AzTrials
AzTrials

PrimaryPhase 2NCT07575724

Comparison of the Effects of Needle Biopsy Tract Resection and Non-resection on Recurrence Rate in Patients With Primary Extremity Sarcoma

A Phase 2 study testing biopsy tract resection and biopsy tract non-resection in people with Primary and Sarcoma, run by Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine at 2 sites in China.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This randomized, non-inferiority clinical trial aims to evaluate whether non-resection of needle biopsy tract is non-inferior to routine biopsy tract resection in terms of local recurrence in patients with primary extremity musculoskeletal sarcoma undergoing en-bloc surgical treatment. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 5 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Primary, Sarcoma
What is being tested?
biopsy tract resection and biopsy tract non-resection
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
3,300 participants
Where
2 sitesChina
Study dates
1 Dec 2026to 1 Dec 2033
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 5 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Histologically confirmed diagnosis of primary bone or soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities (or highly suspected sarcoma);
  • Candidate for limb-sparing surgery and capable of en-bloc resection;
  • Age ≥ 5 years;
  • ECOG performance status 0-2;
  • Able to understand and sign informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Presence of distant metastasis (e.g., lung, bone, or other sites) or unresectable skip lesions;
  • Patients deemed, based on preoperative multidisciplinary team (MDT) evaluation, unlikely to achieve adequate surgical margins and therefore only eligible for debulking or palliative surgery;
  • Patients with inconclusive needle biopsy results requiring open biopsy for definitive diagnosis;
  • Patients requiring amputation;
  • Patients who have received prior treatment for the tumor at non-participating centers;
  • Patients with an expected survival of less than 2 years;
  • Patients in whom the biopsy tract completely lies within the planned tumor resection field;
  • Patients who refuse to provide written informed consent.

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Nong Lin, MD contact

13958195545

linnong@zju.edu.cn

China2 sites
  • the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine

    Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 311200

    Keyi Wang, MS, 17398046579, wky82630965@gmail.com

  • Hangzhou Third People's Hospital

    Hangzhou, Zhejiang

    Yefeng Xu, 15068710437, 2173799040@qq.com

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Comparison of the Effects of Needle Biopsy Tract Resection and Non-resection on Recurrence Rate in Patients With Primary Extremity Sarcoma: Study Protocol of a Randomized, Non-inferior Clinical Trial

This randomized, non-inferiority clinical trial aims to evaluate whether non-resection of needle biopsy tract is non-inferior to routine biopsy tract resection in terms of local recurrence in patients with primary extremity musculoskeletal sarcoma undergoing en-bloc surgical treatment.

Biopsy tract resection is traditionally recommended to reduce the risk of tumor seeding; however, its benefit in reducing recurrence has not been definitively demonstrated, particularly when core needle biopsy is widely used. Also, avoiding biopsy tract resection may preserve uninvolved tissue without compromising oncologic safety.

The primary objective of this study is to compare local recurrence rates between patients who undergo biopsy tract resection and those who do not. Secondary objectives include comparisons of surgical complications, functional outcomes, overall survival, and progression-free survival.

Conditions
Primary, Sarcoma
Being tested
biopsy tract resection, biopsy tract non-resection
Medical subject headings
Sarcoma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • biopsy tract resectionProcedure or surgery

    Surgeons will perform standard en-bloc tumor resection according to oncologic principles. In the biopsy tract resection group, complete biopsy tract excision is defined as en-bloc removal of the entire needle biopsy pathway, including:

    Skin entry site: the original puncture site on the skin surface Subcutaneous and soft tissue tract: all intervening tissues traversed by the biopsy needle Deep tract structures: any muscle, fascia, periosteum, or bone structures penetrated by the needle Intratumoral component: the terminal segment of the needle pathway within the tumor

    All components of the biopsy tract must be removed together with the tumor specimen.

  • biopsy tract non-resectionProcedure or surgery

    Surgeons will perform standard en bloc tumor resection in accordance with oncologic principles. In the non-resection group, the needle biopsy tract will not be intentionally excised. The biopsy tract, including the skin entry site and intervening soft tissue pathway, will be preserved unless it lies within the planned tumor resection field.

    If any portion of the biopsy tract is located within the standard oncologic resection field required to achieve negative margins, it will be removed as part of the tumor specimen; however, no additional resection will be performed specifically to excise the biopsy tract.

Study groups in NCT07575724
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
tract resection groupExperimentalNot described
Receives: Procedure: biopsy tract resection
tract non-section groupActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Procedure: biopsy tract non-resection

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Cumulative incidence of local recurrence at 2 years

    Local recurrence is defined as radiologically or pathologically confirmed recurrence of sarcoma at or adjacent to the primary surgical site after definitive tumor resection. The cumulative incidence of local recurrence will be estimated with death treated as a competing event.

    Measured: From the date of surgery to the date of first documented local recurrence, death, or last follow-up, assessed up to 24 months after surgery.

Secondary outcomes (14)
  1. Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score

    MSTS assesses 6 aspects of a patient's quality including pain, function, emotional, supports, walking and gait with regard to their treatment. higher score. The score ranges from 0% (worst function) to 100% (best function). It is a repeated continuous outcome.

    Measured: recorded at baseline and at 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 months after surgery.

  2. Henderson failure mode

    Henderson failure mode defined as : soft-tissue failure (Type 1), aseptic loosening (Type 2), structural failure (Type 3), infection (Type 4), and tumor progression (Type 5).

    Measured: From surgery to 24 months, assessed every 3 months

  3. The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale

    The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) questionnare is used to evaluate scar quality from both the patient's and the observer's perspectives. Each scale consists of six items, with each item scored from 1 (normal skin) to 10 (worst imaginable scar). Total scores range from 6 to 60, with lower scores indicating better quality.

    Measured: From surgery to 24 months, assessed every 3 months

  4. Soft tissue reconstruction

    Soft tissue reconstruction will be recorded as whether the patient required additional soft tissue reconstruction procedures (e.g., skin grafting) during surgery.

    Measured: perioperative period

  5. Total surgical duration

    The time elapsed from the first incision to the completion of wound closure, measured in minutes.

    Measured: During the operative procedure

  6. Biopsy diagnostic accuracy

    Diagnostic accuracy was defined as the percentage of participants whose percutaneous biopsy results are concordant with the final histopathological diagnosis from the surgical specimen. This is a binary outcome.

    Measured: perioperative period

  7. Metastasis free survival (MFS)

    Metastasis-free survival is defined as the time from definitive surgery to the first radiologically confirmed distant metastasis (e.g., lung, bone, or other organs). Metastasis will be assessed using scheduled chest CT scans and other imaging as clinically indicated. Participants without metastasis will be censored at their last follow-up visit.

    Measured: From surgery to 24 months, assessed every 6 months

  8. The Toronto Extremity Salvage Score

    The Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) is a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) specifically designed to evaluate the physical function of individuals who have undergone limb-salvage surgery for bone or soft-tissue sarcomas.The raw score is converted into a percentage ranging from 0 to 100. Higher score indicates better function.

    Measured: From surgery to 24 months, assessed every 3 months

  9. Overall survival (OS)

    Overall survival is defined as the time from definitive surgery to death from any cause. Participants alive at last follow-up will be censored. Survival status will be assessed at each scheduled visit.

    Measured: From surgery to 24 months, assessed every 3 months

  10. Need for re-biopsy

    Number of participants requiring more than one biopsy procedure to obtain a definitive diagnostic result.

    Measured: preoperative period

  11. Request for external pathology consultation

    Number of participants for whom a second opinion from an external pathology department was sought to confirm the primary diagnosis.

    Measured: perioperative period

  12. intraoperative blood loss

    Total volume of blood lost during the surgical procedure, measured in milliliters (mL).

    Measured: During the surgical procedure

  13. length of hospital stay

    The total number of days from the date of admission to the date of hospital discharge. This is a continuous outcome

    Measured: perioperative period

  14. Major wound complications

    Major wound complication was defined according to the O' sullivian et al (the Lancet, 2002). They are defined as a secondary operation under general or regional anaesthesia for wound repair (debridement, operative drainage, and secondary wound closure including rotationplasty, free flaps, or skin grafts),or wound management without secondary operation.

    Wound management included an invasive procedure without general or regional anaesthesia (mainly aspiration of seroma), readmission for wound care such as intravenous antibiotics, or persistent deep packing for 120 days or longer. It will be recorded as binary outcome

    Measured: Assessed from the date of surgery to 120 days after surgery.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 May 2026
  2. Study start1 Dec 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion1 Dec 2031 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Dec 2033 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
3,300 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07575724
Sponsor's protocol ID
LN_Biopsy_2025
Status last verified
Nov 2025
First submitted
2 Apr 2026
Last updated
14 Jul 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing biopsy tract resection and biopsy tract non-resection in people with Primary and Sarcoma, run by Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine at 2 sites in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Nong Lin, MD (13958195545, linnong@zju.edu.cn), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Cumulative incidence of local recurrence at 2 years (time frame: From the date of surgery to the date of first documented local recurrence, death, or last follow-up, assessed up to 24 months after surgery.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Jul 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in