AzTrials
AzTrials

Fracture of Lower LimbNCT07579520

Effects of Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation on Range of Motion in Post- Fracture Rehabilitation of Lower Limb

A study testing Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation (RAS) in people with Fracture of Lower Limb, run by Riphah International University at 1 site in Pakistan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study aims to investigate the effects of rhythmic auditory stimulation on pain levels and range of motion in children undergoing post-fracture rehabilitation of the lower limb. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 5 to 18 years
Conditions the study is for
Fracture of Lower Limb
What is being tested?
Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation (RAS)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
17 participants
Where
1 sitePakistan
Study dates
1 Apr 2026to 1 Jul 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 5 to 18 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age range typically 5 to18 years
  • Closed lower limb fracture (tibia, fibula, femur, ankle) treated non-surgically with immobilization (e.g., cast, splint, brace)
  • Patients in rehabilitation stage (not immediate post-op trauma care)
  • Sub-acute or post-casting phase where active ROM and gait training are clinically indicated
  • Post-Fracture Stage: Within 4-6 weeks post-fracture
  • Ability to Participate
  • Able to follow instructions and participate in RAS sessions
  • Medically stable and cleared for physical therapy.

Who cannot join

  • Acute emergency management studies
  • Presence of multiple fractures or other significant injuries.
  • Known hearing impairments that may affect response to auditory stimulation.
  • Presence of cognitive or neurological impairments that may affect participation.
  • Pre-existing chronic pain conditions that may confound pain assessments.
  • Recent surgeries or medical conditions that may contraindicate physical therapy or RAS.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Pakistan1 site
  • CLC

    Lahore, Punjab Province, 54000

Other trials in Pakistan

About this study

Official title: Effects of Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation on Pain and Range of Motion in Children With Post- Fracture Rehabilitation of Lower Limb

This study aims to investigate the effects of rhythmic auditory stimulation on pain levels and range of motion in children undergoing post-fracture rehabilitation of the lower limb. It seeks to determine whether incorporating rhythmic auditory cues can help reduce pain and improve joint mobility during the recovery process.

Read the detailed description

Despite notable advancements in pediatric orthopedic rehabilitation, effective pain management and the restoration of functional range of motion continue to present significant challenges for children recovering from lower limb fractures. Traditional physiotherapy interventions largely emphasize manual therapy and structured exercise programs, often supplemented with pharmacological pain management. However, reliance on medications may lead to potential side effects and can negatively impact treatment adherence, particularly in pediatric populations. As a result, there is increasing interest in non-pharmacological approaches that can enhance rehabilitation outcomes while minimizing risks.

One such approach, Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation (RAS), has demonstrated considerable effectiveness in neurorehabilitation settings, including in conditions such as stroke, Parkinson's disease, and cerebral palsy. In these populations, RAS has been shown to improve motor coordination, regulate gait patterns, and positively influence pain perception through the use of rhythmic cues. Despite these promising outcomes, there remains a clear gap in the literature regarding the application of RAS within pediatric orthopedic rehabilitation, especially for children recovering from fractures.

Exploring the role of RAS in this specific context could provide valuable insights into its potential as an adjunct to conventional therapy. Integrating rhythmic auditory cues into rehabilitation programs may not only support improved physical outcomes, such as enhanced joint mobility and reduced pain, but also contribute to better emotional engagement and overall patient experience. Addressing this gap is essential for advancing evidence-based practice, expanding the use of innovative therapeutic techniques, and ultimately improving the quality of care and satisfaction for pediatric patients and their families.

Being tested
Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation (RAS)
Keywords
Pain, Range of Motion, Post- Fracture Rehabilitation, Rehabilitation of Lower Limb, Auditory Stimulation
Medical subject headings
Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation (RAS)Other

    Also called Standard Physiotherapy

    Participants will receive Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation (RAS) during rehabilitation sessions. Structured rhythmic cues or music will be delivered and synchronized with therapeutic movement exercises. The goal is to reduce pain perception and enhance joint range of motion during recovery in children with lower limb fractures.

    All participants will receive standard physiotherapy according to hospital protocol. This includes range of motion exercises, strengthening exercises, gait training, and pain management as prescribed by the treating physiotherapist.

Study groups in NCT07579520
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Rhythmic Auditory StimulationExperimentalThe intervention involves applying Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation (RAS) through structured rhythmic cues or music during rehabilitation sessions alongside standard physiotherapy for children with lower limb fractures. These rhythmic cues are synchronized with movement exercises to help with pain perception and joint range of motion during recovery.
Receives: Other: Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation (RAS)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Pain Intensity in Lower Limb

    Change in pain intensity will be assessed to determine the effectiveness of Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation (RAS) during post-fracture rehabilitation in children with lower limb injuries.

    Pain will be measured using the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale. Assessments will be conducted before and after each rehabilitation session.

    Time Frame: Baseline to 3 months Measurement: Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale. Score range 0 to 10. A score of 0 indicates no pain and a score of 10 indicates worst possible pain. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome.

    Measured: 3 months

  2. Change in Lower Limb Joint Range of Motion

    Change in joint range of motion will be assessed to evaluate the effect of Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation (RAS) on mobility during post-fracture rehabilitation in children with lower limb injuries.

    Range of motion will be measured in degrees using a standard universal goniometer by a trained physiotherapist.

    Time Frame: Baseline to 3 months Measurement: Degrees of joint motion. Higher degree values indicate a better outcome.

    Measured: 3 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 May 2026
  2. Study start1 Apr 2026
  3. Primary completion1 Jul 2026
  4. Study completion1 Jul 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
Since there is no separate control group, participants serve as their own controls, and any differences observed between pre- and post-intervention outcomes are attributed to the intervention, although external factors cannot be entirely ruled out. This model is commonly used in clinical and rehabilitation settings where control groups may not be feasible, and it allows researchers to assess the preliminary effectiveness, feasibility, and clinical impact of an intervention.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
17 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07579520
Sponsor's protocol ID
RCR/RCR&AHS/25/0748
Status last verified
Sep 2026
First submitted
5 May 2026
Last updated
30 Sep 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Liu H, Wang H, Shao B, Lu H, Zhang S, Ou L, Chen Y, Xiang L. Epidemiological evaluation of traumatic lower limb fractures in children: Variation with age, gender, time, and etiology. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Sep;98(38):e17123. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017123.

    PubMed 31567950

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation (RAS) in people with Fracture of Lower Limb, run by Riphah International University at 1 site in Pakistan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Pain Intensity in Lower Limb (time frame: 3 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07579520, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Sep 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in