Quality of Recovery (QoR-15)NCT07647367
Subtransverse Interligamentary Block Versus Paravertebral Block for Quality of Recovery After Mastectomy
A study testing Subtransverse interligamentary plane block (STIL) and Thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) in people with Quality of Recovery (QoR-15) and Modified Radical Mastectomy, run by Tanta University at 2 sites in Egypt.
Trial summary
This prospective randomized controlled double blinded non-inferiority study will be carried out in Tanta University Hospitals for duration of 6 months from June 2026 to December 2026 on 60 female patients scheduled for unilatral modified radical mastectomy under general anesthesia. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Quality of Recovery (QoR-15), Modified Radical Mastectomy
- What is being tested?
- Subtransverse interligamentary plane block (STIL) and Thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB)
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesEgypt
- Study dates
- 20 Jun 2026to Jan 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult female patients aged 18 to 65 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status I - III, who were scheduled for unilateral MRM surgery under general anesthesia and able to understand and complete the QoR-15 questionnaire
Who cannot join
- • Patients declined to participate in the trial.
- History of allergy to the used local anesthetic (LA) drugs.
- Patients with cutaneous lesions at the needle entry point.
- Coagulopathy or current anticoagulant therapy contraindicating regional block.
- Patients with severe hepatic, renal, cardiac, or respiratory disease.
- Psychiatric or cognitive disorder interfering with QoR-15 assessment
Show all 11Show fewer
- Chronic opioid use or chronic pain syndrome.
- Failed block.
- Morbid obesity (body mass index >40 kg/m2)
- Intraoperative major complications requiring postoperative ICU admission.
- Pregnancy
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Egypt2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Recruiting
Tanta university hospital
Tanta, Gharbia Governorate, 31527
- Recruiting
Tanta university hospital
Tanta, 31527
About this study
Official title: Ultrasound-Guided Subtransverse Interligamentary Plane Block Versus Thoracic Paravertebral Block for Quality of Recovery After Modified Radical Mastectomy: A Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial
This prospective randomized controlled double blinded non-inferiority study will be carried out in Tanta University Hospitals for duration of 6 months from June 2026 to December 2026 on 60 female patients scheduled for unilatral modified radical mastectomy under general anesthesia.
Read the detailed description
Breast carcinoma is a common malignancy in females, with modified radical mastectomy (MRM) being the most frequently performed surgery. Surgical intervention is accompanied by significant challenges such as postoperative pain and stress, potentially leading to prolonged hospitalizations and complications. Previous studies had demonstrated that thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) was effective in diminishing opioid requirements for patients undergoing breast surgery. TPVB is technically challenging, requiring skilled healthcare professionals and the narrow paravertebral space, located between the superior costotransverse ligament (SCTL) and the parietal pleura, poses a risk of inadvertent pleural puncture and vascular damage, and increased the potential for pneumothorax and haematoma. The Subtransverse process Interligamentary (STIL) plane block is a recently introduced technique that holds promise as an alternative to TPVB. STIL plane block specifically targets the region adjacent to the paravertebral space, rather than directly penetrating it, which theoretically diminishes the potential risks of inadvertent pneumothorax and hematoma compared with TPVB. Additionally, due to its close anatomical proximity to the paravertebral space, the STIL plane block may facilitate a more straightforward dispersion of local anaesthetics into this area. Research has also confirmed that the block achieved with STIL plane block is effective in providing adequate pain relief for breast surgeries. Also it was associated with decreased postoperative opioid consumption compared to the ESP block in patients undergoing MRM. With the improvement of anaesthesia technology, the quality of patient recovery is no longer solely measured by the success of the surgery or the discharge rate, but is increasingly oriented towards a "patient-centered" approach that focuses on the safety, comfort, and overall quality of recovery throughout the perioperative period. In light of the growing emphasis on improving postoperative quality of recovery while ensuring patient safety, we hypothesize that the STIL plane block will demonstrate non-inferiority to the thoracic PVB in terms of postoperative quality of recovery and analgesia in patients undergoing MRM.
- Being tested
- Subtransverse interligamentary plane block (STIL), Thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB)
- Keywords
- subtransverse interligamentary plane block, modified radical mastectomy, quality of recovery
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Subtransverse interligamentary plane block (STIL)Procedure or surgery
Also called Arm 1
Patients will receieve u;trasound guided subtransverse interligamentary plane block
Thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB)Procedure or surgery
Patients will receieve ultrasound guided thoracic paravertebral block
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| subtransverse interligamentary plane block | Experimental | Patients will receive ultrasound-guided subtransverse interligamentary plane block with local anesthetic mixture (20 mL 0.25% bupivacaine, 100 micrograms of fentanyl (2ml)) Receives: Procedure: Subtransverse interligamentary plane block (STIL) |
| Thoracic paravertebral block | Active comparator | Patients will receive ultrasound- guided thoracic paravertebral block with local anesthetic mixture (20 mL 0.25% bupivacaine, 100 micrograms of fentanyl (2ml)) Receives: Procedure: Thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Postoperative quality of recovery
Postoperative quality of recovery assessed using the Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire which provides a global score of recovery after anesthesia and surgery by evaluating pain, comfort, emotions, independence, and support.
The total score ranges from 0 to 150. Higher score = better recovery.
Measured: It will be measured 24 hours after surgery
Secondary outcomes (6)
Postoperative pain score
Postoperative pain score using numerical rating scale (NRS) score The NRS is an 11-point pain scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 means no pain and 10 means the worst imaginable pain. Participants are asked to rate their pain intensity by choosing the number that best represents their pain level.
Measured: It will be measured at rest and during arm movement at 0,2,6,12,24 hours postoperatively
Time to first rescue analgesia
Time interval from the end of surgery until need of rescue analgesia
Measured: Postoperatively the time interval from the end of surgery until need of rescue analgesia will be recorded
Total postoperative opioid consumption in the first 24 hours
Total postoperative opioid consumption in the first 24 hours will be recorded
Measured: Total needed postoperative opioid dosing during the first 24 hours will recorded
Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting
Postoperative incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting will be recorded during the first 24 hours
Measured: Postoperative incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting will be recorded during the first 24 hours
The degree of patient satisfaction
The degree of patient satisfaction using level of satisfaction regarding the analgesia regimen using a 5 point Likert scale, where 1 indicates "extremely dissatisfied", 2 "unsatisfied", 3 "unsure", 4 "satisfied", and 5 "extremely satisfied"
Measured: it will be recorded postoperatively and 24 hours after surgery
Block performance time
Block performance time from the start of space visualization by ultrasound until the end of local anesthetic injection will be recorded
Measured: Block performance time from the start of space visualization by ultrasound until the end of local anesthetic injection
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Jun 2026
- Study start20 Jun 2026
- Primary completionDec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completionJan 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Quality of Recovery (QoR-15)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Tanta University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Mai Salah Salem, Tanta University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07647367
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 36265PR77/5/26
- Status last verified
- Jun 2026
- First submitted
- 9 Jun 2026
- Last updated
- 4 Aug 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: The data will be available upon a reasonable request from the corresponding author
Publications
Arun N, Singh R, Kumar M. Direct Pectoral Nerve Block versus Ultrasound-Guided Paravertebral Block for Analgesia and Improved Recovery after Modified Radical Mastectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Sri Lankan Journal of Anaesthesiology. 2026;34(1).
Ince I, Dostbil A, Ozmen O, Aksoy M, Karadeniz E. Subtransverse process interligamentary (STIL) plane block for postoperative pain management after breast surgery. J Clin Anesth. 2020 May;61:109649. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2019.109649. Epub 2019 Nov 17. No abstract available.
PubMed 31744747Kilicaslan A, Sarkilar G, Altinok T, Tulgar S. A novel ultrasound-guided technique in peri-paravertebral area: Subtransverse process interligamentary (STIL) plane block: The game has not ended yet. J Clin Anesth. 2020 Mar;60:76-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2019.08.047. Epub 2019 Aug 30. No abstract available.
PubMed 31476624Ardon AE, Lee J, Franco CD, Riutort KT, Greengrass RA. Paravertebral block: anatomy and relevant safety issues. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2020 Oct;73(5):394-400. doi: 10.4097/kja.20065. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
PubMed 32172551Gurkan Y, Aksu C, Kus A, Yorukoglu UH. Erector spinae plane block and thoracic paravertebral block for breast surgery compared to IV-morphine: A randomized controlled trial. J Clin Anesth. 2020 Feb;59:84-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2019.06.036. Epub 2019 Jul 4.
PubMed 31280100Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I, Parkin DM, Pineros M, Znaor A, Bray F. Cancer statistics for the year 2020: An overview. Int J Cancer. 2021 Apr 5. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33588. Online ahead of print.
PubMed 33818764
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Aug 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Ultrasound-Guided Subtransverse Interligamentary Plane Block Versus Thoracic Paravertebral Block for Quality of Recovery After Modified Radical Mastectomy: A Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07647367
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 36265PR77/5/26
- Keywords
- subtransverse interligamentary plane block, modified radical mastectomy, quality of recovery
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Tanta UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 20 Jun 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jan 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 15 Jun 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This prospective randomized controlled double blinded non-inferiority study will be carried out in Tanta University Hospitals for duration of 6 months from June 2026 to December 2026 on 60 female patients scheduled for unilatral modified radical mastectomy under general anesthesia.
Detailed description
Breast carcinoma is a common malignancy in females, with modified radical mastectomy (MRM) being the most frequently performed surgery. Surgical intervention is accompanied by significant challenges such as postoperative pain and stress, potentially leading to prolonged hospitalizations and complications. Previous studies had demonstrated that thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) was effective in diminishing opioid requirements for patients undergoing breast surgery. TPVB is technically challenging, requiring skilled healthcare professionals and the narrow paravertebral space, located between the superior costotransverse ligament (SCTL) and the parietal pleura, poses a risk of inadvertent pleural puncture and vascular damage, and increased the potential for pneumothorax and haematoma. The Subtransverse process Interligamentary (STIL) plane block is a recently introduced technique that holds promise as an alternative to TPVB. STIL plane block specifically targets the region adjacent to the paravertebral space, rather than directly penetrating it, which theoretically diminishes the potential risks of inadvertent pneumothorax and hematoma compared with TPVB. Additionally, due to its close anatomical proximity to the paravertebral space, the STIL plane block may facilitate a more straightforward dispersion of local anaesthetics into this area. Research has also confirmed that the block achieved with STIL plane block is effective in providing adequate pain relief for breast surgeries. Also it was associated with decreased postoperative opioid consumption compared to the ESP block in patients undergoing MRM. With the improvement of anaesthesia technology, the quality of patient recovery is no longer solely measured by the success of the surgery or the discharge rate, but is increasingly oriented towards a "patient-centered" approach that focuses on the safety, comfort, and overall quality of recovery throughout the perioperative period. In light of the growing emphasis on improving postoperative quality of recovery while ensuring patient safety, we hypothesize that the STIL plane block will demonstrate non-inferiority to the thoracic PVB in terms of postoperative quality of recovery and analgesia in patients undergoing MRM.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| subtransverse interligamentary plane block | Experimental | Procedure: Subtransverse interligamentary plane block (STIL)Patients will receive ultrasound-guided subtransverse interligamentary plane block with local anesthetic mixture (20 mL 0.25% bupivacaine, 100 micrograms of fentanyl (2ml)) |
| Thoracic paravertebral block | Active comparator | Procedure: Thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB)Patients will receive ultrasound- guided thoracic paravertebral block with local anesthetic mixture (20 mL 0.25% bupivacaine, 100 micrograms of fentanyl (2ml)) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Adult female patients aged 18 to 65 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status I - III, who were scheduled for unilateral MRM surgery under general anesthesia and able to understand and complete the QoR-15 questionnaire
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- • Patients declined to participate in the trial.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Subtransverse interligamentary plane block (STIL)Also: Arm 1Patients will receieve u;trasound guided subtransverse interligamentary plane block | Procedure or surgery | subtransverse interligamentary plane block |
| Thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB)Patients will receieve ultrasound guided thoracic paravertebral block | Procedure or surgery | Thoracic paravertebral block |
Primary outcome
Postoperative quality of recovery
Time frame: It will be measured 24 hours after surgery
Postoperative quality of recovery assessed using the Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire which provides a global score of recovery after anesthesia and surgery by evaluating pain, comfort, emotions, independence, and support. The total score ranges from 0 to 150. Higher score = better recovery.
6 secondary outcomes
Postoperative pain score
Time frame: It will be measured at rest and during arm movement at 0,2,6,12,24 hours postoperatively
Time to first rescue analgesia
Time frame: Postoperatively the time interval from the end of surgery until need of rescue analgesia will be recorded
Total postoperative opioid consumption in the first 24 hours
Time frame: Total needed postoperative opioid dosing during the first 24 hours will recorded
Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting
Time frame: Postoperative incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting will be recorded during the first 24 hours
The degree of patient satisfaction
Time frame: it will be recorded postoperatively and 24 hours after surgery
Block performance time
Time frame: Block performance time from the start of space visualization by ultrasound until the end of local anesthetic injection
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Aug 2026.
- Results publicationArun N, Singh R, Kumar M. Direct Pectoral Nerve Block versus Ultrasound-Guided Paravertebral Block for Analgesia and Improved Recovery after Modified Radical Mastectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Sri Lankan Journal of Anaesthesiology. 2026;34(1).
- Results publication: PubMed 31744747Ince I, Dostbil A, Ozmen O, Aksoy M, Karadeniz E. Subtransverse process interligamentary (STIL) plane block for postoperative pain management after breast surgery. J Clin Anesth. 2020 May;61:109649. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2019.109649. Epub 2019 Nov 17. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 31476624Kilicaslan A, Sarkilar G, Altinok T, Tulgar S. A novel ultrasound-guided technique in peri-paravertebral area: Subtransverse process interligamentary (STIL) plane block: The game has not ended yet. J Clin Anesth. 2020 Mar;60:76-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2019.08.047. Epub 2019 Aug 30. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 32172551Ardon AE, Lee J, Franco CD, Riutort KT, Greengrass RA. Paravertebral block: anatomy and relevant safety issues. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2020 Oct;73(5):394-400. doi: 10.4097/kja.20065. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
- Results publication: PubMed 31280100Gurkan Y, Aksu C, Kus A, Yorukoglu UH. Erector spinae plane block and thoracic paravertebral block for breast surgery compared to IV-morphine: A randomized controlled trial. J Clin Anesth. 2020 Feb;59:84-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2019.06.036. Epub 2019 Jul 4.
- Results publication: PubMed 33818764Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I, Parkin DM, Pineros M, Znaor A, Bray F. Cancer statistics for the year 2020: An overview. Int J Cancer. 2021 Apr 5. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33588. Online ahead of print.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. The data will be available upon a reasonable request from the corresponding author
Related trials for Quality of Recovery (QoR-15)
Not yet recruiting
Anaesthesia for Hip and Knee Arthroplasty (SPIGA)
Hip Arthroplasty, Knee Arthroplasty
Recruiting
Analgesic Efficacy of Combined PECS II and PIP Block Versus Thoracic Paravertebral Block Post-Mastectomy
Acute Pain, Post Operative Analgesia
Recruiting
Feasibility of Breathwork Intervention With Older Adults After Knee Surgery
Surgical Stress Response, Stress Physiological
RecruitingPhase 4
PeRiOperative Medicine Platform Trial
Surgical Site Infection After Major Surgery, Anaesthesia
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
MAG-PAIN - MAGnesium for Postoperative Analgesia In the Newly Delivered
Postoperative Pain, Quality of Recovery (QoR-15)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Subtransverse interligamentary plane block (STIL) and Thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) in people with Quality of Recovery (QoR-15) and Modified Radical Mastectomy, run by Tanta University at 2 sites in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Mai Salah Salem, MD anesthesia, SIC (01061107658 ext. 002, mai.salah@med.tanta.edu.eg), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Postoperative quality of recovery (time frame: It will be measured 24 hours after surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07647367, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Aug 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 26 Oct 2026.