ViolencePhase 2NCT07667738
Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Common Elements Treatment Approach (CETA) in Peru: Mechanisms of Individual and Intergenerational Change
A Phase 2 study testing Common Elements Treatment Approach and Enhanced Case Managment in people with Violence and Parenting, run by University of Notre Dame at 1 site in Peru.
Trial summary
Recent advances in intervention research have revealed the promise of transdiagnostic, modular approaches implemented by lay paraprofessionals for the treatment of the most prevalent mental health concerns in settings affected by adversity (e.g., anxiety, depression, posttraumatic stress), but to date, few… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- What is being tested?
- Common Elements Treatment Approach and Enhanced Case Managment
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 600 participants
- Where
- 1 sitePeru
- Study dates
- 18 May 2026to 30 Apr 2030
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- live in San Juan de Lurigancho, Lima, Peru,
- be at least 18 years of age,
- have a child between the ages of 4 and 6, and
- have the ability to travel to INFAM for study assessments and treatment sessions
Who cannot join
- living outside of San Juan de Lurigancho,
- those who are unable or unwilling to attend in-person sessions, or
- the presence of severe intellectual disabilities or mental illness (these individuals will be referred to other local services)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Peru1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Centro Patrizio Peyton
Lima
Laura Miller-Graff, PhD, 574-631-3245, lmiller8@nd.edu
About this study
Recent advances in intervention research have revealed the promise of transdiagnostic, modular approaches implemented by lay paraprofessionals for the treatment of the most prevalent mental health concerns in settings affected by adversity (e.g., anxiety, depression, posttraumatic stress), but to date, few effectiveness trials have examined the indirect effects of treatment on intergenerational and economic outcomes or moderators of treatment effectiveness. There is thus a critical need not only for the continued expansion of the evidence-basis for care in low-resource settings, but also for the evaluation of factors contributing to effectiveness across multiple dimensions to gain a better understanding of the sustainability, long-term benefits, and cost-effectiveness of these approaches. The current study will conduct a rigorous evaluation of an existing program, the Common Elements Treatment Approach (CETA) with women (N=300) who are mothers of young children (ages 4-6). The trial will take place in the context of an integrated community care setting in Lima, Peru's most populous and impoverished district, San Juan de Lurigancho. The primary aims are to (1) evaluate the primary and indirect effects of CETA (2) examine moderators of treatment effectiveness, including implementation quality and neighborhood factors and (3) examine CETA's cost effectiveness. The central hypotheses are that (H1a) CETA will improve women's mental health, intimate partner violence, and parenting and that (H1b) CETA will have indirect benefits for women's economic outcomes and for their children's adjustment. It is also hypothesized (H2) that effectiveness will be enhanced by strong implementation quality and the presence of neighborhood promotive factors, and weakened by neighborhood disadvantage. Hypotheses will be evaluated using an RCT employing a longitudinal design with assessments at baseline (T1), post-test (T2), 6-month follow-up (T3) and 12-month follow-up (T4). Women will be randomized into the intervention condition (CETA + Enhanced Case Management [ECM]) or the comparison condition (ECM). Robust, multi-source (i.e., participant, therapist, supervisor, census data) and multi-method data (i.e., interview, observational assessment, google street view coding) will be gathered. The contribution will be significant by advancing research on both direct and long-term benefits of maternal mental health care for family systems, and is likely to provide important insights into the sustainability and cost effectiveness of these approaches. The expected outcome is an evidence-based, cost-effective, integrated approach to maternal mental health care that can be readily implemented by local organizations. Further, it is anticipated that learnings from this project will respond to broader global public health concerns and provide opportunity for cross-context reciprocal innovation. Expanding the evaluation of CETA delivered in Spanish not only has advantages for the specific context under study, but provides an important foundation for addressing health disparities in Spanish-language mental health services in the US as well.
Read the detailed description
The study will occur in the San Juan de Lurigancho district of Lima, Peru. Women who are mothers of children between the ages of 4 and 6 (N=300) will be recruited. Every effort will be made to recruit a diverse sample that reflects the demographics of the local community. Implementation of the project will be done through the Instituto de Pastoral de La Familia (INFAM), a community care organization offering a range of social services to families living in San Juan de Lurigancho district. Participants will be recruited from the community using direct referrals, self-referrals, and via informational flyers at local organizations.
Interested and potentially eligible women will contact the project coordinator, who will conduct an eligibility screen. In order to participate, women must: (1) live in San Juan de Lurigancho, Lima, Peru, (2) be at least 18 years of age, (3) have a child between the ages of 4 and 6, and (4) have the ability to travel to INFAM for study assessments and treatment sessions. Exclusion criteria include: (1) living outside of San Juan de Lurigancho, (2) those who are unable or unwilling to attend in-person sessions, or (3) the presence of severe intellectual disabilities or mental illness (these individuals will be referred to other local services). After confirming eligibility and interest, the most effective means of contacting the participant will also be established, including days and times in which calls can be accepted. Interested women will then be scheduled for a baseline interview, which will be conducted by trained research staff.
Enrollment will continue for approximately 1.75 years. The expected duration of the study for each participant will be approximately 14.5 months.
The primary aims of the of the proposed project are to: (1) evaluate the primary and indirect effects of CETA, (2) examine moderators of treatment effectiveness, including implementation quality and neighborhood factors, and (3) examine cost-effectiveness.
This objective will be evaluated in a randomized clinical trial with women (N=300) assigned to one of two conditions: Common Elements Treatment Approach + Enhanced Case Management (CETA + ECM) or ECM alone. Enhanced case management is considered the standard of care in this context. Women will be individually randomized at a 1:1 ratio across conditions.
CETA was specifically designed for implementation with lay paraprofessionals working in LMICs. It focuses on transdiagnostic approaches to addressing anxiety, posttraumatic stress, and depression. It also includes intervention elements related to IPV and caregiving CETA employs a flexible approach that is guided by the specific symptom presentation of the individual, thus balancing standardization and personalization - a key priority in global mental health. Components of CETA include the following modules: Engagement, Psychoeducation, Anxiety Management Strategies, Behavioral Activation, Cognitive Coping/Restructuring, Imaginal Gradual Exposure, In Vivo Exposure, Suicide/Homicide/Danger Assessment and Planning, and Screening/Brief Intervention for Alcohol. Recent work on CETA has also included a Caregiver Skills component, which aims to teach caregivers effective parenting skills, such as praise, selective attention, special time/positive attention, and behavior management. Depending upon client presentation, as informed by both baseline assessments and clinical presentation, CETA may range in length from 8-12, 1.5 hour sessions.
ECM will be provided to women in both conditions. ECM will include four stages: intake, referral, guided support, and follow-up. At intake, women will participate in a structured interview that includes a brief assessment of risk and protective factors in the following domains: social, economic, daily living, basic needs, and physical and mental health. Depending on assessed needs, women will be referred for relevant services either at INFAM or in the local community. As needed, the social worker will provide guided support for accessing services (e.g., coordinating with local clinics, helping with paperwork for insurance applications). Following this referral and support process, the social worker completes the social services support by conducting a follow-up interview to ascertain progress in accessing referrals and documents women's progress toward identified social service referral goals.
Baseline and post-test/follow-up questionnaires will each take approximately 2-2.5 hours, and will be administered at INFAM. Prior to beginning the baseline interviews, informed consent will be obtained in accord with current regulations enforced by local law and the institutional review board. During the informed consent process, participants will be informed of the purpose and general content of the program, and confidentiality guidelines and procedures will be reviewed. Interviewers will be trained employees of INFAM, all of whom will receive extensive training on clinical interview methods. They will be supervised by the project coordinator and by a local psychologist. Interviewers will complete a training co-designed by the PI, Co-Is and Consultants; standards of (1) the Notre Dame IRB, (2) standards for scientifically survey evaluation research, and (3) standards for clinical care at in the context of work with high-risk populations to gather sensitive information.
Primary outcome measures for the effectiveness evaluation will be Maternal Mental Health (Anxiety, Depression Posttraumatic Stress), IPV, and Parenting.
- Conditions
- Violence, Parenting, Poverty, Depression, Mental Health, Posttraumatic Stress
- Being tested
- Common Elements Treatment Approach, Enhanced Case Managment
- Medical subject headings
- Depression, Psychological Well-Being
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Common Elements Treatment ApproachBehavioural
Also called CETA
CETA was designed for implementation with lay paraprofessionals working in LMICs. It has shown evidence of effectiveness in addressing posttraumatic stress, depression, anxiety, IPV, substance use, and suicide/safety issues. CETA employs a precision science approach using a modular framework. That is, all participants receive a common core of elements (i.e., Engagement, Cognitive Coping/Restructuring, [and for this study] Caregiver Skills) with additional specific elements guided by individual symptom presentation, thus balancing standardization and personalization. Elements of CETA include: Engagement, Psychoeducation, Anxiety Management Strategies, Behavioral Activation, Cognitive Coping/Restructuring, Imaginal \& Live Gradual Exposure, Suicide/Homicide/Danger Assessment and Planning, and Substance Use CBT/MI for Alcohol and Drug Use. The Caregiver Skills module includes information about effective parenting skills for preschool-aged children such as praise, selective
Enhanced Case ManagmentBehavioural
Women assigned to both conditions will receive ECM, which is a standardized (already existing) service at INFAM that includes four stages: intake, referral, guided support, and follow-up. At intake, women will participate in a structured interview that includes a brief assessment of multisystem risk and protective factors (i.e., social, economic, daily living, basic needs, and physical and mental health). Depending on assessed needs, women will be referred to relevant services. As needed, the social worker will provide guided support for accessing services (e.g., helping with paperwork for insurance applications). The ECM process is concluded by a follow-up interview to ascertain progress in accessing referrals and documents women's progress toward identified social service referral goals across domains.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| CETA + Enhanced Case Management | Experimental | Participants receiving CETA will receive a modular CBT 1-on-1 therapeutic program for approximately 12 weeks. They will also receive access to the standard of care provided by the partner agency (enhanced case management). Receives: Behavioral: Common Elements Treatment Approach; Behavioral: Enhanced Case Managment |
| Enhanced Case Management | Active comparator | ECM will include a needs assessment and referral to needed resources, with a follow-up interview after approximately 12 weeks to see which resources were accessed. Receives: Behavioral: Enhanced Case Managment |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Depression
Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale: Scores from from 0 to 60, where low scores indicate better outcomes.
Measured: Baseline, 12-week post-test, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up
Posttraumatic Stress
PTSD Checklist for DSM-5: Scores range from 0 to 80, where lower scores indicate better outcomes.
Measured: Baseline, 12-week post-test, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up
Anxiety
Generalized Anxiety Disorder - 7: Scores range from 0-21, with lower scores indicating better outcomes.
Measured: Baseline, 12-week post-test, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up
Wellbeing
WHO-5 Wellbeing Index: Scores range from 0-25 with higher scores indicating better outcomes.
Measured: Baseline, 12-week post-test, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up
Intimate Partner Violence
Escala de Violencia; Scores range from 0-3, with lower scores indicating lower frequency of violence.
Measured: Baseline, 12-week post-test, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up
Parenting - observed
Dyadic Parent Child Interaction Coding System: Scoring is a tally based system based on number of specific behaviors present; low scores indicate lower frequency of behavior and higher scores indicate higher frequency of behavior. Range floor is zero, with no set ceiling.
Measured: Baseline, 12-week post-test, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up
Parenting - Self-reported
Alabama Parenting Scale - Preschool Version: Positive parenting ranges from 0-48, inconsistent parenting from 0-28 and punitive parenting from 0-20. Higher scores indicate higher frequency of parenting behavior.
Measured: Baseline, 12 week post-test, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up
Secondary outcomes (7)
Child Adjustment
Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire; Total adjustment problems range from 0 to 40, with lower scores indicating lower levels of adjustment problems. Prosocial skills scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating better prosocial skills.
Measured: Baseline, 12 week post-test, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up
Emotion regulation & prosocial skills
Social Competence Scale: Emotion regulation scores range from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating better emotion regulation; prosocial skills range from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating better prosocial skills.
Measured: Baseline, 12 week post-test, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up
Days out of work
Days spent out of work in the past month - range of 0 to 30
Measured: Baseline, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up
Investment in children
Amount of money (in soles) invested in children in the past month. Floor of range is zero; no set ceiling.
Measured: Baseline, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up
Time investment in children
Amount of time spent doing activities with children: Range from 0 to 6, with higher values indicating more time spent with children.
Measured: Baseline, 12 week post-test, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up
WHO Disability Index (selected items)
6 items evaluating difficulties with concentration, work and health impacts: Range 0-24 with lower scores indicating better outcomes.
Measured: Baseline, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up
Decisions in the home
6 items maternal role in decision making on a variety of topics; responses are categorical by decision maker (i.e., you, your partner, you and your partner together, someone else, you with someone else, N/A)
Measured: Baseline, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Jun 2026
- Study start18 May 2026
- Primary completion30 Apr 2030 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Apr 2030 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for ViolenceStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 600 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Notre Dame
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07667738
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 25-09-9575
- Other IDs
- R01HD116815
- Status last verified
- Jun 2026
- First submitted
- 5 Jun 2026
- Last updated
- 25 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: De-identified data will be shared at the conclusion of the study.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Common Elements Treatment Approach (CETA) in Peru: Mechanisms of Individual and Intergenerational Change
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07667738
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 25-09-9575
- Conditions
- Violence, Parenting, Poverty, Depression, Mental Health, Posttraumatic Stress
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 600 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Notre DameUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
- Study start
- 18 May 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Apr 2030 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Apr 2030 (estimated)
- First posted
- 25 Jun 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Recent advances in intervention research have revealed the promise of transdiagnostic, modular approaches implemented by lay paraprofessionals for the treatment of the most prevalent mental health concerns in settings affected by adversity (e.g., anxiety, depression, posttraumatic stress), but to date, few effectiveness trials have examined the indirect effects of treatment on intergenerational and economic outcomes or moderators of treatment effectiveness. There is thus a critical need not only for the continued expansion of the evidence-basis for care in low-resource settings, but also for the evaluation of factors contributing to effectiveness across multiple dimensions to gain a better understanding of the sustainability, long-term benefits, and cost-effectiveness of these approaches. The current study will conduct a rigorous evaluation of an existing program, the Common Elements Treatment Approach (CETA) with women (N=300) who are mothers of young children (ages 4-6). The trial will take place in the context of an integrated community care setting in Lima, Peru's most populous and impoverished district, San Juan de Lurigancho. The primary aims are to (1) evaluate the primary and indirect effects of CETA (2) examine moderators of treatment effectiveness, including implementation quality and neighborhood factors and (3) examine CETA's cost effectiveness. The central hypotheses are that (H1a) CETA will improve women's mental health, intimate partner violence, and parenting and that (H1b) CETA will have indirect benefits for women's economic outcomes and for their children's adjustment. It is also hypothesized (H2) that effectiveness will be enhanced by strong implementation quality and the presence of neighborhood promotive factors, and weakened by neighborhood disadvantage. Hypotheses will be evaluated using an RCT employing a longitudinal design with assessments at baseline (T1), post-test (T2), 6-month follow-up (T3) and 12-month follow-up (T4). Women will be randomized into the intervention condition (CETA + Enhanced Case Management [ECM]) or the comparison condition (ECM). Robust, multi-source (i.e., participant, therapist, supervisor, census data) and multi-method data (i.e., interview, observational assessment, google street view coding) will be gathered. The contribution will be significant by advancing research on both direct and long-term benefits of maternal mental health care for family systems, and is likely to provide important insights into the sustainability and cost effectiveness of these approaches. The expected outcome is an evidence-based, cost-effective, integrated approach to maternal mental health care that can be readily implemented by local organizations. Further, it is anticipated that learnings from this project will respond to broader global public health concerns and provide opportunity for cross-context reciprocal innovation. Expanding the evaluation of CETA delivered in Spanish not only has advantages for the specific context under study, but provides an important foundation for addressing health disparities in Spanish-language mental health services in the US as well.
Detailed description
The study will occur in the San Juan de Lurigancho district of Lima, Peru. Women who are mothers of children between the ages of 4 and 6 (N=300) will be recruited. Every effort will be made to recruit a diverse sample that reflects the demographics of the local community. Implementation of the project will be done through the Instituto de Pastoral de La Familia (INFAM), a community care organization offering a range of social services to families living in San Juan de Lurigancho district. Participants will be recruited from the community using direct referrals, self-referrals, and via informational flyers at local organizations.
Interested and potentially eligible women will contact the project coordinator, who will conduct an eligibility screen. In order to participate, women must: (1) live in San Juan de Lurigancho, Lima, Peru, (2) be at least 18 years of age, (3) have a child between the ages of 4 and 6, and (4) have the ability to travel to INFAM for study assessments and treatment sessions. Exclusion criteria include: (1) living outside of San Juan de Lurigancho, (2) those who are unable or unwilling to attend in-person sessions, or (3) the presence of severe intellectual disabilities or mental illness (these individuals will be referred to other local services). After confirming eligibility and interest, the most effective means of contacting the participant will also be established, including days and times in which calls can be accepted. Interested women will then be scheduled for a baseline interview, which will be conducted by trained research staff.
Enrollment will continue for approximately 1.75 years. The expected duration of the study for each participant will be approximately 14.5 months.
The primary aims of the of the proposed project are to: (1) evaluate the primary and indirect effects of CETA, (2) examine moderators of treatment effectiveness, including implementation quality and neighborhood factors, and (3) examine cost-effectiveness.
This objective will be evaluated in a randomized clinical trial with women (N=300) assigned to one of two conditions: Common Elements Treatment Approach + Enhanced Case Management (CETA + ECM) or ECM alone. Enhanced case management is considered the standard of care in this context. Women will be individually randomized at a 1:1 ratio across conditions.
CETA was specifically designed for implementation with lay paraprofessionals working in LMICs. It focuses on transdiagnostic approaches to addressing anxiety, posttraumatic stress, and depression. It also includes intervention elements related to IPV and caregiving CETA employs a flexible approach that is guided by the specific symptom presentation of the individual, thus balancing standardization and personalization - a key priority in global mental health. Components of CETA include the following modules: Engagement, Psychoeducation, Anxiety Management Strategies, Behavioral Activation, Cognitive Coping/Restructuring, Imaginal Gradual Exposure, In Vivo Exposure, Suicide/Homicide/Danger Assessment and Planning, and Screening/Brief Intervention for Alcohol. Recent work on CETA has also included a Caregiver Skills component, which aims to teach caregivers effective parenting skills, such as praise, selective attention, special time/positive attention, and behavior management. Depending upon client presentation, as informed by both baseline assessments and clinical presentation, CETA may range in length from 8-12, 1.5 hour sessions.
ECM will be provided to women in both conditions. ECM will include four stages: intake, referral, guided support, and follow-up. At intake, women will participate in a structured interview that includes a brief assessment of risk and protective factors in the following domains: social, economic, daily living, basic needs, and physical and mental health. Depending on assessed needs, women will be referred for relevant services either at INFAM or in the local community. As needed, the social worker will provide guided support for accessing services (e.g., coordinating with local clinics, helping with paperwork for insurance applications). Following this referral and support process, the social worker completes the social services support by conducting a follow-up interview to ascertain progress in accessing referrals and documents women's progress toward identified social service referral goals.
Baseline and post-test/follow-up questionnaires will each take approximately 2-2.5 hours, and will be administered at INFAM. Prior to beginning the baseline interviews, informed consent will be obtained in accord with current regulations enforced by local law and the institutional review board. During the informed consent process, participants will be informed of the purpose and general content of the program, and confidentiality guidelines and procedures will be reviewed. Interviewers will be trained employees of INFAM, all of whom will receive extensive training on clinical interview methods. They will be supervised by the project coordinator and by a local psychologist. Interviewers will complete a training co-designed by the PI, Co-Is and Consultants; standards of (1) the Notre Dame IRB, (2) standards for scientifically survey evaluation research, and (3) standards for clinical care at in the context of work with high-risk populations to gather sensitive information.
Primary outcome measures for the effectiveness evaluation will be Maternal Mental Health (Anxiety, Depression Posttraumatic Stress), IPV, and Parenting.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| CETA + Enhanced Case Management | Experimental | Behavioral: Common Elements Treatment Approach, Behavioral: Enhanced Case ManagmentParticipants receiving CETA will receive a modular CBT 1-on-1 therapeutic program for approximately 12 weeks. They will also receive access to the standard of care provided by the partner agency (enhanced case management). |
| Enhanced Case Management | Active comparator | Behavioral: Enhanced Case ManagmentECM will include a needs assessment and referral to needed resources, with a follow-up interview after approximately 12 weeks to see which resources were accessed. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- live in San Juan de Lurigancho, Lima, Peru,
- be at least 18 years of age,
- have a child between the ages of 4 and 6, and
- have the ability to travel to INFAM for study assessments and treatment sessions
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- living outside of San Juan de Lurigancho,
- those who are unable or unwilling to attend in-person sessions, or
- the presence of severe intellectual disabilities or mental illness (these individuals will be referred to other local services)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Common Elements Treatment ApproachAlso: CETACETA was designed for implementation with lay paraprofessionals working in LMICs. It has shown evidence of effectiveness in addressing posttraumatic stress, depression, anxiety, IPV, substance use, and suicide/safety issues. CETA employs a precision science approach using a modular framework. That is, all participants receive a common core of elements (i.e., Engagement, Cognitive Coping/Restructuring, [and for this study] Caregiver Skills) with additional specific elements guided by individual symptom presentation, thus balancing standardization and personalization. Elements of CETA include: Engagement, Psychoeducation, Anxiety Management Strategies, Behavioral Activation, Cognitive Coping/Restructuring, Imaginal \& Live Gradual Exposure, Suicide/Homicide/Danger Assessment and Planning, and Substance Use CBT/MI for Alcohol and Drug Use. The Caregiver Skills module includes information about effective parenting skills for preschool-aged children such as praise, selective | Behavioural | CETA + Enhanced Case Management |
| Enhanced Case ManagmentWomen assigned to both conditions will receive ECM, which is a standardized (already existing) service at INFAM that includes four stages: intake, referral, guided support, and follow-up. At intake, women will participate in a structured interview that includes a brief assessment of multisystem risk and protective factors (i.e., social, economic, daily living, basic needs, and physical and mental health). Depending on assessed needs, women will be referred to relevant services. As needed, the social worker will provide guided support for accessing services (e.g., helping with paperwork for insurance applications). The ECM process is concluded by a follow-up interview to ascertain progress in accessing referrals and documents women's progress toward identified social service referral goals across domains. | Behavioural | CETA + Enhanced Case Management, Enhanced Case Management |
Primary outcome
Depression
Time frame: Baseline, 12-week post-test, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up
Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale: Scores from from 0 to 60, where low scores indicate better outcomes.
Posttraumatic Stress
Time frame: Baseline, 12-week post-test, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up
PTSD Checklist for DSM-5: Scores range from 0 to 80, where lower scores indicate better outcomes.
Anxiety
Time frame: Baseline, 12-week post-test, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up
Generalized Anxiety Disorder - 7: Scores range from 0-21, with lower scores indicating better outcomes.
Wellbeing
Time frame: Baseline, 12-week post-test, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up
WHO-5 Wellbeing Index: Scores range from 0-25 with higher scores indicating better outcomes.
Intimate Partner Violence
Time frame: Baseline, 12-week post-test, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up
Escala de Violencia; Scores range from 0-3, with lower scores indicating lower frequency of violence.
Parenting - observed
Time frame: Baseline, 12-week post-test, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up
Dyadic Parent Child Interaction Coding System: Scoring is a tally based system based on number of specific behaviors present; low scores indicate lower frequency of behavior and higher scores indicate higher frequency of behavior. Range floor is zero, with no set ceiling.
Parenting - Self-reported
Time frame: Baseline, 12 week post-test, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up
Alabama Parenting Scale - Preschool Version: Positive parenting ranges from 0-48, inconsistent parenting from 0-28 and punitive parenting from 0-20. Higher scores indicate higher frequency of parenting behavior.
7 secondary outcomes
Child Adjustment
Time frame: Baseline, 12 week post-test, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up
Emotion regulation & prosocial skills
Time frame: Baseline, 12 week post-test, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up
Days out of work
Time frame: Baseline, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up
Investment in children
Time frame: Baseline, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up
Time investment in children
Time frame: Baseline, 12 week post-test, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up
WHO Disability Index (selected items)
Time frame: Baseline, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up
Decisions in the home
Time frame: Baseline, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Jun 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. De-identified data will be shared at the conclusion of the study.
Related trials for Violence
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Women Who Are Victims of Violence: Treatment of PTSD Through Reactivation of Traumatic Memories Using Propranolol
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, PTSD
Not yet recruiting
A Patient Navigation Trial for Housing and Health (PATHH)
Housing Instability, Health and Social Services
Active, not recruiting
Supportive Hospital-Based Intervention for Firearm Trauma
Gun Violence Prevention, Adolescent Behavior
Active, not recruiting
What Works to Prevent Violence Against Women and Girls in Madagascar
Comprehensive Sexual Education
Not yet recruiting
BEAR for Women Who Have Experienced Sexual Assault and Have Suicidal Thoughts
Sexual Assault and Rape, Suicidal Thoughts
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Common Elements Treatment Approach and Enhanced Case Managment in people with Violence and Parenting, run by University of Notre Dame at 1 site in Peru.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Peru. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Laura Miller-Graff, PhD (574-631-3245, lmiller8@nd.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Depression (time frame: Baseline, 12-week post-test, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up). The study lists 7 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Jun 2026.