MyelomaREMAKENCT07532473
REal World MAIA UK OutcomEs
An observational study of Myeloma, run by The Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
This study will describe the use of triplet therapy with daratumumab, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (DRd) in the treatment of for transplant ineligible (TIE) untreated myeloma outside of clinical trials and assess the associated clinical outcomes. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Myeloma
- How many people
- 300 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- Dec 2026to Jul 2028
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Sites participating in this study will be those who have prescribed DRd for newly diagnosed transplant ineligible patients since this triple combination was reimbursed for use in the UK healthcare system in 2023. Within the study, data will be collected from the medical records of adult patients aged ≥18 years with ND MM, who are ineligible for transplant and who have received at least one dose of DRd outside of clinical trials. To be eligible for inclusion in the study, the date of the first dose should be: * on or before 31 December 2024, between September 2023 to 31 December 2024 (first data cut) * on or before 31 December 2025, between September 2023 and 31 December 2025 (second data cut) Data will be analysed in Q1 2026 to assess treatment outcomes at 12 months (to 31 December 2025) and in Q1 2027 to assessment 12- and 24-months treatment outcomes.
Who may be able to join
- Age ≥18 years
- Diagnosis of NDMM
- Not eligible for autologous stem cell transplant at diagnosis
- Received frontline DRd treatment following NICE approval (post-September 2023)
- Minimum 3 months of follow-up data available
Who cannot join
- Participation in an interventional clinical trial for first-line therapy
- Insufficient treatment or follow-up data for analysis
- DRd used in relapsed/refractory setting rather than newly diagnosed disease
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Lorraine Jacques contact
United Kingdom1 site
The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust
Wolverhampton, WV10 0QP
Tanweer Ahmed, rwh-tr.ukchart@nhs.net
Lorraine Jacques, rwh-tr.sponsorshipofresearch@nhs.net
About this study
Official title: A Retrospective Study of Clinical Outcomes in Newly Diagnosed, Transplant Ineligible Multiple Myeloma Patients Treated With Daratumumab, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (DRd) Outside of Clinical Trials in the UK
This study will describe the use of triplet therapy with daratumumab, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (DRd) in the treatment of for transplant ineligible (TIE) untreated myeloma outside of clinical trials and assess the associated clinical outcomes.
Read the detailed description
Triplet therapy with daratumumab, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (DRd) for transplant ineligible (TIE) untreated myeloma patients (MAIA) was reported in 2019. NICE approved this in September 2023 and since this time DRd has become the standard of care regimen for TIE patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in the UK. Although there are reports of real world experience (RWE) of DRd efficacy in relapsed setting, there are no RWE reports of DRd efficacy and outcomes from the UK where it is used in the upfront setting and very limited data from Europe. Moreover, UK clinicians often adopt a pragmatic dose adjustment approach, particularly in the dosing of lenalidomide (escalation and de-escalation) with steroid tapering. As well as reducing short-term toxicities, this approach may lead to longer term benefits by reducing long-term steroid adverse effects such as steroid-induced diabetes, help ameliorate immune paresis and reduce infection risk.
However, there is very limited data on the efficacy and outcomes of this practice. In particular, there is no published RWE on the impact of pre-emptive dose modifications on tolerability and efficacy in frail patients, the cohort in which the highest treatment discontinuation rates were observed in the MAIA trial. It is also perceived that patients with comorbidities, which would have been excluded in MAIA cohort, are benefiting from this flexible approach in real world practice, especially people with chronic kidney disease and other comorbidities. A proportion of patients initially deemed fit for autologous stem cell transplantation (received D-VTD as induction) are also receiving DRd if they fail to receive a transplant. These patients were not represented in the MAIA study and the outcomes following de-escalation from D-VTD to DRd are unknown.
- Conditions
- Myeloma
- Medical subject headings
- Neoplasms, Plasma Cell
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Overall response rate (OOR) at 12 months
Proportion with partial response (PR) or better (per IMWG criteria).
Measured: 12 months
Real-world dosing strategy for DRd - starting doses of Daratumumab, Lenalidomide and dexamethasone in cycle 1 and relative dose intensity at 12 months
% of patients who have had a dose adjustment in any of the DRD treatment components within the first 12 months of treatment
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (7)
Progression -Free Survival (PFS) at 12 and 24 months
Time from first dose to documented disease progression or death (whichever first)
Median time to disease progression or death
Measured: 12 months and 24 months
Overall survival at 12 and 24 months
Time from first dose to death from any cause
Measured: 12 months and 24 months
Very good partial response (VGPR)
Per IMWG response definitions (CR = negative immunofixation in serum \& urine + <5% bone-marrow plasma cells; sCR adds normal free light-chain ratio and absence of clonal plasma cells).
Measured: 24 months
Occurrence of severe infections
% of patients who have had a grade 3 or 4 infection within 12 or 24 months of starting treatment
Measured: 12 months and 24 months from starting treatment
Treatment exposure /discontinuation (Treatment deliverability)
Median duration of treatment
% treatment discontinuation before 12 and 24 months
Measured: 12 months and 24 months
Dosing practice and outcome difference between academic and DGH trusts
Measured: 12 months and 24 months
Treatment setting
Proportion of patients receiving daratumumab in the community via an outreach service
Measured: 12 months and 24 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Apr 2026
- Study startDec 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completionJul 2028 (estimated)
- Study completionJul 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for MyelomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- The Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Collaborators
- Johnson & Johnson
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Hannah Giles, Principal investigator, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07532473
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2026HAE147
- Acronym
- REMAKE
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 7 Apr 2026
- Last updated
- 15 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Retrospective Study of Clinical Outcomes in Newly Diagnosed, Transplant Ineligible Multiple Myeloma Patients Treated With Daratumumab, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (DRd) Outside of Clinical Trials in the UK
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07532473
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- REMAKE / 2026HAE147
- Conditions
- Myeloma
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- The Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS TrustOther government
- Collaborators
- Johnson & Johnson
- Study start
- Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Jul 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jul 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 16 Apr 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will describe the use of triplet therapy with daratumumab, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (DRd) in the treatment of for transplant ineligible (TIE) untreated myeloma outside of clinical trials and assess the associated clinical outcomes.
Detailed description
Triplet therapy with daratumumab, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (DRd) for transplant ineligible (TIE) untreated myeloma patients (MAIA) was reported in 2019. NICE approved this in September 2023 and since this time DRd has become the standard of care regimen for TIE patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in the UK. Although there are reports of real world experience (RWE) of DRd efficacy in relapsed setting, there are no RWE reports of DRd efficacy and outcomes from the UK where it is used in the upfront setting and very limited data from Europe. Moreover, UK clinicians often adopt a pragmatic dose adjustment approach, particularly in the dosing of lenalidomide (escalation and de-escalation) with steroid tapering. As well as reducing short-term toxicities, this approach may lead to longer term benefits by reducing long-term steroid adverse effects such as steroid-induced diabetes, help ameliorate immune paresis and reduce infection risk.
However, there is very limited data on the efficacy and outcomes of this practice. In particular, there is no published RWE on the impact of pre-emptive dose modifications on tolerability and efficacy in frail patients, the cohort in which the highest treatment discontinuation rates were observed in the MAIA trial. It is also perceived that patients with comorbidities, which would have been excluded in MAIA cohort, are benefiting from this flexible approach in real world practice, especially people with chronic kidney disease and other comorbidities. A proportion of patients initially deemed fit for autologous stem cell transplantation (received D-VTD as induction) are also receiving DRd if they fail to receive a transplant. These patients were not represented in the MAIA study and the outcomes following de-escalation from D-VTD to DRd are unknown.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Sites participating in this study will be those who have prescribed DRd for newly diagnosed transplant ineligible patients since this triple combination was reimbursed for use in the UK healthcare system in 2023. Within the study, data will be collected from the medical records of adult patients aged ≥18 years with ND MM, who are ineligible for transplant and who have received at least one dose of DRd outside of clinical trials. To be eligible for inclusion in the study, the date of the first dose should be: * on or before 31 December 2024, between September 2023 to 31 December 2024 (first data cut) * on or before 31 December 2025, between September 2023 and 31 December 2025 (second data cut) Data will be analysed in Q1 2026 to assess treatment outcomes at 12 months (to 31 December 2025) and in Q1 2027 to assessment 12- and 24-months treatment outcomes.
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Age ≥18 years
- Diagnosis of NDMM
- Not eligible for autologous stem cell transplant at diagnosis
- Received frontline DRd treatment following NICE approval (post-September 2023)
- Minimum 3 months of follow-up data available
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Participation in an interventional clinical trial for first-line therapy
- Insufficient treatment or follow-up data for analysis
- DRd used in relapsed/refractory setting rather than newly diagnosed disease
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Overall response rate (OOR) at 12 months
Time frame: 12 months
Proportion with partial response (PR) or better (per IMWG criteria).
Real-world dosing strategy for DRd - starting doses of Daratumumab, Lenalidomide and dexamethasone in cycle 1 and relative dose intensity at 12 months
Time frame: 12 months
% of patients who have had a dose adjustment in any of the DRD treatment components within the first 12 months of treatment
7 secondary outcomes
Progression -Free Survival (PFS) at 12 and 24 months
Time frame: 12 months and 24 months
Overall survival at 12 and 24 months
Time frame: 12 months and 24 months
Very good partial response (VGPR)
Time frame: 24 months
Occurrence of severe infections
Time frame: 12 months and 24 months from starting treatment
Treatment exposure /discontinuation (Treatment deliverability)
Time frame: 12 months and 24 months
Dosing practice and outcome difference between academic and DGH trusts
Time frame: 12 months and 24 months
Treatment setting
Time frame: 12 months and 24 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Sep 2026.
Related trials for Myeloma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Phase 1b/2 Study of Sonrotoclax (BGB-11417) as Monotherapy and in Various Combinations With Dexamethasone Plus Carfilzomib, Dexamethasone Plus Daratumumab, and Dexamethasone Plus Pomalidomide in Multiple Myeloma
Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma
RecruitingPhase 1
Autologous T Cells Transduced With Retroviral Vectors Expressing TCRs for Participant-specific Neoantigens in Patients With Hematologic Malignancies
Malignancy, Hematologic, Neoplasms, Hematologic
RecruitingObservational study
Screening for AL Amyloidosis in Smoldering Multiple Myeloma
Smoldering Multiple Myeloma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide, Dexamethasone and Belantamab Mafodotin in Multiple Myeloma
Multiple Myeloma
RecruitingObservational study
Biospecimen Procurement for Center for Immuno-Oncology Immunotherapy Protocols
Multiple Myeloma, Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Lorraine Jacques contact
Hannah Giles principal investigator
University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Myeloma, run by The Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Tanweer Ahmed (01902 695065, rwh-tr.ukchart@nhs.net), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Overall response rate (OOR) at 12 months (time frame: 12 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Sep 2026.