Effectiveness of Drugs Was Compared for Treating Trigeminal NeuralgiaPhase 2/3NCT07625410
To Evaluate Efficacy of Monotherapy of Oxcarbazepine Versus Combination of Gabapentin With Oxcarbazepine in the Management of Trigeminal Neuralgia
A Phase 2/3 study testing oxcarbamezapine(300 mg twice daily) and combination therapy(oxcarbamezapine 300 mg twice daily and gabapentine) in people with Effectiveness of Drugs Was Compared for Treating Trigeminal Neuralgia and Pain, run by Rehman Medical Institute - RMI at 1 site in Pakistan.
Trial summary
ABSTRACT: Objective: This study evaluates the effectiveness of oxcarbazepine monotherapy with the combination of gabapentin and oxcarbazepine in managing trigeminal neuralgia(TN). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Effectiveness of Drugs Was Compared for Treating Trigeminal Neuralgia, Pain, Pain Management
- What is being tested?
- oxcarbamezapine(300 mg twice daily) and combination therapy(oxcarbamezapine 300 mg twice daily and gabapentine)
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 44 participants
- Where
- 1 sitePakistan
- Study dates
- 1 May 2023to 1 May 2024
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients of either gender aged 20-80 years
- Patients presenting to the Outpatient Department (OPD)
- Patients fulfilling the diagnostic criteria for idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia according to the International Headache Society (IHS)
Who cannot join
- Patients with orofacial or odontogenic pain conditions other than trigeminal neuralgia (TN)
- Patients with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders
- Patients with a centralized cause of TN evident on MRI
- Patients unwilling to participate in the study
- Patients who failed to attend follow-up visits
- Pregnant or lactating females
Show all 9Show fewer
- Patients with a history of previous surgical procedures for neuralgia
- Patients with known allergy to medications used for neuralgia
- Patients with significant comorbid medical conditions
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Pakistan1 site
Rehman College of Dentistry
Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, 25100
About this study
Official title: To Evaluate Efficacy of Monotherapy of Oxcarbazepine Versus Combination of Gabapentin With Oxcarbazepine in the Management of Trigeminal Neuralgia.
ABSTRACT:
Objective: This study evaluates the effectiveness of oxcarbazepine monotherapy with the combination of gabapentin and oxcarbazepine in managing trigeminal neuralgia(TN).
Read more
Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted at Rehman College of Dentistry for the duration of one year, i.e., from 1st May 2023 till May 2024. A total of 44 patients, fulfilling inclusion criteria, were included.Half were given monotherapy with oxcarbazepine (300 mg twice daily) and half were given combination therapy with gabapentin (100 mg daily) plus oxcarbazepine. Pain was evaluated utilizing the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at baseline, 2 weeks, and 2 months. SPSS software version 26 was used for statistical analysis.
KEYWORDS: Combination Therapy, Gabapentin, Monotherapy, Oxcarbazepine, Trigeminal Neuralgia, Visual Analogue Scale.
Read the detailed description
INTRODUCTION:
Orofacial pain is defined as pain in and around the oral cavity. The orofacial region is complex, and any pain of orofacial origin could be related to the hard or soft tissue in that region or a dysfunction of the nervous system. Amongst all the orofacial pains, trigeminal neuralgia is one of the most debilitating, which badly affects the quality of life of the patient1. Trigeminal neuralgia is defined by the International Classification of Headache Disorders as abrupt, sharp, spontaneous pain that is caused by activation of one or more trigeminal nerve branches and lasts for a few seconds to two minutes. Classic trigeminal neuralgia (idiopathic) typically manifests at 40-60 years of age, whereas symptomatic trigeminal neuralgia (due to compression of the trigeminal ganglion) typically manifests around 30-40 years of age. There are two categories of treatment for trigeminal neuralgia: surgical and medicinal. But no single surgical or medicinal procedure has had a 100% success rate. Neuroleptic medications, muscle relaxants, and anticonvulsants are the recommended medical treatments for TN. However, the most popular invasive therapy choices for individuals not responding to conservative measures include gamma knife surgery, microvascular decompression, and gasserian ganglion percutaneous procedures3. Carbamazepine is generally regarded as the first-line medication for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia among the recommended medical interventions. But not every patient can take carbamazepine, which might make compliance difficult. Moreover, liver failure, aplastic anemia, and hyponatremia are significant side effects of carbamazepine. The structural analogue of carbamazepine is oxcarbazepine. Oxcarbazepine is more well-tolerated in patients than carbamazepine because it selectively induces P450 enzymes, has fewer pharmacologic interactions with other drugs, and has fewer adverse effects. Gabapentin is an analogue of GABA and is useful for the treatment of neuropathic pain. Second-line drugs like gabapentin are added if the patient is unable to tolerate the adverse effects or drug interactions4. Trigeminal neuralgia is a severely incapacitating illness that affects fundamental human activities, including eating, drinking, talking, and touching one's face. As a result, it interferes with day-to-day activities. According to epidemiological research, there is a higher risk of anxiety, depression, and suicide5. For accurate diagnosis and treatment, a thorough history and identification of the affected nerve are crucial. In Pakistan, many trigeminal neuralgia patients have incorrect diagnoses, lead to pointless operations, and receive inefficient therapies. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of gabapentin combination regimens versus monotherapy (oxcarbazepine). The extant literature indicates that there has not yet been a single national or international trial that compares the efficacy of oxcarbazepinemonotherapy with combined therapy using gabapentin, though studies comparing other treatment options or medicines have been conducted 6,7.
METHODS:
Prospective observational study was conducted at Rehman College of Dentistry for the duration of one year, i.e., from 1st May 2023 till May 2024. Universal sampling was used, and 44 patients who reported to our dental OPD and fulfilled the inclusion criteria were included in the study. Patients of either gender, with ages ranging from 20 to 80 years, presenting in the Outpatient Department, who fulfilled the diagnostic criteria of idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia according to the International Headache Society, were included in the study. All patients with orofacial and odontogenic pain other than TN, TMJ disorders having a centralized cause of TN as evidenced by MRI, patients unwilling to participate or who failed to show up for follow-up, pregnant and lactating females, patients who had previous surgical procedures for neuralgia or are allergic to neuralgia medications, and patients with comorbid conditions were excluded from the study. After seeking ethical approval from the Institutional Research Board (via reference number RCD-04-23-167), written consent was taken, and patients were randomly assigned to one of the two groups through block randomization using the lottery method. Patients randomly distributed into two groups were given monotherapy with oxcarbazepine or combination therapy with gabapentin in addition to oxcarbazepine. Pain was calculated on a Visual Analogue Scale (0-10). Pain variable would again be calculated at 2 weeks and 2 months. Data analysis was conducted using the SPSS program 26. Qualitative data were displayed as frequency and percentage, whereas quantitative variables were displayed as mean ± SD. The independent sample t-test was used to compare the mean pain score between the groups; a p-value of less than 0.05 was deemed significant.
- Conditions
- Effectiveness of Drugs Was Compared for Treating Trigeminal Neuralgia, Pain, Pain Management
- Being tested
- oxcarbamezapine(300 mg twice daily), combination therapy(oxcarbamezapine 300 mg twice daily and gabapentine)
- Medical subject headings
- Pain, Agnosia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
oxcarbamezapine(300 mg twice daily)Drug
monotherapy with oxcarbamezapine(300 mg twice daily)
combination therapy(oxcarbamezapine 300 mg twice daily and gabapentine)Drug
combination therapy of oxcarbamezapine with gabapentine was given
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Oxcarbamezapine monotherapy | Active comparator | group given monotherapy with oxcarbamezapine Receives: Drug: oxcarbamezapine(300 mg twice daily) |
| Oxcarbamezapine plus gabapentine combination therapy | Active comparator | group given comination therapy(oxcarbamezapine with gabapentine) Receives: Drug: combination therapy(oxcarbamezapine 300 mg twice daily and gabapentine) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Pain Intensity Scores Assessed by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Pain intensity was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale , a 10-cm horizontal line ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents the worst imaginable pain. Higher scores indicate greater pain severity (worse outcome). Participants will receive either oxcarbazepine monotherapy or combination therapy with gabapentin plus oxcarbazepine. VAS pain scores will be recorded at baseline, 2 weeks, and 2 months to evaluate changes in pain intensity over time.
Measured: Baseline, 2 weeks, and 2 months after initiation of treatment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Jun 2026
- Study start1 May 2023
- Primary completion1 May 2024
- Study completion1 May 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Effectiveness of Drugs Was Compared for Treating Trigeminal NeuralgiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 44 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Rehman Medical Institute - RMI
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Zainab Akbar, Rehman Medical Institute - RMI
- Investigators
- iftikhar qayum, MBBS, MD, PHD, Study director, Rehman Medical Institute
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07625410
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RCD-04-23-167
- Other IDs
- Ethical approval RCD-04-23-167
- Status last verified
- May 2026
- First submitted
- 13 May 2026
- Last updated
- 4 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Relevant data can be shared upon genuine request
Publications
Cheshire WP Jr. Defining the role for gabapentin in the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: a retrospective study. J Pain. 2002 Apr;3(2):137-42. doi: 10.1054/jpai.2002.122944.
PubMed 14622800Texakalidis P, Xenos D, Tora MS, Wetzel JS, Boulis NM. Comparative safety and efficacy of percutaneous approaches for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2019 Jul;182:112-122. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2019.05.011. Epub 2019 May 14.
PubMed 31121470Das B, Saha SP. Trigeminal neuralgia: current concepts and management. J Indian Med Assoc. 2001 Dec;99(12):704-9.
PubMed 12022221Ishikawa R, Iseki M. [Pharmacological Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia]. No Shinkei Geka. 2024 Jan;52(1):63-69. doi: 10.11477/mf.1436204880. Japanese.
PubMed 38246671Lee JY, Lee GH, Yi SH, Sim WS, Kim BW, Park HJ. Non-Surgical Treatments of Trigeminal Neuralgia from the Perspective of a Pain Physician: A Narrative Review. Biomedicines. 2023 Aug 21;11(8):2315. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11082315.
PubMed 37626811
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- To Evaluate Efficacy of Monotherapy of Oxcarbazepine Versus Combination of Gabapentin With Oxcarbazepine in the Management of Trigeminal Neuralgia.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07625410
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RCD-04-23-167
- Conditions
- Effectiveness of Drugs Was Compared for Treating Trigeminal Neuralgia, Pain, Pain Management
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 44 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Rehman Medical Institute - RMIUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 May 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 May 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 May 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Jun 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
ABSTRACT:
Objective: This study evaluates the effectiveness of oxcarbazepine monotherapy with the combination of gabapentin and oxcarbazepine in managing trigeminal neuralgia(TN).
Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted at Rehman College of Dentistry for the duration of one year, i.e., from 1st May 2023 till May 2024. A total of 44 patients, fulfilling inclusion criteria, were included.Half were given monotherapy with oxcarbazepine (300 mg twice daily) and half were given combination therapy with gabapentin (100 mg daily) plus oxcarbazepine. Pain was evaluated utilizing the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at baseline, 2 weeks, and 2 months. SPSS software version 26 was used for statistical analysis.
KEYWORDS: Combination Therapy, Gabapentin, Monotherapy, Oxcarbazepine, Trigeminal Neuralgia, Visual Analogue Scale.
Detailed description
INTRODUCTION:
Orofacial pain is defined as pain in and around the oral cavity. The orofacial region is complex, and any pain of orofacial origin could be related to the hard or soft tissue in that region or a dysfunction of the nervous system. Amongst all the orofacial pains, trigeminal neuralgia is one of the most debilitating, which badly affects the quality of life of the patient1. Trigeminal neuralgia is defined by the International Classification of Headache Disorders as abrupt, sharp, spontaneous pain that is caused by activation of one or more trigeminal nerve branches and lasts for a few seconds to two minutes. Classic trigeminal neuralgia (idiopathic) typically manifests at 40-60 years of age, whereas symptomatic trigeminal neuralgia (due to compression of the trigeminal ganglion) typically manifests around 30-40 years of age. There are two categories of treatment for trigeminal neuralgia: surgical and medicinal. But no single surgical or medicinal procedure has had a 100% success rate. Neuroleptic medications, muscle relaxants, and anticonvulsants are the recommended medical treatments for TN. However, the most popular invasive therapy choices for individuals not responding to conservative measures include gamma knife surgery, microvascular decompression, and gasserian ganglion percutaneous procedures3. Carbamazepine is generally regarded as the first-line medication for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia among the recommended medical interventions. But not every patient can take carbamazepine, which might make compliance difficult. Moreover, liver failure, aplastic anemia, and hyponatremia are significant side effects of carbamazepine. The structural analogue of carbamazepine is oxcarbazepine. Oxcarbazepine is more well-tolerated in patients than carbamazepine because it selectively induces P450 enzymes, has fewer pharmacologic interactions with other drugs, and has fewer adverse effects. Gabapentin is an analogue of GABA and is useful for the treatment of neuropathic pain. Second-line drugs like gabapentin are added if the patient is unable to tolerate the adverse effects or drug interactions4. Trigeminal neuralgia is a severely incapacitating illness that affects fundamental human activities, including eating, drinking, talking, and touching one's face. As a result, it interferes with day-to-day activities. According to epidemiological research, there is a higher risk of anxiety, depression, and suicide5. For accurate diagnosis and treatment, a thorough history and identification of the affected nerve are crucial. In Pakistan, many trigeminal neuralgia patients have incorrect diagnoses, lead to pointless operations, and receive inefficient therapies. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of gabapentin combination regimens versus monotherapy (oxcarbazepine). The extant literature indicates that there has not yet been a single national or international trial that compares the efficacy of oxcarbazepinemonotherapy with combined therapy using gabapentin, though studies comparing other treatment options or medicines have been conducted 6,7.
METHODS:
Prospective observational study was conducted at Rehman College of Dentistry for the duration of one year, i.e., from 1st May 2023 till May 2024. Universal sampling was used, and 44 patients who reported to our dental OPD and fulfilled the inclusion criteria were included in the study. Patients of either gender, with ages ranging from 20 to 80 years, presenting in the Outpatient Department, who fulfilled the diagnostic criteria of idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia according to the International Headache Society, were included in the study. All patients with orofacial and odontogenic pain other than TN, TMJ disorders having a centralized cause of TN as evidenced by MRI, patients unwilling to participate or who failed to show up for follow-up, pregnant and lactating females, patients who had previous surgical procedures for neuralgia or are allergic to neuralgia medications, and patients with comorbid conditions were excluded from the study. After seeking ethical approval from the Institutional Research Board (via reference number RCD-04-23-167), written consent was taken, and patients were randomly assigned to one of the two groups through block randomization using the lottery method. Patients randomly distributed into two groups were given monotherapy with oxcarbazepine or combination therapy with gabapentin in addition to oxcarbazepine. Pain was calculated on a Visual Analogue Scale (0-10). Pain variable would again be calculated at 2 weeks and 2 months. Data analysis was conducted using the SPSS program 26. Qualitative data were displayed as frequency and percentage, whereas quantitative variables were displayed as mean ± SD. The independent sample t-test was used to compare the mean pain score between the groups; a p-value of less than 0.05 was deemed significant.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Oxcarbamezapine monotherapy | Active comparator | Drug: oxcarbamezapine(300 mg twice daily)group given monotherapy with oxcarbamezapine |
| Oxcarbamezapine plus gabapentine combination therapy | Active comparator | Drug: combination therapy(oxcarbamezapine 300 mg twice daily and gabapentine)group given comination therapy(oxcarbamezapine with gabapentine) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients of either gender aged 20-80 years
- Patients presenting to the Outpatient Department (OPD)
- Patients fulfilling the diagnostic criteria for idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia according to the International Headache Society (IHS)
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Patients with orofacial or odontogenic pain conditions other than trigeminal neuralgia (TN)
- Patients with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders
- Patients with a centralized cause of TN evident on MRI
- Patients unwilling to participate in the study
- Patients who failed to attend follow-up visits
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| oxcarbamezapine(300 mg twice daily)monotherapy with oxcarbamezapine(300 mg twice daily) | Drug | Oxcarbamezapine monotherapy |
| combination therapy(oxcarbamezapine 300 mg twice daily and gabapentine)combination therapy of oxcarbamezapine with gabapentine was given | Drug | Oxcarbamezapine plus gabapentine combination therapy |
Primary outcome
Change in Pain Intensity Scores Assessed by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, and 2 months after initiation of treatment
Pain intensity was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale , a 10-cm horizontal line ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents the worst imaginable pain. Higher scores indicate greater pain severity (worse outcome). Participants will receive either oxcarbazepine monotherapy or combination therapy with gabapentin plus oxcarbazepine. VAS pain scores will be recorded at baseline, 2 weeks, and 2 months to evaluate changes in pain intensity over time.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Jun 2026.
- Background: PubMed 14622800Cheshire WP Jr. Defining the role for gabapentin in the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: a retrospective study. J Pain. 2002 Apr;3(2):137-42. doi: 10.1054/jpai.2002.122944.
- Background: PubMed 31121470Texakalidis P, Xenos D, Tora MS, Wetzel JS, Boulis NM. Comparative safety and efficacy of percutaneous approaches for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2019 Jul;182:112-122. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2019.05.011. Epub 2019 May 14.
- Background: PubMed 12022221Das B, Saha SP. Trigeminal neuralgia: current concepts and management. J Indian Med Assoc. 2001 Dec;99(12):704-9.
- Background: PubMed 38246671Ishikawa R, Iseki M. [Pharmacological Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia]. No Shinkei Geka. 2024 Jan;52(1):63-69. doi: 10.11477/mf.1436204880. Japanese.
- Background: PubMed 37626811Lee JY, Lee GH, Yi SH, Sim WS, Kim BW, Park HJ. Non-Surgical Treatments of Trigeminal Neuralgia from the Perspective of a Pain Physician: A Narrative Review. Biomedicines. 2023 Aug 21;11(8):2315. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11082315.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Relevant data can be shared upon genuine request
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
iftikhar qayum, MBBS, MD, PHD study director
Rehman Medical Institute
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing oxcarbamezapine(300 mg twice daily) and combination therapy(oxcarbamezapine 300 mg twice daily and gabapentine) in people with Effectiveness of Drugs Was Compared for Treating Trigeminal Neuralgia and Pain, run by Rehman Medical Institute - RMI at 1 site in Pakistan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Pain Intensity Scores Assessed by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (time frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, and 2 months after initiation of treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07625410, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Jun 2026.