Neck Pain MusculoskeletalEIH-CNNPNCT07546838
Effects of Aerobic and Combined Exercise on Pain and Fatigue in Workers With Chronic Neck Pain
A study testing Aerobic Exercise and Combined Exercise in people with Neck Pain Musculoskeletal and Work Related Musculoskeletal Disorders, run by Hacettepe University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
This randomized controlled trial investigated the acute effects of aerobic exercise (AE) and combined aerobic and cervical-upper extremity resistance exercise (CE) on the pressure pain threshold (PPT), pain perception, and fatigue in workers with high ergonomic risk and chronic non-specific neck pain (CNNP). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Neck Pain Musculoskeletal, Work Related Musculoskeletal Disorders
- What is being tested?
- Aerobic Exercise and Combined Exercise
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 78 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 22 May 2025to 30 Oct 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Aged 20-65 years
- Diagnosed with chronic non-specific neck pain within the past year
- Neck pain intensity ≥4 on a numerical rating scale for at least 3 months
- Actively employed for at least 1 year in similar occupational conditions
- High ergonomic risk (Rapid Upper Limb Assessment - RULA score ≥3)
Who cannot join
- Neurological, cardiopulmonary, or rheumatological disorders
- History of cervical surgery or traumatic injury
- Specific cervical or lumbar pathology
- Whiplash injury, or any traumatic musculoskeletal injury
- Recent physical therapy or regular exercise in the past six months
- Neck pain unresponsive to conservative treatment
Show all 10Show fewer
- Diagnosed thoracic outlet syndrome, rotator cuff pathology, vertebrobasilar insufficiency, or frozen shoulder
- Pregnancy
- Use of antidepressant medication
- Positive clinical tests (Spurling, cervical distraction, Valsalva, radial, ulnar, and median nerve tension tests)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Faculty of Physical Therapy adn Rehabilitation, Hacettepe University
Ankara, Çankaya, 06100
About this study
Official title: Acute Effects of Aerobic Versus Combined Aerobic and Cervical-Upper Extremity Resistance Exercise on Pressure Pain Threshold, Pain Perception, and Fatigue in Workers Exposed to High Ergonomic Risk With Chronic Non-specific Neck Pain: a Randomized Controlled Trial
This randomized controlled trial investigated the acute effects of aerobic exercise (AE) and combined aerobic and cervical-upper extremity resistance exercise (CE) on the pressure pain threshold (PPT), pain perception, and fatigue in workers with high ergonomic risk and chronic non-specific neck pain (CNNP).
A total of 78 workers were randomly assigned to AE, CE, or control groups. The AE and CE groups completed single 40-minute sessions, while the control group received a 30-minute educational session with additional seated rest periods before and after the session. PPT was assessed bilaterally at multiple anatomical sites using a digital pressure algometer. Neck pain, overall pain perception, and fatigue were evaluated using a numerical rating scale (NRS) before, immediately after, and 20 minutes after exercise.
The study focused on exercise-induced hypoalgesia (EIH) and was intended to inform brief, workplace-compatible exercise strategies to reduce pain, fatigue, and work-related musculoskeletal risks in this population.
Read the detailed description
This randomized controlled trial investigated the acute effects of aerobic exercise and combined aerobic and cervical-upper extremity resistance exercise on pain sensitivity, pain perception, and fatigue in workers with chronic non-specific neck pain exposed to high ergonomic risk.
Participants were recruited from occupational groups with high ergonomic risk and were assessed in two sessions. The first session was conducted in the workplace and included eligibility screening, demographic data collection, and ergonomic risk assessment. Participants were then randomly assigned to aerobic exercise, combined exercise, or control groups.
The second session was conducted in a university laboratory setting. Baseline assessments were performed, followed by the intervention. Outcome measures were collected before the intervention (T0), immediately after (T1), and 20 minutes after the intervention (T2).
The aerobic exercise group performed moderate-intensity cycling using a recumbent ergometer (64-76% of maximum heart rate), consisting of a 5-minute warm-up, 30 minutes of exercise, and a 5-minute cool-down. The combined exercise group performed aerobic exercise at the same intensity, followed by cervical and upper-extremity resistance exercises focusing on motor control and scapular stabilization. This protocol included a 5-minute warm-up, 15 minutes of aerobic exercise, 15 minutes of resistance exercise, and a 5-minute cool-down. The control group received a 30-minute educational session on exercise and workplace ergonomics.
Pain sensitivity was assessed using pressure pain threshold measurements obtained with a digital algometer at the C2, C5, and upper trapezius regions. Neck pain, overall body pain perception, and fatigue were evaluated using numerical rating scales (0-10).
Sample size was calculated using G*Power (v3.1.9.6) based on a previous study (effect size = 0.165 for a three-group design), with an alpha level of 0.05 and power of 0.80, resulting in a required sample of 78 participants. Considering a 20% drop-out rate, 95 participants were targeted.
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS. Data normality was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Baseline differences between groups were analyzed using ANOVA and chi-squared tests. The primary analysis evaluated group × time interactions using repeated-measures ANOVA (T0, T1, T2), with Bonferroni post-hoc tests applied when appropriate. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
The study focused on exercise-induced hypoalgesia (EIH) and aimed to compare the immediate and short-term responses to different exercise modalities in a working population with chronic neck pain.
- Being tested
- Aerobic Exercise, Combined Exercise, Informed Control
- Keywords
- Exercise-induced hypoalgesia, Acute effect of exercise, Chronic Neck Pain, Pressure Pain Threshold, Aerobic Exercise, Resistance Exercise, Ergonomic Risk
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Aerobic ExerciseBehavioural
Moderate-intensity aerobic exercise performed using a recumbent cycle ergometer in a single 40-minute session. The protocol included a 5-minute warm-up, 30 minutes of continuous cycling, and a 5-minute cool-down. Exercise intensity was maintained at 64-76% of maximum heart rate and adjusted individually throughout the session. No resistance or strength training exercises were included.
Combined ExerciseBehavioural
Participants performed a combination of aerobic and resistance exercises in a single 40-minute session. The protocol included a 5-minute warm-up, 15 minutes of moderate-intensity aerobic exercise (64-76% HRmax, Borg RPE 11-14), 15 minutes of resistance exercises targeting cervical and upper-extremity muscles, and a 5-minute cool-down. The resistance program focused on cervical motor control and scapular stabilization, including chin tuck, cervical retraction with extension, scapular retraction, vertical pulling, horizontal shoulder abduction, scapular plane abduction, and shoulder elevation. Each exercise was performed for 8-10 repetitions in two sets with 30-second rest intervals. All exercises were supervised and performed with proper postural alignment.
Informed ControlBehavioural
Participants attended a 30-minute educational session on exercise benefits, workplace ergonomics, and postural recommendations. Participants remained seated for 5 minutes before and after the session.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Aerobic Exercise | Experimental | Participants performed moderate-intensity cycling using a recumbent ergometer in a single 40-minute session, including a 5-minute warm-up, 30 minutes of aerobic exercise, and a 5-minute cool-down. Receives: Behavioral: Aerobic Exercise |
| Combined Exercise | Experimental | Participants performed a combination of aerobic and resistance exercises in a single 40-minute session, including a 5-minute warm-up, 15 minutes of aerobic exercise, 15 minutes of resistance training targeting cervical and upper-extremity muscles, and a 5-minute cool-down. Receives: Behavioral: Combined Exercise |
| Informed Control | Active comparator | A 30-minute educational session on exercise benefits, workplace ergonomics, and postural recommendations. Participants remained seated for 5 minutes before and after the session. Receives: Behavioral: Informed Control |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pressure Pain Threshold
Pressure pain threshold is assessed using a digital algometer to evaluate pain sensitivity. The value at which the sensation of pressure first becomes painful is recorded in lbf/cm². Three consecutive measurements are obtained at each site, and the mean value is used for analysis.
Measurements are obtained bilaterally at the C2 region, C5 region, and upper trapezius muscle.
Measured: Three time points: before the intervention (T0), immediately after the intervention (T1), and 20 minutes after the intervention (T2).
Secondary outcomes (3)
Acute Neck Pain Perception
Acute neck pain intensity is assessed using a numerical rating scale (0-10), a simple and widely used tool for evaluating pain. Participants are asked to select the number that best represents their pain intensity. Zero indicates no pain, and 10 represents the worst imaginable pain.
Measured: Assessments are performed at three time points: before the intervention (T0), immediately after the intervention (T1), and 20 minutes after the intervention (T2).
Acute Overall Body Pain Perception
Acute overall body pain perception is assessed using a numerical rating scale (0-10), a simple and widely used tool for evaluating pain. Participants are asked to select the number that best represents their pain intensity. Zero indicates no pain, and 10 represents the worst imaginable pain.
Measured: Assessments are performed at three time points: before the intervention (T0), immediately after the intervention (T1), and 20 minutes after the intervention (T2).
Acute Fatigue
Acute fatigue is assessed using a numerical rating scale (0-10), a simple and widely used tool for evaluating fatigue. Participants are asked to select the number that best represents their fatigue intensity. Zero indicates no fatigue, and 10 represents the worst imaginable fatigue.
Measured: Assessments are performed at three time points: before the intervention (T0), immediately after the intervention (T1), and 20 minutes after the intervention (T2).
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Apr 2026
- Study start22 May 2025
- Primary completion1 Oct 2025
- Study completion30 Oct 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Neck Pain MusculoskeletalStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Hacettepe UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 78 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hacettepe University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Eda ACIKALIN, Hacettepe University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07546838
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EA-CNNP-RCT-2025
- Acronym
- EIH-CNNP
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 17 Apr 2026
- Last updated
- 23 Apr 2026
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Rice D, Nijs J, Kosek E, Wideman T, Hasenbring MI, Koltyn K, Graven-Nielsen T, Polli A. Exercise-Induced Hypoalgesia in Pain-Free and Chronic Pain Populations: State of the Art and Future Directions. J Pain. 2019 Nov;20(11):1249-1266. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2019.03.005. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
PubMed 30904519Senarath ID, Chen KK, Weerasekara I, de Zoete RMJ. Exercise-induced hypoalgesic effects of different types of physical exercise in individuals with neck pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain Pract. 2023 Jan;23(1):110-122. doi: 10.1111/papr.13150. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
PubMed 35869789Anarte-Lazo E, Bernal-Utrera C, Lopez-Amor M, Porras-Valencia E, Ruy-Diaz-Rojas FJ, Falla D, Rodriguez-Blanco C. Exercise-induced hypoalgesia after aerobic versus neck-specific exercise in people with acute/subacute whiplash-associated disorders: protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 22;12(9):e061679. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061679.
PubMed 36137629Acikalin E, Atasavun Uysal S. Acute effects of aerobic versus combined aerobic and cervical-upper extremity resistance exercise on pressure pain threshold, pain perception, and fatigue in workers exposed to high ergonomic risk with chronic non-specific neck pain: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2026 Jul 14;27(1):610. doi: 10.1186/s12891-026-10182-8.
PubMed 42449286
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Apr 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Acute Effects of Aerobic Versus Combined Aerobic and Cervical-Upper Extremity Resistance Exercise on Pressure Pain Threshold, Pain Perception, and Fatigue in Workers Exposed to High Ergonomic Risk With Chronic Non-specific Neck Pain: a Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07546838
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EIH-CNNP / EA-CNNP-RCT-2025
- Keywords
- Exercise-induced hypoalgesia, Acute effect of exercise, Chronic Neck Pain, Pressure Pain Threshold, Aerobic Exercise, Resistance Exercise, Ergonomic Risk
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 78 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hacettepe UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey
- Study start
- 22 May 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Oct 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Oct 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Apr 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This randomized controlled trial investigated the acute effects of aerobic exercise (AE) and combined aerobic and cervical-upper extremity resistance exercise (CE) on the pressure pain threshold (PPT), pain perception, and fatigue in workers with high ergonomic risk and chronic non-specific neck pain (CNNP).
A total of 78 workers were randomly assigned to AE, CE, or control groups. The AE and CE groups completed single 40-minute sessions, while the control group received a 30-minute educational session with additional seated rest periods before and after the session. PPT was assessed bilaterally at multiple anatomical sites using a digital pressure algometer. Neck pain, overall pain perception, and fatigue were evaluated using a numerical rating scale (NRS) before, immediately after, and 20 minutes after exercise.
The study focused on exercise-induced hypoalgesia (EIH) and was intended to inform brief, workplace-compatible exercise strategies to reduce pain, fatigue, and work-related musculoskeletal risks in this population.
Detailed description
This randomized controlled trial investigated the acute effects of aerobic exercise and combined aerobic and cervical-upper extremity resistance exercise on pain sensitivity, pain perception, and fatigue in workers with chronic non-specific neck pain exposed to high ergonomic risk.
Participants were recruited from occupational groups with high ergonomic risk and were assessed in two sessions. The first session was conducted in the workplace and included eligibility screening, demographic data collection, and ergonomic risk assessment. Participants were then randomly assigned to aerobic exercise, combined exercise, or control groups.
The second session was conducted in a university laboratory setting. Baseline assessments were performed, followed by the intervention. Outcome measures were collected before the intervention (T0), immediately after (T1), and 20 minutes after the intervention (T2).
The aerobic exercise group performed moderate-intensity cycling using a recumbent ergometer (64-76% of maximum heart rate), consisting of a 5-minute warm-up, 30 minutes of exercise, and a 5-minute cool-down. The combined exercise group performed aerobic exercise at the same intensity, followed by cervical and upper-extremity resistance exercises focusing on motor control and scapular stabilization. This protocol included a 5-minute warm-up, 15 minutes of aerobic exercise, 15 minutes of resistance exercise, and a 5-minute cool-down. The control group received a 30-minute educational session on exercise and workplace ergonomics.
Pain sensitivity was assessed using pressure pain threshold measurements obtained with a digital algometer at the C2, C5, and upper trapezius regions. Neck pain, overall body pain perception, and fatigue were evaluated using numerical rating scales (0-10).
Sample size was calculated using G*Power (v3.1.9.6) based on a previous study (effect size = 0.165 for a three-group design), with an alpha level of 0.05 and power of 0.80, resulting in a required sample of 78 participants. Considering a 20% drop-out rate, 95 participants were targeted.
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS. Data normality was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Baseline differences between groups were analyzed using ANOVA and chi-squared tests. The primary analysis evaluated group × time interactions using repeated-measures ANOVA (T0, T1, T2), with Bonferroni post-hoc tests applied when appropriate. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
The study focused on exercise-induced hypoalgesia (EIH) and aimed to compare the immediate and short-term responses to different exercise modalities in a working population with chronic neck pain.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Aerobic Exercise | Experimental | Behavioral: Aerobic ExerciseParticipants performed moderate-intensity cycling using a recumbent ergometer in a single 40-minute session, including a 5-minute warm-up, 30 minutes of aerobic exercise, and a 5-minute cool-down. |
| Combined Exercise | Experimental | Behavioral: Combined ExerciseParticipants performed a combination of aerobic and resistance exercises in a single 40-minute session, including a 5-minute warm-up, 15 minutes of aerobic exercise, 15 minutes of resistance training targeting cervical and upper-extremity muscles, and a 5-minute cool-down. |
| Informed Control | Active comparator | Behavioral: Informed ControlA 30-minute educational session on exercise benefits, workplace ergonomics, and postural recommendations. Participants remained seated for 5 minutes before and after the session. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Aged 20-65 years
- Diagnosed with chronic non-specific neck pain within the past year
- Neck pain intensity ≥4 on a numerical rating scale for at least 3 months
- Actively employed for at least 1 year in similar occupational conditions
- High ergonomic risk (Rapid Upper Limb Assessment - RULA score ≥3)
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Neurological, cardiopulmonary, or rheumatological disorders
- History of cervical surgery or traumatic injury
- Specific cervical or lumbar pathology
- Whiplash injury, or any traumatic musculoskeletal injury
- Recent physical therapy or regular exercise in the past six months
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Aerobic ExerciseModerate-intensity aerobic exercise performed using a recumbent cycle ergometer in a single 40-minute session. The protocol included a 5-minute warm-up, 30 minutes of continuous cycling, and a 5-minute cool-down. Exercise intensity was maintained at 64-76% of maximum heart rate and adjusted individually throughout the session. No resistance or strength training exercises were included. | Behavioural | Aerobic Exercise |
| Combined ExerciseParticipants performed a combination of aerobic and resistance exercises in a single 40-minute session. The protocol included a 5-minute warm-up, 15 minutes of moderate-intensity aerobic exercise (64-76% HRmax, Borg RPE 11-14), 15 minutes of resistance exercises targeting cervical and upper-extremity muscles, and a 5-minute cool-down. The resistance program focused on cervical motor control and scapular stabilization, including chin tuck, cervical retraction with extension, scapular retraction, vertical pulling, horizontal shoulder abduction, scapular plane abduction, and shoulder elevation. Each exercise was performed for 8-10 repetitions in two sets with 30-second rest intervals. All exercises were supervised and performed with proper postural alignment. | Behavioural | Combined Exercise |
| Informed ControlParticipants attended a 30-minute educational session on exercise benefits, workplace ergonomics, and postural recommendations. Participants remained seated for 5 minutes before and after the session. | Behavioural | Informed Control |
Primary outcome
Pressure Pain Threshold
Time frame: Three time points: before the intervention (T0), immediately after the intervention (T1), and 20 minutes after the intervention (T2).
Pressure pain threshold is assessed using a digital algometer to evaluate pain sensitivity. The value at which the sensation of pressure first becomes painful is recorded in lbf/cm². Three consecutive measurements are obtained at each site, and the mean value is used for analysis. Measurements are obtained bilaterally at the C2 region, C5 region, and upper trapezius muscle.
3 secondary outcomes
Acute Neck Pain Perception
Time frame: Assessments are performed at three time points: before the intervention (T0), immediately after the intervention (T1), and 20 minutes after the intervention (T2).
Acute Overall Body Pain Perception
Time frame: Assessments are performed at three time points: before the intervention (T0), immediately after the intervention (T1), and 20 minutes after the intervention (T2).
Acute Fatigue
Time frame: Assessments are performed at three time points: before the intervention (T0), immediately after the intervention (T1), and 20 minutes after the intervention (T2).
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Apr 2026.
- Background: PubMed 30904519Rice D, Nijs J, Kosek E, Wideman T, Hasenbring MI, Koltyn K, Graven-Nielsen T, Polli A. Exercise-Induced Hypoalgesia in Pain-Free and Chronic Pain Populations: State of the Art and Future Directions. J Pain. 2019 Nov;20(11):1249-1266. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2019.03.005. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
- Background: PubMed 35869789Senarath ID, Chen KK, Weerasekara I, de Zoete RMJ. Exercise-induced hypoalgesic effects of different types of physical exercise in individuals with neck pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain Pract. 2023 Jan;23(1):110-122. doi: 10.1111/papr.13150. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
- Background: PubMed 36137629Anarte-Lazo E, Bernal-Utrera C, Lopez-Amor M, Porras-Valencia E, Ruy-Diaz-Rojas FJ, Falla D, Rodriguez-Blanco C. Exercise-induced hypoalgesia after aerobic versus neck-specific exercise in people with acute/subacute whiplash-associated disorders: protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 22;12(9):e061679. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061679.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42449286Acikalin E, Atasavun Uysal S. Acute effects of aerobic versus combined aerobic and cervical-upper extremity resistance exercise on pressure pain threshold, pain perception, and fatigue in workers exposed to high ergonomic risk with chronic non-specific neck pain: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2026 Jul 14;27(1):610. doi: 10.1186/s12891-026-10182-8.
Related trials for Neck Pain Musculoskeletal
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Agreement Between CSI and IASP Pain Classification in Chronic Cervical Myofascial Pain
Myofascial Pain Syndrome - Neck
Not yet recruiting
Focused Versus Multi-Target Trigger Point Injection for Chronic Myofascial Neck Pain
Myofacial Pain Syndrome, Chronic Neck Pain
Not yet recruiting
Validating Blinding Maintenance of a Sham-Sensitization Control Design for Sensitization Acupuncture Trials
Knee Osteoarthritis; Insomnia; Cervical Spondylosis; Chronic Low Back Pain; Allergic Rhinitis
Recruiting
Effectiveness of Pressure Biofeedback-Assisted Deep Cervical Flexor Training With and Without Scapular Stabilization Exercises on Pain, Range of Motion and Neck Disability in Cervical Spondylosis
Cervical Spondylosis
RecruitingObservational study
Changes in Cervical Posture, Cervical Function, and Neck Pain After Sleeve Gastrectomy
Morbid Obesity Requiring Bariatric Surgery, Neck Pain Musculoskeletal
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Aerobic Exercise and Combined Exercise in people with Neck Pain Musculoskeletal and Work Related Musculoskeletal Disorders, run by Hacettepe University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pressure Pain Threshold (time frame: Three time points: before the intervention (T0), immediately after the intervention (T1), and 20 minutes after the intervention (T2).). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07546838, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Apr 2026.