AzTrials
AzTrials

Lateral EpicondylitisNCT07604454

Muscle Energy Technique Combined With Mulligan Technique in Tennis Elbow

A study testing Muscle Energy Technique Combined With Mulligan Technique and Mulligan Mobilization With Movement in people with Lateral Epicondylitis and Tennis Elbow, run by University of Lahore at 1 site in Pakistan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of Muscle Energy Technique (MET) combined with Mulligan Mobilization With Movement (MWM) in patients with lateral epicondylitis (tennis elbow). The study compares the combined intervention with Mulligan technique and routine physical therapy alone. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 45 years
Conditions the study is for
Lateral Epicondylitis, Tennis Elbow
What is being tested?
Muscle Energy Technique Combined With Mulligan Technique and Mulligan Mobilization With Movement
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
40 participants
Where
1 sitePakistan
Study dates
26 Sep 2025to 25 Jan 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 45 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age between 18 and 45 years
  • Both genders
  • Unilateral lateral epicondylitis
  • Diagnosed by senior physiotherapist
  • Pain duration of at least 6 weeks
  • Pain score ≥7 on NPRS/VAS
  • Positive symptoms during extensor carpi radialis brevis and longus isometric contraction

Who cannot join

  • Previous elbow or shoulder surgery
  • Manual therapy within previous 6 months
  • History of fracture, dislocation, or tendon tear
  • Steroid or pain medication use
  • Peripheral nerve entrapment
  • Cervical radiculopathy
  • Osteoporosis or metastasis involving elbow

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Pakistan1 site
  • University of Lahore Teaching Hospital, Lahore

    Lahore, Punjab Province

Other trials in Pakistan

About this study

Official title: Effectiveness of Muscle Energy Technique Combined With Mulligan Mobilization Among Patients With Lateral Epicondylitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of Muscle Energy Technique (MET) combined with Mulligan Mobilization With Movement (MWM) in patients with lateral epicondylitis (tennis elbow). The study compares the combined intervention with Mulligan technique and routine physical therapy alone. Outcomes including pain intensity, functional disability, and quality of life will be assessed using NPRS, PRTEE, and SF-8 questionnaires over a four-week treatment period.

Read the detailed description

Lateral epicondylitis, commonly known as tennis elbow, is a musculoskeletal disorder characterized by pain and reduced functional ability affecting the lateral aspect of the elbow. It commonly results from repetitive wrist extension and forearm movements leading to overuse of the extensor tendons.

Conservative physiotherapy management including manual therapy and therapeutic exercises is widely used for the treatment of lateral epicondylitis. Mulligan Mobilization With Movement (MWM) has shown beneficial effects in reducing pain and improving grip strength and functional mobility. Muscle Energy Technique (MET) is another manual therapy approach that may help improve joint mobility, muscle flexibility, and pain reduction through controlled isometric contractions.

This study aims to determine whether combining MET with Mulligan technique provides superior clinical outcomes compared to Mulligan technique alone in patients with tennis elbow.

Participants will be randomly allocated into two groups:

Experimental Group: MET + MWM + Routine Physical Therapy Control Group: MWM + Routine Physical Therapy

Treatment will be provided five sessions per week for four weeks. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline and after completion of the intervention period.

Being tested
Muscle Energy Technique Combined With Mulligan Technique, Mulligan Mobilization With Movement
Keywords
Tennis Elbow, Lateral Epicondylitis, Muscle Energy Technique, Mulligan Technique, Mobilization With Movement
Medical subject headings
Tennis Elbow

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Muscle Energy Technique Combined With Mulligan TechniqueProcedure or surgery

    Muscle Energy Technique will be applied using resisted isometric contractions of forearm supination and pronation. Mulligan Mobilization With Movement will be applied using sustained lateral glide during pain-free gripping activity. Treatment sessions will be conducted five times weekly for four weeks.

  • Mulligan Mobilization With MovementProcedure or surgery

    Mulligan Mobilization With Movement technique will be applied using sustained glide of the forearm while participants perform pain-free gripping activities. Sessions will be conducted five times weekly for four weeks.

Study groups in NCT07604454
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Experimental Group (MET + MWM + Routine Physical Therapy)ExperimentalParticipants in this group will receive Muscle Energy Technique combined with Mulligan Mobilization With Movement along with routine physical therapy including eccentric strengthening and stretching exercises for wrist extensors.
Receives: Procedure: Muscle Energy Technique Combined With Mulligan Technique
Control Group (MWM + Routine Physical Therapy)Active comparatorParticipants in this group will receive Mulligan Mobilization With Movement along with routine physical therapy including eccentric strengthening and stretching exercises.
Receives: Procedure: Mulligan Mobilization With Movement

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pain Intensity Measured by Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)

    Pain intensity will be measured using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain).

    Measured: Baseline and after 4 weeks of intervention

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Functional Disability Measured by PRTEE Questionnaire

    Functional disability will be assessed using the Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) questionnaire.

    Measured: Baseline and after 4 weeks of intervention

  2. Quality of Life Measured by SF-8 Questionnaire

    Quality of life will be assessed using the Short Form-8 (SF-8) questionnaire. The SF-8 is an 8-item questionnaire that evaluates physical functioning, general health, pain, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, mental health, and physical role limitations. Higher scores indicate better quality of life.

    Measured: Baseline and after 4 weeks of intervention

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 May 2026
  2. Study start26 Sep 2025
  3. Primary completion28 Oct 2025
  4. Study completion25 Jan 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Participants will be randomly assigned into two parallel groups. One group will receive Muscle Energy Technique combined with Mulligan Mobilization With Movement and routine physical therapy, while the control group will receive Mulligan Mobilization With Movement with routine physical therapy alone.
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
40 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07604454
Sponsor's protocol ID
UOL/IREB/25/12/0027
Status last verified
May 2026
First submitted
17 May 2026
Last updated
22 May 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Individual participant data will not be shared because this study was conducted as an academic research project. The informed consent obtained from participants did not include provisions for public data sharing, and the dataset contains sensitive personal health information. Data will be stored securely and used only for academic and research purposes in accordance with institutional ethics approval.

Publications

  • Bowman EN. Current concepts: pathology in the overhead athlete's lateral elbow. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024 Feb;33(2):507-511. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.08.017. Epub 2023 Sep 27.

    PubMed 37774828
  • Blanchette MA, Normand MC. Augmented soft tissue mobilization vs natural history in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis: a pilot study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2011 Feb;34(2):123-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2010.12.001.

    PubMed 21334545
  • Bazancir Z, Firat T. A potential factor in the pathophysiology of lateral epicondylitis: The long sarcomere length of the extensor carpi radialis brevis muscle and implications for physiotherapy. Med Hypotheses. 2019 Sep;130:109278. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2019.109278. Epub 2019 Jun 12.

    PubMed 31383324
  • Bagcaci S, Unuvar BS, Gercek H, Ugurlu I, Sert OA, Yilmaz K. A randomized controlled trial on pain, grip strength, and functionality in lateral elbow pain: Mulligan vs muscle energy techniques. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2023;36(2):419-427. doi: 10.3233/BMR-220061.

    PubMed 36120766
  • Alagaesan, J., & Nirmala, J. G. (2024). Effectiveness of Mulligan Mobilization Technique Versus Cyriax Technique for Lateral Epicondylitis: A Pilot Study. Indian Journal of Physiotherapy & Occupational Therapy, 18.

  • Akbar H, Akbar S, Saddique MN, Sarfraz MS. Prevalence of lateral epicondylitis among housewives in Lahore: a cross-sectional study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Oct 15;25(1):815. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07889-x.

    PubMed 39407258
  • Ahmed A, Ibrar M, Arsh A, Wali S, Hayat S, Abass S. Comparing the effectiveness of Mulligan mobilization versus Cyriax approach in the management of patients with subacute lateral epicondylitis. J Pak Med Assoc. 2021 Jan;71(1(A)):12-15. doi: 10.47391/JPMA.186.

    PubMed 33484510
  • Afzal, M., Zakaullah, S., Memon, S. I., Nisar, A., Touqeer, H., & Shabir, H. (2021). Prevalence and risk factors of lateral epicondylitis among restaurant cooks at district Gujranwala: A cross-sectional study. Rawal Medical Journal, 46(2), 338.

  • Aben A, De Wilde L, Hollevoet N, Henriquez C, Vandeweerdt M, Ponnet K, Van Tongel A. Tennis elbow: associated psychological factors. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Mar;27(3):387-392. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.11.033.

    PubMed 29433642
  • Abd Elrahim, R. M., Ali, M. F., Elwerdany, S. H., Salama, A. M., & Elsayed, M. (2022). Mulligan mobilisation with movement versus deep friction massage in patients with lateral epicondylitis. J Pharm Negat Results, 13, 5184-5192.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Muscle Energy Technique Combined With Mulligan Technique and Mulligan Mobilization With Movement in people with Lateral Epicondylitis and Tennis Elbow, run by University of Lahore at 1 site in Pakistan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pain Intensity Measured by Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) (time frame: Baseline and after 4 weeks of intervention). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07604454, which also lists 10 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 May 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in