Breast CancerGM_ANTNCT07653698
Cachexia and Gut Microbiota in Patients With Breast Cancer Receiving Home Care
A study testing Probiotic Mixture in people with Breast Cancer and Cancer Cachexia, run by Fondazione ANT Franco Pannuti ETS.
Trial summary
This study aims to evaluate the possible association between cancer cachexia and Gut Microbiota (GM) in patients with Breast Cancer (BC) cared at home. Cancer cachexia is a multifactorial condition causing weight loss, muscle loss, and reduced physical strength in people with cancer. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Breast Cancer, Cancer Cachexia
- What is being tested?
- Probiotic Mixture
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 140 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Jun 2026to 31 Aug 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Female patients with Breast Cancer (BC)
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Able to understand the study objectives and provide written informed consent
- Able to speak and understand Italian
Who cannot join
- Antibiotic treatment within the previous 2 weeks
- Use of probiotic supplements within the previous month
- Artificial nutrition (enteral or parenteral)
- Severe dysphagia, intestinal obstruction, or impaired gastrointestinal function
- Diagnosis of dementia or cognitive impairment preventing understanding of the study information and/or provision of informed consent
- Severe organ failure
- Refusal to participate For the interventional phase: refractory cachexia and/or life expectancy of less than 6 weeks
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of Cancer Cachexia and Analysis of Gut Microbiota in Patients With Breast Cancer Receiving Home Care
This study aims to evaluate the possible association between cancer cachexia and Gut Microbiota (GM) in patients with Breast Cancer (BC) cared at home.
Cancer cachexia is a multifactorial condition causing weight loss, muscle loss, and reduced physical strength in people with cancer. Moreover, the study will also analyze whether different stages of cachexia are linked to changes in the GM.
Read more
The study will also explore whether a supplementation with a probiotic mixture for twelve weeks is associated with changes in the GM and participants' nutritional and clinical condition.
The effect of the probiotic mixture (experimental group) will be compared with a placebo (control group) to evaluate whether changes in the GM and in cachexia-related measures differ between the two groups.
Participants will:
- Provide blood, stool, and urine samples to study the GM and biological markers.
- Answer questionnaires about symptoms and quality of life.
- Undergo assessments of nutritional status and body composition.
Participants eligible for the intervention will take either a probiotic mixture or a placebo for twelve weeks.
All study procedures will take place during home visits as part of the participants' regular home care program.
Read the detailed description
Cancer cachexia is a multifactorial syndrome defined by an ongoing loss of skeletal muscle mass that cannot be fully reversed by conventional nutritional support and leads to a progressive functional impairment. Moreover, cachexia is characterized by involuntary weight loss, reduced food intake, systemic inflammation, and metabolic alteration. Its pathophysiology is characterized by a negative protein and energy balance driven by a variable combination of reduced food intake and abnormal metabolism. It is common in people with advanced cancer and is associated with lower quality of life, poorer functional status, and shorter survival. Cachexia syndrome can develop progressively through various stages - precachexia, cachexia, and refractory cachexia and its severity can be classified according to degree of depletion of energy stores and body protein in combination with degree of ongoing weight loss. Refractory cachexia, which is considered no longer reversible, represents a very advanced stage associated with progressive worsening of quality of life and severe hypercatabolism, with an expected survival of less than three months.
The Gut Microbiota (GM) is increasingly recognized as a possible factor involved in the development and progression of cancer cachexia. Alterations in the GM, often referred to as dysbiosis, may contribute to systemic inflammation, intestinal barrier dysfunction, altered nutrient metabolism, and loss of muscle mass. Previous studies have shown that people with cancer cachexia may have specific alterations in GM, including differences in the abundance of certain bacterial groups and lower production of anti-inflammatory metabolites such as short-chain fatty acids.
The association between alterations in the GM and the development of cancer cachexia suggests that modifying the GM to correct cachexia-related dysbiosis may lead to new integrative approaches for the management of this highly burdensome condition.
Recent studies suggest that Breast Cancer (BC) is associated with GM dysbiosis and that changes in GM composition and function may play a crucial role in tumor development and progression. In these studies, patients with BC frequently show a different GM composition compared with healthy individuals, including specific alterations in certain bacterial taxa and a reduction in microbial alpha diversity. However, limited data are available on the relationship between GM and cachexia in people with BC, especially among those receiving home-based supportive and palliative care.
Considering that BC is one of the most common cancers among women assisted by the home supportive and palliative care program, it is particularly important to identify strategies that may improve the quality of life of these patients. A simple and feasible option to support the nutritional and functional status of these particularly vulnerable patients could be probiotic supplementation. At present, to our knowledge, no studies have evaluated the effect of probiotic supplementation on cachexia status in patients with BC.
This study was developed to better understand the role of the GM in the nutritional and functional condition of people with BC receiving home care and to explore whether modulation of the GM through a probiotic mixture may be associated with changes in cachexia-related measures.
The primary objective of the study is to evaluate whether GM composition, diversity, and function are associated with the stage of cachexia in people with BC receiving home care.
Secondary objectives include:
- Evaluate changes in GM composition, diversity, and function after 12 weeks in participants who received either a probiotic mixture or placebo.
- Evaluate the association between changes in GM composition and function and changes in cachexia status after 12 weeks in participants who received either a probiotic mixture or placebo.
- Evaluate inflammatory biomarkers and intestinal permeability biomarkers at baseline and after 12 weeks in relation to cachexia status in participants who received either a probiotic mixture or placebo.
All study procedures will be performed during home visits as part of the participants' regular home care program.
The study consists of two consecutive phases: an observational phase and an interventional phase.
- Observational phase During the observational phase, all eligible participants (expected number: 200 patients) entering the home care program will undergo a baseline assessment. This phase is designed to evaluate the association between GM composition, diversity, and function and the stage of cachexia at baseline.
Participants will be classified into one of the following cachexia stages:
- No cachexia
- Precachexia
- Cachexia
- Refractory cachexia Cachexia stage will be defined using body weight loss, Body Mass Index, body composition, sarcopenia, oral intake, systemic inflammation, and Karnofsky Performance Status.
The observational phase aims to determine whether specific GM profiles are associated with different stages of cachexia at the entry and whether these profiles are related to inflammatory markers, intestinal permeability, symptoms, and quality of life.
Participants who do not have refractory cachexia and who have a life expectancy greater than six weeks will be eligible for the interventional phase.
II) Interventional phase The interventional phase is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with two parallel groups. Approximately 140 participants are expected to enter the randomized interventional phase, with about 70 participants in each study group.
Participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to one of the following groups:
- Experimental group
- Control group Participants in the experimental group will take a probiotic mixture containing different strains of lactic acid bacteria and bifidobacteria orally twice daily for twelve weeks. Participants in the control group will receive a placebo in identical sachets for the same duration.
Neither the participants nor the study team performing the assessments will know the assigned intervention arm. Randomization will be centrally managed and stratified according to age and Karnofsky Performance Status to ensure balance between the groups.
Participants will undergo study assessments at three time points:
- Baseline
- Six weeks
- Twelve weeks At each assessment, clinical information, biological samples, and questionnaire data will be collected.
Clinical data collected during the study will include:
- Tumor stage and metastatic disease
- Previous and ongoing cancer treatments
- Pain treatment and other medications
- Karnofsky Performance Status
- Nutritional status
- Weight loss during the previous six months
- Body Mass Index
- Dietary intake
- Body composition and sarcopenia assessment
- Perceived symptom burden
- Quality of life Body composition and sarcopenia will be evaluated using bioimpedance analysis and handgrip strength measurement.
Participants will also complete questionnaires on symptoms and quality of life, including:
- Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale
- EuroQol 5-Dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D) Blood, stool, and urine samples will be collected at baseline, six weeks, and twelve weeks.
Blood samples will be used to measure:
- Inflammatory markers
- Cytokines
- Markers of intestinal permeability
Stool samples will be used to evaluate:
- GM composition
- GM diversity
- Fecal calprotectin
- Functional and metabolomic profiles of the GM Urine samples will be collected for metabolomic analyses.
GM analysis will include:
- 16S Ribosomal RNA (16S rRNA) sequencing
- Shotgun metagenomic sequencing
- Alpha diversity indices
- Beta diversity analyses
- Relative abundance of major microbial groups
- Functional and metabolomic profiling The study will also evaluate biomarkers of systemic inflammation and intestinal permeability, including inflammatory cytokines, lipopolysaccharide-related markers, zonulin, intestinal fatty acid-binding protein, and other serum and fecal biomarkers.
Participants may continue to receive their prescribed oncologic treatments, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and hormonal therapy, provided that these treatments are documented and monitored during the trial.
Participants may also continue or start supportive treatments, including antiemetics, pain medications, and other drugs used to manage symptoms related to cancer. Participants who require antibiotic treatment or the initiation of total artificial nutrition during the 12-week trial period will discontinue the intervention phase of the study.
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer, Cancer Cachexia
- Being tested
- Probiotic Mixture, Placebo
- Keywords
- Breast Cancer, Cancer cachexia, Gut Microbiota, Palliative Care, Probiotic Mixture, Dysbiosis
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms, Dysbiosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Probiotic MixtureDietary supplement
Participants assigned to this intervention will receive an oral probiotic mixture twice daily for 12 weeks in addition to their usual oncologic treatment and supportive care. The probiotic mixture will be administered in sachets and taken orally twice daily for 12 weeks.
PlaceboOther
Participants assigned to this intervention will receive a placebo orally twice daily for 12 weeks in addition to their usual oncologic treatment and supportive care. The placebo will be provided in sachets identical in appearance, taste, and administration schedule to the probiotic mixture and will contain no active bacteria.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Probiotic Mixture | Experimental | Participants will receive an oral probiotic mixture twice daily for 12 weeks in addition to their usual oncologic treatment and supportive care. Assessments will be performed at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks during home visits. Receives: Dietary Supplement: Probiotic Mixture |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Participants will receive a placebo orally twice daily for 12 weeks in addition to their usual oncologic treatment and supportive care. The placebo will be provided in sachets identical in appearance, taste, and administration schedule to the probiotic mixture. Assessments will be performed at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks during home visits. Receives: Other: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Gut Microbiota Alpha Diversity Indices
Alpha diversity assessed by Shannon, Simpson, and Chao indices derived from 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing.
Measured: Baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks
Gut Microbiota Beta Diversity Metrics
Beta diversity assessed using Bray-Curtis and UniFrac dissimilarity metrics.
Measured: Baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks
Relative Abundance of major Gut Microbiota Taxa
Relative abundance of major microbial taxa assessed by 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing and shotgun metagenomics.
Measured: Baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks
Cachexia Status
Cachexia stage classified as no cachexia, precachexia, cachexia, or refractory cachexia.
Measured: Baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks
Secondary outcomes (5)
Symptom Distress Score
Symptom burden measured by the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale, including pain, nausea, tiredness, depression, anxiety, drowsiness, appetite, well-being, and shortness of breath. The Symptom Distress Score ranges from 0 to 90, with higher scores indicating greater symptom burden and worse clinical status.
Measured: Baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks
Health-Related Quality of Life Assessed by the EuroQol 5-Dimension Questionnaire
Health-related quality of life assessed using the EuroQol 5-Dimension Questionnaire (EQ-5D). The EQ-5D evaluates five dimensions of health status (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). Participants also rate their overall health using the EQ Visual Analogue Scale (EQ VAS), ranging from 0 to 100, where 0 indicates the worst imaginable health state and 100 indicates the best imaginable health state. Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.
Measured: Baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks
Intestinal Permeability Biomarkers
Serum and fecal biomarkers of intestinal permeability, including Endotoxin Core Antibodies (EndoCab) immunoglobulin M (IgM), immunoglobulin A (IgA), and immunoglobulin G (IgG), soluble cluster of differentiation 14 (sCD14), lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP), intestinal fatty acid-binding protein (I-FABP), zonulin, plasma vesicle-associated protein-1 (PV1), and fecal immunoglobulin A.
Measured: Baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks
Systemic Inflammation Cytokine
Systemic inflammation assessed by serum cytokine levels, including interleukin-1 (IL-1), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and interleukin-8 (IL-8).
Measured: Baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks
Fecal Calprotectin Concentration
Intestinal inflammation assessed by fecal calprotectin.
Measured: Baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Jun 2026
- Study start1 Jun 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion31 May 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Aug 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (28)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Breast CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either a probiotic mixture or a placebo for 12 weeks. Randomization will be stratified according to age and Karnofsky Performance Status. The study includes two parallel groups and all assessments will be performed at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks during home visits.
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 140 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Fondazione ANT Franco Pannuti ETS
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Bologna
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Enrico Ruggeri, Medicine, Principal investigator, Fondazione ANT Franco Pannuti ETS
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07653698
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 578-2025-OSS-AUSLBO
- Other IDs
- 578-2025-OSS-AUSLBO
- Acronym
- GM_ANT
- Status last verified
- Jun 2026
- First submitted
- 10 Jun 2026
- Last updated
- 17 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Individual participant data will not be shared due to privacy and confidentiality considerations related to sensitive clinical and biological data.
Publications
Dodds RM, Syddall HE, Cooper R, Benzeval M, Deary IJ, Dennison EM, Der G, Gale CR, Inskip HM, Jagger C, Kirkwood TB, Lawlor DA, Robinson SM, Starr JM, Steptoe A, Tilling K, Kuh D, Cooper C, Sayer AA. Grip strength across the life course: normative data from twelve British studies. PLoS One. 2014 Dec 4;9(12):e113637. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113637. eCollection 2014.
PubMed 25474696Studenski SA, Peters KW, Alley DE, Cawthon PM, McLean RR, Harris TB, Ferrucci L, Guralnik JM, Fragala MS, Kenny AM, Kiel DP, Kritchevsky SB, Shardell MD, Dam TT, Vassileva MT. The FNIH sarcopenia project: rationale, study description, conference recommendations, and final estimates. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2014 May;69(5):547-58. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glu010.
PubMed 24737557Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Bahat G, Bauer J, Boirie Y, Bruyere O, Cederholm T, Cooper C, Landi F, Rolland Y, Sayer AA, Schneider SM, Sieber CC, Topinkova E, Vandewoude M, Visser M, Zamboni M; Writing Group for the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People 2 (EWGSOP2), and the Extended Group for EWGSOP2. Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing. 2019 Jul 1;48(4):601. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afz046. No abstract available.
PubMed 31081853Harris JA, Benedict FG. A Biometric Study of Human Basal Metabolism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1918 Dec;4(12):370-3. doi: 10.1073/pnas.4.12.370. No abstract available.
PubMed 16576330Hui D, Bruera E. The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System 25 Years Later: Past, Present, and Future Developments. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 Mar;53(3):630-643. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.10.370. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
PubMed 28042071Bruera E, Kuehn N, Miller MJ, Selmser P, Macmillan K. The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS): a simple method for the assessment of palliative care patients. J Palliat Care. 1991 Summer;7(2):6-9.
PubMed 1714502Moro C, Brunelli C, Miccinesi G, Fallai M, Morino P, Piazza M, Labianca R, Ripamonti C. Edmonton symptom assessment scale: Italian validation in two palliative care settings. Support Care Cancer. 2006 Jan;14(1):30-7. doi: 10.1007/s00520-005-0834-3. Epub 2005 Jun 4.
PubMed 15937688Crooks V, Waller S, Smith T, Hahn TJ. The use of the Karnofsky Performance Scale in determining outcomes and risk in geriatric outpatients. J Gerontol. 1991 Jul;46(4):M139-44. doi: 10.1093/geronj/46.4.m139.
PubMed 2071835Balestroni G, Bertolotti G. [EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D): an instrument for measuring quality of life]. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 2012 Sep;78(3):155-9. doi: 10.4081/monaldi.2012.121. Italian.
PubMed 23614330Schwenkglenks M, Matter-Walstra K. Is the EQ-5D suitable for use in oncology? An overview of the literature and recent developments. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2016;16(2):207-19. doi: 10.1586/14737167.2016.1146594. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
PubMed 26808097Stone CA, Tiernan E, Dooley BA. Prospective validation of the palliative prognostic index in patients with cancer. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2008 Jun;35(6):617-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.07.006. Epub 2008 Feb 8.
PubMed 18261876Laborda-Illanes A, Sanchez-Alcoholado L, Dominguez-Recio ME, Jimenez-Rodriguez B, Lavado R, Comino-Mendez I, Alba E, Queipo-Ortuno MI. Breast and Gut Microbiota Action Mechanisms in Breast Cancer Pathogenesis and Treatment. Cancers (Basel). 2020 Aug 31;12(9):2465. doi: 10.3390/cancers12092465.
PubMed 32878124Goedert JJ, Jones G, Hua X, Xu X, Yu G, Flores R, Falk RT, Gail MH, Shi J, Ravel J, Feigelson HS. Investigation of the association between the fecal microbiota and breast cancer in postmenopausal women: a population-based case-control pilot study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Jun 1;107(8):djv147. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv147. Print 2015 Aug.
PubMed 26032724Dewys WD, Begg C, Lavin PT, Band PR, Bennett JM, Bertino JR, Cohen MH, Douglass HO Jr, Engstrom PF, Ezdinli EZ, Horton J, Johnson GJ, Moertel CG, Oken MM, Perlia C, Rosenbaum C, Silverstein MN, Skeel RT, Sponzo RW, Tormey DC. Prognostic effect of weight loss prior to chemotherapy in cancer patients. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Med. 1980 Oct;69(4):491-7. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(05)80001-3.
PubMed 7424938Bernstein R, Isdale J, Pinto M, Du Toit Zaaijman J, Jenkins T. Short rib-polydactyly syndrome: a single or heterogeneous entity? A re-evaluation prompted by four new cases. J Med Genet. 1985 Feb;22(1):46-53. doi: 10.1136/jmg.22.1.46.
PubMed 3981580
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of Cancer Cachexia and Analysis of Gut Microbiota in Patients With Breast Cancer Receiving Home Care
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07653698
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GM_ANT / 578-2025-OSS-AUSLBO
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer, Cancer Cachexia
- Keywords
- Breast Cancer, Cancer cachexia, Gut Microbiota, Palliative Care, Probiotic Mixture, Dysbiosis
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 140 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Fondazione ANT Franco Pannuti ETSUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Bologna
- Study start
- 1 Jun 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 31 May 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Aug 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 17 Jun 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aims to evaluate the possible association between cancer cachexia and Gut Microbiota (GM) in patients with Breast Cancer (BC) cared at home.
Cancer cachexia is a multifactorial condition causing weight loss, muscle loss, and reduced physical strength in people with cancer. Moreover, the study will also analyze whether different stages of cachexia are linked to changes in the GM.
The study will also explore whether a supplementation with a probiotic mixture for twelve weeks is associated with changes in the GM and participants' nutritional and clinical condition.
The effect of the probiotic mixture (experimental group) will be compared with a placebo (control group) to evaluate whether changes in the GM and in cachexia-related measures differ between the two groups.
Participants will:
- Provide blood, stool, and urine samples to study the GM and biological markers.
- Answer questionnaires about symptoms and quality of life.
- Undergo assessments of nutritional status and body composition.
Participants eligible for the intervention will take either a probiotic mixture or a placebo for twelve weeks.
All study procedures will take place during home visits as part of the participants' regular home care program.
Detailed description
Cancer cachexia is a multifactorial syndrome defined by an ongoing loss of skeletal muscle mass that cannot be fully reversed by conventional nutritional support and leads to a progressive functional impairment. Moreover, cachexia is characterized by involuntary weight loss, reduced food intake, systemic inflammation, and metabolic alteration. Its pathophysiology is characterized by a negative protein and energy balance driven by a variable combination of reduced food intake and abnormal metabolism. It is common in people with advanced cancer and is associated with lower quality of life, poorer functional status, and shorter survival. Cachexia syndrome can develop progressively through various stages - precachexia, cachexia, and refractory cachexia and its severity can be classified according to degree of depletion of energy stores and body protein in combination with degree of ongoing weight loss. Refractory cachexia, which is considered no longer reversible, represents a very advanced stage associated with progressive worsening of quality of life and severe hypercatabolism, with an expected survival of less than three months.
The Gut Microbiota (GM) is increasingly recognized as a possible factor involved in the development and progression of cancer cachexia. Alterations in the GM, often referred to as dysbiosis, may contribute to systemic inflammation, intestinal barrier dysfunction, altered nutrient metabolism, and loss of muscle mass. Previous studies have shown that people with cancer cachexia may have specific alterations in GM, including differences in the abundance of certain bacterial groups and lower production of anti-inflammatory metabolites such as short-chain fatty acids.
The association between alterations in the GM and the development of cancer cachexia suggests that modifying the GM to correct cachexia-related dysbiosis may lead to new integrative approaches for the management of this highly burdensome condition.
Recent studies suggest that Breast Cancer (BC) is associated with GM dysbiosis and that changes in GM composition and function may play a crucial role in tumor development and progression. In these studies, patients with BC frequently show a different GM composition compared with healthy individuals, including specific alterations in certain bacterial taxa and a reduction in microbial alpha diversity. However, limited data are available on the relationship between GM and cachexia in people with BC, especially among those receiving home-based supportive and palliative care.
Considering that BC is one of the most common cancers among women assisted by the home supportive and palliative care program, it is particularly important to identify strategies that may improve the quality of life of these patients. A simple and feasible option to support the nutritional and functional status of these particularly vulnerable patients could be probiotic supplementation. At present, to our knowledge, no studies have evaluated the effect of probiotic supplementation on cachexia status in patients with BC.
This study was developed to better understand the role of the GM in the nutritional and functional condition of people with BC receiving home care and to explore whether modulation of the GM through a probiotic mixture may be associated with changes in cachexia-related measures.
The primary objective of the study is to evaluate whether GM composition, diversity, and function are associated with the stage of cachexia in people with BC receiving home care.
Secondary objectives include:
- Evaluate changes in GM composition, diversity, and function after 12 weeks in participants who received either a probiotic mixture or placebo.
- Evaluate the association between changes in GM composition and function and changes in cachexia status after 12 weeks in participants who received either a probiotic mixture or placebo.
- Evaluate inflammatory biomarkers and intestinal permeability biomarkers at baseline and after 12 weeks in relation to cachexia status in participants who received either a probiotic mixture or placebo.
All study procedures will be performed during home visits as part of the participants' regular home care program.
The study consists of two consecutive phases: an observational phase and an interventional phase.
- Observational phase During the observational phase, all eligible participants (expected number: 200 patients) entering the home care program will undergo a baseline assessment. This phase is designed to evaluate the association between GM composition, diversity, and function and the stage of cachexia at baseline.
Participants will be classified into one of the following cachexia stages:
- No cachexia
- Precachexia
- Cachexia
- Refractory cachexia Cachexia stage will be defined using body weight loss, Body Mass Index, body composition, sarcopenia, oral intake, systemic inflammation, and Karnofsky Performance Status.
The observational phase aims to determine whether specific GM profiles are associated with different stages of cachexia at the entry and whether these profiles are related to inflammatory markers, intestinal permeability, symptoms, and quality of life.
Participants who do not have refractory cachexia and who have a life expectancy greater than six weeks will be eligible for the interventional phase.
II) Interventional phase The interventional phase is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with two parallel groups. Approximately 140 participants are expected to enter the randomized interventional phase, with about 70 participants in each study group.
Participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to one of the following groups:
- Experimental group
- Control group Participants in the experimental group will take a probiotic mixture containing different strains of lactic acid bacteria and bifidobacteria orally twice daily for twelve weeks. Participants in the control group will receive a placebo in identical sachets for the same duration.
Neither the participants nor the study team performing the assessments will know the assigned intervention arm. Randomization will be centrally managed and stratified according to age and Karnofsky Performance Status to ensure balance between the groups.
Participants will undergo study assessments at three time points:
- Baseline
- Six weeks
- Twelve weeks At each assessment, clinical information, biological samples, and questionnaire data will be collected.
Clinical data collected during the study will include:
- Tumor stage and metastatic disease
- Previous and ongoing cancer treatments
- Pain treatment and other medications
- Karnofsky Performance Status
- Nutritional status
- Weight loss during the previous six months
- Body Mass Index
- Dietary intake
- Body composition and sarcopenia assessment
- Perceived symptom burden
- Quality of life Body composition and sarcopenia will be evaluated using bioimpedance analysis and handgrip strength measurement.
Participants will also complete questionnaires on symptoms and quality of life, including:
- Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale
- EuroQol 5-Dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D) Blood, stool, and urine samples will be collected at baseline, six weeks, and twelve weeks.
Blood samples will be used to measure:
- Inflammatory markers
- Cytokines
- Markers of intestinal permeability
Stool samples will be used to evaluate:
- GM composition
- GM diversity
- Fecal calprotectin
- Functional and metabolomic profiles of the GM Urine samples will be collected for metabolomic analyses.
GM analysis will include:
- 16S Ribosomal RNA (16S rRNA) sequencing
- Shotgun metagenomic sequencing
- Alpha diversity indices
- Beta diversity analyses
- Relative abundance of major microbial groups
- Functional and metabolomic profiling The study will also evaluate biomarkers of systemic inflammation and intestinal permeability, including inflammatory cytokines, lipopolysaccharide-related markers, zonulin, intestinal fatty acid-binding protein, and other serum and fecal biomarkers.
Participants may continue to receive their prescribed oncologic treatments, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and hormonal therapy, provided that these treatments are documented and monitored during the trial.
Participants may also continue or start supportive treatments, including antiemetics, pain medications, and other drugs used to manage symptoms related to cancer. Participants who require antibiotic treatment or the initiation of total artificial nutrition during the 12-week trial period will discontinue the intervention phase of the study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either a probiotic mixture or a placebo for 12 weeks. Randomization will be stratified according to age and Karnofsky Performance Status. The study includes two parallel groups and all assessments will be performed at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks during home visits.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Probiotic Mixture | Experimental | Dietary Supplement: Probiotic MixtureParticipants will receive an oral probiotic mixture twice daily for 12 weeks in addition to their usual oncologic treatment and supportive care. Assessments will be performed at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks during home visits. |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Other: PlaceboParticipants will receive a placebo orally twice daily for 12 weeks in addition to their usual oncologic treatment and supportive care. The placebo will be provided in sachets identical in appearance, taste, and administration schedule to the probiotic mixture. Assessments will be performed at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks during home visits. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Female patients with Breast Cancer (BC)
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Able to understand the study objectives and provide written informed consent
- Able to speak and understand Italian
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Antibiotic treatment within the previous 2 weeks
- Use of probiotic supplements within the previous month
- Artificial nutrition (enteral or parenteral)
- Severe dysphagia, intestinal obstruction, or impaired gastrointestinal function
- Diagnosis of dementia or cognitive impairment preventing understanding of the study information and/or provision of informed consent
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Probiotic MixtureParticipants assigned to this intervention will receive an oral probiotic mixture twice daily for 12 weeks in addition to their usual oncologic treatment and supportive care. The probiotic mixture will be administered in sachets and taken orally twice daily for 12 weeks. | Dietary supplement | Probiotic Mixture |
| PlaceboParticipants assigned to this intervention will receive a placebo orally twice daily for 12 weeks in addition to their usual oncologic treatment and supportive care. The placebo will be provided in sachets identical in appearance, taste, and administration schedule to the probiotic mixture and will contain no active bacteria. | Other | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Gut Microbiota Alpha Diversity Indices
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks
Alpha diversity assessed by Shannon, Simpson, and Chao indices derived from 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing.
Gut Microbiota Beta Diversity Metrics
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks
Beta diversity assessed using Bray-Curtis and UniFrac dissimilarity metrics.
Relative Abundance of major Gut Microbiota Taxa
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks
Relative abundance of major microbial taxa assessed by 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing and shotgun metagenomics.
Cachexia Status
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks
Cachexia stage classified as no cachexia, precachexia, cachexia, or refractory cachexia.
5 secondary outcomes
Symptom Distress Score
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks
Health-Related Quality of Life Assessed by the EuroQol 5-Dimension Questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks
Intestinal Permeability Biomarkers
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks
Systemic Inflammation Cytokine
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks
Fecal Calprotectin Concentration
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Jun 2026.
- Background: PubMed 25474696Dodds RM, Syddall HE, Cooper R, Benzeval M, Deary IJ, Dennison EM, Der G, Gale CR, Inskip HM, Jagger C, Kirkwood TB, Lawlor DA, Robinson SM, Starr JM, Steptoe A, Tilling K, Kuh D, Cooper C, Sayer AA. Grip strength across the life course: normative data from twelve British studies. PLoS One. 2014 Dec 4;9(12):e113637. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113637. eCollection 2014.
- Background: PubMed 24737557Studenski SA, Peters KW, Alley DE, Cawthon PM, McLean RR, Harris TB, Ferrucci L, Guralnik JM, Fragala MS, Kenny AM, Kiel DP, Kritchevsky SB, Shardell MD, Dam TT, Vassileva MT. The FNIH sarcopenia project: rationale, study description, conference recommendations, and final estimates. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2014 May;69(5):547-58. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glu010.
- Background: PubMed 31081853Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Bahat G, Bauer J, Boirie Y, Bruyere O, Cederholm T, Cooper C, Landi F, Rolland Y, Sayer AA, Schneider SM, Sieber CC, Topinkova E, Vandewoude M, Visser M, Zamboni M; Writing Group for the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People 2 (EWGSOP2), and the Extended Group for EWGSOP2. Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing. 2019 Jul 1;48(4):601. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afz046. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 16576330Harris JA, Benedict FG. A Biometric Study of Human Basal Metabolism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1918 Dec;4(12):370-3. doi: 10.1073/pnas.4.12.370. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 28042071Hui D, Bruera E. The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System 25 Years Later: Past, Present, and Future Developments. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 Mar;53(3):630-643. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.10.370. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
- Background: PubMed 1714502Bruera E, Kuehn N, Miller MJ, Selmser P, Macmillan K. The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS): a simple method for the assessment of palliative care patients. J Palliat Care. 1991 Summer;7(2):6-9.
- Background: PubMed 15937688Moro C, Brunelli C, Miccinesi G, Fallai M, Morino P, Piazza M, Labianca R, Ripamonti C. Edmonton symptom assessment scale: Italian validation in two palliative care settings. Support Care Cancer. 2006 Jan;14(1):30-7. doi: 10.1007/s00520-005-0834-3. Epub 2005 Jun 4.
- Background: PubMed 2071835Crooks V, Waller S, Smith T, Hahn TJ. The use of the Karnofsky Performance Scale in determining outcomes and risk in geriatric outpatients. J Gerontol. 1991 Jul;46(4):M139-44. doi: 10.1093/geronj/46.4.m139.
- Background: PubMed 23614330Balestroni G, Bertolotti G. [EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D): an instrument for measuring quality of life]. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 2012 Sep;78(3):155-9. doi: 10.4081/monaldi.2012.121. Italian.
- Background: PubMed 26808097Schwenkglenks M, Matter-Walstra K. Is the EQ-5D suitable for use in oncology? An overview of the literature and recent developments. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2016;16(2):207-19. doi: 10.1586/14737167.2016.1146594. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
- Background: PubMed 18261876Stone CA, Tiernan E, Dooley BA. Prospective validation of the palliative prognostic index in patients with cancer. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2008 Jun;35(6):617-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.07.006. Epub 2008 Feb 8.
- Background: PubMed 32878124Laborda-Illanes A, Sanchez-Alcoholado L, Dominguez-Recio ME, Jimenez-Rodriguez B, Lavado R, Comino-Mendez I, Alba E, Queipo-Ortuno MI. Breast and Gut Microbiota Action Mechanisms in Breast Cancer Pathogenesis and Treatment. Cancers (Basel). 2020 Aug 31;12(9):2465. doi: 10.3390/cancers12092465.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Individual participant data will not be shared due to privacy and confidentiality considerations related to sensitive clinical and biological data.
Related trials for Breast Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 2
Gene Signatures to Guide HR+MBC Therapy in a Diverse Cohort
Invasive Mammary Carcinoma, Metastatic Breast Cancer
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Comparison of Reliability, Time Cost, and Participant Comfort of Lymphedema Assessments in Upper Extremity
Lymphedema, Upper Extremity Lymphedema
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Combination With or Without Famitinib as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Participants With Triple Negative Breast Cancer (BCTOP-T-N01)
TNBC - Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
Testing Whether Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib is as Effective as Chemotherapy Followed by Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib for the Treatment of High Anatomic Stage Breast Cancer With Low Recurrence Risk, The RxFINE-Low Trial
Anatomic Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage IIIA Breast Cancer AJCC v8
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Enrico Ruggeri, Medicine principal investigator
Fondazione ANT Franco Pannuti ETS
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Probiotic Mixture in people with Breast Cancer and Cancer Cachexia, run by Fondazione ANT Franco Pannuti ETS.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Rita Ostan, Biological Sciences (+393487900191, rita.ostan@ant.it), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Gut Microbiota Alpha Diversity Indices (time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07653698, which also lists 28 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Jun 2026.