AzTrials
AzTrials

Aneurysmal Subarachnoid HaemorrhageDINTESA-FranceNCT07634172

Diagnosis and Treatment of Late Neurological Ischemic Deficit in Patients Suffering From Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.

An observational study of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Haemorrhage and Delayed Ischemic Neurological Deficit, run by Société Française d'Anesthésie et de Réanimation at 1 site in France.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Recent studies state that patients affected by aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) today survive longer because they are treated early. Unfortunately, patients often develop chronic disabling neurological deficits at a rate that is still unacceptable given the progress in the specific treatment of this pathology… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
How many people
1,000 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
15 Jun 2026to 15 Jun 2028
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients with primary diagnosis of subarachnoid hemorrhage due to rupture of a cerebral artery aneurysm confirmed by cerebral angiotomography or angiography of the intracranial vessels, with the need for admission to the Intensive Care Unit in France

Who may be able to join

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Primary diagnosis of subarachnoid hemorrhage due to rupture of a cerebral artery aneurysm, confirmed by cerebral CT angiography or intracranial angiography, requiring admission to an intensive care unit (ICU)
  • No objection to the use of data in accordance with regulations.

Who cannot join

  • Age < 18 years
  • Primary diagnosis of subarachnoid hemorrhage sine materia, i.e. post-traumatic or caused by arteriovenous malformation or bleeding from a brain tumor.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Edoardo Di Paolo, MD contact

0145658902

edoardo.di_paolo@ghu-paris.fr

Aurélien Mazeraud, MD contact

0145658902

a.mazeraud@ghu-paris.fr

France1 site
  • GHU Paris

    Paris, 75014

    Edoardo Di Paolo, MD

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Diagnosis and Treatment of Late Neurological Ischemic Deficit in Patients Suffering From Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Recent studies state that patients affected by aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) today survive longer because they are treated early. Unfortunately, patients often develop chronic disabling neurological deficits at a rate that is still unacceptable given the progress in the specific treatment of this pathology and the volume of systems of neurological monitoring available to date in Italy.

The main cause of unfavorable neurological outcome is delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI), often resulting from symptomatic vasospasm defined as delayed neurological ischemic deficit (DIND). The incidence of DIND is not defined and is difficult to diagnose early as there is no gold standard for identifying it, nor guidelines regarding the most effective treatment.

Read more

Given these gaps, the primary objective of this study is to describe the incidence of DIND in patients affected by aSAH, collecting information regarding the diagnostic imaging (neurological symptom on clinical examination or alteration on instrumental monitoring). Secondary objectives will be to evaluate the different therapeutic strategies adopted in the different participating centers and compare these strategies to mortality and short- and long-term functional neurological outcome. Furthermore, as there are no data in the literature, the Investigators want to describe the indications, usefulness and intensity of treatment in the aSAH patient in case of monitoring of parenchymal intracranial pressure.

Same as italian study, with their consent. For France addition of medical imaging

Read the detailed description

Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is a particular form of hemorrhagic stroke characterized by blood spillage into the intracranial subarachnoid spaces due to the rupture of an aneurysm of a large cerebral arterial vessel of the circle of Willis. It can cause sudden and intense symptoms, such as violent headache, nausea, vomiting, neck stiffness and sensitivity to light, but also loss of consciousness, cardiac arrest and death.

The pre-hospital mortality rate in the literature remains high (22-26%), even if it is lower than in previous decades. However, the number of patients discharged from hospital with permanent disabilities is increasing, especially those of working age (the average age at onset of symptoms is 55 years), contributing significantly to public health costs.

The incidence of aSAH worldwide is approximately 6.1 cases per 100,000 people per year, but there are national differences. In Italy, for example, it is 11.2 (10.5-12.4) cases per 100,000 inhabitants per year.

At the onset of symptoms, once the aneurysmal origin of the cerebral hemorrhage has been confirmed through radiological examinations, it is essential to promptly ensure treatment of the ruptured aneurysm. Early repair of the ruptured aneurysm is recommended within 24 to 72 hours, via endovascular coiling or neurosurgical clipping. This allows to prevent any rebleeding and reduce the risk of cerebral vasospasm, as it reduces the amount of blood distributed in the subarachnoid space. The latter, in fact, represents the main inflammatory stimulus on large cerebral arteries, favoring the vasoconstriction reaction which manifests itself angiographically and/or ultrasonographically in 70% of cases. Cerebral vasospasm is very often clinically silent, since the reduction of the vascular lumen is not sufficient to generate the conditions of discrepancy between the arterial flow of the perfused brain parenchyma and its metabolic demand.

However, in 20-30% of cases a neurological deterioration also occurs, called delayed ischemic neurological deficit or DIND (Delayed Ischemic Neurological Deficit), defined as a focal neurological deterioration (appearance of at least one of the symptoms including hemiparesis, aphasia, hemianopsia or neglect) or global (sudden neurological worsening leading to at least a two-point decrease in the Glasgow Scale or the appearance of anisocoria or pupillary reactivity). DIND is not always immediately evident after securing the aneurysm, and it is necessary to exclude other causes of neurological deterioration, such as hydrocephalus, convulsions, rebleeding and hyponatremia in order to confirm it.

Identifying DIND early is essential to prevent the formation of a true ischemic core in the area affected by vasospasm, i.e. late cerebral ischemia, DCI (Delayed Cerebral Ischemia), defined by radiological criteria: evidence of cerebral infarction on brain computed tomography (CT) scan or brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) within 6 weeks of onset of aSAH complicated by vasospasm.

DIND, in fact, is the main preventable cause of unfavorable neurological-functional outcome and DCI in patients with SAH.

Regarding the identification of DIND, it is certainly crucial to carry out a systematic clinical neurological examination on the awake patient. In comatose patients, or in those in whom it is not possible to carry out a sedation window, multimodal instrumental monitoring is certainly helpful. In fact, if the patient is sedated or cannot be awakened, the information deriving from the inspection (pupillary reactivity and isocoria) should be integrated with continuous electroencephalographic monitoring (cEEG) and/or transcranial color Doppler ultrasound (TCD)ccc. Instrumental monitoring is, in fact, fundamental in those patients in whom a suspension of sedation generates an increase in intracranial pressure and consequent reduction in cerebral oxygenation, making clinical neurological evaluation impossible.

The alterations associated with DIND most commonly described during quantitative EEG (qEEG) are decreased alpha/delta ratio and reduced alpha variability. EEG changes may precede clinical deterioration by several hours, and allow for a differential diagnosis with nonconvulsive status epilepticus. Instrumental vasospasm is defined as an average blood flow velocity > 120 cm/sec detected ultrasonographically via TCD. Instead, clinical vasospasm, i.e. DIND that requires treatment, is diagnosed in case of speed of at least 200 cm/sec, or increased by 50 cm/sec in the last 24 hours, or even if the Lindeegard index is greater of 3 (defined as the ratio of flow velocities between the middle cerebral artery and the ipsilateral distal internal carotid artery, MCA/ICA).

Regarding second-level tests, in sedated or unconscious patients, it is also reasonable to perform screening through repeated imaging tests, such as computed perfusion tomography (CTP), cerebral angiotomography (CTA) and intracranial vessel angiography ( TSA). The use of CTP is increasingly widespread: it detects imminent ischemia by decreasing cerebral perfusion, thus identifying salvageable brain tissue (ischemic penumbra) before irreversible brain damage occurs. This approach, however, involves transporting the critically ill patient to radiology and administering a contrast medium, adding considerable risks. It should also be underlined that, in case of clinical or instrumental suspicion of DIND, in some centers second level tests are used less and less, intervening early with therapy to resolve it.

As with the diagnostic procedure, the therapeutic strategies implemented are also very different from each other, and none has been proven to be more effective than another. They can be more or less invasive, and the main ones are:

hemodynamic therapy, i.e. permissive hypertension, in which systemic blood pressure is increased to increase cerebral perfusion and ensure that an adequate quantity of blood supplies the brain parenchyma downstream of vasospasm; local intra-arterial pharmacological therapy, in bolus or continuous infusion, with a vasodilator drug (calcium antagonist/milrinone); mechanical therapy, whereby action is taken on the muscular wall of the vessel in question by carrying out angioplasty with a transluminal balloon.

Innovative techniques, such as stent retriever angioplasty, which also allows the application of intra-arterial calcium channel antagonists, can be an additional tool in selected patients with refractory vasospasm.

To date, there is no gold standard for diagnosing DIND, evidence on which patients are at greatest risk of developing it and recommendations regarding the most effective treatment to resolve it. Management is delegated to the multidisciplinary department team of each centre.

In conclusion, also in light of the recent guidelines on aSAH, it is urgent to establish how to prevent DCI, identifying the onset of DIND early, both clinically and instrumentally.

With this study the Investoigators aim to determine the incidence of DIND in patients with aSAH, to evaluate the effectiveness of different treatments and to compare the different diagnostic/therapeutic strategies in the participating centers, investigating the impact of DIND on short-term and long-term neurological-functional outcomes.

Same as italian study, with their consent. For France addition of medical imaging

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT07634172
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage groupPatients diagnosed with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Delayed Ischemic Neurologic Deficit GroupPatients diagnosed with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage who develop delayed ischemic neurologic deficit

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. DIND incidence

    Calculation of the incidence of DIND in patients affected by aSAH. The presence of a suspicious alteration for DIND at the neurological clinical examination (if the patient is awake or if a sedation window is possible) or instrumental (if the clinical examination is not possible), confirmed or not by radiological examinations, will be recorded.

    Conditions that are considered diagnostic are discribed in the protocole for :

    • patient who is awake or can be awakened to undergo a clinical neurological examination
    • in comatose or unresponsive patients

    Measured: 12 months

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Imaging application

    Describe and analyze the variability of the diagnostic methods (clinical and instrumental examination) applied by each center to identify DIND in patients with aSAH and how this is treated.

    Measured: 12 months

  2. Neurological-functional outcome assessment

    Evaluate the impact of DIND and its treatment on short-term and long-term neurological-functional outcomes by mortality at 6 months and 12 months after the acute event.

    Assess mortality and neurological-functional outcomes (GOSE - Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended, and mRS - modified Rankin Scale) at 6 and 12 months after the acute event

    Measured: 12 months

  3. Invasive monitoring of intracranial pressure

    To evaluate the usefulness of invasive monitoring of intracranial pressure (ICP) in guiding the treatment of patients with SAH by comparing the variation of intracranial pressure in patients who have ICP monitoring with the intensity of the treatment applied (TIL, Therapy Intensity Level).

    Compare changes in intracranial pressure (ICP) in patients undergoing ICP monitoring with the intensity of the treatment received (TIL - Therapy Intensity Level)

    Measured: 12 months

  4. Neurological-functional outcome assessment

    Evaluate the impact of DIND and its treatment on short-term and long-term neurological-functional outcomes by neurological-functional outcome (GOSE, Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended) at 6 months and 12 months after the acute event. From GOSE=1 (death) to GOSE=8 (good recovery).

    Measured: 12 months

  5. Neurological-functional outcome assessment

    Evaluate the impact of DIND and its treatment on short-term and long-term neurological-functional outcomes by neurological-functional outcome (mRS, modified Rankin Scale) at 6 months and 12 months after the acute event. From mRS=0 (no symptoms) to mRS=5 (severe disability).

    Measured: 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Jun 2026
  2. Study start15 Jun 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion15 Jun 2028 (estimated)
  4. Study completion15 Jun 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
1,000 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07634172
Sponsor's protocol ID
2026-01
Acronym
DINTESA-France
Status last verified
Jun 2026
First submitted
28 May 2026
Last updated
8 Jun 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Haemorrhage and Delayed Ischemic Neurological Deficit, run by Société Française d'Anesthésie et de Réanimation at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Edoardo Di Paolo, MD (0145658902, edoardo.di_paolo@ghu-paris.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

DIND incidence (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Jun 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in