Cardiac ArrestLower_limb_CPRNCT07646496
Comparison of Chest Compressions Performed With the Lower Limb and the Classical Method (Lower_limb_CPR).
A study testing Instruction to perform chest compressions using the lower limb (foot) in people with Cardiac Arrest, run by Marcin Muża at 1 site in Poland.
Trial summary
Chest compressions, alongside early defibrillation, are the most important component of basic life support for adults. High-quality compressions give the patient a chance to survive cardiac arrest. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Cardiac Arrest
- What is being tested?
- Instruction to perform chest compressions using the lower limb (foot)
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 99 participants
- Where
- 1 sitePoland
- Study dates
- 22 Nov 2025to 1 Jan 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Paramedic and nursing students from the Powiśle Academy of Applied Sciences who voluntarily and knowingly consent to participate in the study.
- Completed first aid training during their studies.
Who cannot join
- Lack of consent to participate in the study.
- Education in another medical profession.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Poland1 site
Powiślańska Academy of Applied Sciences
Kwidzyn, Pomeranian Voivodeship, 82-500
About this study
Official title: Comparison of the Quality of Chest Compressions Performed With the Lower Limb and the Classical Method During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - a Simulation Study.
Chest compressions, alongside early defibrillation, are the most important component of basic life support for adults. High-quality compressions give the patient a chance to survive cardiac arrest.
The chest compression technique, described for years in guidelines, requires kneeling next to the victim and pressing down on the center of the chest with both extended arms at a specific rate and depth. However, there is a lack of scientific data on whether alternative compression methods (for example, using a lower limb) can be considered equally effective in situations where conventional compressions are impossible (e.g., the witness to cardiac arrest is a person with a disability, with an upper limb injury, or an elderly person; or when there is very little space to kneel). The aim of the study is to determine whether compressions performed with the dominant foot by paramedic and nursing students can be considered comparable in quality to conventional compressions. Furthermore, subjective levels of physical fatigue are assessed.
Read more
Participants are recruited from among paramedic and nursing students who voluntarily and knowingly consent to participate in the research study.
Inclusion Criteria
- Paramedic and nursing students from the Powiśle Academy of Applied Sciences who voluntarily and knowingly consent to participate in the study.
- Completed first aid training during their studies.
Exclusion Criteria
- Lack of consent to participate in the study.
- Education in another medical profession.
Procedure Students are randomly assigned to the control and study groups. Before participating in the simulation scenario, participants complete a questionnaire asking several demographic questions (age, gender, education, physical activity). Participants then enter the simulation room individually. The activities are not videotaped. From the moment of randomization, students are anonymous to the researcher. Both when completing the questionnaires and recording data from the simulation scenario, participants will be assigned a unique number (generated solely for the study), which prevents identification. Upon entering the simulation room, participants receive all instructions verbally. Students' task in the simulation environment involves performing two minutes of continuous chest compressions. Participants in the control group perform these compressions traditionally, while those in the study group are asked to perform compressions using their dominant leg. Compression quality is assessed using a Prestan Manikin (2000 series) with the CPR FEEDBACK mobile app. Parameters such as compression depth, rate, and relaxation are assessed. Completion of chest compressions on the manikin marks the end of the simulation scenario. Furthermore, participants are verbally questioned after the simulation about their level of physical fatigue on a scale of 1 (none) to 10 (the most severe ever).
- Conditions
- Cardiac Arrest
- Being tested
- Instruction to perform chest compressions using the lower limb (foot)
- Keywords
- cardiac arrest, chest compressions, CPR, resuscitation
- Medical subject headings
- Heart Arrest
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Instruction to perform chest compressions using the lower limb (foot)Other
Verbal instruction to perform chest compressions using the lower limb (foot) before the simulation scenario.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Study | Experimental | Not described Receives: Other: Instruction to perform chest compressions using the lower limb (foot) |
| Control | No intervention | Not described |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Chest compressions quality - Frequency
Measured: 2 minutes
Chest compressions quality - Relaxation
Measured: 2 minutes
Chest compressions quality - Depth
Measured: 2 minutes
Secondary outcomes (1)
Fatigue
Self-assessed physical fatigue (1-10 scale)
Measured: 2 minutes
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Jun 2026
- Study start22 Nov 2025
- Primary completion1 Jan 2026
- Study completion1 Jan 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Cardiac ArrestStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 99 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Marcin Muża
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Powiślańska Academy of Applied Sciences
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Marcin Muża, Powiślańska Academy of Applied Sciences
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07646496
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Powiślańska1
- Acronym
- Lower_limb_CPR
- Status last verified
- Jun 2026
- First submitted
- 4 Jun 2026
- Last updated
- 12 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of the Quality of Chest Compressions Performed With the Lower Limb and the Classical Method During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - a Simulation Study.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07646496
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Lower_limb_CPR / Powiślańska1
- Conditions
- Cardiac Arrest
- Keywords
- cardiac arrest, chest compressions, CPR, resuscitation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 99 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Marcin MużaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Powiślańska Academy of Applied Sciences
- Study start
- 22 Nov 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jan 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Jan 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Jun 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Chest compressions, alongside early defibrillation, are the most important component of basic life support for adults. High-quality compressions give the patient a chance to survive cardiac arrest.
The chest compression technique, described for years in guidelines, requires kneeling next to the victim and pressing down on the center of the chest with both extended arms at a specific rate and depth. However, there is a lack of scientific data on whether alternative compression methods (for example, using a lower limb) can be considered equally effective in situations where conventional compressions are impossible (e.g., the witness to cardiac arrest is a person with a disability, with an upper limb injury, or an elderly person; or when there is very little space to kneel). The aim of the study is to determine whether compressions performed with the dominant foot by paramedic and nursing students can be considered comparable in quality to conventional compressions. Furthermore, subjective levels of physical fatigue are assessed.
Participants are recruited from among paramedic and nursing students who voluntarily and knowingly consent to participate in the research study.
Inclusion Criteria
- Paramedic and nursing students from the Powiśle Academy of Applied Sciences who voluntarily and knowingly consent to participate in the study.
- Completed first aid training during their studies.
Exclusion Criteria
- Lack of consent to participate in the study.
- Education in another medical profession.
Procedure Students are randomly assigned to the control and study groups. Before participating in the simulation scenario, participants complete a questionnaire asking several demographic questions (age, gender, education, physical activity). Participants then enter the simulation room individually. The activities are not videotaped. From the moment of randomization, students are anonymous to the researcher. Both when completing the questionnaires and recording data from the simulation scenario, participants will be assigned a unique number (generated solely for the study), which prevents identification. Upon entering the simulation room, participants receive all instructions verbally. Students' task in the simulation environment involves performing two minutes of continuous chest compressions. Participants in the control group perform these compressions traditionally, while those in the study group are asked to perform compressions using their dominant leg. Compression quality is assessed using a Prestan Manikin (2000 series) with the CPR FEEDBACK mobile app. Parameters such as compression depth, rate, and relaxation are assessed. Completion of chest compressions on the manikin marks the end of the simulation scenario. Furthermore, participants are verbally questioned after the simulation about their level of physical fatigue on a scale of 1 (none) to 10 (the most severe ever).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Study | Experimental | Other: Instruction to perform chest compressions using the lower limb (foot) |
| Control | No intervention | – |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Paramedic and nursing students from the Powiśle Academy of Applied Sciences who voluntarily and knowingly consent to participate in the study.
- Completed first aid training during their studies.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Lack of consent to participate in the study.
- Education in another medical profession.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Instruction to perform chest compressions using the lower limb (foot)Verbal instruction to perform chest compressions using the lower limb (foot) before the simulation scenario. | Other | Study |
Primary outcome
Chest compressions quality - Frequency
Time frame: 2 minutes
Chest compressions quality - Relaxation
Time frame: 2 minutes
Chest compressions quality - Depth
Time frame: 2 minutes
1 secondary outcome
Fatigue
Time frame: 2 minutes
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Jun 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Cardiac Arrest
RecruitingObservational study
AI-powered ECG Analysis Using Willem™ Software in High-risk Cardiac Patients (WILLEM)
Cardiomyopathies, Cardiac Arrest
Active, not recruiting
Assessment of Combined CCM and ICD Device in HFrEF
Heart Failure, Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
Not yet recruitingObservational study
CAROTID DOPPLER AND CEREBRAL OXIMERY IN POST CARDIAC ARREST ICU PATIENTS
Cardiac Arrest (CA), Carotid Doppler
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
The Danish Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Study
Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest, Post-Cardiac Arrest Syndrome
RecruitingObservational study
Evaluation of Acid-base Disorders and Ventilation Settings in Cardiogenic Shock and Post-cardiac Arrest Patients: Comparison With VentilO Algorithm
Cardiac Arrest (CA), Cardiogenic Shock
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Instruction to perform chest compressions using the lower limb (foot) in people with Cardiac Arrest, run by Marcin Muża at 1 site in Poland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Poland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Chest compressions quality - Frequency (time frame: 2 minutes). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Jun 2026.