AzTrials
AzTrials

Effectiveness of Drugs Was Compared for Treating Trigeminal NeuralgiaPhase 2/3NCT07625410

To Evaluate Efficacy of Monotherapy of Oxcarbazepine Versus Combination of Gabapentin With Oxcarbazepine in the Management of Trigeminal Neuralgia

A Phase 2/3 study testing oxcarbamezapine(300 mg twice daily) and combination therapy(oxcarbamezapine 300 mg twice daily and gabapentine) in people with Effectiveness of Drugs Was Compared for Treating Trigeminal Neuralgia and Pain, run by Rehman Medical Institute - RMI at 1 site in Pakistan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

ABSTRACT: Objective: This study evaluates the effectiveness of oxcarbazepine monotherapy with the combination of gabapentin and oxcarbazepine in managing trigeminal neuralgia(TN). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 80 years
What is being tested?
oxcarbamezapine(300 mg twice daily) and combination therapy(oxcarbamezapine 300 mg twice daily and gabapentine)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
44 participants
Where
1 sitePakistan
Study dates
1 May 2023to 1 May 2024
Phase
Phase 2/3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients of either gender aged 20-80 years
  • Patients presenting to the Outpatient Department (OPD)
  • Patients fulfilling the diagnostic criteria for idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia according to the International Headache Society (IHS)

Who cannot join

  • Patients with orofacial or odontogenic pain conditions other than trigeminal neuralgia (TN)
  • Patients with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders
  • Patients with a centralized cause of TN evident on MRI
  • Patients unwilling to participate in the study
  • Patients who failed to attend follow-up visits
  • Pregnant or lactating females
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Patients with a history of previous surgical procedures for neuralgia
  • Patients with known allergy to medications used for neuralgia
  • Patients with significant comorbid medical conditions

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Pakistan1 site
  • Rehman College of Dentistry

    Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, 25100

Other trials in Pakistan

About this study

Official title: To Evaluate Efficacy of Monotherapy of Oxcarbazepine Versus Combination of Gabapentin With Oxcarbazepine in the Management of Trigeminal Neuralgia.

ABSTRACT:

Objective: This study evaluates the effectiveness of oxcarbazepine monotherapy with the combination of gabapentin and oxcarbazepine in managing trigeminal neuralgia(TN).

Read more

Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted at Rehman College of Dentistry for the duration of one year, i.e., from 1st May 2023 till May 2024. A total of 44 patients, fulfilling inclusion criteria, were included.Half were given monotherapy with oxcarbazepine (300 mg twice daily) and half were given combination therapy with gabapentin (100 mg daily) plus oxcarbazepine. Pain was evaluated utilizing the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at baseline, 2 weeks, and 2 months. SPSS software version 26 was used for statistical analysis.

KEYWORDS: Combination Therapy, Gabapentin, Monotherapy, Oxcarbazepine, Trigeminal Neuralgia, Visual Analogue Scale.

Read the detailed description

INTRODUCTION:

Orofacial pain is defined as pain in and around the oral cavity. The orofacial region is complex, and any pain of orofacial origin could be related to the hard or soft tissue in that region or a dysfunction of the nervous system. Amongst all the orofacial pains, trigeminal neuralgia is one of the most debilitating, which badly affects the quality of life of the patient1. Trigeminal neuralgia is defined by the International Classification of Headache Disorders as abrupt, sharp, spontaneous pain that is caused by activation of one or more trigeminal nerve branches and lasts for a few seconds to two minutes. Classic trigeminal neuralgia (idiopathic) typically manifests at 40-60 years of age, whereas symptomatic trigeminal neuralgia (due to compression of the trigeminal ganglion) typically manifests around 30-40 years of age. There are two categories of treatment for trigeminal neuralgia: surgical and medicinal. But no single surgical or medicinal procedure has had a 100% success rate. Neuroleptic medications, muscle relaxants, and anticonvulsants are the recommended medical treatments for TN. However, the most popular invasive therapy choices for individuals not responding to conservative measures include gamma knife surgery, microvascular decompression, and gasserian ganglion percutaneous procedures3. Carbamazepine is generally regarded as the first-line medication for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia among the recommended medical interventions. But not every patient can take carbamazepine, which might make compliance difficult. Moreover, liver failure, aplastic anemia, and hyponatremia are significant side effects of carbamazepine. The structural analogue of carbamazepine is oxcarbazepine. Oxcarbazepine is more well-tolerated in patients than carbamazepine because it selectively induces P450 enzymes, has fewer pharmacologic interactions with other drugs, and has fewer adverse effects. Gabapentin is an analogue of GABA and is useful for the treatment of neuropathic pain. Second-line drugs like gabapentin are added if the patient is unable to tolerate the adverse effects or drug interactions4. Trigeminal neuralgia is a severely incapacitating illness that affects fundamental human activities, including eating, drinking, talking, and touching one's face. As a result, it interferes with day-to-day activities. According to epidemiological research, there is a higher risk of anxiety, depression, and suicide5. For accurate diagnosis and treatment, a thorough history and identification of the affected nerve are crucial. In Pakistan, many trigeminal neuralgia patients have incorrect diagnoses, lead to pointless operations, and receive inefficient therapies. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of gabapentin combination regimens versus monotherapy (oxcarbazepine). The extant literature indicates that there has not yet been a single national or international trial that compares the efficacy of oxcarbazepinemonotherapy with combined therapy using gabapentin, though studies comparing other treatment options or medicines have been conducted 6,7.

METHODS:

Prospective observational study was conducted at Rehman College of Dentistry for the duration of one year, i.e., from 1st May 2023 till May 2024. Universal sampling was used, and 44 patients who reported to our dental OPD and fulfilled the inclusion criteria were included in the study. Patients of either gender, with ages ranging from 20 to 80 years, presenting in the Outpatient Department, who fulfilled the diagnostic criteria of idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia according to the International Headache Society, were included in the study. All patients with orofacial and odontogenic pain other than TN, TMJ disorders having a centralized cause of TN as evidenced by MRI, patients unwilling to participate or who failed to show up for follow-up, pregnant and lactating females, patients who had previous surgical procedures for neuralgia or are allergic to neuralgia medications, and patients with comorbid conditions were excluded from the study. After seeking ethical approval from the Institutional Research Board (via reference number RCD-04-23-167), written consent was taken, and patients were randomly assigned to one of the two groups through block randomization using the lottery method. Patients randomly distributed into two groups were given monotherapy with oxcarbazepine or combination therapy with gabapentin in addition to oxcarbazepine. Pain was calculated on a Visual Analogue Scale (0-10). Pain variable would again be calculated at 2 weeks and 2 months. Data analysis was conducted using the SPSS program 26. Qualitative data were displayed as frequency and percentage, whereas quantitative variables were displayed as mean ± SD. The independent sample t-test was used to compare the mean pain score between the groups; a p-value of less than 0.05 was deemed significant.

Being tested
oxcarbamezapine(300 mg twice daily), combination therapy(oxcarbamezapine 300 mg twice daily and gabapentine)
Medical subject headings
Pain, Agnosia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • oxcarbamezapine(300 mg twice daily)Drug

    monotherapy with oxcarbamezapine(300 mg twice daily)

  • combination therapy(oxcarbamezapine 300 mg twice daily and gabapentine)Drug

    combination therapy of oxcarbamezapine with gabapentine was given

Study groups in NCT07625410
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Oxcarbamezapine monotherapyActive comparatorgroup given monotherapy with oxcarbamezapine
Receives: Drug: oxcarbamezapine(300 mg twice daily)
Oxcarbamezapine plus gabapentine combination therapyActive comparatorgroup given comination therapy(oxcarbamezapine with gabapentine)
Receives: Drug: combination therapy(oxcarbamezapine 300 mg twice daily and gabapentine)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Pain Intensity Scores Assessed by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    Pain intensity was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale , a 10-cm horizontal line ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents the worst imaginable pain. Higher scores indicate greater pain severity (worse outcome). Participants will receive either oxcarbazepine monotherapy or combination therapy with gabapentin plus oxcarbazepine. VAS pain scores will be recorded at baseline, 2 weeks, and 2 months to evaluate changes in pain intensity over time.

    Measured: Baseline, 2 weeks, and 2 months after initiation of treatment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Jun 2026
  2. Study start1 May 2023
  3. Primary completion1 May 2024
  4. Study completion1 May 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2/3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
44 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07625410
Sponsor's protocol ID
RCD-04-23-167
Other IDs
Ethical approval RCD-04-23-167
Status last verified
May 2026
First submitted
13 May 2026
Last updated
4 Jun 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Relevant data can be shared upon genuine request

Publications

  • Cheshire WP Jr. Defining the role for gabapentin in the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: a retrospective study. J Pain. 2002 Apr;3(2):137-42. doi: 10.1054/jpai.2002.122944.

    PubMed 14622800
  • Texakalidis P, Xenos D, Tora MS, Wetzel JS, Boulis NM. Comparative safety and efficacy of percutaneous approaches for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2019 Jul;182:112-122. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2019.05.011. Epub 2019 May 14.

    PubMed 31121470
  • Das B, Saha SP. Trigeminal neuralgia: current concepts and management. J Indian Med Assoc. 2001 Dec;99(12):704-9.

    PubMed 12022221
  • Ishikawa R, Iseki M. [Pharmacological Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia]. No Shinkei Geka. 2024 Jan;52(1):63-69. doi: 10.11477/mf.1436204880. Japanese.

    PubMed 38246671
  • Lee JY, Lee GH, Yi SH, Sim WS, Kim BW, Park HJ. Non-Surgical Treatments of Trigeminal Neuralgia from the Perspective of a Pain Physician: A Narrative Review. Biomedicines. 2023 Aug 21;11(8):2315. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11082315.

    PubMed 37626811

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2/3 study testing oxcarbamezapine(300 mg twice daily) and combination therapy(oxcarbamezapine 300 mg twice daily and gabapentine) in people with Effectiveness of Drugs Was Compared for Treating Trigeminal Neuralgia and Pain, run by Rehman Medical Institute - RMI at 1 site in Pakistan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Pain Intensity Scores Assessed by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (time frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, and 2 months after initiation of treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07625410, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Jun 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in