AzTrials
AzTrials

Interactive Condition (HAPA-I: Group 1)NCT07581847

A Boost of Health: Effectiveness of a Personalized Communication Intervention to Increase Daily Fruit and Vegetable Intake

A study testing Interactive communication, Non-interactive Communication and Self-monitoring in people with Interactive Condition (HAPA-I: Group 1) and Non-interactive Condition (HAPA-NI: Group 2), run by Marco D'Addario at 1 site in Italy.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of a healthy diet promotion intervention focused on increasing fruit and vegetable consumption. The intervention is delivered via mobile application in a sample drawn from the healthy adult population. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 55 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Interactive communication, Non-interactive Communication and Self-monitoring
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
403 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
3 Dec 2024to 16 Jan 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 55 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Individuals from the general population in good health
  • Adequate level of education to understand study procedures and to use a smartphone
  • Ownership and regular use of a smartphone

Who cannot join

  • Medical conditions that contraindicate an increased consumption of fruit and vegetables
  • Habitual consumption of five (or more) portions of fruit and vegetables per day at baseline

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Italy1 site
  • Adorni Roberta

    Milan, Milano, 20126

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: A Boost of Health: Effectiveness of a Personalized Communication Intervention Aimed at Increasing Daily Fruit and Vegetable Portions - A Study Within the PNRR 10 ON Foods Partnership

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of a healthy diet promotion intervention focused on increasing fruit and vegetable consumption. The intervention is delivered via mobile application in a sample drawn from the healthy adult population.

Read the detailed description

The present study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a protocol designed to increase fruit and vegetable consumption, grounded in the Health Action Process Approach (HAPA).

The protocol was delivered via the MyPocketHealth app, developed by the research team, and incorporated different communication strategies. Participants were involved in setting a goal and choosing between a personalized or a standardized goal (5 daily portions), which could be reviewed at any time. Moreover, they received either interactive (HAPA-I: group 1) or non-interactive (HAPA-NI: group 2) daily notifications promoting the target behavior through HAPA constructs for 15 days, while also monitoring their daily fruit and vegetable consumption (self-monitoring). A third group engaged solely in self-monitoring without receiving any communication (no-communication group; No comm). Goal attainment was reinforced through badge awards (rewards).

Being tested
Interactive communication, Non-interactive Communication, Self-monitoring
Keywords
mHealth, Health Action Process Approach, Healthy Diet, Behavioral Change techniques, Behavioral Goal Setting, Self-monitoring, Rewards

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Interactive communicationBehavioural

    Participants received two daily notifications. Each notification included a question about a variable from the HAPA model, and participants responded on a 5-point Likert scale. Those who scored low (1-3) received a motivational message tailored to their response. In contrast, participants who scored high (4-5) received rewarding messages. These notifications gave participants feedback on their standings within the HAPA.

  • Non-interactive CommunicationBehavioural

    Participants received two daily educational notifications about HAPA variables, but they did not interact with the app. The notifications for both the HAPA-I and HAPA-NI groups were identical in structure, word count, and graphic format. The only difference was the level of content customization: it was generic for the HAPA-NI group and tailored to participants' responses for the HAPA-I group.

  • Self-monitoringBehavioural

    Participants received a daily reminder to log the portions of fruit and vegetables in a dedicated self-monitoring section of the app.

Study groups in NCT07581847
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Interactive condition (HAPA-I: group 1)ExperimentalParticipants received two daily notifications. Each notification included a question about a variable from the HAPA model, and participants responded on a 5-point Likert scale. Those who scored low (1-3) received a motivational message tailored to their response. In contrast, participants who scored high (4-5) received rewarding messages. These notifications gave participants feedback on their standings within the HAPA. Moreover, participants received a daily reminder to log the portions of fruit and vegetables in a dedicated self-monitoring section of the app.
Receives: Behavioral: Interactive communication; Behavioral: Self-monitoring
Non-interactive condition (HAPA-NI: group 2)ExperimentalParticipants received two daily educational notifications about HAPA variables, but they did not interact with the app. The notifications for both the HAPA-I and HAPA-NI groups were identical in structure, word count, and graphic format. The only difference was the level of content customization: it was generic for the HAPA-NI group and tailored to participants' responses for the HAPA-I group. Moreover, participants received a daily reminder to log the portions of fruit and vegetables in a dedicated self-monitoring section of the app.
Receives: Behavioral: Non-interactive Communication; Behavioral: Self-monitoring
Non-communication condition (No-comm: group 3)ExperimentalParticipants did not receive HAPA-based notifications during the trial period. They received a daily reminder to log the portions of fruit and vegetables in a dedicated self-monitoring section of the app.
Receives: Behavioral: Self-monitoring

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Daily Fruit and Vegetable Intake from Baseline

    Participants self-monitored daily fruit and vegetable intake throughout the study period. Each evening, participants received a reminder and recorded the number of fruit and vegetable portions consumed that day via a dedicated app interface. At the end of the 15-day intervention, the mean daily intake was calculated for each participant. This value was then compared with baseline intake (assessed prior to the start of the intervention) to evaluate whether a statistically significant increase in daily fruit and vegetable consumption was observed.

    Measured: From Day 1 to Day 15 (end of intervention)

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Change in Perceived Well-Being (WHO-5 Index)

    Perceived well-being is assessed using the WHO-5 Well-Being Index, a validated self-report questionnaire that measures subjective psychological well-being. The WHO-5 consists of five items rated on a 6-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating greater well-being. Scores are collected at baseline and at the end of the 15-day intervention. The outcome is defined as the change in WHO-5 score from baseline to post-intervention.

    Measured: Baseline and Day 15 (end of intervention)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 May 2026
  2. Study start3 Dec 2024
  3. Primary completion16 Jan 2026
  4. Study completion16 Jan 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
403 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07581847
Sponsor's protocol ID
RM-2024-882
Other IDs
PE00000003;CUP D93C22000890001
Status last verified
May 2026
First submitted
5 May 2026
Last updated
20 May 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Schwarzer, R. (2008). Modeling health behavior change: How to predict and modify the adoption and maintenance of health behaviors. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 57(1), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2007.00325.x

  • Mujcic R, J Oswald A. Evolution of Well-Being and Happiness After Increases in Consumption of Fruit and Vegetables. Am J Public Health. 2016 Aug;106(8):1504-10. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303260.

    PubMed 27400354
  • Kamphuis CB, van Lenthe FJ, Giskes K, Brug J, Mackenbach JP. Perceived environmental determinants of physical activity and fruit and vegetable consumption among high and low socioeconomic groups in the Netherlands. Health Place. 2007 Jun;13(2):493-503. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2006.05.008. Epub 2006 Jul 11.

    PubMed 16815073
  • Fjeldsoe B, Neuhaus M, Winkler E, Eakin E. Systematic review of maintenance of behavior change following physical activity and dietary interventions. Health Psychol. 2011 Jan;30(1):99-109. doi: 10.1037/a0021974.

    PubMed 21299298
  • D'Addario M, Cappelletti ER, Sarini M, Greco A, Steca P. The TTCYB Study Protocol: A Tailored Print Message Intervention to Improve Cardiovascular Patients' Lifestyles. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 23;17(8):2919. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082919.

    PubMed 32340219
  • Blanchflower, D. G., Oswald, A. J., & Stewart-Brown, S. (2013). Is psychological well-being linked to the consumption of fruit and vegetables? Social Indicators Research, 114(3), 785-801. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0173-y

  • Aune D, Giovannucci E, Boffetta P, Fadnes LT, Keum N, Norat T, Greenwood DC, Riboli E, Vatten LJ, Tonstad S. Fruit and vegetable intake and the risk of cardiovascular disease, total cancer and all-cause mortality-a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies. Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Jun 1;46(3):1029-1056. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyw319.

    PubMed 28338764
  • Adorni R, Zanatta F, Cappelletti ER, Greco A, Steca P, D'Addario M. Effectiveness of a tailored communication intervention to improve physical activity in hypertensive patients: a twelve-month randomized controlled trial. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Mar 5;24(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-03786-2.

    PubMed 38443805

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Interactive communication, Non-interactive Communication and Self-monitoring in people with Interactive Condition (HAPA-I: Group 1) and Non-interactive Condition (HAPA-NI: Group 2), run by Marco D'Addario at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Daily Fruit and Vegetable Intake from Baseline (time frame: From Day 1 to Day 15 (end of intervention)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07581847, which also lists 8 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 May 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in