Lumbar RadiculopathyNCT07573124
Efficacy of Combining Mulligan Spinal Mobilization With Leg Movement and Mechanical Lumbar Traction in Lumbar Radiculopathy
A study testing Spinal Mobilization with Leg Movement (SMWLM), Mechanical Lumbar Traction and Conventional Physical Therapy in people with Lumbar Radiculopathy, run by Khyber Medical University Peshawar at 1 site in Pakistan.
Trial summary
Lumbar radiculopathy (LR), often caused by disc herniation, results in significant pain, disability, and reduced quality of life. Spinal Mobilization with Leg Movement (SMWLM) is a manual technique that has shown promise, while mechanical lumbar traction is used to reduce nerve compression, though its standalone… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 50 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Lumbar Radiculopathy
- What is being tested?
- Spinal Mobilization with Leg Movement (SMWLM), Mechanical Lumbar Traction and Conventional Physical Therapy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 32 participants
- Where
- 1 sitePakistan
- Study dates
- 1 Apr 2026to 15 Nov 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 50 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 20-50 years
- Male and female participants
- Unilateral radiculopathy due to L4-L5 or L5-S1 disc bulge, confirmed by clinical examination and MRI
- Symptom duration of 4 weeks to 6 months
- Positive Straight Leg Raise (SLR) test on the affected leg (<70° of hip flexion)
- Pain intensity <7 on the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS; mild to moderate pain)
Who cannot join
- Cognitive impairment, dementia, central cord signs
- Inflammatory or degenerative spine conditions
- Spine surgery within the last 6 months
- Pregnant women in the later half of 2nd trimester or 3rd trimester
- Muscular involvement (e.g., Deep Gluteal syndrome, Piriformis syndrome)
- Currently receiving medications or other contemporaneous treatment
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Pakistan1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
DMC Physiotherapy Clinic
Islamabad, Capital
Muhammad Haris, DPT, +923495959672, drm.harispt@gmail.com
Dr Muhammad Mustafa, MSPT, +923339475130, contact@drmustafaclinics.com
About this study
Official title: Efficacy of Combining Mulligan's Spinal Mobilization With Leg Movement Technique and Mechanical Lumbar Traction Among Patients With Lumbar Radiculopathy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Lumbar radiculopathy (LR), often caused by disc herniation, results in significant pain, disability, and reduced quality of life. Spinal Mobilization with Leg Movement (SMWLM) is a manual technique that has shown promise, while mechanical lumbar traction is used to reduce nerve compression, though its standalone effectiveness is debated. This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the combined effect of SMWLM plus mechanical lumbar traction against SMWLM alone, both administered with conventional physiotherapy. Outcomes will be assessed over 4 weeks to determine if the combined intervention offers superior pain relief, functional improvement, and range of motion in patients with unilateral L4-L5 or L5-S1 radiculopathy.
Read the detailed description
Lumbar radiculopathy, commonly arising from disc herniation and nerve root compression, causes disabling leg pain, functional limitations, and reduced quality of life. Manual techniques such as Spinal Mobilization with Leg Movement (SMWLM) have shown promise, while mechanical lumbar traction aims to decrease nerve compression, though its added benefit remains uncertain. This randomized controlled trial will evaluate whether the combination of SMWLM and mechanical lumbar traction, delivered alongside conventional physiotherapy, yields superior clinical outcomes compared to SMWLM and conventional therapy alone. The study will be conducted in Islamabad, Pakistan, enrolling 32 adults aged 20-50 years with unilateral L4-L5 or L5-S1 radiculopathy (confirmed by MRI, symptom duration 4 weeks-6 months, positive Straight Leg Raise below 70°, and pain <7 on the Numeric Pain Rating Scale). Participants will be randomly allocated to either the experimental group (SMWLM + intermittent mechanical lumbar traction at 50% body weight + conventional therapy) or the control group (SMWLM + conventional therapy alone).
The intervention will be applied over four weeks (three sessions weekly for the first two weeks, then two sessions weekly). SMWLM involves a sustained transverse glide to the spinous process of the superior vertebra while the patient actively performs pain-free leg movement. Mechanical traction will be applied intermittently (30-second hold, 10-second rest) for 15 minutes per session. Conventional therapy includes hot pack, TENS, and a standardized exercise program. Primary outcomes include pain intensity (Numeric Pain Rating Scale), hip range of motion during Straight Leg Raise (universal goniometer), and functional disability (Modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Questionnaire) will be measured at baseline, week 2, and week 4. Data will be analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVA and independent t-tests to assess between-group differences. This trial will provide evidence on whether combining mechanical traction with SMWLM enhances pain relief, mobility, and function in lumbar radiculopathy.
- Conditions
- Lumbar Radiculopathy
- Being tested
- Spinal Mobilization with Leg Movement (SMWLM), Mechanical Lumbar Traction, Conventional Physical Therapy
- Keywords
- Lumbar radiculopathy, Mulligan mobilization, Mechanical lumbar traction, Physical therapy, Randomized controlled trial
- Medical subject headings
- Radiculopathy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Spinal Mobilization with Leg Movement (SMWLM)Procedure or surgery
Also called Mulligan mobilization, SMWLM, spinal mobilization with limb movement
The therapist positions the patient side-lying on the unaffected side with the affected leg slightly abducted. A sustained transverse manual glide is applied to the spinous process of the superior vertebra of the involved lumbar segment (e.g., L4 for an L4-L5 lesion). Simultaneously, the patient actively lifts the leg into hip flexion and knee extension, ensuring the movement remains pain-free. Dosage: 3 sets of 7-10 repetitions per treatment session.
Mechanical Lumbar TractionProcedure or surgery
Also called Intermittent lumbar traction, automatic traction therapy
Following SMWLM, the patient is placed supine in a Fowler position with hips and knees flexed to 90°, lower legs supported. An intermittent distractive force (up to 50% of body weight) is delivered using an automatic traction device (e.g., PH-T3021). The traction cycle consists of a 30-second hold and a 10-second rest, with a 1-minute ramp-up and ramp-down, for a total of 15 minutes.
Conventional Physical TherapyProcedure or surgery
Also called Standard physiotherapy, hot pack and TENS, therapeutic exercise
All participants receive a standardized conventional therapy program consisting of:
- Moist hot pack on the lumbar region for 10 minutes.
- Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) with 50-100 ms pulse width for 10 minutes, electrodes placed over the lumbar spine and affected lower limb.
- Supervised therapeutic exercises: heel sitting (lumbar flexion), drawing-in maneuver, bridging, and pelvic tilting (2 sets of 5-7 repetitions per session).
- Home exercise program: same exercises performed daily, 3 sets of 10 repetitions, with progression as tolerated.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| SMWLM + Mechanical Lumbar Traction + Conventional Therapy | Experimental | Participants receive Spinal Mobilization with Leg Movement (SMWLM), mechanical lumbar traction, and conventional physiotherapy. Receives: Procedure: Spinal Mobilization with Leg Movement (SMWLM); Procedure: Mechanical Lumbar Traction; Procedure: Conventional Physical Therapy |
| SMWLM + Conventional Therapy | Active comparator | Participants receive Spinal Mobilization with Leg Movement (SMWLM) and conventional physiotherapy without mechanical traction. Receives: Procedure: Spinal Mobilization with Leg Movement (SMWLM); Procedure: Conventional Physical Therapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pain Intensity
The average pain intensity (Numerical Pain Rating Scale) over the previous 24 hours is rated on an 11-point scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). The patient is asked to provide current, best, and worst pain ratings; the mean of the three ratings will be used.
Measured: Baseline, Week 2 (mid-intervention), Week 4 (post-intervention)
Functional Disability
Modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Questionnaire (MOLBPQ) is a validated 10-item questionnaire measuring how much low back pain has affected daily activities (e.g., walking, sitting, lifting, sleeping). Each item scores 0-5; total sum is expressed as a percentage (0-50). Higher scores indicate greater disability.
Measured: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4
Hip Range of Motion
Straight Leg Raise (SLR) Test is a pain-free hip flexion angle (in degrees) measured with a universal goniometer during the passive straight leg raise test. The examiner stops the movement at the point where the patient first reports concordant radicular pain or tightness. Standardized goniometer placement relative to the femur ensures consistency.
Measured: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 May 2026
- Study start1 Apr 2026
- Primary completion15 Oct 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion15 Nov 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Lumbar RadiculopathyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Two-arm parallel-group design comparing an experimental group (SMWLM + mechanical lumbar traction + conventional therapy) with an active comparator group (SMWLM + conventional therapy).
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 32 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Khyber Medical University Peshawar
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- KMU-Institute of Health Sciences, Islamabad
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Muhammad Haris, DPT, Principal investigator, Institute of Health Science, Khyber Medical University IslamabadDr Muhammad Mustafa, MSPT, Principal investigator, Institute of Health Science, Khyber Medical University IslamabadKinza Afzal, DPT, Principal investigator, Hamdard University Islamabad Campus
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07573124
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- KMU/DIR/CTU/2026/03
- Status last verified
- May 2026
- First submitted
- 1 May 2026
- Last updated
- 7 May 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: De-identified individual participant data (IPD) that underlie the results reported in published articles will be shared. This includes the demographic data, baseline characteristics, and all primary outcome measures (NPRS pain scores, Straight Leg Raise goniometry angles, and Modified Oswestry Disability scores) at the three assessment time points. The shared data will be accompanied by a data dictionary explaining all variable names and values.
Publications
Fourre A, Monnier F, Ris L, Telliez F, Michielsen J, Roussel N, Hage R. Low-back related leg pain: is the nerve guilty? How to differentiate the underlying pain mechanism. J Man Manip Ther. 2023 Apr;31(2):57-63. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2022.2092266. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
PubMed 35735104Roberts KE, Beckenkamp PR, Ferreira ML, Duncan GE, Calais-Ferreira L, Gatt JM, Ferreira P. Positive lifestyle behaviours and emotional health factors are associated with low back pain resilience. Eur Spine J. 2022 Dec;31(12):3616-3626. doi: 10.1007/s00586-022-07404-7. Epub 2022 Oct 8.
PubMed 36208321Qaseem A, Wilt TJ, McLean RM, Forciea MA; Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians; Denberg TD, Barry MJ, Boyd C, Chow RD, Fitterman N, Harris RP, Humphrey LL, Vijan S. Noninvasive Treatments for Acute, Subacute, and Chronic Low Back Pain: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2017 Apr 4;166(7):514-530. doi: 10.7326/M16-2367. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
PubMed 28192789Vanti C, Panizzolo A, Turone L, Guccione AA, Violante FS, Pillastrini P, Bertozzi L. Effectiveness of Mechanical Traction for Lumbar Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Phys Ther. 2021 Mar 3;101(3):pzaa231. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzaa231.
PubMed 33382419
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy of Combining Mulligan's Spinal Mobilization With Leg Movement Technique and Mechanical Lumbar Traction Among Patients With Lumbar Radiculopathy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07573124
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- KMU/DIR/CTU/2026/03
- Conditions
- Lumbar Radiculopathy
- Keywords
- Lumbar radiculopathy, Mulligan mobilization, Mechanical lumbar traction, Physical therapy, Randomized controlled trial
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 32 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Khyber Medical University PeshawarUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- KMU-Institute of Health Sciences, Islamabad
- Study start
- 1 Apr 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Oct 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 15 Nov 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 7 May 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Lumbar radiculopathy (LR), often caused by disc herniation, results in significant pain, disability, and reduced quality of life. Spinal Mobilization with Leg Movement (SMWLM) is a manual technique that has shown promise, while mechanical lumbar traction is used to reduce nerve compression, though its standalone effectiveness is debated. This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the combined effect of SMWLM plus mechanical lumbar traction against SMWLM alone, both administered with conventional physiotherapy. Outcomes will be assessed over 4 weeks to determine if the combined intervention offers superior pain relief, functional improvement, and range of motion in patients with unilateral L4-L5 or L5-S1 radiculopathy.
Detailed description
Lumbar radiculopathy, commonly arising from disc herniation and nerve root compression, causes disabling leg pain, functional limitations, and reduced quality of life. Manual techniques such as Spinal Mobilization with Leg Movement (SMWLM) have shown promise, while mechanical lumbar traction aims to decrease nerve compression, though its added benefit remains uncertain. This randomized controlled trial will evaluate whether the combination of SMWLM and mechanical lumbar traction, delivered alongside conventional physiotherapy, yields superior clinical outcomes compared to SMWLM and conventional therapy alone. The study will be conducted in Islamabad, Pakistan, enrolling 32 adults aged 20-50 years with unilateral L4-L5 or L5-S1 radiculopathy (confirmed by MRI, symptom duration 4 weeks-6 months, positive Straight Leg Raise below 70°, and pain <7 on the Numeric Pain Rating Scale). Participants will be randomly allocated to either the experimental group (SMWLM + intermittent mechanical lumbar traction at 50% body weight + conventional therapy) or the control group (SMWLM + conventional therapy alone).
The intervention will be applied over four weeks (three sessions weekly for the first two weeks, then two sessions weekly). SMWLM involves a sustained transverse glide to the spinous process of the superior vertebra while the patient actively performs pain-free leg movement. Mechanical traction will be applied intermittently (30-second hold, 10-second rest) for 15 minutes per session. Conventional therapy includes hot pack, TENS, and a standardized exercise program. Primary outcomes include pain intensity (Numeric Pain Rating Scale), hip range of motion during Straight Leg Raise (universal goniometer), and functional disability (Modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Questionnaire) will be measured at baseline, week 2, and week 4. Data will be analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVA and independent t-tests to assess between-group differences. This trial will provide evidence on whether combining mechanical traction with SMWLM enhances pain relief, mobility, and function in lumbar radiculopathy.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Two-arm parallel-group design comparing an experimental group (SMWLM + mechanical lumbar traction + conventional therapy) with an active comparator group (SMWLM + conventional therapy).
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| SMWLM + Mechanical Lumbar Traction + Conventional Therapy | Experimental | Procedure: Spinal Mobilization with Leg Movement (SMWLM), Procedure: Mechanical Lumbar Traction, Procedure: Conventional Physical TherapyParticipants receive Spinal Mobilization with Leg Movement (SMWLM), mechanical lumbar traction, and conventional physiotherapy. |
| SMWLM + Conventional Therapy | Active comparator | Procedure: Spinal Mobilization with Leg Movement (SMWLM), Procedure: Conventional Physical TherapyParticipants receive Spinal Mobilization with Leg Movement (SMWLM) and conventional physiotherapy without mechanical traction. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 50 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Age 20-50 years
- Male and female participants
- Unilateral radiculopathy due to L4-L5 or L5-S1 disc bulge, confirmed by clinical examination and MRI
- Symptom duration of 4 weeks to 6 months
- Positive Straight Leg Raise (SLR) test on the affected leg (<70° of hip flexion)
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Cognitive impairment, dementia, central cord signs
- Inflammatory or degenerative spine conditions
- Spine surgery within the last 6 months
- Pregnant women in the later half of 2nd trimester or 3rd trimester
- Muscular involvement (e.g., Deep Gluteal syndrome, Piriformis syndrome)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Spinal Mobilization with Leg Movement (SMWLM)Also: Mulligan mobilization, SMWLM, spinal mobilization with limb movementThe therapist positions the patient side-lying on the unaffected side with the affected leg slightly abducted. A sustained transverse manual glide is applied to the spinous process of the superior vertebra of the involved lumbar segment (e.g., L4 for an L4-L5 lesion). Simultaneously, the patient actively lifts the leg into hip flexion and knee extension, ensuring the movement remains pain-free. Dosage: 3 sets of 7-10 repetitions per treatment session. | Procedure or surgery | SMWLM + Conventional Therapy, SMWLM + Mechanical Lumbar Traction + Conventional Therapy |
| Mechanical Lumbar TractionAlso: Intermittent lumbar traction, automatic traction therapyFollowing SMWLM, the patient is placed supine in a Fowler position with hips and knees flexed to 90°, lower legs supported. An intermittent distractive force (up to 50% of body weight) is delivered using an automatic traction device (e.g., PH-T3021). The traction cycle consists of a 30-second hold and a 10-second rest, with a 1-minute ramp-up and ramp-down, for a total of 15 minutes. | Procedure or surgery | SMWLM + Mechanical Lumbar Traction + Conventional Therapy |
| Conventional Physical TherapyAlso: Standard physiotherapy, hot pack and TENS, therapeutic exerciseAll participants receive a standardized conventional therapy program consisting of: * Moist hot pack on the lumbar region for 10 minutes. * Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) with 50-100 ms pulse width for 10 minutes, electrodes placed over the lumbar spine and affected lower limb. * Supervised therapeutic exercises: heel sitting (lumbar flexion), drawing-in maneuver, bridging, and pelvic tilting (2 sets of 5-7 repetitions per session). * Home exercise program: same exercises performed daily, 3 sets of 10 repetitions, with progression as tolerated. | Procedure or surgery | SMWLM + Conventional Therapy, SMWLM + Mechanical Lumbar Traction + Conventional Therapy |
Primary outcome
Pain Intensity
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2 (mid-intervention), Week 4 (post-intervention)
The average pain intensity (Numerical Pain Rating Scale) over the previous 24 hours is rated on an 11-point scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). The patient is asked to provide current, best, and worst pain ratings; the mean of the three ratings will be used.
Functional Disability
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4
Modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Questionnaire (MOLBPQ) is a validated 10-item questionnaire measuring how much low back pain has affected daily activities (e.g., walking, sitting, lifting, sleeping). Each item scores 0-5; total sum is expressed as a percentage (0-50). Higher scores indicate greater disability.
Hip Range of Motion
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4
Straight Leg Raise (SLR) Test is a pain-free hip flexion angle (in degrees) measured with a universal goniometer during the passive straight leg raise test. The examiner stops the movement at the point where the patient first reports concordant radicular pain or tightness. Standardized goniometer placement relative to the femur ensures consistency.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 May 2026.
- Background: PubMed 35735104Fourre A, Monnier F, Ris L, Telliez F, Michielsen J, Roussel N, Hage R. Low-back related leg pain: is the nerve guilty? How to differentiate the underlying pain mechanism. J Man Manip Ther. 2023 Apr;31(2):57-63. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2022.2092266. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
- Background: PubMed 36208321Roberts KE, Beckenkamp PR, Ferreira ML, Duncan GE, Calais-Ferreira L, Gatt JM, Ferreira P. Positive lifestyle behaviours and emotional health factors are associated with low back pain resilience. Eur Spine J. 2022 Dec;31(12):3616-3626. doi: 10.1007/s00586-022-07404-7. Epub 2022 Oct 8.
- Background: PubMed 28192789Qaseem A, Wilt TJ, McLean RM, Forciea MA; Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians; Denberg TD, Barry MJ, Boyd C, Chow RD, Fitterman N, Harris RP, Humphrey LL, Vijan S. Noninvasive Treatments for Acute, Subacute, and Chronic Low Back Pain: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2017 Apr 4;166(7):514-530. doi: 10.7326/M16-2367. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
- Background: PubMed 33382419Vanti C, Panizzolo A, Turone L, Guccione AA, Violante FS, Pillastrini P, Bertozzi L. Effectiveness of Mechanical Traction for Lumbar Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Phys Ther. 2021 Mar 3;101(3):pzaa231. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzaa231.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. De-identified individual participant data (IPD) that underlie the results reported in published articles will be shared. This includes the demographic data, baseline characteristics, and all primary outcome measures (NPRS pain scores, Straight Leg Raise goniometry angles, and Modified Oswestry Disability scores) at the three assessment time points. The shared data will be accompanied by a data dictionary explaining all variable names and values.
Related trials for Lumbar Radiculopathy
Active, not recruiting
Comparative Effects of Kinetic Control Training and Neural Mobilization in Lumbar Radiculopathy
Lumbar Radiculopathy
Recruiting
Effect of Transfer of Energy Capacitive and Resistive on Chronic Discogenic Sciatica
Lumbar Radiculopathy
Not yet recruiting
Selective Nerve Root Block Versus Sham to Reduce Surgery for Lumbar Disc Herniation
Lumbar Disc Herniation, Lumbar Radiculopathy
Recruiting
Comparative Effect Between Mulligan Leg Raise and Spinal Mobilization With Limb Movement in Lumbar Radiculopathy
Lumbar Radiculopathy
Not yet recruiting
Comparison of Efficacy of Caudal Versus Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injections in Unilateral S1 Nerve Root Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Unilateral S1 Nerve Root Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Muhammad Haris, DPT principal investigator
Institute of Health Science, Khyber Medical University Islamabad
Dr Muhammad Mustafa, MSPT principal investigator
Institute of Health Science, Khyber Medical University Islamabad
Kinza Afzal, DPT principal investigator
Hamdard University Islamabad Campus
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Spinal Mobilization with Leg Movement (SMWLM), Mechanical Lumbar Traction and Conventional Physical Therapy in people with Lumbar Radiculopathy, run by Khyber Medical University Peshawar at 1 site in Pakistan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Muhammad Haris, DPT (+92 349 5959672, drm.harispt@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pain Intensity (time frame: Baseline, Week 2 (mid-intervention), Week 4 (post-intervention)). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07573124, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 May 2026.