HIVNCT07644546
Immunogenicity of MF59-adjuvanted Versus High-dose Influenza Vaccine in People With HIV: a Randomized Clinical Trial
A study testing IM in people with HIV, run by National Taiwan University Hospital.
Trial summary
Seasonal influenza causes morbidity in people with impaired immunity, including adults with elder ages and other comorbidities [1]. Standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccines (IIV) may induce lower hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) titers and more rapid waning in these groups. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- HIV
- What is being tested?
- IM
- Type of treatment
- Vaccines
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 350 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2026to 31 Dec 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- PWH aged ≥18 years
Who cannot join
- History of confirmed severe adverse effects owing to any type of influenza vaccine, including anaphylaxis and Guillain-Barré syndrome.
- Severe coagulopathy which causes contraindication for vaccination.
- Already vaccinated with any type of 2026-2027 influenza vaccines.
- Having diagnosed with influenza one month before vaccination.
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
About this study
Seasonal influenza causes morbidity in people with impaired immunity, including adults with elder ages and other comorbidities [1]. Standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccines (IIV) may induce lower hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) titers and more rapid waning in these groups. High-dose IIV could generate higher and more durable serological responses, including HAI, B-cell activation and antibody magnitude, which was demonstrated in randomized trials [2,3]. MF59-adjuvanted IIV further enhances innate immune activation and antigen presentation, potentially broadening and strengthening responses, particularly during antigenic drift seasons [4]. These enhanced platforms represent biologically distinct strategies to overcome reduced vaccine responsiveness.
Influenza A/H3N2 was reported as the predominant circulating strain in Taiwan. Initial antigenic characterization suggested suboptimal match between some circulating A/H3N2 viruses (the subclade K variant) and the vaccine reference strain, whereas A/H1N1 viruses appeared consistency with the circulating and vaccine-containing strain [5]. As of February 2026, approximately 2,300 cases of severe influenza had been confirmed during the 2025-2026 season, representing the largest epidemic in the post-COVID-19 era. In the meanwhile, both MF59-adjuvanted and high-dose influenza vaccine were firstly introduced in Taiwan for elderly people [5].
Previous study had demonstrated that people living HIV (PWH) might have lower humoral immune responses compared with people without HIV, even among PWH with relatively higher (defined as ≥ 350 cells/mm3) CD4 counts [6]. In spite of the broad use of these novel influenza vaccines in older adults and other population with immunocompromised status such as the recipient of solid organ transplantation [7], evidence gap exists in PWH, where vaccine responses vary by CD4 count, viral suppression, immune activation, comorbidities, and prior vaccination history. High-dose influenza vaccination has shown improved serologic outcomes versus standard dose in PWH in randomized trials [2], while data of MF59-adjuvanted vaccines used for PWH are lacking. Moreover, comparative serological responses, durability or effectiveness between the two vaccines (MF59 adjuvant vs high-dose) was only conducted among participants with elder age, which showed that the seroconversion rate for H3N2 among those receiving MF59-adjuvanted vaccines did not meet noninferiority criteria compared with those receiving high-dose vaccines [8]. Nevertheless, such data on PWH remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to compare toe immunogenicity among PWH undergoing MF59-adjuvanted or high-dose seasonal influenza vaccine.
- Conditions
- HIV
- Being tested
- IM
- Keywords
- HIV, influenza, vaccine
- Medical subject headings
- Influenza, Human
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
IMBiological
0.5ml/Vial, IM on Day1
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| MF59-adjuvant vaccine | Experimental | MF59-adjuvant vaccine Receives: Biological: IM |
| high-dose vaccine | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Biological: IM |
| egg-based vaccine | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Biological: IM |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The vaccine response rate among participants undergoing MF59-adjuvanted and high-dose influenza vaccines at day 28
The vaccine response rate among participants undergoing MF59-adjuvanted and high-dose influenza vaccines at day 28, defined as the proportion of patients exhibiting seroconversion for at least 1 viral strain (A/H1N1, A/H3N2, or B) contained in the trivalent vaccines at day 28 after vaccination. Seroconversion was defined as a ≥ 4-fold increase of HAI titer from baseline.
Measured: 1 month
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Jun 2026
- Study start1 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion28 Feb 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for HIVStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by National Taiwan University HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 350 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- National Taiwan University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, National Taiwan University Clinical Trial Center, National Taiwan University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07644546
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 202603137MIPA
- Status last verified
- Jun 2026
- First submitted
- 8 Jun 2026
- Last updated
- 12 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Immunogenicity of MF59-adjuvanted Versus High-dose Influenza Vaccine in People With HIV: a Randomized Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07644546
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 202603137MIPA
- Conditions
- HIV
- Keywords
- HIV, influenza, vaccine
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 350 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- National Taiwan University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 28 Feb 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 12 Jun 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Seasonal influenza causes morbidity in people with impaired immunity, including adults with elder ages and other comorbidities [1]. Standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccines (IIV) may induce lower hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) titers and more rapid waning in these groups. High-dose IIV could generate higher and more durable serological responses, including HAI, B-cell activation and antibody magnitude, which was demonstrated in randomized trials [2,3]. MF59-adjuvanted IIV further enhances innate immune activation and antigen presentation, potentially broadening and strengthening responses, particularly during antigenic drift seasons [4]. These enhanced platforms represent biologically distinct strategies to overcome reduced vaccine responsiveness.
Influenza A/H3N2 was reported as the predominant circulating strain in Taiwan. Initial antigenic characterization suggested suboptimal match between some circulating A/H3N2 viruses (the subclade K variant) and the vaccine reference strain, whereas A/H1N1 viruses appeared consistency with the circulating and vaccine-containing strain [5]. As of February 2026, approximately 2,300 cases of severe influenza had been confirmed during the 2025-2026 season, representing the largest epidemic in the post-COVID-19 era. In the meanwhile, both MF59-adjuvanted and high-dose influenza vaccine were firstly introduced in Taiwan for elderly people [5].
Previous study had demonstrated that people living HIV (PWH) might have lower humoral immune responses compared with people without HIV, even among PWH with relatively higher (defined as ≥ 350 cells/mm3) CD4 counts [6]. In spite of the broad use of these novel influenza vaccines in older adults and other population with immunocompromised status such as the recipient of solid organ transplantation [7], evidence gap exists in PWH, where vaccine responses vary by CD4 count, viral suppression, immune activation, comorbidities, and prior vaccination history. High-dose influenza vaccination has shown improved serologic outcomes versus standard dose in PWH in randomized trials [2], while data of MF59-adjuvanted vaccines used for PWH are lacking. Moreover, comparative serological responses, durability or effectiveness between the two vaccines (MF59 adjuvant vs high-dose) was only conducted among participants with elder age, which showed that the seroconversion rate for H3N2 among those receiving MF59-adjuvanted vaccines did not meet noninferiority criteria compared with those receiving high-dose vaccines [8]. Nevertheless, such data on PWH remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to compare toe immunogenicity among PWH undergoing MF59-adjuvanted or high-dose seasonal influenza vaccine.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| MF59-adjuvant vaccine | Experimental | Biological: IMMF59-adjuvant vaccine |
| high-dose vaccine | Active comparator | Biological: IM |
| egg-based vaccine | Active comparator | Biological: IM |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- PWH aged ≥18 years
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- History of confirmed severe adverse effects owing to any type of influenza vaccine, including anaphylaxis and Guillain-Barré syndrome.
- Severe coagulopathy which causes contraindication for vaccination.
- Already vaccinated with any type of 2026-2027 influenza vaccines.
- Having diagnosed with influenza one month before vaccination.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| IM0.5ml/Vial, IM on Day1 | Biological | MF59-adjuvant vaccine, egg-based vaccine, high-dose vaccine |
Primary outcome
The vaccine response rate among participants undergoing MF59-adjuvanted and high-dose influenza vaccines at day 28
Time frame: 1 month
The vaccine response rate among participants undergoing MF59-adjuvanted and high-dose influenza vaccines at day 28, defined as the proportion of patients exhibiting seroconversion for at least 1 viral strain (A/H1N1, A/H3N2, or B) contained in the trivalent vaccines at day 28 after vaccination. Seroconversion was defined as a ≥ 4-fold increase of HAI titer from baseline.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Jun 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for HIV
Not yet recruiting
HealthMpowerment Korea: Pilot Testing the Cultural Adaptation of a Digital HIV Intervention for Men Who Have Sex With Men in South Korea
HIV Infections, HIV Prevention and Care
Not yet recruiting
Prescribe to Prevent HIV: A Hybrid Trial Helping Addiction Clinics Prevent HIV & Infections Through Safer Drug Use Support
People Who Use Opioids/People With Opioid Use Disorder (OUD)
Recruiting
Evaluating the Impact of Using the B-OK Bottles for HIV and ART Literacy in South Africa
HIV, HIV Treatment
Recruiting
Trial Phase: Syndemic Adapted Medly Uganda
Mental Health
RecruitingObservational study
Olfactory Function and Model-Based Behavior in People Living With HIV and SUD
HIV, Substance Use Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing IM in people with HIV, run by National Taiwan University Hospital.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Wang-Da Liu, M.D., M.P.H. (+886-972-652797, b95401043@ntu.edu.tw), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The vaccine response rate among participants undergoing MF59-adjuvanted and high-dose influenza vaccines at day 28 (time frame: 1 month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Jun 2026.