Endotracheal IntubationNCT07612995
Impact of Via CT-based 3D Printing Technology on Success Rate in Endotracheal Intubation in Students
A study testing the course training-3D and the course training- traditional in people with Endotracheal Intubation, run by xiaojing wang at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
The objective of this project is to develop a tracheal intubation teaching curriculum covering both normal and difficult airways using CT three-dimensional imaging and 3D printing technologies, enabling trainees to intuitively learn anatomical knowledge, operational skills, and special handling techniques, and to… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Endotracheal Intubation
- What is being tested?
- the course training-3D and the course training- traditional
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 80 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- May 2026to Aug 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- The only patients who were selected for the intubation were grade I and II according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA), non-obese and with good visualization of soft palate and uvula (Mallampati classification)
Who cannot join
- no
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
China1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Shanxibaiqiuen Hospital
Taiyuan, Shaanxi, 030000
xiaojing wang
About this study
Official title: Impact of Via CT-based 3D Models and 3D Printing Technology on Success Rate in Endotracheal Intubation in Undergraduate Medical Students-A Prospective Single-Center Study
The objective of this project is to develop a tracheal intubation teaching curriculum covering both normal and difficult airways using CT three-dimensional imaging and 3D printing technologies, enabling trainees to intuitively learn anatomical knowledge, operational skills, and special handling techniques, and to evaluate the learning outcomes. The research content includes the establishment of airway models and the training of students. Trainees in Group A will be trained using the tracheal intubation curriculum independently developed in this project, while trainees in Group B will be trained using traditional teaching methods, where instructors explain the course content via PowerPoint, elaborate on key and difficult points, answer student questions, and provide a summary. The teaching content for both groups is identical. After the teaching session, the teaching effectiveness will be evaluated using the second part of the teaching assessment methods.
- Conditions
- Endotracheal Intubation
- Being tested
- the course training-3D, the course training- traditional
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
the course training-3DBehavioural
The experimental group received training using the curriculum developed in this study. After training, both groups performed tracheal intubation on patients, and thon operation scores, as well as the satisfaction of students and teachers, were evaluated
the course training- traditionalBehavioural
Vtrained using traditional teaching methods, involving explanations by instructors via PowerPoint, det elaboration on key and difficult points, answering student questions, and summarizing the content
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| traditional teaching group | Active comparator | trained using traditional teaching methods, involving explanations by instructors via PowerPoint, det elaboration on key and difficult points, answering student questions, and summarizing the content. Receives: Behavioral: the course training- traditional |
| the course training group | Experimental | trained using a tracheal intubation course independently developed for this project。 Receives: Behavioral: the course training-3D |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
success rate of endotracheal intubation
fter inserting the video laryngoscope into the oral cavity, insert the endotracheal tube into the trachea.
Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Secondary outcomes (1)
Complications of tracheal intubation, student satisfaction and confidence scores
Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 May 2026
- Study startMay 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completionJul 2026 (estimated)
- Study completionAug 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Endotracheal IntubationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- xiaojing wang
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, xiaojing wang, Shanxi Bethune Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07612995
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- J20240662
- Status last verified
- May 2026
- First submitted
- 29 Apr 2026
- Last updated
- 29 May 2026
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Impact of Via CT-based 3D Models and 3D Printing Technology on Success Rate in Endotracheal Intubation in Undergraduate Medical Students-A Prospective Single-Center Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07612995
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- J20240662
- Conditions
- Endotracheal Intubation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- xiaojing wangUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- May 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Jul 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Aug 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 29 May 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The objective of this project is to develop a tracheal intubation teaching curriculum covering both normal and difficult airways using CT three-dimensional imaging and 3D printing technologies, enabling trainees to intuitively learn anatomical knowledge, operational skills, and special handling techniques, and to evaluate the learning outcomes. The research content includes the establishment of airway models and the training of students. Trainees in Group A will be trained using the tracheal intubation curriculum independently developed in this project, while trainees in Group B will be trained using traditional teaching methods, where instructors explain the course content via PowerPoint, elaborate on key and difficult points, answer student questions, and provide a summary. The teaching content for both groups is identical. After the teaching session, the teaching effectiveness will be evaluated using the second part of the teaching assessment methods.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| traditional teaching group | Active comparator | Behavioral: the course training- traditionaltrained using traditional teaching methods, involving explanations by instructors via PowerPoint, det elaboration on key and difficult points, answering student questions, and summarizing the content. |
| the course training group | Experimental | Behavioral: the course training-3Dtrained using a tracheal intubation course independently developed for this project。 |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- The only patients who were selected for the intubation were grade I and II according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA), non-obese and with good visualization of soft palate and uvula (Mallampati classification)
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- no
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| the course training-3DThe experimental group received training using the curriculum developed in this study. After training, both groups performed tracheal intubation on patients, and thon operation scores, as well as the satisfaction of students and teachers, were evaluated | Behavioural | the course training group |
| the course training- traditionalVtrained using traditional teaching methods, involving explanations by instructors via PowerPoint, det elaboration on key and difficult points, answering student questions, and summarizing the content | Behavioural | traditional teaching group |
Primary outcome
success rate of endotracheal intubation
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
fter inserting the video laryngoscope into the oral cavity, insert the endotracheal tube into the trachea.
1 secondary outcome
Complications of tracheal intubation, student satisfaction and confidence scores
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 May 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Endotracheal Intubation
Not yet recruitingObservational study
AI-assisted Tracheal Intubation in Children
Intubation
Not yet recruiting
AI Smart Glasses Feedback for Intubation Training in Medical Students
Intubation, Intratracheal, Medical Education
Recruiting
Development and Preliminary Validation of Intelligent Video Laryngoscope for Emergency Use
Critically Ill Patients Requiring Mechanical Ventilation
Recruiting
Effect of a Brief Educational Intervention on Endotracheal Tube Cuff Pressure
Intubation, Endotracheal Tube Cuff Pressure
Recruiting
Hyperangulated vs Standard Videolaryngoscopy vs Direct Laryngoscopy for Double-Lumen Endobronchial Tube Intubation
Endobronchial Intubation, Double Lumen Tube Intubation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing the course training-3D and the course training- traditional in people with Endotracheal Intubation, run by xiaojing wang at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact xiaojing wang (18406559795, wangxiaojing@sxbqeh.com.cn), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
success rate of endotracheal intubation (time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 May 2026.