AzTrials
AzTrials

Surgical EducationNCT07583082

Validation of an Ex Vivo Calf Brain Force Detection System for Neurosurgical Simulation Training

An observational study of Surgical Education, run by McGill University at 1 site in Canada.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Neurosurgery is a high-stakes surgical specialty where errors can result in significant patient mortality and morbidity. The amount of force applied on the brain simultaneously by the multiple different instruments during complex neurosurgical procedures is a critical safety metric that, to the investigators'… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Surgical Education
What is being tested?
Observational
How many people
30 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
May 2026to Sep 2026
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Staff neurosurgeons, neurosurgical fellows, neurosurgical residents, and medical students from four Quebec institutions.

Who may be able to join

  • Medical students, neurosurgical residents, neurosurgical fellows, and staff neurosurgeons from one of four Quebec institutions who do not fit the exclusion criteria.

Who cannot join

  • For medical students, participation in a previous trial where they received training on the NeuroVR surgical simulator or the ex vivo calf brain simulation model.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Mohammed Babgi, MD contact

mohammed.babgi@mail.mcgill.ca

Canada1 site
  • Neuro Imaging and Surgical Technologies Lab, Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, McGill University

    Montreal, Quebec, H3A 2B4

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Validation of an Ex Vivo Calf Brain Force Detection System for Neurosurgical Simulation Training: A Case Series Study

Neurosurgery is a high-stakes surgical specialty where errors can result in significant patient mortality and morbidity. The amount of force applied on the brain simultaneously by the multiple different instruments during complex neurosurgical procedures is a critical safety metric that, to the investigators' knowledge, has not been previously measured in a realistic operative environment.

The investigators have therefore developed a simulation platform integrating an ex vivo calf brain and a 3D-printed skull model attached to a force sensor capable of capturing real-time forces applied to the brain. A cross-sectional case series study will be conducted to evaluate the validity of the system. Medical students, neurosurgical residents, neurosurgical fellows, and staff neurosurgeons from four Quebec institutions will be recruited to perform three simulated subpial resections each using our ex vivo calf brain simulation platform. The forces applied by the microscissors, bipolar forceps, and ultrasonic aspirator onto the brain will be captured along with kinematic data. This study aims to establish the face, content, construct, and convergent validity of this ex vivo calf brain force detection system.

Read the detailed description

Background and Rationale: The subpial resection technique is a complex neurosurgical procedure that is essential for brain tumor and epilepsy surgery. However, opportunities for trainees to gain hands-on experience with this procedure without risk to patient safety are limited. The force applied on the brain during tool-tissue contact is a critical factor impacting patient safety. While virtual simulation platforms enable force monitoring, ex vivo animal brains cannot readily capture quantitative data. The investigators have therefore developed a prototype of a simulation platform that integrates a force sensor and a calf brain and can accurately detect real-time forces during simulated subpial resections. This study seeks to investigate the validity of this ex vivo calf brain force detection system.

Hypotheses:

  1. The forces applied by instruments on an ex vivo calf brain during simulated subpial resection procedures will significantly differ between novice, intermediate, and expert participants.
  2. The ex vivo calf brain force detection system will demonstrate face, content, construct, and convergent validity.
  3. Levels of negative emotions, stress, and cognitive load will be greater in surgical trainees compared with experts.

Primary Objective: To measure and compare the forces applied by novice, intermediate, and expert participants during simulated ex vivo subpial resection procedures.

Secondary Objectives:

  1. To evaluate the face, content, construct, and convergent validity of the ex vivo calf brain force measurement setup.
  2. To determine how the simulation platform influences emotions, stress, and cognitive load of participants of different expertise levels.

Setting: McGill University Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital.

Participants:

Neurosurgeons (experts): Staff neurosurgeons at McGill University, Université de Montréal, Université de Sherbrooke, or Université Laval specializing in oncology, epilepsy, pediatric, or vascular neurosurgery.

Neurosurgical fellows (trainees): Neurosurgical fellows at McGill University, Université de Montréal, Université de Sherbrooke, or Université Laval specializing in oncology, epilepsy, pediatric, or vascular neurosurgery.

Neurosurgical residents (trainees): Neurosurgical residents at McGill University, Université de Montréal, Université de Sherbrooke, or Université Laval.

Medical students (novices): Students enrolled in medical school at McGill University, Université de Montréal, Université de Sherbrooke, or Université Laval.

Design: A cross-sectional case series study.

Methodology: This study was approved by the McGill University Health Centre Research Ethics Board, Neurosciences-Psychiatry. A case series study will be conducted where medical students, neurosurgical residents, neurosurgical fellows, and staff neurosurgeons from four Quebec institutions will be recruited to perform subpial resection tasks on an ex vivo calf brain model. Calf brains will be placed in a 3D-printed skull model to mimic a realistic human operative environment. The 3D-printed skull model was prototyped from a publicly available CT scan obtained from Embodi3D, an open-access medical imaging repository, and reconstructed in 3D using the open-source software 3D Slicer version 5.10.0. A 6-degree-of-freedom force/torque sensor (Nano17 IP68, ATI Industrial Automation Inc., North Carolina, USA) and a USB data acquisition board (NI-6210, National Instruments Inc., Texas, USA) will be used to measure real-time forces applied to the brain. Participants will use microscissors, bipolar forceps, and a SONOPET ultrasonic aspirator (Stryker, Portage, Michigan, USA) to perform each simulated procedure. All three surgical instruments will be continuously tracked using infrared cameras, allowing kinematic data (velocity, acceleration, and jerk) of each instrument to be derived. The tasks will be performed using an OPMI pico surgical microscope (ZEISS, Jena, Germany) and video-recorded using a Blackfly S GigE embedded microscope camera (FLIR, Wilsonville, Oregon, USA), allowing a broader instrument view for evaluation of tracking data and postoperative performance. Before, during, and after the trial, all participants will self-report their emotions using Medical Emotions Scale (MES) and their stress using the Short Stress State Questionnaire (SSSQ) on 7-point Likert scales. All participants will also report their cognitive load after the trial using the Cognitive Load Index (CLI) on 5-point Likert scales and the NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) on 7-point Likert scales. Expert participants will fill out questionnaires assessing the face and content validity of the ex vivo calf brain force detection setup on 7-point Likert scales. Blinded expert raters will watch the videos of each procedure and grade it using a modified Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) rating scale to determine the simulation platform's construct and convergent validity.

Study Procedure: Upon arrival, participants will read and sign an informed consent form. They will then fill out a pre-trial questionnaire assessing their demographic characteristics (e.g., sex, gender, age, institutional affiliation, etc.) as well as their baseline emotions and stress. Each participant will receive standardized written instructions on instrument use and function and presented with an image outlining the location of the three subpial resections on the ex vivo calf brain in front of them. Participants will adjust the operating microscope according to their preferences. The resections will be performed using microscissors to make an initial incision in the pia mater, bipolar forceps to lift the pia, and an ultrasonic aspirator to remove the assigned cortical area. After the first and second tasks, participants will fill out questionnaires assessing their emotions and stress once more. Finally, after the third task, novice and trainee participants will fill out a post-trial questionnaire assessing their emotions, stress, and cognitive load. Expert participants will fill out face and content validity questionnaires, followed by the post-trial questionnaire.

Significance: This study will provide validity evidence to support the educational utility of a novel ex vivo calf brain force detection system using both traditional and contemporary frameworks. For the first time in a realistic operative environment, it will be possible to monitor the force applied on the brain. The force and kinematic data collected from this case series study will be used to build an intelligent tutoring system capable of monitoring performance and mitigating errors during human surgical procedures.

Being tested
Observational
Keywords
Surgical Education, Surgical Simulation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ObservationalBehavioural

    As such, no interventions are provided. All participants will perform three subpial resections on an ex vivo calf brain.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Forces applied to the brain during each simulated subpial resection procedure

    Throughout each simulated ex vivo subpial resection procedure, forces applied to the brain during tool-tissue contact will be measured by the force/torque sensor in grams and Newtons. This will enable for the assessment of differences in force applied by novice, intermediate, and expert participants.

    Measured: 1 day of study

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Face validity questionnaire responses

    Expert participants will fill out face validity questionnaires on 7-point Likert scales after the trial to assess the realism of the simulation platform, with 1 indicating lowest realism and 7 indicating highest realism.

    Measured: 1 day of study

  2. Content validity questionnaire responses

    Expert participants will fill out content validity questionnaires on 7-point Likert scales after the trial to assess the educational utility of the simulation platform, with 1 indicating lowest utility and 7 indicating highest utility.

    Measured: 1 day of study

  3. Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) scores for each simulated subpial resection procedure

    Blinded expert raters will review videos of each procedure and grade them using a modified OSATS rating scale on 7-point Likert scales, with 1 indicating worse performance and 7 indicating better performance. This will allow for the assessment of differences in performance between each expertise group, providing evidence of the platform's construct and convergent validity.

    Measured: 1 day of study

  4. Strength of emotions elicited

    Measured using the Medical Emotions Scale (MES) before the trial and after each of three simulated subpial resections. Participants self-reported emotional states via questionnaires on 7-point Likert scales, with 1 indicating lowest intensity and 7 indicating highest intensity.

    Measured: 1 day of study

  5. Levels of stress

    Measured using the Short Stress State Questionnaire (SSSQ) before the trial and after each of three simulated subpial resections. Participants self-reported stress states via questionnaires on 7-point Likert scales, with 1 indicating lowest intensity and 7 indicating highest intensity.

    Measured: 1 day of study

  6. Levels of cognitive load

    Measured using the Cognitive Load Index (CLI) after the trial. Participants self-reported cognitive load via questionnaires on 5-point Likert scales, with 1 indicating lowest intensity and 5 indicating highest intensity.

    Measured: 1 day of study

  7. Levels of cognitive load

    Measured using the NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) after the trial. Participants self-reported cognitive load via questionnaires on 7-point Likert scales, with 1 indicating lowest intensity and 7 indicating highest intensity.

    Measured: 1 day of study

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 May 2026
  2. Study startMay 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionSep 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completionSep 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
30 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07583082
Sponsor's protocol ID
2018 4395
Status last verified
May 2026
First submitted
12 Dec 2025
Last updated
13 May 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Data obtained from primary and secondary outcomes may be shared if other researchers have an interest in this data.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Surgical Education, run by McGill University at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Bianca Giglio, MSc (514-802-1608, bianca.giglio@mail.mcgill.ca), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Forces applied to the brain during each simulated subpial resection procedure (time frame: 1 day of study). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 May 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in