AzTrials
AzTrials

Cystitis, InterstitialPhase 1HA-IC/BPSPilotNCT07658118

Safety and Preliminary Efficacy of Endoscopic Submucosal Injection of Hyaluronic Acid Into the Bladder Wall in Patients With Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome (IC/BPS)

A Phase 1 study testing Hyaluronic Acid (HA) in people with Cystitis, Interstitial and Chronic Pain, run by Sverdlovsk Regional Clinical Hospital No.1.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this pilot clinical trial is to learn if injecting hyaluronic acid into the bladder wall is safe and if it works to reduce pain and urinary frequency in people with interstitial cystitis (IC), also called bladder pain syndrome (BPS). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Cystitis, Interstitial, Chronic Pain
What is being tested?
Hyaluronic Acid (HA)
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
15 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jul 2026to Jan 2027
Phase
Phase 1
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Men and women aged ≥ 18 years.
  • Confirmed diagnosis of Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome (IC/BPS) based on cystoscopic findings (glomerulations after hydrodistension or Hunner's lesions).
  • Refractory to at least 2 lines of standard therapy (e.g., dietary modifications, oral medications, intravesical hyaluronic acid instillations, hydrodistension) for ≥ 6 months.
  • Pain score ≥ 4 on a 0-10 Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at screening.
  • Ability and willingness to provide written informed consent and to complete a 3-day voiding diary.

Who cannot join

  • Active urinary tract infection (bacteriuria > 10⁴ CFU/mL).
  • History of genital herpes.
  • Severe renal failure (eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m²).
  • Known allergy to hyaluronic acid or any component of the study product.
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  • Psychiatric disorders or substance abuse that would interfere with study participation.
  • Participation in another clinical study within 30 days prior to enrollment.

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Ekaterina S Philippova, Professor, MD contact

+79126380286

filippova.cat@yandex.ru

About this study

Official title: A Pilot Open-Label Prospective Study of Safety and Preliminary Efficacy of Endoscopic Submucosal Injection of Hyaluronic Acid Into the Bladder Wall in Patients With Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome (IC/BPS)

The goal of this pilot clinical trial is to learn if injecting hyaluronic acid into the bladder wall is safe and if it works to reduce pain and urinary frequency in people with interstitial cystitis (IC), also called bladder pain syndrome (BPS).

Who can take part? Adults aged 18 and older who have IC/BPS that did not get better after at least two standard treatments (such as diet changes, oral drugs, or bladder instillations) for 6 months or more.

Read more

Main questions the study aims to answer:

What side effects (medical problems) do participants have after the injection procedure?

Does the injection lower pain and reduce how often a person needs to urinate, compared to before the treatment?

What will happen in the study? There is no comparison group or placebo (a look-alike substance with no drug). All participants receive the same treatment.

Participants will:

Have a one-time procedure under intravenous anesthesia (medicine that puts them to sleep)

Receive 20 small injections of hyaluronic acid into the bladder wall using a thin tube with a camera (cystoscope)

Have small tissue samples taken from the bladder (biopsy) during the same procedure

Keep a 3-day diary of their urination

Fill out short questionnaires about pain, symptoms, and quality of life

Return for follow-up visits at 1 day, 1 week, 4 weeks, 3 and 6 months after the injection.

At the 4-week visit, participants will have cystoscopy with bladder biopsy and may receive a second injection if the first one helped.

Possible benefits We cannot guarantee that this experimental treatment will help everyone. However, based on years of experience with similar hyaluronic acid injections in other body parts, researchers hope that injecting the substance directly into the bladder wall will give longer-lasting relief than standard bladder instillations.

Risks and side effects

The most common expected side effects are:

Blood in the urine for a few hours or days (usually goes away on its own) Temporary increase in pain or burning when urinating Infection (unlikely; the team will give antibiotics to lower the risk) Serious problems such as bladder wall puncture or allergic reaction are very rare.

Participation is voluntary People can join or leave the study at any time without giving a reason. Refusing or stopping will not affect their regular medical care at the hospital.

Confidentiality All personal information will be kept private. Results will only be shared in combined, anonymous form (no names or identifying details).

Read the detailed description

Study design in detail This is a prospective, open-label, single-center, pilot phase I-II clinical trial. No randomization or blinding is applied. All enrolled participants receive the same intervention. The study aims to enroll 10-20 evaluable participants with refractory interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS).

Rationale for submucosal injection of non-cross-linked hyaluronic acid Hyaluronic acid (HA) is a natural component of the extracellular matrix. Intravesical HA instillations are a standard therapy for IC/BPS but require frequent administration (up to 3 times per week for ≥6 months) and provide only temporary relief in many patients. Submucosal injection is hypothesized to achieve a higher and more prolonged local concentration of HA in the lamina propria, enhancing glycosaminoglycan layer repair, reducing inflammation, and stimulating fibroblast activity and neocollagenesis. This technique is technically identical to endoscopic botulinum toxin injection, which has an established safety profile in the bladder.

Extrapolated safety evidence

The safety of submucosal non-cross-linked HA injection is supported by extensive experience in other mucosal sites:

Laryngoplasty (vocal cords): no serious adverse events (SAEs) in published case series; histological evidence of biocompatibility without chronic inflammation or necrosis.

Vulvovaginal atrophy and provoked vestibulodynia: randomized and retrospective studies show only transient edema and pain (10-25%), no SAEs.

Non-surgical rhinoplasty: serious complication rate <0.05% with proper technique.

Endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR): >20 years of experience with dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer (Deflux®) in >2500 patients - obstruction requiring intervention occurs in <1% of ureters; long-term follow-up (≥10 years) shows no malignancy or delayed tissue damage.

Intervention details

Device: Flexible or rigid cystoscope.

Injection needle: 23-25 Gauge, length 4 mm (standard endoscopic injection needle).

Product: Non-cross-linked hyaluronic acid (marketing authorization No. РЗН 2024/22715, Russian Federation). Each milliliter contains 10 mg of sodium hyaluronate.

Injection protocol: 20 submucosal injections of 0.5 mL each, evenly distributed over the bladder wall (trigone avoided). Total volume injected = 10 mL.

Anesthesia: Intravenous general anesthesia.

Post-procedure care: No indwelling catheter. Single dose of perioperative antibiotic (cephalosporin) for infection prophylaxis.

Optional repeat procedure Participants who show a positive clinical response (e.g., ≥2-point reduction in VAS pain score at week 4) may be offered a second identical injection at the week-4 visit (V4). This decision is made jointly by the investigator and the participant.

Histological and endoscopic evaluation

At baseline (V1) and at week 4 (V4, before optional repeat injection), punch biopsies are taken from predetermined sites (e.g., posterior wall, lateral wall). Tissue samples are fixed in formalin and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H\&E) and, if feasible, with alcian blue or for mast cell markers (c-kit/tryptase).

Endoscopic images and videos are recorded at V1 and V4 to assess changes in glomerulations, Hunner's lesions, and overall mucosal appearance.

Statistical analysis plan

Primary analysis (safety): Descriptive statistics - frequency and percentage of participants with adverse events (AEs) grade ≥2 according to CTCAE v5.0, and frequency of SAEs.

Secondary analysis (efficacy): Continuous variables (VAS, ICSI, PUF, functional bladder capacity, voiding frequency) are compared between baseline and follow-up time points (week 4, month 3) using paired t-test (if normally distributed) or Wilcoxon signed-rank test (if non-normal). Categorical variables (PGI-I response) are reported as proportions with exact 95% confidence intervals.

Missing data: No imputation for missing values; analysis is per protocol.

Software: SPSS (version 26 or later) or R.

Significance level: α = 0.05 (two-sided), no adjustment for multiple comparisons (pilot, exploratory).

Data monitoring and quality control The study is conducted at a single tertiary care center (Sverdlovsk Regional Clinical Hospital No. 1, Yekaterinburg). An independent data safety monitoring board (DSMB) is not planned because this is a low-risk pilot study. However, all adverse events are reviewed weekly by the principal investigator. Serious adverse events are reported to the local ethics committee within 24 hours. Source data verification will be performed by the sponsor (the institution) according to its standard operating procedures.

Duration of participation Each participant is expected to be in the study for approximately 6 months (screening through month-6 follow-up). The optional repeat injection extends active treatment to 2 injections (day 0 and week 4).

Funding and sponsorship The study is investigator-initiated and funded by the Sverdlovsk Regional Clinical Hospital No. 1. No commercial funding is involved.

Being tested
Hyaluronic Acid (HA)
Keywords
Bladder Pain Syndrome, IC/BPS, Hyaluronic Acid Injection
Medical subject headings
Cystitis, Interstitial, Chronic Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Hyaluronic Acid (HA)Drug

    Non-cross-linked hyaluronic acid solution 10 mg/mL for submucosal injection

Study groups in NCT07658118
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Hyaluronic Acid Injection GroupExperimentalParticipants receive a single session of 20 submucosal injections of non-cross-linked hyaluronic acid into the bladder wall, with optional repeat at week 4.
Receives: Drug: Hyaluronic Acid (HA)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events

    Adverse events (AEs) are assessed and graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0. The analysis includes all participants who received at least one injection. The total number and proportion of participants experiencing any AE, as well as AEs of Grade 2 or higher, will be reported. This includes pre-specified expected events such as transient hematuria, urinary tract infection, and injection site pain. Higher scores on the CTCAE scale represent a more severe adverse event.

    Measured: From day of procedure up to 30 days

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Change in Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Index (ICSI) and Problem Index (ICPI) Scores

    Validated questionnaires (O'Leary-Sant) measuring symptom severity and bother. ICSI ranges 0-19, ICPI ranges 0-16. Higher scores indicate worse symptoms. A reduction of ≥30% from baseline is considered a response.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 4, Month 3

  2. Change in Pelvic Pain and Urgency/Frequency (PUF) Score

    Validated questionnaire assessing pelvic pain, urgency, and frequency. Total score ranges 0-35 (or 0-39 depending on version). Higher scores indicate greater symptom burden. A reduction of ≥30% from baseline is considered a response.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 4, Month 3

  3. Change in Pain Intensity Measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    Pain intensity is assessed using a 0-10 Visual Analog Scale (VAS), where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst possible pain. A reduction of ≥2 points from baseline is considered a clinical response.

    Measured: Baseline (screening), Week 4, Month 3

  4. Change in Functional Bladder Capacity

    Assessed by 3-day voiding diary (average voided volume per micturition). Measured in milliliters (mL). An increase of ≥30 mL from baseline is considered a response.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 4, Month 3

  5. Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I)

    A single-item scale where participants rate their overall change in bladder condition since treatment on a 7-point scale: 1 = very much better, 2 = much better, 3 = a little better, 4 = no change, 5 = a little worse, 6 = much worse, 7 = very much worse. Response is defined as a score of 1-3 (improvement).

    Measured: Week 4, Month 3

  6. Change in Quality of Life Measured by Short Form-36 (SF-36)

    Validated 36-item questionnaire assessing physical and mental health components. Scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 4, Month 3

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Jun 2026
  2. Study startJul 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionDec 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJan 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
15 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07658118
Sponsor's protocol ID
U7-2026
Acronym
HA-IC/BPSPilot
Status last verified
Jun 2026
First submitted
14 Jun 2026
Last updated
25 Jun 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: This is a pilot phase I study with a small sample size. The informed consent form does not include provisions for sharing individual participant data with external researchers, and there is no established infrastructure at our institution for de-identifying and transferring such data. Therefore, there is no plan to make IPD available.

Publications

  • Pyo JS, Cho WJ. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Intravesical Hyaluronic Acid and Hyaluronic Acid/Chondroitin Sulfate Instillation for Interstitial Cystitis/Painful Bladder Syndrome. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2016;39(4):1618-25. doi: 10.1159/000447863. Epub 2016 Sep 15.

    PubMed 27627755

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1 study testing Hyaluronic Acid (HA) in people with Cystitis, Interstitial and Chronic Pain, run by Sverdlovsk Regional Clinical Hospital No.1.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Ekaterina S Philippova, Professor, MD (+79126380286, filippova.cat@yandex.ru), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events (time frame: From day of procedure up to 30 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07658118, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Jun 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in