researchers will compare two carbohydrate intakes. In one condition, participants will consume a moderate-carbohydrate diet. In the other condition, participants will consume the same base diet plus carbohydrate drinks. The drinks will look and taste similar, but only one type will contain extra carbohydrate.
Participants will complete both conditions during two pre-season training weeks. The order of the conditions will be randomized. This means participants will be assigned by chance to start with either the moderate-carbohydrate condition or the higher-carbohydrate condition.
During the study, participants will:
- Follow a standardized diet during each training week
- Drink three study beverages per day during each condition
- Take part in their regular team football training
- Wear a global positioning system device during training to measure running activity
- Complete countermovement jump tests during the training weeks
- Report their perceived effort, recovery, and daily readiness
This study will help researchers understand whether changing carbohydrate intake during a normal football training week affects training output and recovery-related measures in professional football players.
Detailed description
This study used a single-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized crossover design to examine the effects of different levels of daily carbohydrate availability during a pre-season training microcycle in professional male football players.
The study was conducted in an applied professional football environment during two consecutive pre-season training weeks. Each participant completed both dietary conditions. The order of the two conditions was randomized and counterbalanced. The training schedule and overall training content were matched between the two intervention weeks as part of the club's regular training program.
The two dietary conditions were designed to provide different daily carbohydrate intakes. In both conditions, participants followed a standardized food-based diet that provided 4 grams of carbohydrate per kilogram of body mass per day. In the higher-carbohydrate condition, participants also consumed three carbohydrate-containing study beverages per day, providing an additional 3 grams of carbohydrate per kilogram of body mass per day. This resulted in a total target intake of 7 grams of carbohydrate per kilogram of body mass per day. In the moderate-carbohydrate condition, participants consumed similar placebo beverages without added carbohydrate, resulting in a total target intake of 4 grams of carbohydrate per kilogram of body mass per day.
The study beverages were prepared from water and an artificially sweetened concentrate. In the higher-carbohydrate condition, maltodextrin was added to the beverage. In the moderate-carbohydrate condition, no maltodextrin was added. Beverages were provided in non-transparent bottles to support participant blinding. Participants were not informed of the carbohydrate content of the study beverages.
Dietary targets were individualized according to body mass. Breakfast and snacks were individualized according to participant preferences but standardized for carbohydrate content. Lunch was provided through the club's restaurant and adjusted to meet the carbohydrate target. Dinner targets were communicated using an image-based portion guide to support consistent carbohydrate intake outside the training facility. Participants were instructed to maintain their habitual protein and fat intake across both conditions.
Adherence to supervised meals and beverages at the training facility was monitored by study staff. Evening beverages were distributed for home consumption and returned the following morning so that remaining contents could be inspected. Dietary intake outside the training facility was not fully controlled.
External training load was monitored during football training sessions using a global positioning system device worn by each participant. The same device was used by each participant throughout the study to reduce measurement variation. The training monitoring system was used to quantify running and movement demands during the intervention period.
Neuromuscular function was assessed using countermovement jump testing on repeated occasions during the two training weeks. Self-reported measures were collected to assess perceived exertion after training, perceived recovery before training, and daily readiness upon waking.
The study was designed to compare the two carbohydrate conditions within the same participants while preserving the normal structure of a professional football training environment. This design allowed the researchers to examine whether changing carbohydrate availability during regular team training influenced training-related performance and recovery measures under applied conditions.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| High-Carbohydrate First Sequence | Experimental | Dietary Supplement: High-Carbohydrate Beverage, Dietary Supplement: placebo beverageParticipants completed the high-carbohydrate condition during the first pre-season training week, followed by the moderate-carbohydrate condition during the second pre-season training week. |
| Moderate-Carbohydrate First Sequence | Experimental | Dietary Supplement: High-Carbohydrate Beverage, Dietary Supplement: placebo beverageParticipants completed the moderate-carbohydrate condition during the first pre-season training week, followed by the high-carbohydrate condition during the second pre-season training week. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Professional male football player
- Outfield player
- Member of the recruited professional football team
- Available to take part in the pre-season training period
- Able to follow the study diet and beverage protocol
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Goalkeeper
- Injured at the start of the study period
- Expected to leave the team on loan during the study period
- Unable to complete both dietary conditions
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| High-Carbohydrate BeverageAlso: H-CHO, High-carbohydrate condition, High carbohydrate availabilityParticipants consumed three daily maltodextrin-containing beverages in addition to a standardized food-based diet providing 4 grams of carbohydrate per kilogram of body mass per day. The beverages provided an additional 3 grams of carbohydrate per kilogram of body mass per day, resulting in a total target intake of 7 grams of carbohydrate per kilogram of body mass per day. | Dietary supplement | High-Carbohydrate First Sequence, Moderate-Carbohydrate First Sequence |
| placebo beverageAlso: M-CHO, Moderate-carbohydrate condition, Placebo beverage conditionParticipants consumed three daily placebo beverages without added carbohydrate in addition to the same standardized food-based diet providing 4 grams of carbohydrate per kilogram of body mass per day. The total target intake was 4 grams of carbohydrate per kilogram of body mass per day. | Dietary supplement | High-Carbohydrate First Sequence, Moderate-Carbohydrate First Sequence |
Primary outcome
High-Speed Running Distance
Time frame: During each football training session in each of the two 1-week intervention periods
Distance covered at speeds >19.8 km·h-¹ during football training sessions, measured in meters using a global positioning system device.
Number of Sprints
Time frame: During each football training session in each of the two 1-week intervention periods
Number of sprint efforts performed during football training sessions, measured using a global positioning system device.
Sprint Distance
Time frame: During each football training session in each of the two 1-week intervention periods
Distance covered at speeds >25.2 km·h-¹ during football training sessions, measured in meters using a global positioning system device.
10 secondary outcomes
Total Distance Covered
Time frame: During each football training session in each of the two 1-week intervention periods
High Metabolic Load Distance
Time frame: During each football training session in each of the two 1-week intervention periods
Acceleration Distance
Time frame: During each football training session in each of the two 1-week intervention periods
Number of Accelerations
Time frame: During each football training session in each of the two 1-week intervention periods
Deceleration Distance
Time frame: During each football training session in each of the two 1-week intervention periods
Number of Decelerations
Time frame: During each football training session in each of the two 1-week intervention periods
Countermovement Jump Height
Time frame: Three times during each 1-week intervention period: baseline, mid-week, and end-week
Session Rating of Perceived Exertion
Time frame: After each football training session in each of the two 1-week intervention periods
Perceived Recovery
Time frame: Before each football training session in each of the two 1-week intervention periods
Perceived Readiness
Time frame: Daily upon waking during each of the two 1-week intervention periods
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Jun 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Individual participant data will not be made publicly available due to the small sample size and the specific professional team context. These factors may increase the risk of participant identification, even after de-identification of the data.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Stefan Pettersson, PhD, Associate Professor principal investigator
Department of Food and Nutrition, and Sport Science, Göteborgs universitet, Gothenburg, Sweden
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing High-Carbohydrate Beverage in people with Carbohydrate Intake and Exercise Performance, run by Göteborg University at 1 site in Sweden.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
High-Speed Running Distance (time frame: During each football training session in each of the two 1-week intervention periods). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Jun 2026.