AzTrials
AzTrials

Atrial Fibrillation (Prevention of Stroke)Numaplus_FANCT07598903

Pharmacy-based Opportunistic Atrial Fibrillation Screening Integrated With Emergency Services (NUMAPLUS-FA)

A study testing Integrated pharmacy-based AF screening circuit in people with Atrial Fibrillation (Prevention of Stroke) and Arrythmia, Cardiac, run by Centro de Emergencias Sanitarias 061 Andalucía at 1 site in Spain.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

This study evaluates the feasibility and fidelity of an opportunistic atrial fibrillation (AF) screening programme conducted in 38 community pharmacies in Seville (Spain), using the Kardias® 6-lead portable ECG device, coordinated with the emergency medical services centre Salud Responde (CES 061) and primary care… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 65 years and older
What is being tested?
Integrated pharmacy-based AF screening circuit
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
380 participants
Where
1 siteSpain
Study dates
1 Jun 2026to 31 Dec 2026
Phase
Interventional

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 65 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age 65 years or older
  • Attending a participating community pharmacy for any routine healthcare purpose
  • No prior documented or patient-reported diagnosis of atrial fibrillation
  • Capacity to provide written informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Confirmed prior diagnosis of atrial fibrillation
  • Implanted pacemaker, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) or other intracardiac device
  • Clinically evident haemodynamic instability requiring direct emergency 061 activation (active chest pain, severe dyspnoea, syncope)
  • Concurrent participation in another cardiac rhythm monitoring study
  • Inability to maintain the required position for a 30-second ECG recording

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

María José ML Luque-Hernández, MD, PhD contact

+34683511613

mariajose.luque.sspa@juntadeandalucia.es

Jesús Antonio JC Carrillo-Castrillo, PhD contact

+34 955006300

jesus.carrillo.castrillo@juntadeandalucia.es

Spain1 site
  • Centro de Emergencias Sanitarias 061

    Seville, SEVILLA, 41092

    María José Luque-Hernández, MD, PhD, 683511613, mariajose.luque.sspa@juntadeandalucia.es

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: Pharmacy-based Opportunistic Screening for Atrial Fibrillation Using a Portable ECG Device Integrated With Emergency Medical Services: a Prospective Type-1 Hybrid Implementation Study (NUMAPLUS Project)

This study evaluates the feasibility and fidelity of an opportunistic atrial fibrillation (AF) screening programme conducted in 38 community pharmacies in Seville (Spain), using the Kardias® 6-lead portable ECG device, coordinated with the emergency medical services centre Salud Responde (CES 061) and primary care physicians. Eligible participants are individuals aged 65 years or older without a prior AF diagnosis who attend a participating pharmacy for any routine purpose. The screening consists of a 30-second ECG recording performed by a trained community pharmacist. Positive or indeterminate results are transmitted in real time to Salud Responde for clinical validation and referral to primary care. The study is evaluated using the RE-AIM framework (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance). The primary outcome is protocol fidelity, measured by the Implementation Adherence Grade (IAG). The study is part of the NUMAPLUS project, funded by INTERREG VI-A España-Portugal (POCTEP 2021-2027), co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF).

Read the detailed description

STUDY DESIGN This is a prospective, single-cohort, type-1 effectiveness-implementation hybrid study conducted within the NUMAPLUS project (INTERREG VI-A España-Portugal, POCTEP 2021-2027, co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund). This design was selected because external evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of the Kardias® device is sufficient to justify its deployment, while uncertainty persists regarding the organisational conditions, care pathways and economic incentives required for its sustainable integration into the Andalusian community pharmacy network. The primary focus is on implementation outcomes; clinical outcomes related to atrial fibrillation screening are collected as secondary endpoints. The study is reported in accordance with the Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI) guideline.

SETTING The study is conducted in 38 community pharmacies in the province of Seville affiliated with the Real e Ilustre Colegio Oficial de Farmacéuticos de Sevilla (RICOFS), selected by voluntary participation following an open invitation. Eligibility criteria for pharmacies required stable internet connectivity for access to the Numaplus application, completion of pre-study training, and absence of concurrent participation in another cardiovascular screening programme. Priority was given to pharmacies with 24-hour or 12-hour opening schedules. Geographic coverage targets at least three urban health zones per province and at least one semi-urban or rural zone per healthcare management area.

The study articulates three coordination levels: (1) the community pharmacy as the point of patient recruitment and screening; (2) Salud Responde (CES 061) as the clinical validation, risk stratification and real-time coordination node; and (3) the primary care physician as the responsible party for definitive diagnosis and initiation of treatment.

TRAINING OF PARTICIPATING PHARMACISTS Prior to the recruitment period, all enrolled pharmacists completed a structured training programme accredited by the Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública (EASP) and the Agencia de Calidad Sanitaria de Andalucía (ACSA). The programme was delivered entirely online in asynchronous modality between 23 March and 13 April 2026 (10 hours total) through the EASP Moodle platform. It comprised four learning units: (1) epidemiological basis and scientific rationale for opportunistic AF screening; (2) detection protocol, radial pulse palpation technique, and interpretation of Kardias® device outputs; (3) data entry in the Numaplus platform, risk classification and patient communication within the pharmacy-Salud Responde circuit; and (4) ethical and legal framework, informed consent procedures, and data protection requirements. Certification required completion of all practical activities and a minimum score of 7 out of 10 on the final knowledge assessment.

INTERVENTION

The screening protocol comprises five sequential operational phases aligned with the RE-AIM framework:

Phase 1 (Reach): Opportunistic invitation during dispensing or consultation, without prior appointment. The pharmacist records the monthly denominator of unique patients aged 65 years or older using pharmacy management software. Reasons for refusal are recorded anonymously.

Phase 2 (Adoption): Following written informed consent, the case is opened in the Numaplus application. The pharmacist records current symptoms (palpitations, chest pain, dyspnoea, syncope), oral anticoagulant therapy status, and the CHA₂DS₂-VA score (0-6), adopted per the 2024 ESC Guidelines for AF Management in replacement of CHA₂DS₂-VASc.

Phase 3 (Implementation): The Kardias® 6-lead portable device is applied for a 30-second ECG recording (maximum 3 attempts). The device algorithm classifies the result as: Suspected AF / Sinus rhythm / Bradycardia / Tachycardia / Unclassified. Protocol fidelity is operationalised through the Implementation Adherence Grade (IAG). A performance-based financial incentive of 20 euros per complete and valid case is applied.

Phase 4 (Effectiveness): In case of suspected or indeterminate AF, the Numaplus platform automatically transmits a PDF containing the ECG tracing and clinical data to Salud Responde; simultaneously, the pharmacist places a direct call. The Salud Responde nurse applies a structured triage protocol: emergency 061 activation (heart rate >110 or <60 bpm or alarm symptoms), medium priority referral (haemodynamically stable suspected AF, primary care appointment within 72 hours), or low priority referral (unclassified tracing, scheduled ECG at primary care). Definitive AF diagnosis is confirmed by the primary care physician.

Phase 5 (Maintenance): Six-month telephone follow-up conducted by Salud Responde, assessing anticoagulation initiation and adherence, health-related quality of life (visual analogue scale 0-10), and major adverse events (ischaemic stroke, major bleeding, death).

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The primary analysis is precision-based, targeting 385 participants (operational target: 380, 10 per pharmacy). Categorical variables are reported as proportions with 95% confidence intervals (Clopper-Pearson); the IAG is estimated with an exact binomial 95% CI. Factors associated with low fidelity are explored by logistic regression. Missing data are handled by multiple imputation (MICE, 20 imputations) if below 15% under the MAR assumption. All analyses are conducted in R version 4.3 or higher.

Being tested
Integrated pharmacy-based AF screening circuit
Keywords
atrial fibrillation, opportunistic screening, community pharmacy, RE-AIM, implementation science, emergency medical services, portable ECG, hybrid implementation study
Medical subject headings
Atrial Fibrillation, Arrhythmias, Cardiac

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Integrated pharmacy-based AF screening circuitOther

    Also called Numaplus digital platform, Salud Responde CES 061, Kardias 6-lead portable ECG device

    A coordinated opportunistic screening model integrating community pharmacies, emergency medical services (Salud Responde, CES 061) and primary care physicians. The model comprises: opportunistic patient identification during routine pharmacy visits; 30-second ECG recording using the Kardias 6-lead portable device; real-time data transmission via the Numaplus platform; structured clinical triage by Salud Responde nursing staff; and referral to primary care for definitive diagnosis and treatment. Implementation strategies include a structured EASP-accredited online training programme, ongoing technical support, activity feedback reports and a performance-based financial incentive of 20 euros per complete valid case.

Study groups in NCT07598903
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Pharmacy-based AF screening cohortExperimentalAdults aged 65 years or older attending participating community pharmacies in Seville without prior diagnosis of atrial fibrillation, recruited opportunistically during routine pharmacy visits.
Receives: Other: Integrated pharmacy-based AF screening circuit

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Implementation Adherence Grade (IAG)

    Implementation Adherence Grade (IAG) Composite fidelity index expressed as the percentage of mandatory protocol items completed per screening case, calculated as (number of mandatory items completed / 5) × 100. The five mandatory items, each scored dichotomously as completed (1) or not completed (0) and weighted equally, are: (1) written informed consent obtained and documented; (2) minimum demographic data recorded; (3) complete CHA₂DS₂-VA score calculated; (4) successful 30-second ECG tracing obtained within a maximum of three attempts; and (5) documented contact with Salud Responde for all cases classified as suspected or indeterminate atrial fibrillation. The pharmacy-level and study-level IAG is the mean of individual case-level IAG values. Target value: ≥90%.

    Unit of Measure: Percentage of mandatory protocol items completed (single composite index).

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 6 months

Secondary outcomes (15)
  1. Participation rate (Reach)

    Proportion of patients aged 65 years or older who accept screening divided by the monthly denominator of unique patients aged 65 years or older attending each pharmacy.

    Measured: Monthly, through study completion, an average of 6 months

  2. Pharmacy-level adoption rate

    Number of pharmacies completing at least one valid screening divided by the number of invited pharmacies.

    Measured: At end of recruitment period (month 6)

  3. Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) score

    Mean score of the 4-item AIM scale (range 1-5) measuring pharmacist acceptability of the screening programme.

    Measured: At end of recruitment period (month 6)

  4. Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) score

    Mean score of the 4-item FIM scale (range 1-5) measuring pharmacist-perceived feasibility of the screening programme.

    Measured: At end of recruitment period (month 6)

  5. Suspected AF detection rate.

    Proportion of screened participants with Suspected AF classification by the Kardias device algorithm.

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 6 months

  6. Confirmed AF diagnosis rate.

    Proportion of screened participants with confirmed AF diagnosis following primary care assessment.

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 6 months

  7. Linkage to Care rate

    Proportion of participants with suspected or indeterminate AF who attend primary care appointment within the planned timeframe.

    Measured: Up to 72 hours after positive or indeterminate screening result

  8. Oral anticoagulation initiation rate

    proportion of participants with confirmed AF initiated on oral anticoagulation.

    Measured: Up to 6 months after confirmed AF diagnosis

  9. Major adverse events at 6 months

    Incidence of ischaemic stroke, major bleeding and death among participants with confirmed AF at 6-month follow-up.

    Measured: 6 months after confirmed AF diagnosis

  10. Refusal rate and reasons

    proportion of eligible patients who decline screening, with the main reason for refusal recorded anonymously.

    Measured: Monthly, through study completion, an average of 6 months

  11. Programme sustainability intention

    Proportion of pharmacists reporting intention to continue the screening programme beyond project funding period, assessed through the sustainability block of the post-study questionnaire.

    Measured: At end of recruitment period (month 6)

  12. Salud Responde coordination performance

    Operational indicators of the Salud Responde (CES 061) triage node, including median time from ECG transmission to clinical validation, distribution of triage decisions (emergency 061 activation, medium priority referral, low priority referral), and qualitative assessment of circuit barriers by the SR coordination team at end of study.

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 6 months

  13. 13a. Salud Responde Coordination. ECG transmission.

    Median time from ECG transmission to Salud Responde clinical validation (minutes)

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 6 months

  14. Salud Responde coordination. Triage decission

    Distribution of Salud Responde triage decisions (percentage of cases in each category: emergency 061 activation / medium priority / low priority)

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 6 months

  15. SR circuit barrers

    Qualitative assessment of circuit barriers by Salud Responde coordination team (thematic categories)

    Measured: At end of study (month 6)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 May 2026
  2. Study start1 Jun 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion15 Dec 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Screening
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
Single-cohort prospective study. All eligible participants attending participating community pharmacies are offered the same opportunistic AF screening protocol. No comparator group.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
380 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07598903
Sponsor's protocol ID
0237_NUMAPLUS_5_E_CASE2
Acronym
Numaplus_FA
Status last verified
May 2026
First submitted
7 May 2026
Last updated
22 May 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Individual participant data are pseudonymised and collected within the Andalusian Public Health System (SSPA). Data are subject to Spanish data protection legislation (Organic Law 3/2018, LOPD-GDD) and EU GDPR 2016/679 and cannot be made publicly available. Anonymised aggregate data supporting the conclusions of this study may be available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author, subject to institutional approval by the Centro de Emergencias Sanitarias 061 and the Comite Coordinador de Etica de la Investigacion Biomedica de Andalucia (CCEIBA).

Publications

  • Pinnock H, Barwick M, Carpenter CR, Eldridge S, Grandes G, Griffiths CJ, Rycroft-Malone J, Meissner P, Murray E, Patel A, Sheikh A, Taylor SJ; StaRI Group. Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI) Statement. BMJ. 2017 Mar 6;356:i6795. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i6795.

    PubMed 28264797
  • Wahab A, Nadarajah R, Larvin H, Farooq M, Raveendra K, Haris M, Nadeem U, Joseph T, Bhatty A, Wilkinson C, Khunti K, Vedanthan R, Camm AJ, Svennberg E, Lip GY, Freedman B, Wu J, Gale CP. Systematic screening for atrial fibrillation with non-invasive devices: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2025 Apr 11;53:101298. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101298. eCollection 2025 Jun.

    PubMed 40276326
  • Van Gelder IC, Rienstra M, Bunting KV, Casado-Arroyo R, Caso V, Crijns HJGM, De Potter TJR, Dwight J, Guasti L, Hanke T, Jaarsma T, Lettino M, Lochen ML, Lumbers RT, Maesen B, Molgaard I, Rosano GMC, Sanders P, Schnabel RB, Suwalski P, Svennberg E, Tamargo J, Tica O, Traykov V, Tzeis S, Kotecha D; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2024 Sep 29;45(36):3314-3414. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae176. No abstract available.

    PubMed 39210723
  • Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999 Sep;89(9):1322-7. doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.9.1322.

    PubMed 10474547
  • Curran GM, Bauer M, Mittman B, Pyne JM, Stetler C. Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact. Med Care. 2012 Mar;50(3):217-26. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182408812.

    PubMed 22310560

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in