Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma (PTCL NOS)Phase 2NCT07535762
Aclarubicin Plus Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, and Prednisone (CAOP) in Patients With Previously Untreated Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma
A Phase 2 study testing Aclarubicin, Cyclophosphamide and Vincristine in people with Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma (PTCL NOS) and Nodal T-follicular Helper Cell Lymphoma, run by Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine at 2 sites in China.
Trial summary
Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) are a heterogeneous group of rare disorders that result from clonal proliferation of mature post-thymic lymphocytes. These T-cell neoplasms account for approximately 10-15% of all lymphomas. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 65 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma (PTCL NOS), Nodal T-follicular Helper Cell Lymphoma, Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma (ALCL) (ALK-1 Negative)
- What is being tested?
- Aclarubicin, Cyclophosphamide and Vincristine
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 36 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesChina
- Study dates
- 30 Mar 2026to 30 Dec 2028
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 65 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Understand and voluntarily sign the informed consent form
- Age ≥ 65 years at enrollment
- ECOG performance status score ≤ 2
- Able to comply with the research visit plan and other protocol requirements
- Patients with histologically confirmed peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) who have not previously received treatment
- The following subtypes as defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) classification (2022) are eligible, with Ann Arbor stage I-IV, and pathological immunohistochemical CD30 negative:
Show all 16Show fewer
- Peripheral T-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (PTCL, NOS)
- Nodal T-follicular helper cell lymphoma (TFH)
- Anaplastic large cell lymphoma, ALK-negative (ALCL)
- Life expectancy ≥ 3 months
- Hematological, renal, and hepatic function all meet the requirements:
- Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1,500/μL
- Platelet count ≥ 100,000/μL
- Total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) for the institution (except for patients with Gilbert's syndrome)
- Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≤ 2.5 × ULN; if liver involvement is known, then ≤ 5.0 × ULN
- Serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 × ULN, or creatinine clearance > 50 mL/min calculated by the Cockcroft-Gault formula
Who cannot join
- Mental illness, disability, or social circumstances that may affect participant safety, ability to provide informed consent, or poor adherence
- Other types of lymphoma
- Previous immunotherapy or chemotherapy for PTCL, excluding those who used corticosteroids (≤8 days) prior to enrollment
- Previous radiotherapy for PTCL, excluding those confined to a single lymph node region
- Pathological immunohistochemistry showing CD30 positivity and/or ALK positivity
- Patients planning to receive autologous or allogeneic transplantation as first-line consolidation therapy
Show all 16Show fewer
- Confirmed central nervous system/meningeal involvement
- Significant uncontrolled comorbidities or infections, specifically:
- Uncontrolled infection requiring intravenous antibiotics
- Clinically significant heart disease (NYHA Class III or IV), unstable angina
- History of angioplasty, stent implantation, or myocardial infarction within the past 6 months
- Uncontrolled hypertension (systolic blood pressure >160 mmHg) despite using two antihypertensive medications. (or diastolic blood pressure >100 mmHg, measured twice consecutively, one week apart)
- Clinically significant cardiac arrhythmias
- Uncontrolled diabetes
- Known or detected positive for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), human T-cell leukemia virus (HTLV-1), hepatitis B, or hepatitis C.
- Patients diagnosed with malignancy within the past two years. However, the following are excluded: non-melanoma skin cancer, melanoma in situ, localized prostate cancer (current PSA <0.1 ng/mL), treated thyroid cancer; or cervical carcinoma in situ or breast ductal/lobular carcinoma in situ within the past two years, provided there is currently no evidence of active disease.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
China2 sites
Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai
Shanghai
Yunxiang Zhang, +8613564516004, zyx12103@rjh.com.cn
Ruijin Hospital Wuxi Branch
Wuxi
Jiong Hu, +8613764313546, hj10709@rjh.com.cn
About this study
Official title: A Prospective, Single-Arm, Multi-center, Phase 2 Study of Aclarubicin Plus Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, and Prednisone (CAOP) in Patients With Previously Untreated Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma
Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) are a heterogeneous group of rare disorders that result from clonal proliferation of mature post-thymic lymphocytes. These T-cell neoplasms account for approximately 10-15% of all lymphomas. The most common subtype of PTCL is classified as "not otherwise specified" (NOS) which accounts for 30-40%.
PTCLs have been treated similarly with CHOP (Cyclophosphamide, Hydroxydaunorubicin, Vincristine and Prednisone), often with etoposide (CHOEP), followed by high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in first remission. However, <50% of the patients are cured with CHOP alone, and the progression-free survival rates at 5 years are as low as 20% for PTCLs. Meanwhile, for elderly patients who can't endure CHOPE and proceed ASCT, the long-term survival is even worse.
Read more
Aclarubicin is an anthracycline which showed good safety profile in the treatment of both myeloid and lymphocytic leukemia. Previous studies have shown that aclarubicin only induces histone eviction without causing DNA damage, and it stands out in pre-clinical models and clinical studies, as it potently kills AML cells. Meanwhile, aclarubicin lacks cardiotoxicity, and can be safely administered even after the maximum cumulative dose of either doxorubicin or idarubicin has been reached.
The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of Aclarubicin, Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, and Prednisone (CAOP) in elderly patients with newly diagnosed PTCLs. The investigators hope to try to replace doxorubicin in CHOP with aclarubicin, which is less toxic, without reducing the efficacy of patients while ensuring safety.
Read the detailed description
Peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) is a rare and highly heterogeneous group of hematologic malignancies, belonging to the T-cell tumor category of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Compared to B-cell tumors, current understanding of T-cell leukemia and lymphoma remains relatively underdeveloped, and a significant proportion of patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage. Therefore, PTCL patients have not experienced the same level of prognostic improvement over the past 20 to 30 years. In recent years, however, with a deeper understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of PTCLs and the approval of numerous new drugs (including various epigenetic modifiers and biologics), the prognosis for T-cell lymphoma patients may be further improved.
Although histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi), PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, EZH2 inhibitors, and demethylating agents have made some progress in clinical research on PTCLs, their clinical application still relies heavily on CHOP-based chemotherapy regimens. A study of 239 patients with localized nodular PTCL showed that among patients receiving CHOP-like therapy ± radiotherapy, the 5-year overall survival (OS) was 58%, and the 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 53%. Multivariate analysis indicated that age ≥60 years and presence of B symptoms at onset were poor prognostic factors, while ALK-positive anaplastic large T-cell lymphoma had a better prognosis. Therefore, for elderly PTCL patients, there is an urgent need to find a low-toxicity, tolerable, and effective basic chemotherapy regimen.
Aclarubicin (Acla) is an anthracycline anticancer drug. In vitro, Acla has demonstrated potent cytotoxicity against various lymphoma and T-lymphocytic leukemia cell lines. Mechanistic studies of anthracyclines have revealed that doxorubicin, epirubicin, daunorubicin, and idarubicin all induce tumor cell apoptosis through two mechanisms: 1. DNA damage: through inhibition of topoisomerase II (Topo II), leading to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs); and 2. Chromatin damage: through histone removal, causing chromatin alterations at specific genomic loci. However, these dual mechanisms also lead to dose-dependent, irreversible cardiotoxicity. Compared with classic anthracyclines (such as doxorubicin and daunorubicin), Acla does not cause DNA damage and accumulates significantly in lymphoid tissues (spleen, thymus, and lymph nodes), with poor distribution to other tissues. Consequently, its cardiotoxicity is significantly reduced. Even at high cumulative doses, it is less likely to cause cardiac dysfunction. Therefore, Acla may offer a safer option for elderly patients or those with concomitant heart disease. Previous studies have shown that the combination of Acla and cytarabine (such as the CAG regimen) has some efficacy and is well tolerated in relapsed/refractory and elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia. In the 1980s and 1990s, studies explored the use of Acla in chemotherapy regimens for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and Hodgkin's lymphoma, demonstrating some activity. Small studies have shown that Acla monotherapy can achieve a response rate of approximately 30% in patients with advanced non-hedging lymphoma, without compromising cardiac function. Japanese researchers have found that combination chemotherapy regimens containing Acla in T-cell lymphomas exhibit superior efficacy.
In this study, the investigators will replace doxorubicin in the traditional CHOP regimen with aclarubicin, which has good efficacy and low cardiotoxicity, to create a novel CAOP (aclarubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone) regimen for elderly patients newly diagnosed with PTCL. This combination chemotherapy regimen may improve efficacy while also considering tolerability and safety, providing a new treatment option for elderly patients with PTCLs.
- Conditions
- Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma (PTCL NOS), Nodal T-follicular Helper Cell Lymphoma, Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma (ALCL) (ALK-1 Negative)
- Being tested
- Aclarubicin, Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, Prednisone
- Keywords
- PTCL, aclarubicin, elderly patients, ALCL, ALK-negative
- Medical subject headings
- Lymphoma, T-Cell, Peripheral, Lymphoma, Large-Cell, Anaplastic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AclarubicinDrug
20mg/m^2/D, D1-4, QD, ivgtt
CyclophosphamideDrug
750 mg/m^2, D1, ivgtt
VincristineDrug
1.4 mg/m^2, D1 (maximum 2mg/d), IV
PrednisoneDrug
60 mg/m^2, D1-5 (maximum 100mg/d), Po
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| CAOP | Experimental | Eligible participants will receive up to 6 cycles of CAOP induction therapy (3 week cycles for 6 cycles or until progression). An interim evaluation will be conducted after 3 cycles of treatment. Efficacy will be assessed according to the 2014 Lugano criteria. If the patient achieves CR or PR, they will continue with the next 3 cycles of CAOP. If the patient does not achieve CR or PR, they will be withdrawn from the clinical trial. Receives: Drug: Aclarubicin; Drug: Cyclophosphamide; Drug: Vincristine; Drug: Prednisone |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Complete remission rate (CR)
Proportion of enrolled subjects who achieved CR after receiving up to 6 cycles of the CAOP regimen
Measured: After a maximum of 6 cycles of CAOP regimen (each cycle is 28 days)
Secondary outcomes (5)
Progression Free Survival
The time from enrollment to confirmed disease progression or death from any cause.
Measured: Maximum follow-up period is 2 years after the end of treatment.
Overall Survival
The time from enrollment to death from any cause.
Measured: maximum follow-up period is 2 years after the end of treatment.
Adverse Events
Adverse Events (CTCAE v6.0), Vital Signs and Physical Examination, ECOG, Clinical Laboratory Tests, Electrocardiogram (ECG), Echocardiography, Cardiac Enzyme Profile
Measured: From enrollment to 28 days after the end of treatment
Change in quality of life as measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) global health status score
Quality of life will be assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30).
The global health status score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Scores will be calculated according to the EORTC scoring manual and summarized as change from baseline.
Measured: From enrollment to 28 days after the end of treatment
Cancer-related fatigue as measured by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue score
Cancer-related fatigue will be assessed using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue questionnaire.
Scores are reported as T-scores standardized to a reference population, with higher scores indicating greater fatigue (worse outcome). Changes from baseline will be summarized.
Measured: From enrollment to 28 days after the end of treatment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Apr 2026
- Study start30 Mar 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion30 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Dec 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma (PTCL NOS)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of MedicineThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- The Bayesian Optimal Phase II (BOP2) clinical trial design was adopted. Efficacy and toxicity were assessed simultaneously. Based on previous data, the complete response (CR) rate for the CHOP regimen was 50%, while the expected CR rate for the CAOP regimen was 60%. The probability of grade ≥3 non-hematologic toxicity was 30% for patients receiving CHOP chemotherapy. We assume this can be reduced to 15% for the CAOP regimen. Non-hematologic toxicity was correlated with the chemotherapy regimen. Assuming an efficacy and toxicity analysis was performed after every 10 patients enrolled, the first phase planned to enroll 30 patients; assuming a 15% loss to follow-up, 36 subjects would be required.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 36 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Leiden University Medical Center
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Junmin Li, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
- Investigators
- Junmin Li, Principal investigator, Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07535762
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Acla-PTCL
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 20 Mar 2026
- Last updated
- 17 Apr 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Apr 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective, Single-Arm, Multi-center, Phase 2 Study of Aclarubicin Plus Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, and Prednisone (CAOP) in Patients With Previously Untreated Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07535762
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Acla-PTCL
- Conditions
- Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma (PTCL NOS), Nodal T-follicular Helper Cell Lymphoma, Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma (ALCL) (ALK-1 Negative)
- Keywords
- PTCL, aclarubicin, elderly patients, ALCL, ALK-negative
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 36 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of MedicineUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Leiden University Medical Center
- Study start
- 30 Mar 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 30 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Dec 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 17 Apr 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) are a heterogeneous group of rare disorders that result from clonal proliferation of mature post-thymic lymphocytes. These T-cell neoplasms account for approximately 10-15% of all lymphomas. The most common subtype of PTCL is classified as "not otherwise specified" (NOS) which accounts for 30-40%.
PTCLs have been treated similarly with CHOP (Cyclophosphamide, Hydroxydaunorubicin, Vincristine and Prednisone), often with etoposide (CHOEP), followed by high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in first remission. However, <50% of the patients are cured with CHOP alone, and the progression-free survival rates at 5 years are as low as 20% for PTCLs. Meanwhile, for elderly patients who can't endure CHOPE and proceed ASCT, the long-term survival is even worse.
Aclarubicin is an anthracycline which showed good safety profile in the treatment of both myeloid and lymphocytic leukemia. Previous studies have shown that aclarubicin only induces histone eviction without causing DNA damage, and it stands out in pre-clinical models and clinical studies, as it potently kills AML cells. Meanwhile, aclarubicin lacks cardiotoxicity, and can be safely administered even after the maximum cumulative dose of either doxorubicin or idarubicin has been reached.
The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of Aclarubicin, Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, and Prednisone (CAOP) in elderly patients with newly diagnosed PTCLs. The investigators hope to try to replace doxorubicin in CHOP with aclarubicin, which is less toxic, without reducing the efficacy of patients while ensuring safety.
Detailed description
Peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) is a rare and highly heterogeneous group of hematologic malignancies, belonging to the T-cell tumor category of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Compared to B-cell tumors, current understanding of T-cell leukemia and lymphoma remains relatively underdeveloped, and a significant proportion of patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage. Therefore, PTCL patients have not experienced the same level of prognostic improvement over the past 20 to 30 years. In recent years, however, with a deeper understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of PTCLs and the approval of numerous new drugs (including various epigenetic modifiers and biologics), the prognosis for T-cell lymphoma patients may be further improved.
Although histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi), PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, EZH2 inhibitors, and demethylating agents have made some progress in clinical research on PTCLs, their clinical application still relies heavily on CHOP-based chemotherapy regimens. A study of 239 patients with localized nodular PTCL showed that among patients receiving CHOP-like therapy ± radiotherapy, the 5-year overall survival (OS) was 58%, and the 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 53%. Multivariate analysis indicated that age ≥60 years and presence of B symptoms at onset were poor prognostic factors, while ALK-positive anaplastic large T-cell lymphoma had a better prognosis. Therefore, for elderly PTCL patients, there is an urgent need to find a low-toxicity, tolerable, and effective basic chemotherapy regimen.
Aclarubicin (Acla) is an anthracycline anticancer drug. In vitro, Acla has demonstrated potent cytotoxicity against various lymphoma and T-lymphocytic leukemia cell lines. Mechanistic studies of anthracyclines have revealed that doxorubicin, epirubicin, daunorubicin, and idarubicin all induce tumor cell apoptosis through two mechanisms: 1. DNA damage: through inhibition of topoisomerase II (Topo II), leading to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs); and 2. Chromatin damage: through histone removal, causing chromatin alterations at specific genomic loci. However, these dual mechanisms also lead to dose-dependent, irreversible cardiotoxicity. Compared with classic anthracyclines (such as doxorubicin and daunorubicin), Acla does not cause DNA damage and accumulates significantly in lymphoid tissues (spleen, thymus, and lymph nodes), with poor distribution to other tissues. Consequently, its cardiotoxicity is significantly reduced. Even at high cumulative doses, it is less likely to cause cardiac dysfunction. Therefore, Acla may offer a safer option for elderly patients or those with concomitant heart disease. Previous studies have shown that the combination of Acla and cytarabine (such as the CAG regimen) has some efficacy and is well tolerated in relapsed/refractory and elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia. In the 1980s and 1990s, studies explored the use of Acla in chemotherapy regimens for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and Hodgkin's lymphoma, demonstrating some activity. Small studies have shown that Acla monotherapy can achieve a response rate of approximately 30% in patients with advanced non-hedging lymphoma, without compromising cardiac function. Japanese researchers have found that combination chemotherapy regimens containing Acla in T-cell lymphomas exhibit superior efficacy.
In this study, the investigators will replace doxorubicin in the traditional CHOP regimen with aclarubicin, which has good efficacy and low cardiotoxicity, to create a novel CAOP (aclarubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone) regimen for elderly patients newly diagnosed with PTCL. This combination chemotherapy regimen may improve efficacy while also considering tolerability and safety, providing a new treatment option for elderly patients with PTCLs.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- The Bayesian Optimal Phase II (BOP2) clinical trial design was adopted. Efficacy and toxicity were assessed simultaneously. Based on previous data, the complete response (CR) rate for the CHOP regimen was 50%, while the expected CR rate for the CAOP regimen was 60%. The probability of grade ≥3 non-hematologic toxicity was 30% for patients receiving CHOP chemotherapy. We assume this can be reduced to 15% for the CAOP regimen. Non-hematologic toxicity was correlated with the chemotherapy regimen. Assuming an efficacy and toxicity analysis was performed after every 10 patients enrolled, the first phase planned to enroll 30 patients; assuming a 15% loss to follow-up, 36 subjects would be required.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| CAOP | Experimental | Drug: Aclarubicin, Drug: Cyclophosphamide, Drug: Vincristine, Drug: PrednisoneEligible participants will receive up to 6 cycles of CAOP induction therapy (3 week cycles for 6 cycles or until progression). An interim evaluation will be conducted after 3 cycles of treatment. Efficacy will be assessed according to the 2014 Lugano criteria. If the patient achieves CR or PR, they will continue with the next 3 cycles of CAOP. If the patient does not achieve CR or PR, they will be withdrawn from the clinical trial. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 65 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (16 listed)
- Understand and voluntarily sign the informed consent form
- Age ≥ 65 years at enrollment
- ECOG performance status score ≤ 2
- Able to comply with the research visit plan and other protocol requirements
- Patients with histologically confirmed peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) who have not previously received treatment
Key exclusion criteria (16 listed)
- Mental illness, disability, or social circumstances that may affect participant safety, ability to provide informed consent, or poor adherence
- Other types of lymphoma
- Previous immunotherapy or chemotherapy for PTCL, excluding those who used corticosteroids (≤8 days) prior to enrollment
- Previous radiotherapy for PTCL, excluding those confined to a single lymph node region
- Pathological immunohistochemistry showing CD30 positivity and/or ALK positivity
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Aclarubicin20mg/m^2/D, D1-4, QD, ivgtt | Drug | CAOP |
| Cyclophosphamide750 mg/m^2, D1, ivgtt | Drug | CAOP |
| Vincristine1.4 mg/m^2, D1 (maximum 2mg/d), IV | Drug | CAOP |
| Prednisone60 mg/m^2, D1-5 (maximum 100mg/d), Po | Drug | CAOP |
Primary outcome
Complete remission rate (CR)
Time frame: After a maximum of 6 cycles of CAOP regimen (each cycle is 28 days)
Proportion of enrolled subjects who achieved CR after receiving up to 6 cycles of the CAOP regimen
5 secondary outcomes
Progression Free Survival
Time frame: Maximum follow-up period is 2 years after the end of treatment.
Overall Survival
Time frame: maximum follow-up period is 2 years after the end of treatment.
Adverse Events
Time frame: From enrollment to 28 days after the end of treatment
Change in quality of life as measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) global health status score
Time frame: From enrollment to 28 days after the end of treatment
Cancer-related fatigue as measured by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue score
Time frame: From enrollment to 28 days after the end of treatment
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Apr 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma (PTCL NOS)
RecruitingPhase 1/2
AZD3470 as Monotherapy or in Combination With Anticancer Agent(s) in Participants With Haematologic Malignancies.
Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, Efficacy, and Drug Levels of BMS-986369 (Golcadomide) in Participants With Relapsed or Refractory T-cell Lymphomas in Japan (GOLSEEK-3)
Relapsed or Refractory T-cell Lymphomas
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Study of ONO-4685 in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory T Cell Lymphoma
Relapsed or Refractory T Cell Lymphoma
RecruitingPhase 3
Soquelitinib vs Standard of Care in Participants With Relapsed/Refractory Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma Not Otherwise Specified, Follicular Helper T-cell Lymphomas, or Systemic Anaplastic Large-cell Lymphoma
Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma, Not Otherwise Specified, Angioimmunoblastic T-cell Lymphoma
RecruitingPhase 3
Testing Whether High Dose Chemotherapy and Infusion of the Patients' Own Stem Cells Improves Survival in Patients With Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma Who Achieved a Complete Response at the End of the Initial Chemotherapy
Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma, ALK-Negative, Follicular Helper T-Cell Lymphoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Junmin Li principal investigator
Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Aclarubicin, Cyclophosphamide and Vincristine in people with Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma (PTCL NOS) and Nodal T-follicular Helper Cell Lymphoma, run by Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine at 2 sites in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 16 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Jiong Hu (86-13764313546, hj10709@rjh.com.cn), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Complete remission rate (CR) (time frame: After a maximum of 6 cycles of CAOP regimen (each cycle is 28 days)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Apr 2026.