Prematurity ComplicationsPhase 1NCT07667049
Gut Permeability and Microbiome in Preterm Infants
A Phase 1 study testing measurement of intestinal permeability in people with Prematurity Complications, run by University of Maryland, Baltimore at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
NEC, a life-threatening, GI emergency characterized by increased IP, affects approximately 7 to 10% of preterm neonates, and typically occurs within 7 to 14 days of birth with mortality as high as 30-50%. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages Up to 4 days
- Conditions the study is for
- Prematurity Complications
- What is being tested?
- measurement of intestinal permeability
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 150 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 30 Sep 2026to 30 Dec 2027
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Up to 4 days
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- <5 days Gestational age 24-32 weeks
Who cannot join
- Nonviable or planned withdrawal of care
- Significant GI dysfunction (e.g. heme-positive stools, abdominal distension (girth >2 cm baseline), or bilious emesis/ aspirates.
- Triplet or higher order multiple
- Severe asphyxia
- Lethal chromosome abnormalities
- Cyanotic congenital heart disease
Show all 9Show fewer
- Intestinal atresia or perforation
- Abdominal wall defects
- Known galactosemia or other galactose intolerance
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
University of Maryland
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201
Sripriya Sundararajan, MD, 410 328 6003, ssundararajan@som.umaryland.edu
Bing Ma, Ph.D., 6083344877, mba@som.umaryland.edu
About this study
Official title: Gut Permeability and Microbiome in Very Low Birth Weight Preterm Neonates.
NEC, a life-threatening, GI emergency characterized by increased IP, affects approximately 7 to 10% of preterm neonates, and typically occurs within 7 to 14 days of birth with mortality as high as 30-50%. NEC symptoms mainly involve GI dysfunction, such as abdominal distension and feeding intolerance, but the presentation can be non-specific with few warning signs. Current therapies may be invasive, including surgical interventions that are often ineffective due to the rapid progression of the disease. Prematurity is the greatest risk factor for development of NEC due to physiological immaturity of the GI tract and altered levels of the normal GI microbiota. Several studies suggest that the initiation of an intense systemic and local inflammatory cascade leads to intestinal necrosis . Antenatal exposure to infection/inflammation may predispose the developing intestinal mucosa to subsequent injury or dysregulated inflammatory responses. Previous studies have linked presence of amniotic fluid infection/elevated cytokines, cord blood cytokines, and umbilical cord inflammation with risk for NEC in preterm neonates. In a rat model of NEC, maternal prenatal exposure to microbial LPS led to increased frequency and severity of intestinal injury. Taken together, these observations suggest that intestinal injury may be initiated in utero and contributes to increased IP at birth in the preterm neonate. Many of the defense mechanisms present in the mature intestine, such as peristalsis and tight junctions between intestinal epithelial cells are decreased in an immature intestine, and thus bacteria normally confined to the intestinal lumen are able to reach systemic organs and tissues. Bacterial translocation triggers the activation of an exaggerated inflammatory response, which leads to further epithelial damage. Our analysis of the initial cohort of 43 preterm infants, and others' previous studies have shown that IP is high at birth in preterms (<33wk gestation) with a rapid maturation of the intestinal barrier over the first 2 weeks. However, in some infants, high IP persisted and/or recurred in association with altered levels of the normal microbiota (bacteria community composition). Specifically, the investigators observed that (1) rapid maturation of intestinal barrier function, characterized by decreased IP, correlates with increased microbial community diversity (Figure 1), and most outstandingly, the increased abundance of beneficial bacteria Clostridiales (Figure 2); (2) Clostridiales is highly transcriptionally active and co-active with the probiotic bacterium Bifidobacterium; (3) neonatal factors, including early introduction of breast milk, shorter period of antibiotic exposure, and later gestational age, favor the early colonization of the gut microbiota by members of Clostridiales and Bifidobacterium, which altogether are associated with improved intestinal barrier in preterm infants; (4) low Clostridiales spp. abundance (<5%) and early gestational age (<31.7wk) were identified to be the most discriminatory features for elevated IP by supervised learning scheme, reaching an accuracy of 86.1%. (5) Clostridiales and Bifidobacteriales are the most abundant bacteria groups in later stages (phase II/III at 6-18 months of age) as shown in Figure 2, suggesting a process of gaining prosperity of these two bacterial groups during intestine development after birth. Altogether our preliminary results suggest the early colonization of the natural occurring probiotics strains Clostridiales and Bifidobacterium strongly associate with rapid maturation of intestinal barrier function, and their measurement are highly promising for early detection and as potential nutritional supplement to prevent NEC in the high-risk preterm population. Investigators propose in this study to recruit additional 150 mother-infant dyads (justified in study size analysis in research design), to address our hypothesis that the two naturally occurring beneficial bacteria Clostridiales and Bifidobacterium are rapidly gaining prosperity during normal intestine development in association with improved barrier function measured by La/Rh ratio. This continuation of the initial study builds on the previous findings that identified commensal bacteria Clostridiales and Bifidobacterium species as a strong indicator to the lowered IP and rapid maturation of intestinal barrier, to substantiate measurement of these probiotic strains combined with associated neonatal factors to form an accurate, rapid detection of intestinal permeability abnormality. The investigators propose in this study to recruit additional 150 mother-infant dyads (justified in study size analysis in research design), to address our hypothesis that the two naturally occurring beneficial bacteria Clostridiales and Bifidobacterium are rapidly gaining prosperity during normal intestine development in association with improved barrier function measured by La/Rh ratio.
- Conditions
- Prematurity Complications
- Being tested
- measurement of intestinal permeability
- Keywords
- Intestinal permeability, necrotizing enterocolitis, preterm infants, dual sugar probe test
- Medical subject headings
- Enterocolitis, Necrotizing
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
measurement of intestinal permeabilityDrug
Measure intestinal permeability by use of non-digestable sugars known to not cross the intestinal barrier in normal healthy intestinal tissue.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Lactulose-Rhamnose solution | Other | Not described Receives: Drug: measurement of intestinal permeability |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Measurement of intestinal permeability
The study outcome measures will be intestinal permeability (quantitative) and leaky gut (binary). Increased levels of urine Lactulose/Rhamnose [La/Rh] ratio >0.05 will identify infants with increased intestinal permeability (IP).
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Jun 2026
- Study start30 Sep 2026
- Primary completion30 Oct 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Dec 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (12)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Prematurity ComplicationsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Maryland, Baltimore
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Sripriya Sundararajan, University of Maryland, Baltimore
- Investigators
- Marcela Pasetti, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Maryland
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07667049
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HP-00110340
- Other IDs
- 125-10212000-M33003-TPPRGGRT-2
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 18 Jun 2026
- Last updated
- 5 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
van Elburg RM, Fetter WP, Bunkers CM, Heymans HS. Intestinal permeability in relation to birth weight and gestational and postnatal age. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2003 Jan;88(1):F52-5. doi: 10.1136/fn.88.1.f52.
PubMed 12496227Noone C, Menzies IS, Banatvala JE, Scopes JW. Intestinal permeability and lactose hydrolysis in human rotaviral gastroenteritis assessed simultaneously by non-invasive differential sugar permeation. Eur J Clin Invest. 1986 Jun;16(3):217-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.1986.tb01332.x.
PubMed 3089818Malagon I, Onkenhout W, Klok M, van der Poel PF, Bovill JG, Hazekamp MG. Gut permeability in neonates after a stage 1 Norwood procedure. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2005 Sep;6(5):547-9. doi: 10.1097/01.pcc.0000175990.72753.97.
PubMed 16148815Piena M, Albers MJ, Van Haard PM, Gischler S, Tibboel D. Introduction of enteral feeding in neonates on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation after evaluation of intestinal permeability changes. J Pediatr Surg. 1998 Jan;33(1):30-4. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(98)90355-4.
PubMed 9473094Albers MJ, Steyerberg EW, Hazebroek FW, Mourik M, Borsboom GJ, Rietveld T, Huijmans JG, Tibboel D. Glutamine supplementation of parenteral nutrition does not improve intestinal permeability, nitrogen balance, or outcome in newborns and infants undergoing digestive-tract surgery: results from a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2005 Apr;241(4):599-606. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000157270.24991.71.
PubMed 15798461Rouwet EV, Heineman E, Buurman WA, ter Riet G, Ramsay G, Blanco CE. Intestinal permeability and carrier-mediated monosaccharide absorption in preterm neonates during the early postnatal period. Pediatr Res. 2002 Jan;51(1):64-70. doi: 10.1203/00006450-200201000-00012.
PubMed 11756641Piena-Spoel M, Albers MJ, ten Kate J, Tibboel D. Intestinal permeability in newborns with necrotizing enterocolitis and controls: Does the sugar absorption test provide guidelines for the time to (re-)introduce enteral nutrition? J Pediatr Surg. 2001 Apr;36(4):587-92. doi: 10.1053/jpsu.2001.22288.
PubMed 11283883Beach RC, Menzies IS, Clayden GS, Scopes JW. Gastrointestinal permeability changes in the preterm neonate. Arch Dis Child. 1982 Feb;57(2):141-5. doi: 10.1136/adc.57.2.141.
PubMed 7065710van Wijck K, Verlinden TJ, van Eijk HM, Dekker J, Buurman WA, Dejong CH, Lenaerts K. Novel multi-sugar assay for site-specific gastrointestinal permeability analysis: a randomized controlled crossover trial. Clin Nutr. 2013 Apr;32(2):245-51. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2012.06.014. Epub 2012 Aug 11.
PubMed 22892368van Wijck K, Bessems BA, van Eijk HM, Buurman WA, Dejong CH, Lenaerts K. Polyethylene glycol versus dual sugar assay for gastrointestinal permeability analysis: is it time to choose? Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2012;5:139-50. doi: 10.2147/CEG.S31799. Epub 2012 Jul 19.
PubMed 22888267Bjarnason I. Intestinal permeability. Gut. 1994 Jan;35(1 Suppl):S18-22. doi: 10.1136/gut.35.1_suppl.s18.
PubMed 8125384Fasano A. Physiological, pathological, and therapeutic implications of zonulin-mediated intestinal barrier modulation: living life on the edge of the wall. Am J Pathol. 2008 Nov;173(5):1243-52. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2008.080192. Epub 2008 Oct 2.
PubMed 18832585
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Gut Permeability and Microbiome in Very Low Birth Weight Preterm Neonates.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07667049
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HP-00110340
- Conditions
- Prematurity Complications
- Keywords
- Intestinal permeability, necrotizing enterocolitis, preterm infants, dual sugar probe test
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Maryland, BaltimoreUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 30 Sep 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Oct 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 24 Jun 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
NEC, a life-threatening, GI emergency characterized by increased IP, affects approximately 7 to 10% of preterm neonates, and typically occurs within 7 to 14 days of birth with mortality as high as 30-50%. NEC symptoms mainly involve GI dysfunction, such as abdominal distension and feeding intolerance, but the presentation can be non-specific with few warning signs. Current therapies may be invasive, including surgical interventions that are often ineffective due to the rapid progression of the disease. Prematurity is the greatest risk factor for development of NEC due to physiological immaturity of the GI tract and altered levels of the normal GI microbiota. Several studies suggest that the initiation of an intense systemic and local inflammatory cascade leads to intestinal necrosis . Antenatal exposure to infection/inflammation may predispose the developing intestinal mucosa to subsequent injury or dysregulated inflammatory responses. Previous studies have linked presence of amniotic fluid infection/elevated cytokines, cord blood cytokines, and umbilical cord inflammation with risk for NEC in preterm neonates. In a rat model of NEC, maternal prenatal exposure to microbial LPS led to increased frequency and severity of intestinal injury. Taken together, these observations suggest that intestinal injury may be initiated in utero and contributes to increased IP at birth in the preterm neonate. Many of the defense mechanisms present in the mature intestine, such as peristalsis and tight junctions between intestinal epithelial cells are decreased in an immature intestine, and thus bacteria normally confined to the intestinal lumen are able to reach systemic organs and tissues. Bacterial translocation triggers the activation of an exaggerated inflammatory response, which leads to further epithelial damage. Our analysis of the initial cohort of 43 preterm infants, and others' previous studies have shown that IP is high at birth in preterms (<33wk gestation) with a rapid maturation of the intestinal barrier over the first 2 weeks. However, in some infants, high IP persisted and/or recurred in association with altered levels of the normal microbiota (bacteria community composition). Specifically, the investigators observed that (1) rapid maturation of intestinal barrier function, characterized by decreased IP, correlates with increased microbial community diversity (Figure 1), and most outstandingly, the increased abundance of beneficial bacteria Clostridiales (Figure 2); (2) Clostridiales is highly transcriptionally active and co-active with the probiotic bacterium Bifidobacterium; (3) neonatal factors, including early introduction of breast milk, shorter period of antibiotic exposure, and later gestational age, favor the early colonization of the gut microbiota by members of Clostridiales and Bifidobacterium, which altogether are associated with improved intestinal barrier in preterm infants; (4) low Clostridiales spp. abundance (<5%) and early gestational age (<31.7wk) were identified to be the most discriminatory features for elevated IP by supervised learning scheme, reaching an accuracy of 86.1%. (5) Clostridiales and Bifidobacteriales are the most abundant bacteria groups in later stages (phase II/III at 6-18 months of age) as shown in Figure 2, suggesting a process of gaining prosperity of these two bacterial groups during intestine development after birth. Altogether our preliminary results suggest the early colonization of the natural occurring probiotics strains Clostridiales and Bifidobacterium strongly associate with rapid maturation of intestinal barrier function, and their measurement are highly promising for early detection and as potential nutritional supplement to prevent NEC in the high-risk preterm population. Investigators propose in this study to recruit additional 150 mother-infant dyads (justified in study size analysis in research design), to address our hypothesis that the two naturally occurring beneficial bacteria Clostridiales and Bifidobacterium are rapidly gaining prosperity during normal intestine development in association with improved barrier function measured by La/Rh ratio. This continuation of the initial study builds on the previous findings that identified commensal bacteria Clostridiales and Bifidobacterium species as a strong indicator to the lowered IP and rapid maturation of intestinal barrier, to substantiate measurement of these probiotic strains combined with associated neonatal factors to form an accurate, rapid detection of intestinal permeability abnormality. The investigators propose in this study to recruit additional 150 mother-infant dyads (justified in study size analysis in research design), to address our hypothesis that the two naturally occurring beneficial bacteria Clostridiales and Bifidobacterium are rapidly gaining prosperity during normal intestine development in association with improved barrier function measured by La/Rh ratio.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Lactulose-Rhamnose solution | Other | Drug: measurement of intestinal permeability |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- Up to 4 days
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- <5 days Gestational age 24-32 weeks
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Nonviable or planned withdrawal of care
- Significant GI dysfunction (e.g. heme-positive stools, abdominal distension (girth >2 cm baseline), or bilious emesis/ aspirates.
- Triplet or higher order multiple
- Severe asphyxia
- Lethal chromosome abnormalities
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| measurement of intestinal permeabilityMeasure intestinal permeability by use of non-digestable sugars known to not cross the intestinal barrier in normal healthy intestinal tissue. | Drug | Lactulose-Rhamnose solution |
Primary outcome
Measurement of intestinal permeability
Time frame: 1 year
The study outcome measures will be intestinal permeability (quantitative) and leaky gut (binary). Increased levels of urine Lactulose/Rhamnose [La/Rh] ratio >0.05 will identify infants with increased intestinal permeability (IP).
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Oct 2026.
- Background: PubMed 12496227van Elburg RM, Fetter WP, Bunkers CM, Heymans HS. Intestinal permeability in relation to birth weight and gestational and postnatal age. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2003 Jan;88(1):F52-5. doi: 10.1136/fn.88.1.f52.
- Background: PubMed 3089818Noone C, Menzies IS, Banatvala JE, Scopes JW. Intestinal permeability and lactose hydrolysis in human rotaviral gastroenteritis assessed simultaneously by non-invasive differential sugar permeation. Eur J Clin Invest. 1986 Jun;16(3):217-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.1986.tb01332.x.
- Background: PubMed 16148815Malagon I, Onkenhout W, Klok M, van der Poel PF, Bovill JG, Hazekamp MG. Gut permeability in neonates after a stage 1 Norwood procedure. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2005 Sep;6(5):547-9. doi: 10.1097/01.pcc.0000175990.72753.97.
- Background: PubMed 9473094Piena M, Albers MJ, Van Haard PM, Gischler S, Tibboel D. Introduction of enteral feeding in neonates on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation after evaluation of intestinal permeability changes. J Pediatr Surg. 1998 Jan;33(1):30-4. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(98)90355-4.
- Background: PubMed 15798461Albers MJ, Steyerberg EW, Hazebroek FW, Mourik M, Borsboom GJ, Rietveld T, Huijmans JG, Tibboel D. Glutamine supplementation of parenteral nutrition does not improve intestinal permeability, nitrogen balance, or outcome in newborns and infants undergoing digestive-tract surgery: results from a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2005 Apr;241(4):599-606. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000157270.24991.71.
- Background: PubMed 11756641Rouwet EV, Heineman E, Buurman WA, ter Riet G, Ramsay G, Blanco CE. Intestinal permeability and carrier-mediated monosaccharide absorption in preterm neonates during the early postnatal period. Pediatr Res. 2002 Jan;51(1):64-70. doi: 10.1203/00006450-200201000-00012.
- Background: PubMed 11283883Piena-Spoel M, Albers MJ, ten Kate J, Tibboel D. Intestinal permeability in newborns with necrotizing enterocolitis and controls: Does the sugar absorption test provide guidelines for the time to (re-)introduce enteral nutrition? J Pediatr Surg. 2001 Apr;36(4):587-92. doi: 10.1053/jpsu.2001.22288.
- Background: PubMed 7065710Beach RC, Menzies IS, Clayden GS, Scopes JW. Gastrointestinal permeability changes in the preterm neonate. Arch Dis Child. 1982 Feb;57(2):141-5. doi: 10.1136/adc.57.2.141.
- Background: PubMed 22892368van Wijck K, Verlinden TJ, van Eijk HM, Dekker J, Buurman WA, Dejong CH, Lenaerts K. Novel multi-sugar assay for site-specific gastrointestinal permeability analysis: a randomized controlled crossover trial. Clin Nutr. 2013 Apr;32(2):245-51. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2012.06.014. Epub 2012 Aug 11.
- Background: PubMed 22888267van Wijck K, Bessems BA, van Eijk HM, Buurman WA, Dejong CH, Lenaerts K. Polyethylene glycol versus dual sugar assay for gastrointestinal permeability analysis: is it time to choose? Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2012;5:139-50. doi: 10.2147/CEG.S31799. Epub 2012 Jul 19.
- Background: PubMed 8125384Bjarnason I. Intestinal permeability. Gut. 1994 Jan;35(1 Suppl):S18-22. doi: 10.1136/gut.35.1_suppl.s18.
- Background: PubMed 18832585Fasano A. Physiological, pathological, and therapeutic implications of zonulin-mediated intestinal barrier modulation: living life on the edge of the wall. Am J Pathol. 2008 Nov;173(5):1243-52. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2008.080192. Epub 2008 Oct 2.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Prematurity Complications
Recruiting
Nutritional Maturity in Preterm Newborns (Premature Infant Oral Motor Intervention, PIOMI)
Preterm, Preterm Infant Development
RecruitingPhase 4
Impact of Higher Zinc Supplementation on Neonatal Weight Velocity
Extreme Prematurity,Extremely Low Birthweight, BPD - Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia
Not yet recruiting
Strap To Reduce Apnea in Preterm Infants: A Randomized Crossover Trial
Apnea of Prematurity, Intermittent Hypoxemia
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Blood Pressure Goal in Preterm Preeclampsia
Hypertensive Disorder of Pregnancy, Preeclampsia
Recruiting
Amnioinfusion for Chorioamnionitis: Targeting Neonatal Brain Injury Biomarkers
Chorioamnionitis Affecting Fetus or Newborn, Amnioinfusion
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Marcela Pasetti, PhD principal investigator
University of Maryland
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1 study testing measurement of intestinal permeability in people with Prematurity Complications, run by University of Maryland, Baltimore at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Sripriya Sundararajan, MD (4103286003, ssundararajan@som.umaryland.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Measurement of intestinal permeability (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07667049, which also lists 12 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Oct 2026.