Last Year Medical StudentNCT07603843
Use of Cognitive Aid Methods in the Management of Status Epilepticus
A study testing Management of status epilepticus with paper cognitive aids, Management of status epilepticus with digital cognitive aids and Management of status epilepticus with no cognitive aid in people with Last Year Medical Student, run by Ankara University.
Trial summary
This study aims to evaluate whether cognitive aids improve the management performance of sixth-year Emergency Medicine interns during simulated status epilepticus scenarios. It will also examine whether the format of the cognitive aid (paper-based or digital) influences technical and non-technical performance during… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages Up to 80 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Last Year Medical Student
- What is being tested?
- Management of status epilepticus with paper cognitive aids, Management of status epilepticus with digital cognitive aids and Management of status epilepticus with no cognitive aid
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 76 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 25 May 2026to 10 Jul 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Up to 80 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Being a sixth-year Emergency Medicine intern
- Willingness to participate in the study
Who cannot join
- Previous participation in simulation studies involving cognitive aids,
- Prior involvement in the development of the cognitive aids used in this study
About this study
Official title: İmpact of Cognitive Aid Methods on Clinical Decision-making in the Management of Status Epilepticus in the Emergency Department: A Simulation-based Study
This study aims to evaluate whether cognitive aids improve the management performance of sixth-year Emergency Medicine interns during simulated status epilepticus scenarios. It will also examine whether the format of the cognitive aid (paper-based or digital) influences technical and non-technical performance during crisis management.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Read more
Do cognitive aids improve adherence to evidence-based status epilepticus management during simulation? Do cognitive aids reduce time to initiation of critical treatments? Is there a difference between paper-based and digital cognitive aids in terms of performance, cognitive workload, and stress levels?
Researchers will compare paper-based cognitive aids, digital cognitive aids, and standard management without cognitive aids in standardized simulation scenarios.
Participants will:
Attend a standardized didactic session on status epilepticus management Participate in a high-fidelity simulation scenario approximately one month after the educational session Use either a paper-based cognitive aid, a digital cognitive aid, or no cognitive aid during the simulation scenario Complete post-simulation assessments evaluating stress levels, cognitive workload, and participant satisfaction Participate in structured debriefing sessions following the simulation exercise
Study Groups Intervention Group A
A cognitive aid (status epilepticus management checklist/algorithm in paper format) will be provided during the simulated scenario.
Intervention Group B
A cognitive aid (status epilepticus management checklist/algorithm in digital format) will be provided during the simulated scenario.
Control Group
No cognitive aid will be provided. Participants will manage the patient using only their existing knowledge and clinical reasoning skills.
Study Procedure
- Pre-Simulation Preparation All participants will receive a standardized didactic lecture on status epilepticus management delivered by a faculty member from the Department of Emergency Medicine. A validated cognitive aid for status epilepticus management (checklist/algorithm/flowchart) will be developed in accordance with current evidence-based guidelines. One month after the didactic session, all participants will participate in a simulation scenario focused on status epilepticus management.
- Simulation Scenarios Participants will manage standardized status epilepticus scenarios requiring timely and appropriate interventions, including: benzodiazepine administration, escalation to second-line therapy, glucose assessment and correction, airway management when indicated.
Scenario-specific performance assessment checklists will be developed to evaluate technical skills.
Non-technical skills will be assessed using the Ottawa Global Rating Scale.
Outcomes Primary Outcomes Technical performance in status epilepticus management Non-technical performance during crisis management Time to initiation of first-line treatment (e.g., benzodiazepine administration) Time to initiation of second-line treatment Secondary Outcomes Adherence to evidence-based guidelines (appropriate medication selection, dosage, and timing) Completion of essential management steps (e.g., glucose control, airway management) Team communication and coordination (assessed using the Ottawa Global Rating Scale) Participant stress levels measured using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
Post-Simulation Assessment Structured debriefing sessions will be conducted following the simulation scenarios.
Participants will complete assessments evaluating: cognitive workload (using the NASA Task Load Index), satisfaction with the cognitive aid (intervention groups only).
Ethical Considerations Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. The anonymity and confidentiality of simulation recordings will be ensured. Participants will be informed that study participation will not affect their Emergency Medicine internship evaluation in any way.
Read the detailed description
Status epilepticus (SE) is a neurological emergency requiring rapid recognition, timely escalation of therapy, and coordinated team-based management. Delays in treatment initiation and deviations from evidence-based algorithms are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. In high-stress emergency settings, healthcare trainees may experience cognitive overload, impaired situational awareness, and reduced adherence to treatment protocols. Cognitive aids have been increasingly incorporated into crisis resource management strategies to support clinical decision-making and reduce omission of critical steps during time-sensitive emergencies.
The present study is designed as a simulation-based educational intervention investigating the impact of cognitive aids on the management of status epilepticus among sixth-year Emergency Medicine interns. The study specifically examines whether the availability and format of cognitive aids influence crisis management performance in a standardized simulated environment.
- Inclusion Criteria Being a sixth-year Emergency Medicine intern, Willingness to participate in the study
- Exclusion Criteria Previous participation in simulation studies involving cognitive aids, Prior involvement in the development of the cognitive aids used in this study
The cognitive aids used in the study will be developed according to contemporary evidence-based recommendations for status epilepticus management. Their content and clinical appropriateness will be reviewed by an expert panel consisting of emergency medicine specialists, neurologists and intensive care specialists. Both paper-based and digital-format cognitive aids will contain identical clinical content and treatment algorithms.
All participants will receive standardized baseline instruction on status epilepticus management before participation in simulation activities. Simulation sessions will be conducted approximately one month after the didactic training in order to evaluate retention and practical application of knowledge rather than immediate post-lecture recall.
Simulation scenarios will be conducted in a high-fidelity simulation environment using predefined case scripts, standardized patient progression, and uniform learning objectives. Scenarios will involve dynamic clinical deterioration requiring participants to recognize ongoing seizure activity, initiate first-line therapy, escalate treatment appropriately, assess reversible causes, and manage airway and hemodynamic complications. Simulation conditions will be standardized across all groups to minimize variability in scenario delivery.
The study will be conducted as a prospective, simulation-based, controlled educational intervention study involving sixth-year Emergency Medicine interns. Participants will be allocated into three study groups:
Intervention Group A: Participants will be provided with a paper-based cognitive aid consisting of a status epilepticus management checklist/algorithm during the simulation scenario.
Intervention Group B: Participants will be provided with a digital-format cognitive aid consisting of a status epilepticus management checklist/algorithm during the simulation scenario.
Control Group: Participants will manage the simulated patient without the use of any cognitive aid and will rely solely on their existing knowledge and clinical reasoning skills.
Participants assigned to cognitive aid groups will receive a brief orientation regarding the practical use of the aid before the simulation session. This orientation will focus solely on usability and navigation of the tool and will not include additional clinical instruction.
Performance assessment will include both technical and non-technical domains. Technical performance will be evaluated using structured scenario-specific checklists derived from guideline-based management steps. Non-technical performance will be assessed using validated crisis resource management assessment principles, including leadership, communication, situational awareness, task prioritization, and decision-making behaviors.
Simulation encounters will be video recorded for assessment purposes. Evaluators responsible for scoring participant performance will use standardized assessment tools and predefined scoring criteria to improve scoring consistency. Structured debriefing sessions will be conducted after completion of the scenarios to facilitate reflective learning and reinforce evidence-based management principles.
The study is expected to provide evidence regarding the educational effectiveness of cognitive aids in emergency medicine simulation training and may contribute to the development of future crisis resource management strategies in time-critical neurological emergencies. In addition, findings from this study may help clarify whether digital or paper-based cognitive support tools provide advantages in clinical performance, workflow integration, and cognitive workload management during acute emergency scenarios.
- Conditions
- Last Year Medical Student
- Being tested
- Management of status epilepticus with paper cognitive aids, Management of status epilepticus with digital cognitive aids, Management of status epilepticus with no cognitive aid
- Keywords
- cognitive aids, status epilepticus, simulation
- Medical subject headings
- Status Epilepticus
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Management of status epilepticus with paper cognitive aidsBehavioural
Also called Paper CA
Students assigned in the paper cognitive aids group will manage status epilepticus using paper cognitive aids
Management of status epilepticus with digital cognitive aidsBehavioural
Also called Digital CA
Students assigned in the digital cognitive aids group will manage status epilepticus using digital cognitive aids
Management of status epilepticus with no cognitive aidBehavioural
Also called No CA
Students assigned in the No cognitive aids group will manage status epilepticus using their existing knowledge
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Paper Cognitive aids | Experimental | Intervention Group A:
A cognitive aid (status epilepticus management checklist/algorithm in paper format) will be provided during the simulated scenario. Receives: Behavioral: Management of status epilepticus with paper cognitive aids |
| Digital cognitive aid | Experimental | Intervention Group B:
A cognitive aid (status epilepticus management checklist/algorithm in digital format) will be provided during the simulated scenario. Receives: Behavioral: Management of status epilepticus with digital cognitive aids |
| Control Group | Experimental | No cognitive aid will be provided. Participants will manage the patient using only their existing knowledge and clinical reasoning skills Receives: Behavioral: Management of status epilepticus with no cognitive aid |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Technical performance of participants in status epilepticus management
- Technical Performance Score in Status Epilepticus Management The checklist will evaluate completion and accuracy of critical management steps, including first-line treatment administration, escalation to second-line therapy, glucose assessment, and airway management.
Unit of Measure:Checklist score (points) Score Range:0-100 Interpretation:Higher scores indicate better technical performance.
Measured: from the beginning of the simulation session to the end
Non-Technical Skill Performance Assessed by the Ottawa Global Rating Scale
Non-Technical Skill Performance Assessed by the Ottawa Global Rating Scale Unit of Measure: Ottawa Global Rating Scale score Score Range: 1-7 for each domain Interpretation: Higher scores indicate better non-technical performance.
Measured: from the beginning of the simulation session to the end
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 May 2026
- Study start25 May 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion25 Jun 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion10 Jul 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Last Year Medical StudentStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Ankara UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Model description
- Study Groups 1. Intervention Group-A: A cognitive aid (status epilepticus management checklist or algorithm in paper format) will be provided during the simulated scenario. 2. Intervention Group-B: A cognitive aid (status epilepticus management checklist or algorithm in digital format) will be provided during the simulated scenario. 3. Control Group: No cognitive aid was provided. Participants manage the patient using only their own knowledge.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 76 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ankara University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ayca Koca, Ankara University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07603843
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AnkaraUU
- Status last verified
- May 2026
- First submitted
- 4 May 2026
- Last updated
- 29 May 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- İmpact of Cognitive Aid Methods on Clinical Decision-making in the Management of Status Epilepticus in the Emergency Department: A Simulation-based Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07603843
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AnkaraUU
- Conditions
- Last Year Medical Student
- Keywords
- cognitive aids, status epilepticus, simulation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 76 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Ankara UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 25 May 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 25 Jun 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 10 Jul 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 22 May 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aims to evaluate whether cognitive aids improve the management performance of sixth-year Emergency Medicine interns during simulated status epilepticus scenarios. It will also examine whether the format of the cognitive aid (paper-based or digital) influences technical and non-technical performance during crisis management.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Do cognitive aids improve adherence to evidence-based status epilepticus management during simulation? Do cognitive aids reduce time to initiation of critical treatments? Is there a difference between paper-based and digital cognitive aids in terms of performance, cognitive workload, and stress levels?
Researchers will compare paper-based cognitive aids, digital cognitive aids, and standard management without cognitive aids in standardized simulation scenarios.
Participants will:
Attend a standardized didactic session on status epilepticus management Participate in a high-fidelity simulation scenario approximately one month after the educational session Use either a paper-based cognitive aid, a digital cognitive aid, or no cognitive aid during the simulation scenario Complete post-simulation assessments evaluating stress levels, cognitive workload, and participant satisfaction Participate in structured debriefing sessions following the simulation exercise
Study Groups Intervention Group A
A cognitive aid (status epilepticus management checklist/algorithm in paper format) will be provided during the simulated scenario.
Intervention Group B
A cognitive aid (status epilepticus management checklist/algorithm in digital format) will be provided during the simulated scenario.
Control Group
No cognitive aid will be provided. Participants will manage the patient using only their existing knowledge and clinical reasoning skills.
Study Procedure
- Pre-Simulation Preparation All participants will receive a standardized didactic lecture on status epilepticus management delivered by a faculty member from the Department of Emergency Medicine. A validated cognitive aid for status epilepticus management (checklist/algorithm/flowchart) will be developed in accordance with current evidence-based guidelines. One month after the didactic session, all participants will participate in a simulation scenario focused on status epilepticus management.
- Simulation Scenarios Participants will manage standardized status epilepticus scenarios requiring timely and appropriate interventions, including: benzodiazepine administration, escalation to second-line therapy, glucose assessment and correction, airway management when indicated.
Scenario-specific performance assessment checklists will be developed to evaluate technical skills.
Non-technical skills will be assessed using the Ottawa Global Rating Scale.
Outcomes Primary Outcomes Technical performance in status epilepticus management Non-technical performance during crisis management Time to initiation of first-line treatment (e.g., benzodiazepine administration) Time to initiation of second-line treatment Secondary Outcomes Adherence to evidence-based guidelines (appropriate medication selection, dosage, and timing) Completion of essential management steps (e.g., glucose control, airway management) Team communication and coordination (assessed using the Ottawa Global Rating Scale) Participant stress levels measured using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
Post-Simulation Assessment Structured debriefing sessions will be conducted following the simulation scenarios.
Participants will complete assessments evaluating: cognitive workload (using the NASA Task Load Index), satisfaction with the cognitive aid (intervention groups only).
Ethical Considerations Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. The anonymity and confidentiality of simulation recordings will be ensured. Participants will be informed that study participation will not affect their Emergency Medicine internship evaluation in any way.
Detailed description
Status epilepticus (SE) is a neurological emergency requiring rapid recognition, timely escalation of therapy, and coordinated team-based management. Delays in treatment initiation and deviations from evidence-based algorithms are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. In high-stress emergency settings, healthcare trainees may experience cognitive overload, impaired situational awareness, and reduced adherence to treatment protocols. Cognitive aids have been increasingly incorporated into crisis resource management strategies to support clinical decision-making and reduce omission of critical steps during time-sensitive emergencies.
The present study is designed as a simulation-based educational intervention investigating the impact of cognitive aids on the management of status epilepticus among sixth-year Emergency Medicine interns. The study specifically examines whether the availability and format of cognitive aids influence crisis management performance in a standardized simulated environment.
- Inclusion Criteria Being a sixth-year Emergency Medicine intern, Willingness to participate in the study
- Exclusion Criteria Previous participation in simulation studies involving cognitive aids, Prior involvement in the development of the cognitive aids used in this study
The cognitive aids used in the study will be developed according to contemporary evidence-based recommendations for status epilepticus management. Their content and clinical appropriateness will be reviewed by an expert panel consisting of emergency medicine specialists, neurologists and intensive care specialists. Both paper-based and digital-format cognitive aids will contain identical clinical content and treatment algorithms.
All participants will receive standardized baseline instruction on status epilepticus management before participation in simulation activities. Simulation sessions will be conducted approximately one month after the didactic training in order to evaluate retention and practical application of knowledge rather than immediate post-lecture recall.
Simulation scenarios will be conducted in a high-fidelity simulation environment using predefined case scripts, standardized patient progression, and uniform learning objectives. Scenarios will involve dynamic clinical deterioration requiring participants to recognize ongoing seizure activity, initiate first-line therapy, escalate treatment appropriately, assess reversible causes, and manage airway and hemodynamic complications. Simulation conditions will be standardized across all groups to minimize variability in scenario delivery.
The study will be conducted as a prospective, simulation-based, controlled educational intervention study involving sixth-year Emergency Medicine interns. Participants will be allocated into three study groups:
Intervention Group A: Participants will be provided with a paper-based cognitive aid consisting of a status epilepticus management checklist/algorithm during the simulation scenario.
Intervention Group B: Participants will be provided with a digital-format cognitive aid consisting of a status epilepticus management checklist/algorithm during the simulation scenario.
Control Group: Participants will manage the simulated patient without the use of any cognitive aid and will rely solely on their existing knowledge and clinical reasoning skills.
Participants assigned to cognitive aid groups will receive a brief orientation regarding the practical use of the aid before the simulation session. This orientation will focus solely on usability and navigation of the tool and will not include additional clinical instruction.
Performance assessment will include both technical and non-technical domains. Technical performance will be evaluated using structured scenario-specific checklists derived from guideline-based management steps. Non-technical performance will be assessed using validated crisis resource management assessment principles, including leadership, communication, situational awareness, task prioritization, and decision-making behaviors.
Simulation encounters will be video recorded for assessment purposes. Evaluators responsible for scoring participant performance will use standardized assessment tools and predefined scoring criteria to improve scoring consistency. Structured debriefing sessions will be conducted after completion of the scenarios to facilitate reflective learning and reinforce evidence-based management principles.
The study is expected to provide evidence regarding the educational effectiveness of cognitive aids in emergency medicine simulation training and may contribute to the development of future crisis resource management strategies in time-critical neurological emergencies. In addition, findings from this study may help clarify whether digital or paper-based cognitive support tools provide advantages in clinical performance, workflow integration, and cognitive workload management during acute emergency scenarios.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- Study Groups 1. Intervention Group-A: A cognitive aid (status epilepticus management checklist or algorithm in paper format) will be provided during the simulated scenario. 2. Intervention Group-B: A cognitive aid (status epilepticus management checklist or algorithm in digital format) will be provided during the simulated scenario. 3. Control Group: No cognitive aid was provided. Participants manage the patient using only their own knowledge.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Paper Cognitive aids | Experimental | Behavioral: Management of status epilepticus with paper cognitive aidsIntervention Group A: A cognitive aid (status epilepticus management checklist/algorithm in paper format) will be provided during the simulated scenario. |
| Digital cognitive aid | Experimental | Behavioral: Management of status epilepticus with digital cognitive aidsIntervention Group B: A cognitive aid (status epilepticus management checklist/algorithm in digital format) will be provided during the simulated scenario. |
| Control Group | Experimental | Behavioral: Management of status epilepticus with no cognitive aidNo cognitive aid will be provided. Participants will manage the patient using only their existing knowledge and clinical reasoning skills |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- Up to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Being a sixth-year Emergency Medicine intern
- Willingness to participate in the study
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Previous participation in simulation studies involving cognitive aids,
- Prior involvement in the development of the cognitive aids used in this study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Management of status epilepticus with paper cognitive aidsAlso: Paper CAStudents assigned in the paper cognitive aids group will manage status epilepticus using paper cognitive aids | Behavioural | Paper Cognitive aids |
| Management of status epilepticus with digital cognitive aidsAlso: Digital CAStudents assigned in the digital cognitive aids group will manage status epilepticus using digital cognitive aids | Behavioural | Digital cognitive aid |
| Management of status epilepticus with no cognitive aidAlso: No CAStudents assigned in the No cognitive aids group will manage status epilepticus using their existing knowledge | Behavioural | Control Group |
Primary outcome
Technical performance of participants in status epilepticus management
Time frame: from the beginning of the simulation session to the end
1. Technical Performance Score in Status Epilepticus Management The checklist will evaluate completion and accuracy of critical management steps, including first-line treatment administration, escalation to second-line therapy, glucose assessment, and airway management. Unit of Measure:Checklist score (points) Score Range:0-100 Interpretation:Higher scores indicate better technical performance.
Non-Technical Skill Performance Assessed by the Ottawa Global Rating Scale
Time frame: from the beginning of the simulation session to the end
Non-Technical Skill Performance Assessed by the Ottawa Global Rating Scale Unit of Measure: Ottawa Global Rating Scale score Score Range: 1-7 for each domain Interpretation: Higher scores indicate better non-technical performance.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 May 2026.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Management of status epilepticus with paper cognitive aids, Management of status epilepticus with digital cognitive aids and Management of status epilepticus with no cognitive aid in people with Last Year Medical Student, run by Ankara University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Technical performance of participants in status epilepticus management (time frame: from the beginning of the simulation session to the end). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 May 2026.