AzTrials
AzTrials

Rhinosinusitis ChronicNCT07627789

This Study Aims to Assess the Impact of 50°C Saline Irrigation on the Overall Intraoperative Blood Loss and Surgical Visualization During Endoscopic Sinus Surgery for Rhinosinusitis.

A study testing Hot saline irrigation and Room-temperature saline irrigation in people with Rhinosinusitis Chronic and Bleeding, run by Military Institute of Aviation Medicine at 1 site in Poland.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Objectives: Intraoperative bleeding during endoscopic sinus surgery for severe rhinosinusitis may significantly compromise the surgical field. Saline heated to 50°C promotes transient vessel vasodilation and mucosal edema without causing nasal mucosal necrosis. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Rhinosinusitis Chronic, Bleeding
What is being tested?
Hot saline irrigation and Room-temperature saline irrigation
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
59 participants
Where
1 sitePoland
Study dates
1 Mar 2023to 28 May 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Chronic rhinosinusitis diagnosed according to the EPOS 2020 criteria;
  • Confirmed failure of conservative treatment, defined as persistence of CRS symptoms for more than 12 weeks despite optimal pharmacological therapy;
  • Age over 18 years and ability to provide informed consent;
  • Written informed consent to participate in the study;
  • Presence of inflammatory changes on sinus computed tomography scans.

Who cannot join

  • Lack of patient consent;
  • Disease limited to a single sinus;
  • Conditions associated with ciliary dyskinesia (e.g., cystic fibrosis);
  • Suspected fungal infection or fungal ball;
  • Poor adherence to medical recommendations or noncompliance with treatment;
  • Suspected neoplastic disease;
  • Suspected or confirmed autoimmune disorders, particularly granulomatosis with polyangiitis;
  • - Confirmed or clinically suspected immunodeficiency; Diagnosed coagulation disorders or preoperative hemostasis test results outside laboratory reference ranges; Preoperative systemic glucocorticosteroid therapy.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Poland1 site
  • Military Institute of Aviation Medicine

    Warsaw, Mazovian, 01-755

Other trials in Poland

About this study

Official title: Hot Saline Irrigation on Intraoperative Bleeding and Improving Surgical Field Visibility During Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: a Prospective Clinical Study.

Objectives: Intraoperative bleeding during endoscopic sinus surgery for severe rhinosinusitis may significantly compromise the surgical field. Saline heated to 50°C promotes transient vessel vasodilation and mucosal edema without causing nasal mucosal necrosis. The brief thermal exposure may induce superficial protein denaturation and facilitate local hemostasis, thereby improving endoscopic visibility. This study aims to assess the impact of 50°C saline irrigation on the overall intraoperative blood loss and surgical visualization during endoscopic sinus surgery for rhinosinusitis.

Methods: This prospective randomized controlled trial study is going to assign the patients to three groups. In the interventional hot saline group (HSI), intraoperative irrigation will be performed with heated saline at 50°C. In the room-temperature saline group (RTSI), saline at 22°C will be used; in the third one group (Control), no irrigation will be administered. Intraoperative blood loss will be recorded in milliliters and milliliters per minute of operative time, and the surgical field will be evaluated using the Boezaart scale.

HSI is hypothesized to be more effective than RTSI in minimizing intraoperative bleeding during FESS.

Read the detailed description

Introduction Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) affects approximately 5-15% of the European population and significantly reduces quality of life. While pharmacological treatment, including intranasal corticosteroids, nasal irrigation, and antibiotics, may be effective in many cases, some patients will require functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). Compared with traditional surgery, FESS will provide better visualization, reduced tissue trauma, fewer complications, and shorter hospitalization. However, intraoperative bleeding will remain a major challenge, as even minor bleeding may impair endoscopic visibility and increase the risk of complications. Various methods, including controlled hypotension, vasoconstrictors, corticosteroids, and reverse Trendelenburg positioning, will be used to reduce bleeding. Heated saline irrigation may also represent a useful supportive technique.

Aim This prospective study will evaluate the effect of intraoperative hot saline irrigation (HSI) on blood loss and surgical field visibility during FESS compared with room-temperature saline irrigation (RTSI) and no irrigation.

Materials and Methods Adult patients with CRS meeting EPOS 2020 criteria and requiring FESS after unsuccessful conservative treatment will be included in this randomized, patient-blinded study. Patients with fungal disease, immunodeficiency, coagulation disorders, neoplastic or autoimmune disease, or preoperative systemic steroid use will be excluded.

Participants will be randomized into three groups: HSI (0.9% NaCl at 50°C), RTSI (0.9% NaCl at 22°C), and control (no irrigation) using coin-toss allocation. Randomization will be conducted by an independent researcher not involved in surgery or postoperative assessment. Separation of responsibilities and independent surgical scheduling will be applied to reduce the risk of selection bias.

Surgical Procedure Surgical procedures will include middle meatal antrostomy, anterior and posterior ethmoidectomy, Draf I-IIa procedure, and bilateral sphenoidectomy performed without preoperative topical decongestants. A 2.7-mm Hopkins nasal endoscope (0°, 30°, 45°, or 70°; Karl Storz) and a microdebrider will be used during all procedures.

Anesthesia General anesthesia will be administered according to a standardized protocol. Anesthesia induction will be achieved with propofol, analgesia with fentanyl or remifentanil, maintenance with sevoflurane or desflurane, neuromuscular blockade with rocuronium bromide, and reversal with atropine plus neostigmine or sugammadex, depending on individual patient requirements.

Study Procedure Nasal irrigation will be performed using 0.9% NaCl at either 22°C or 50°C at least three times during surgery at 10-minute intervals. The 50°C saline solution will be stored in a laboratory incubator, while the 22°C solution will be maintained at room temperature. Irrigation will be delivered through a metal cannula connected to a syringe and inserted into the middle nasal meatus over approximately 5 seconds.

Following each irrigation, the surgical field will be evaluated using the 6-point Boezaart scale after suctioning the irrigation fluid mixed with blood from the nasopharynx. In the control group, surgical field visibility will be assessed every 10 minutes. Total blood loss will be calculated as the difference between the irrigation volume and the total suctioned fluid volume, and mean blood loss per minute will also be recorded.

The primary outcome measure will be total intraoperative blood loss. Secondary outcomes will include blood loss per minute of operative time and surgical field quality assessed using the Boezaart scale.

Data collection and analysis:

This is a pilot study; hence the statistical analysis will be completed at the end of the study.

Each participant will receive a unique study identification number to ensure anonymity and prevent the collection of directly identifiable personal data. Study data will be recorded in a Microsoft Excel database and will include demographic characteristics, comorbidities, current pharmacological treatment, Lund-Mackay CT score, CRS phenotype with or without nasal polyps, type of surgery (primary or revision), anesthetic infusion details, mean arterial pressure and pulse rate measured at 15-minute intervals, endoscopic surgical field assessment scores recorded every 10 minutes, intraoperative complications, use of a microdebrider, total intraoperative blood loss, duration of surgery, and total volume of saline irrigation used.

Being tested
Hot saline irrigation, Room-temperature saline irrigation
Keywords
bleeding, boezaart scale, saline irrigation, surgical endoscopic visibility, fess
Medical subject headings
Hemorrhage

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Hot saline irrigationProcedure or surgery

    Intraoperative irrigation of the sinonasal cavity using 0.9% NaCl heated to 50°C during FESS.

  • Room-temperature saline irrigationProcedure or surgery

    Also called 2

    Intraoperative irrigation of the sinonasal cavity using 0.9% NaCl at 22°C during FESS.

Study groups in NCT07627789
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Hot Saline IrrigationExperimentalParticipants undergoing functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) will receive intraoperative irrigation with 0.9% sodium chloride solution heated to 50°C at 10-minute intervals during surgery.
Receives: Procedure: Hot saline irrigation
Room-Temperature Saline IrrigationExperimentalParticipants undergoing FESS will receive intraoperative irrigation with 0.9% sodium chloride solution at room temperature (22°C).
Receives: Procedure: Room-temperature saline irrigation
Control GroupNo interventionParticipants undergoing FESS without intraoperative saline irrigation.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Total intraoperative bleeding

    The effect of intraoperative irrigation with hot 0.9% NaCl on total intraoperative blood loss during FESS, compared with room-temperature NaCl irrigation and no irrigation, that will be measured in mililiters (ml).

    Measured: From the beginning until the end of the surgery

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Surgical field visibility

    The effect of intraoperative irrigation with hot 0.9% NaCl on surgical field visibility of operative time during FESS, compared with room-temperature NaCl irrigation and no irrigation. To measure this visibility - Boezaart score (from 0-5) will be used.

    Measured: From the beginning of the operation until the end.

  2. The effect of intraoperative irrigation with hot 0.9% NaCl surgical field visibility and blood loss per minute of operative time during FESS, compared with room-temperature NaCl irrigation and no irrigation.

    The effect of intraoperative irrigation with hot 0.9% NaCl on blood loss per minute of operative time during FESS, compared with room-temperature NaCl irrigation and no irrigation. Unit of measure: ml/min.

    Measured: From the beginning to the end of surgery.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Jun 2026
  2. Study start1 Mar 2023
  3. Primary completion1 Dec 2025
  4. Study completion28 May 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
59 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07627789
Sponsor's protocol ID
Bioethics Comm. MMC (232/22)
Status last verified
Jun 2026
First submitted
27 May 2026
Last updated
4 Jun 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Individual participant data collected during the study will not be made publicly available.

Publications

  • Altaf J, Ashfaq AH, Riaz N, Arshad M, Ayub N, Rehman A, Maqbool S. Effect of hot saline irrigation on the operative field during endoscopic sinus surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 Jan;282(1):235-240. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-09005-0. Epub 2024 Oct 1.

    PubMed 39354187
  • Stangerup SE, Thomsen HK. Histological changes in the nasal mucosa after hot-water irrigation. An animal experimental study. Rhinology. 1996 Mar;34(1):14-7.

    PubMed 8739861
  • Nagarajah D, Kueh YC, Lazim NM, Abdullah B. The hemostatic effect of hot saline irrigation in endoscopic sinus surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 18;11(1):246. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-02113-0.

    PubMed 36401259
  • Al-Qudah MA. The effect of intranasal irrigation with epinephrine solution on intraoperative visualization and bleeding during FESS. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Apr;279(4):1911-1917. doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-06952-w. Epub 2021 Jun 27.

    PubMed 34175968

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Hot saline irrigation and Room-temperature saline irrigation in people with Rhinosinusitis Chronic and Bleeding, run by Military Institute of Aviation Medicine at 1 site in Poland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Poland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Total intraoperative bleeding (time frame: From the beginning until the end of the surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07627789, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Jun 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in