AzTrials
AzTrials

Deep Vein ThrombosisNCT07622212

Comparison Of Different Mechanical Thrombectomy Devices in Endovascular Treatment of Acute Iliofemoral Venous Thrombosis

An observational study of Deep Vein Thrombosis, run by RenJi Hospital at 1 site in China.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

A head-to-head comparison of two different types of percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (PMT) - ClotTriever System versus aspiration thrombectomy (including rheolytic thrombectomy) - in patients with acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT) was conducted to determine whether ClotTriever System can improve… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 85 years
Conditions the study is for
Deep Vein Thrombosis
What is being tested?
Percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy by ClotTriever System and Percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy by aspiration or rheolytic thrombectomy
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
180 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
1 Jan 2024to 31 Dec 2028
How long will I take part?
24 Months
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: 180

Who may be able to join

  • Aged between 18 and 85 years;
  • Diagnosed with acute iliofemoral venous thrombosis, with thrombosis involving at least the iliac vein and common femoral vein;
  • Time from symptom onset to endovascular treatment ≤ 14 days;
  • Patients undergo endovascular treatment with percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy;
  • Patients sign the informed consent form.

Who cannot join

  • Presence of PTS in the limb to be treated in this procedure, or a history of symptomatic DVT in the same limb within the past 2 years;
  • Concurrent symptomatic acute DVT involving the iliac vein and/or common femoral vein in the contralateral limb;
  • Known allergy to heparin, low molecular weight heparin, contrast agents, etc.
  • Concomitant severe pulmonary embolism with hemodynamic changes, such as hypoxia, hypotension, etc.
  • Inability to tolerate endovascular treatment due to conditions such as acute systemic illness, severe dyspnea, etc.
  • Concomitant severe renal insufficiency with creatinine clearance < 30 ml/min;
Show all 13Show fewer
  • Concomitant active bleeding, severe hepatic insufficiency, bleeding tendency, etc.
  • Concomitant severe anemia (hemoglobin < 8.0 mg/dL) or platelet count < 80,000/mL;
  • History of subarachnoid hemorrhage, intracranial hemorrhage, intracranial vascular malformation, or intracranial aneurysm;
  • Pregnant women;
  • Presence of other diseases (e.g., advanced malignancy, cardiac insufficiency, etc.) with an expected life expectancy < 24 months
  • Participation in any drug or medical device clinical trial that may interfere with this study within the past 1 month;
  • Patients unwilling to participate in this trial.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

China1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Renji hospital

    Shanghai

    Qihong Ni, +8615801900772, niqihong1989@163.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Comparison Of Different Mechanical Thrombectomy Devices in Endovascular Treatment of Acute Iliofemoral Venous Thrombosis (The COMET Study)

A head-to-head comparison of two different types of percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (PMT) - ClotTriever System versus aspiration thrombectomy (including rheolytic thrombectomy) - in patients with acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT) was conducted to determine whether ClotTriever System can improve thrombus clearance rate, reduce the incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS), and enhance the long-term efficacy of endovascular treatment for acute iliofemoral DVT.

Read the detailed description

Acute deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is associated with development of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS). Early removal of iliofemoral thrombosis by percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (PMT) may reduce the incidence of PTS. There is currently a lack of research on which device is optimal for thrombus removal. The aim of this study is to conduct a multicenter, observational, prospective cohort study in patients with acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT), performing a head-to-head comparison of two different types of mechanical thrombectomy devices - ClotTriever System versus aspiration thrombectomy (including rheolytic thrombectomy) - to determine whether ClotTriever System can improve thrombus clearance rate, reduce the incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS), and enhance the long-term efficacy of endovascular treatment for acute iliofemoral DVT.

Being tested
Percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy by ClotTriever System, Percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy by aspiration or rheolytic thrombectomy
Keywords
Deep venous thrombosis, Percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy, Post-thrombotic syndrome
Medical subject headings
Venous Thrombosis, Postthrombotic Syndrome

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy by ClotTriever SystemProcedure or surgery

    The procedure is performed via the ipsilateral popliteal vein access or the ipsilateral femoral vein access. After puncture under fluoroscopic or ultrasound guidance, a vascular sheath is inserted, systemic heparinization is administered, and a guidewire is advanced antegradely into the inferior vena cava with the assistance of a catheter to establish the access. Once the access is established, treatment is carried out using stent retriever devices. Available stent retriever devices include currently marketed options such as ClotTriever (INARI MEDICAL, USA). After thrombectomy, the thrombus removal efficacy is assessed by venography.

  • Percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy by aspiration or rheolytic thrombectomyProcedure or surgery

    The procedure is performed via the ipsilateral calf deep vein access, the ipsilateral popliteal vein access, or the ipsilateral femoral vein access. After puncture under fluoroscopic or ultrasound guidance, a vascular sheath is inserted, systemic heparinization is administered, and a guidewire is advanced antegradely into the inferior vena cava with the assistance of a catheter to establish the access. Once the access is established, treatment is carried out using mechanical aspiration thrombectomy devices. Available aspiration thrombectomy devices include currently marketed options such as the AngioJet thrombectomy catheter (Boston Scientific, USA) and the Acostream thrombectomy catheter (Acotec, China). After thrombectomy, the thrombus removal efficacy is assessed by venography.

Study groups in NCT07622212
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ClotTriever System groupPatients receive percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy by ClotTriever System
Receives: Procedure: Percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy by ClotTriever System
Aspiration thrombectomy groupPatients receive percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy by aspiration or rheolytic thrombectomy
Receives: Procedure: Percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy by aspiration or rheolytic thrombectomy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Incidence of PTS

    Assessed by the Villalta score

    Measured: At 24 months

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Incidence of moderate-to-severe PTS

    Assessed by the Villalta score

    Measured: at 6, 12, and 24 months

  2. Clinical classification of Clinical-Etiology-Anatomy-Pathophysiology (CEAP)

    Based on clinical symptoms

    Measured: at 6, 12, and 24 months

  3. Patency rate of the ipsilateral iliofemoral vein

    Assessed by color Doppler ultrasound

    Measured: at 12 months and 24 months

  4. Incidence of PTS

    at 6 and 12 months

    Measured: Assessed by the Villalta score

  5. Recurrence rate of symptomatic Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT)

    Assessed by symptoms combined with ultrasound examination in the ipsilateral limb

    Measured: at 24 months

  6. Rate of re-intervention

    Assessed by documentation of clinical reintervention

    Measured: at 24 months

  7. Quality of life score

    Assessed by Venous Insufficiency Epidemiological and Economic Study Quality of Life questionnaire (VEINES-QOL)

    Measured: at 6, 12, and 24 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Jun 2026
  2. Study start1 Jan 2024
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
180 participants (estimated)
Target duration
24 Months
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07622212
Sponsor's protocol ID
The COMET Study
Status last verified
May 2026
First submitted
26 May 2026
Last updated
3 Jun 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Deep Vein Thrombosis, run by RenJi Hospital at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Qihong Ni (+8615801900772, niqihong1989@163.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Incidence of PTS (time frame: At 24 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Jun 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in