AzTrials
AzTrials

Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression FracturesNCT07616583

Standardized Study Protocol of Percutaneous Vertebroplasty Based on Pedicle Nine-Grid Zoning Method

A study testing Nine-grid Area Division Method Assisted PVP and Traditional Standard Percutaneous Vertebroplasty (PVP) in people with Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures and Vertebroplasty, run by Beijing Friendship Hospital at 1 site in China.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to verify the safety and efficacy of the pedicle "Nine-grid Zoning Method" in assisting percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) for the treatment of lumbar osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF) in adults. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 50 to 80 years
What is being tested?
Nine-grid Area Division Method Assisted PVP and Traditional Standard Percutaneous Vertebroplasty (PVP)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
68 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
1 Jan 2024to 31 Dec 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 50 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosed with single-segment acute osteoporotic lumbar vertebral compression fracture (L1-L5), confirmed by typical MRI manifestations: low signal on T1-weighted imaging and high signal on T2-weighted and STIR sequences.
  • First-time reception of percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) surgery.
  • Complete preoperative imaging data including X-ray, CT, and MRI/bone scan.
  • Aged patients who voluntarily participate in the study and sign written informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Patients with old vertebral compression fractures or congenital pedicle dysplasia and lesions.
  • With a history of bone tumors or other systematic bone metabolic diseases.
  • CT examination shows incomplete or ruptured posterior wall of the fractured vertebral body.
  • Failure to obtain signed informed consent.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

China1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Beijing Friendship hospital, Capital Medical University

    Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100050

    Qi Fei, 13641225060, spinefei@126.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in China

About this study

The goal of this clinical trial is to verify the safety and efficacy of the pedicle "Nine-grid Zoning Method" in assisting percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) for the treatment of lumbar osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF) in adults. It also aims to standardize the puncture path of PVP and optimize the intraoperative operation process. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does the "Nine-grid Zoning Method" significantly increase the rate of achieving ideal intraoperative puncture endpoints and reduce operative time compared with the traditional pedicle puncture method?
  • Does the novel puncture method reduce intraoperative fluoroscopy times, radiation exposure, and the incidence of postoperative bone cement leakage without increasing surgical risks? Researchers will compare the modified PVP assisted by the "Nine-grid Zoning Method" (experimental group) with conventional PVP adopting the traditional "10 o'clock/2 o'clock" pedicle puncture point (control group) to confirm the clinical superiority and safety of the new standardized puncture path.
Read more

Participants will:

  • Receive unilateral transpedicular PVP surgery via either the nine-grid zoning puncture path or the traditional puncture path for single-segment acute lumbar OVCF
  • Complete preoperative baseline examinations including bone density detection, VAS pain score, ODI functional score and SF-36 quality of life score assessment
  • Receive standardized intraoperative data recording covering operative time, fluoroscopy frequency, radiation dose, bone cement filling and leakage conditions
  • Undergo postoperative follow-up at 1 day after surgery, discharge, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year after operation, with regular imaging re-examination and scale evaluation to monitor fracture recovery and postoperative complications
Being tested
Nine-grid Area Division Method Assisted PVP, Traditional Standard Percutaneous Vertebroplasty (PVP)
Keywords
Nine-grid Area Division Method, PVP, OVCF, Vertebral pedicle puncture

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Nine-grid Area Division Method Assisted PVPProcedure or surgery

    This intervention applies a novel pedicle nine-grid zoning technique for puncture positioning during unilateral transpedicular PVP. Under intraoperative C-arm fluoroscopy, the vertebral pedicle projection is divided into a nine-grid area to determine the optimal bony puncture surface and accurate puncture entry point, replacing the traditional fixed puncture site. The standardized zoning positioning reduces repeated needle adjustment. All other surgical procedures including routine disinfection, anesthesia, needle insertion depth adjustment, bone cement mixing and injection, and incision suture follow standard PVP protocols. Perioperative management and 1-year systematic postoperative follow-up are performed uniformly.

  • Traditional Standard Percutaneous Vertebroplasty (PVP)Procedure or surgery

    This intervention adopts conventional unilateral transpedicular PVP with classic empirical puncture positioning. The standard puncture entry point is defined as the left 10 o'clock and right 2 o'clock position of the pedicle projection. Surgeons adjust the puncture needle repeatedly via real-time C-arm fluoroscopy to reach the ideal intraoperative puncture endpoint. All surgical procedures, perioperative care, postoperative rehabilitation guidance, and long-term follow-up regimen are identical to the experimental group, ensuring consistent intervention conditions except for the puncture positioning method.

Study groups in NCT07616583
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Nine-grid Area Division Method Assisted PVPExperimentalParticipants in this group undergo unilateral transpedicular percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) for single-segment acute lumbar osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Based on the newly proposed pedicle nine-grid zoning theory, surgeons identify the optimal puncture surface and puncture site under C-arm fluoroscopy guidance. Except for the standardized nine-grid puncture positioning method, all other intraoperative operations, perioperative management, and postoperative treatment are completely consistent with the control group. All subjects receive unified preoperative baseline evaluation, standardized intraoperative data collection, and regular postoperative follow-up up to 1 year after surgery.
Receives: Procedure: Nine-grid Area Division Method Assisted PVP
Traditional PVPActive comparatorParticipants in this group receive conventional unilateral transpedicular PVP for single-segment acute lumbar osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. The traditional classic puncture positioning standard is adopted, with the ideal pedicle puncture point located at the "10 o'clock (left) and 2 o'clock (right)" projection position. Surgeons adjust the puncture needle position repeatedly under intraoperative C-arm fluoroscopy to reach the ideal puncture endpoint. Perioperative nursing, surgical operation specifications, postoperative rehabilitation guidance and follow-up schedule are identical to those of the experimental group to ensure consistent baseline conditions of the two groups.
Receives: Procedure: Traditional Standard Percutaneous Vertebroplasty (PVP)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Proportion of cases reaching ideal intraoperative puncture endpoint

    The number and proportion of patients who achieve the standardized ideal puncture endpoint during operation. Ideal endpoint is defined as the puncture needle reaches the anterior 1/3 of the vertebral body on lateral fluoroscopy and locates at the vertebral midline on anteroposterior fluoroscopy, with qualified pedicle channel positioning.

    Measured: Intraoperatively

  2. Operative time

    Total intraoperative operation time, defined as the time from surgical positioning start to complete incision suture, used to evaluate intraoperative operation efficiency.

    Measured: Intraoperatively

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Incidence of bone cement leakage

    The number and proportion of patients with intraoperative or immediate postoperative bone cement leakage detected by C-arm fluoroscopy, and the classification of leakage types, to evaluate surgical safety.

    Measured: Intraoperatively and within 24 hours after surgery

  2. Intraoperative fluoroscopy times and radiation dose

    Record the total number of intraoperative C-arm fluoroscopy and cumulative radiation dose (mSv) to compare intraoperative radiation exposure between two groups.

    Measured: Intraoperatively

  3. VAS

    Evaluate postoperative pain degree via Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) to assess long-term clinical efficacy.The VAS is a 10-point continuous scale used to evaluate subjective pain intensity. The minimum score is 0 points, representing no pain at all. The maximum score is 10 points, representing the most severe and unbearable pain. A lower VAS score indicates milder pain and better clinical recovery, while a higher score indicates worse pain status and poorer symptomatic improvement.

    Measured: Postoperative day 1, discharge, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery

  4. ODI

    Evaluate postoperative pain degree via lumbar function via Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) to assess long-term clinical efficacy.The ODI is a validated questionnaire for assessing lumbar spine-related functional disability. The total score ranges from 0 points to 100 points. The minimum score (0 points) means no functional disability and completely normal lumbar activity. The maximum score (100 points) means severe lumbar dysfunction and complete inability to perform daily activities. Lower ODI scores reflect better lumbar function and improved living ability, whereas higher scores represent more serious functional impairment and worse surgical efficacy.

    Measured: Postoperative day 1, discharge, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery

  5. SF-36 scores

    Evaluate postoperative quality of life via SF-36 scale to assess long-term clinical efficacy.The SF-36 is a comprehensive scale for evaluating overall quality of life and general health status. Each dimension and the aggregated total score range from 0 points to 100 points. The minimum score (0 points) indicates the worst health status and extremely poor quality of life. The maximum score (100 points) indicates perfect physical and mental health with excellent daily living quality. Unlike VAS and ODI, a higher SF-36 score represents better health condition and superior postoperative quality of life, while a lower score indicates poorer recovery and worse health outcomes.

    Measured: Postoperative day 1, discharge, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery

  6. Incidence of postoperative vertebral re-fracture

    Record the number of patients with adjacent or injured vertebral re-fracture during follow-up to evaluate long-term surgical prognosis.

    Measured: Up to 1 year after surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Jun 2026
  2. Study start1 Jan 2024
  3. Primary completion31 Oct 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
68 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07616583
Sponsor's protocol ID
2024-P2-145
Status last verified
May 2026
First submitted
21 May 2026
Last updated
1 Jun 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Nine-grid Area Division Method Assisted PVP and Traditional Standard Percutaneous Vertebroplasty (PVP) in people with Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures and Vertebroplasty, run by Beijing Friendship Hospital at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Qi Fei (+86 13641225060, spinefei@126.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Proportion of cases reaching ideal intraoperative puncture endpoint (time frame: Intraoperatively). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Jun 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in