Patellofemoral OsteoarthritisFDG-PFJOANCT07625150
FDG PET/MRI Imaging of Patellofemoral Joint Osteoarthritis
An observational study of Patellofemoral Osteoarthritis and Knee Osteoarthritis, run by University of California, San Francisco at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This project aims to develop an [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) / magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) method to locate the painful inflammation in PFJ OA associated with joint loading. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Patellofemoral Osteoarthritis, Knee Osteoarthritis, Knee Pain
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 19 Feb 2025to Feb 2028
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: The study population includes outpatient individuals with patellofemoral joint osteoarthritis (PFJ OA) and healthy asymptomatic volunteers recruited from the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) and the surrounding community
Who may be able to join
- Adult with the capacity to give informed consent
- Ability to perform 25 single-leg squats
- No traumatic knee injuries/surgeries since last visit for the parent study (IRB #21-34763)
- No investigational drugs since last visit for the parent study (IRB #21-34763)
- No contraindications to MRI or PET tracer since last visit for the parent study (IRB #21-34763)
- Not taking steroid injections
- Not pregnant
- Additional inclusion criteria for healthy volunteers: Minimal pain (VAS=0-1) during a series of 25 single-leg squats on one or both legs
Who cannot join
- Inability to consent for themselves
- Inability to perform 25 single-leg squats with the study leg
- New traumatic knee injuries/surgeries since last visit for the parent study (IRB #21-34763)
- Taking investigational drugs since last visit for the parent study (IRB #21-34763)
- New contraindications to MRI or PET tracer since last visit for the parent study (IRB #21-34763)
- Taking steroid injections
Show all 9Show fewer
- Pregnant
- Diabetic
- Additional exclusion criteria for healthy volunteers: VAS of 2 or greater during a series of 25 single-leg squats on both legs
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
UCSF Radiology China Basin
San Francisco, California, 94107
Eric Hammond, 415-502-6470, eric.hammond@ucsf.edu
About this study
Official title: Understanding Painful Inflammation in Patellofemoral Joint OA Using [18F] FDG
This project aims to develop an [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) / magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) method to locate the painful inflammation in PFJ OA associated with joint loading. [18F] FDG PET/MRI is an emerging pain imaging approach with enhanced sensitivity to painful hypermetabolic inflammation through evaluation of intracellular glucose utilization rate via ([18F]FDG PET) and fine anatomy details (MRI). The investigative group has shown its promise in revealing previously unidentified or unspecified pain generators in various musculoskeletal pain conditions. The investigators have also demonstrated the feasibility of visualizing the structural changes between unloaded and loaded knee joints with MRI, which can be easily adopted in the current PET/MRI setting. The main challenge in the proposed [18F]FDG PET/MRI approach is to differentiate the normal uptake of FDG for metabolic changes by weight-bearing from abnormal changes indicating eventual pain aggravation by weight-bearing and knee-flexion. The investigators have garnered the following two aims to validate the proposed method by comparing unloaded and loaded knee imaging results between PFJ OA pain patients and asymptomatic, matched controls.
Read the detailed description
Background:
Imaging of pain from patellofemoral joint osteoarthritis (PFJ OA): PFJ OA is primarily defined as the degeneration of the cartilage of the PFJ; however, the cartilage itself is not innervated and thus cannot be a source of pain. The knee joint is composed of a variety of other innervated tissues, including the synovium, subchondral bone, meniscus, ligaments, tendons, muscles, and infrapatellar fat pad. The degeneration of the patella cartilage may result from or even result in some form of damage to these innervated joint tissues, which eventually leads to the sensation of pain. The main challenge in imaging identification of pain generators in PFJ OA is that structural abnormalities that can cause pain also frequently occur in the asymptomatic population as a natural wear-and-tear process with aging. For example, meniscal tears on MRI are nearly equally prevalent (~60%) in symptomatic and asymptomatic knees. The proposed approach here is to adopt [18F]FDG PET/MRI, a molecular imaging technique highly sensitive to hypermetabolic inflammation. Pain in PFJ OA may stem from inflammatory responses to tissue damage, leading to the increased activities of immune cells causing the local surge of need for energy. [18F]FDG PET is the most widely accepted imaging modality for identifying pathology by visualizing hotspots of energy demand and has recently shown strong promise in detecting painful hypermetabolic inflammation in multiple musculoskeletal pain conditions. Therefore, the proposed implementation of [18F]FDG PET/MRI for PFJ OA will facilitate pinpointing hypermetabolic pain generators that conventional structural imaging techniques have failed to identify.
Loading of PFJ OA: The magnitude and distribution of loads across a joint have the potential to accelerate structural OA decline and result in pain. While biomechanical factors are known to influence the progression of TFJ OA, little is known about the role of biomechanical factors in PFJOA disease progression. These factors are likely to differ from those for TFJ OA progression as a result of the unique functions and design of the different joints. The investigative team has extensive experience in the field of biomechanics and OA. Elevated PFJ stress during squatting was demonstrated in people with patellofemoral pain, a condition affecting younger adults with similar features to PFJ OA. Preliminary work by the investigators confirmed higher PFJ stress during walking in individuals with PFJ OA compared to controls. These data suggest that elevated PFJ stress is likely a contributory factor in PFJ OA. Increased knee extensor moments can result in higher PFJ reaction forces and PFJ stress at a given knee angle and thus may be a potential risk factor for PFJ OA progression. Preliminary work by the investigators showed that higher knee extensor moment during late stance was predictive of structural progression of PFJ OA at one-year follow-up. The current supplement will support further investigation in single-leg squat biomechanics in persons with painful PFJ OA and asymptomatic matched controls. These data are necessary to understand the impact of loading and squat kinematics on pain, leading to novel movement-based interventions for pain management.
AIMS:
Aim 1: Identification of painful inflammation in the unloaded knee with PFJ OA The investigators will 1) compare [18F]FDG uptake measurements of the unloaded knee between symptomatic PFJ OA knees and asymptomatic knees and 2) analyze the correlation between [18F]FDG and biomechanical measurements. The investigators will recruit 25 PFJ OA patients with pain reproducible with a weight-bearing exercise (single-leg squats) and 25 age/sex/BMI-matched asymptomatic controls. The [18F]FDG PET/MRI session of the unloaded knee will yield the max measurements of [18F]FDG standardized uptake value (SUV) in the local hotspots. All subjects will have a post-imaging functional assessment through a battery of physical performance tests for biomechanical measurements. The investigators will compare the [18F]FDG uptake measurements between patients and controls using the t-test and conduct a generalized linear model (GLM) analysis to determine the biomechanical measurements predicting the [18F]FDG uptake measurements.
Aim 2: Identification of painful inflammation in the loaded knee with PFJ OA The investigators will identify abnormal [18F]FDG hotspots in the PFJ of the patients due to knee loading by comparison with asymptomatic controls. After the [18F]FDG PET/MRI session in Aim 1, the participant will be re-scanned using the same PET/MRI protocol while loading the knee continuously with 25% bodyweight using a custom-made device. The investigators will measure the difference of the [18F]FDG SUVmax between the unloaded and loaded sessions in the synovium, femur, tibia, meniscus, fat pad, and muscle around the PFJ. [18F]FDG uptake difference will be compared between PFJ OA patients and asymptomatic controls using the t-test and GLM analysis to determine biomechanical measurements prediction of [18F]FDG uptake difference.
The successful execution of the proposed aims will offer a novel, non-invasive imaging method to identify the painful inflammation in PFJ OA as well as increased inflammatory response due to joint loading, which will eventually aggravate the pain. Together with the ongoing development in the parent R01 project to visualize bone remodeling and cartilage compositional changes, this project will facilitate building a comprehensive imaging method to examine the underlying degenerative process and the symptomatic manifestation of PFJ OA.
- Medical subject headings
- Osteoarthritis, Knee
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| PFJ OA Patients | Group defined as WORMS 2-6, and >1 VAS pain during 25 single-leg squats | |
| Healthy Controls | Healthy volunteers with WORMS 0-1, and 0-1 VAS pain during 25 single-leg squats |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) of [18F]FDG in PFJ Tissues, Pre-Loading
Comparison of FDG SUVmax between PFJ OA patients and asymptomatic controls across various tissue types (synovium, femur, tibia, meniscus, fat pad, and muscles) to identify hypermetabolic inflammation at pre-loading.
Measured: baseline, pre-loading
Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) of [18F]FDG in PFJ Tissues, Post-Loading
Comparison of FDG SUVmax between PFJ OA patients and asymptomatic controls across various tissue types (synovium, femur, tibia, meniscus, fat pad, and muscles) to identify hypermetabolic inflammation at post-loading.
Measured: baseline, post-loading
Secondary outcomes (2)
Change in SUVmax Between Unloaded and Loaded States
The difference in FDG SUVmax measurements between the loaded PFJ and the unloaded PFJ imaging sessions to determine sensitivity to loading-induced inflammation.
Measured: baseline
Visual Analog Scale Maximum Pain Score During a Single-Leg Squat
Assessment of maximum pain levels during a single-leg squat. Pain will be evaluated using a Visual Analog Scale, where scores range from 0 to 10, with 0 indicating "no pain" and 10 indicating "worst possible pain". Higher scores represent a worse outcome. Individual scores will be analyzed in relation to FDG uptake and loaded-unloaded uptake differences.
Measured: baseline
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Jun 2026
- Study start19 Feb 2025
- Primary completionFeb 2028 (estimated)
- Study completionFeb 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Patellofemoral OsteoarthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of California, San FranciscoThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, San Francisco
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Richard Souza, PhD, PT, Principal investigator, University of California, San Francisco
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07625150
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- K24AR072133
- Other IDs
- K24AR072133, 24-41266
- Acronym
- FDG-PFJOA
- Status last verified
- Jun 2026
- First submitted
- 22 May 2026
- Last updated
- 4 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Understanding Painful Inflammation in Patellofemoral Joint OA Using [18F] FDG
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07625150
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FDG-PFJOA / K24AR072133
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, San FranciscoUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)
- Study start
- 19 Feb 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Feb 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Feb 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 4 Jun 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This project aims to develop an [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) / magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) method to locate the painful inflammation in PFJ OA associated with joint loading. [18F] FDG PET/MRI is an emerging pain imaging approach with enhanced sensitivity to painful hypermetabolic inflammation through evaluation of intracellular glucose utilization rate via ([18F]FDG PET) and fine anatomy details (MRI). The investigative group has shown its promise in revealing previously unidentified or unspecified pain generators in various musculoskeletal pain conditions. The investigators have also demonstrated the feasibility of visualizing the structural changes between unloaded and loaded knee joints with MRI, which can be easily adopted in the current PET/MRI setting. The main challenge in the proposed [18F]FDG PET/MRI approach is to differentiate the normal uptake of FDG for metabolic changes by weight-bearing from abnormal changes indicating eventual pain aggravation by weight-bearing and knee-flexion. The investigators have garnered the following two aims to validate the proposed method by comparing unloaded and loaded knee imaging results between PFJ OA pain patients and asymptomatic, matched controls.
Detailed description
Background:
Imaging of pain from patellofemoral joint osteoarthritis (PFJ OA): PFJ OA is primarily defined as the degeneration of the cartilage of the PFJ; however, the cartilage itself is not innervated and thus cannot be a source of pain. The knee joint is composed of a variety of other innervated tissues, including the synovium, subchondral bone, meniscus, ligaments, tendons, muscles, and infrapatellar fat pad. The degeneration of the patella cartilage may result from or even result in some form of damage to these innervated joint tissues, which eventually leads to the sensation of pain. The main challenge in imaging identification of pain generators in PFJ OA is that structural abnormalities that can cause pain also frequently occur in the asymptomatic population as a natural wear-and-tear process with aging. For example, meniscal tears on MRI are nearly equally prevalent (~60%) in symptomatic and asymptomatic knees. The proposed approach here is to adopt [18F]FDG PET/MRI, a molecular imaging technique highly sensitive to hypermetabolic inflammation. Pain in PFJ OA may stem from inflammatory responses to tissue damage, leading to the increased activities of immune cells causing the local surge of need for energy. [18F]FDG PET is the most widely accepted imaging modality for identifying pathology by visualizing hotspots of energy demand and has recently shown strong promise in detecting painful hypermetabolic inflammation in multiple musculoskeletal pain conditions. Therefore, the proposed implementation of [18F]FDG PET/MRI for PFJ OA will facilitate pinpointing hypermetabolic pain generators that conventional structural imaging techniques have failed to identify.
Loading of PFJ OA: The magnitude and distribution of loads across a joint have the potential to accelerate structural OA decline and result in pain. While biomechanical factors are known to influence the progression of TFJ OA, little is known about the role of biomechanical factors in PFJOA disease progression. These factors are likely to differ from those for TFJ OA progression as a result of the unique functions and design of the different joints. The investigative team has extensive experience in the field of biomechanics and OA. Elevated PFJ stress during squatting was demonstrated in people with patellofemoral pain, a condition affecting younger adults with similar features to PFJ OA. Preliminary work by the investigators confirmed higher PFJ stress during walking in individuals with PFJ OA compared to controls. These data suggest that elevated PFJ stress is likely a contributory factor in PFJ OA. Increased knee extensor moments can result in higher PFJ reaction forces and PFJ stress at a given knee angle and thus may be a potential risk factor for PFJ OA progression. Preliminary work by the investigators showed that higher knee extensor moment during late stance was predictive of structural progression of PFJ OA at one-year follow-up. The current supplement will support further investigation in single-leg squat biomechanics in persons with painful PFJ OA and asymptomatic matched controls. These data are necessary to understand the impact of loading and squat kinematics on pain, leading to novel movement-based interventions for pain management.
AIMS:
Aim 1: Identification of painful inflammation in the unloaded knee with PFJ OA The investigators will 1) compare [18F]FDG uptake measurements of the unloaded knee between symptomatic PFJ OA knees and asymptomatic knees and 2) analyze the correlation between [18F]FDG and biomechanical measurements. The investigators will recruit 25 PFJ OA patients with pain reproducible with a weight-bearing exercise (single-leg squats) and 25 age/sex/BMI-matched asymptomatic controls. The [18F]FDG PET/MRI session of the unloaded knee will yield the max measurements of [18F]FDG standardized uptake value (SUV) in the local hotspots. All subjects will have a post-imaging functional assessment through a battery of physical performance tests for biomechanical measurements. The investigators will compare the [18F]FDG uptake measurements between patients and controls using the t-test and conduct a generalized linear model (GLM) analysis to determine the biomechanical measurements predicting the [18F]FDG uptake measurements.
Aim 2: Identification of painful inflammation in the loaded knee with PFJ OA The investigators will identify abnormal [18F]FDG hotspots in the PFJ of the patients due to knee loading by comparison with asymptomatic controls. After the [18F]FDG PET/MRI session in Aim 1, the participant will be re-scanned using the same PET/MRI protocol while loading the knee continuously with 25% bodyweight using a custom-made device. The investigators will measure the difference of the [18F]FDG SUVmax between the unloaded and loaded sessions in the synovium, femur, tibia, meniscus, fat pad, and muscle around the PFJ. [18F]FDG uptake difference will be compared between PFJ OA patients and asymptomatic controls using the t-test and GLM analysis to determine biomechanical measurements prediction of [18F]FDG uptake difference.
The successful execution of the proposed aims will offer a novel, non-invasive imaging method to identify the painful inflammation in PFJ OA as well as increased inflammatory response due to joint loading, which will eventually aggravate the pain. Together with the ongoing development in the parent R01 project to visualize bone remodeling and cartilage compositional changes, this project will facilitate building a comprehensive imaging method to examine the underlying degenerative process and the symptomatic manifestation of PFJ OA.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| PFJ OA Patients | – | –Group defined as WORMS 2-6, and >1 VAS pain during 25 single-leg squats |
| Healthy Controls | – | –Healthy volunteers with WORMS 0-1, and 0-1 VAS pain during 25 single-leg squats |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- The study population includes outpatient individuals with patellofemoral joint osteoarthritis (PFJ OA) and healthy asymptomatic volunteers recruited from the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) and the surrounding community
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Adult with the capacity to give informed consent
- Ability to perform 25 single-leg squats
- No traumatic knee injuries/surgeries since last visit for the parent study (IRB #21-34763)
- No investigational drugs since last visit for the parent study (IRB #21-34763)
- No contraindications to MRI or PET tracer since last visit for the parent study (IRB #21-34763)
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Inability to consent for themselves
- Inability to perform 25 single-leg squats with the study leg
- New traumatic knee injuries/surgeries since last visit for the parent study (IRB #21-34763)
- Taking investigational drugs since last visit for the parent study (IRB #21-34763)
- New contraindications to MRI or PET tracer since last visit for the parent study (IRB #21-34763)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) of [18F]FDG in PFJ Tissues, Pre-Loading
Time frame: baseline, pre-loading
Comparison of FDG SUVmax between PFJ OA patients and asymptomatic controls across various tissue types (synovium, femur, tibia, meniscus, fat pad, and muscles) to identify hypermetabolic inflammation at pre-loading.
Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) of [18F]FDG in PFJ Tissues, Post-Loading
Time frame: baseline, post-loading
Comparison of FDG SUVmax between PFJ OA patients and asymptomatic controls across various tissue types (synovium, femur, tibia, meniscus, fat pad, and muscles) to identify hypermetabolic inflammation at post-loading.
2 secondary outcomes
Change in SUVmax Between Unloaded and Loaded States
Time frame: baseline
Visual Analog Scale Maximum Pain Score During a Single-Leg Squat
Time frame: baseline
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Jun 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Patellofemoral Osteoarthritis
Not yet recruiting
Comparison of High-Intensity and Conventional Physical Therapy in Musculoskeletal Disorders
Low Back Pain, Radicular Syndrome
RecruitingObservational study
Assessing the Association Between WBCT PFJ Morphological Metrics and Knee Symptoms
Knee Osteoarthritis, Patellofemoral Pain (PFPS)
Active, not recruiting
Persona Ti-Nidium Post-Market Clinical Follow-up
Knee Pain Chronic, Osteoarthritis
RecruitingPhase 2
Treatment of Patellofemoral Osteoarthritis With Engineered Cartilage.
Patellofemoral Osteoarthritis
Active, not recruiting
To Compare the Effect of Closed Kinetic Chain and Isometric Exercises in Reducing Pain and Improving Functional Disability in Patients With Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome Associated With Knee Osteoarthritis
Knee Osteoarthritis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Richard Souza, PhD, PT principal investigator
University of California, San Francisco
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Patellofemoral Osteoarthritis and Knee Osteoarthritis, run by University of California, San Francisco at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Eric Hammond (415-502-6470, eric.hammond@ucsf.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) of [18F]FDG in PFJ Tissues, Pre-Loading (time frame: baseline, pre-loading). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Jun 2026.