AzTrials
AzTrials

MelorheostosisMELO-REHABNCT07521150

Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation in Melorheostosis: A Case Report

A study testing Assigned Interventions in people with Melorheostosis, run by Yeditepe University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of a structured physiotherapy and rehabilitation-based exercise program on clinical and functional parameters in a patient diagnosed with melorheostosis. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age, women only
Conditions the study is for
Melorheostosis
What is being tested?
Assigned Interventions
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
1 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
18 Apr 2026to 22 Sep 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosed with melorheostosis by a physician.
  • Voluntarily agreeing to participate in the study and providing written informed consent.
  • Being under physician follow-up for the disease.
  • Being 18 years of age or older.
  • Having the cognitive level, communication skills, and physical capacity to perform the planned exercise program.

Who cannot join

  • Presence of additional systemic, rheumatologic, or metabolic diseases that could affect bone metabolism, other than melorheostosis.
  • Presence of cardiovascular, pulmonary, or neurological disease at a level that may restrict exercising.
  • History of surgical intervention or severe trauma within the last six months.
  • Presence of psychiatric or cognitive disorders that could interfere with evaluation and exercise applications.
  • Failure to continue the 8-week exercise program.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Yeditepe University

    Istanbul, 34755

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: The Role of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation in a Patient Diagnosed With Melorheostosis: A Case Report

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of a structured physiotherapy and rehabilitation-based exercise program on clinical and functional parameters in a patient diagnosed with melorheostosis.

This study specifically aims to assess the effects of a structured physiotherapy and rehabilitation-based intervention program, including patient education and therapeutic exercise, on lower extremity functional parameters, muscle strength, balance, and quality of life in a patient with melorheostosis.

Read more

The main hypotheses:

H0: A structured physiotherapy and rehabilitation-based exercise program has no effect on improvement in clinical and functional evaluation parameters in a patient with melorheostosis.

H1: A structured physiotherapy and rehabilitation-based exercise program leads to improvement in clinical and functional evaluation parameters in a patient with melorheostosis.

Read the detailed description

Melorheostosis is a rare, chronic, and progressive sclerosing bone disorder characterized by cortical bone thickening, pain, joint stiffness, restricted mobility, and functional impairment. Due to its low prevalence, the available literature is limited, and conservative management strategies, particularly physiotherapy interventions, remain insufficiently defined.

A patient diagnosed with melorheostosis who meets the inclusion criteria and is followed by an orthopedic specialist will be included in this prospective single-case study to investigate the effectiveness of a structured physiotherapy and rehabilitation-based exercise program.

The patient, who is under regular physician supervision and willing to participate in the rehabilitation program, will be included in the study. The intervention approach will be based on a non-invasive, exercise-oriented physiotherapy program.

The rehabilitation program will consist of patient education, diaphragmatic breathing training, and a structured exercise program including strength, flexibility, and balance components. The patient will participate in a total of 24 physiotherapy sessions, three days per week, for eight weeks.

Before starting the treatment program, the patient's sociodemographic characteristics, medical history, and disease-related clinical features will be recorded using a structured evaluation form. A baseline clinical evaluation will be performed prior to the intervention.

Following the baseline assessment, the individualized physiotherapy program will be implemented. Exercise intensity and progression will be adjusted according to the patient's pain level and functional capacity throughout the intervention period.

Clinical and functional parameters will be evaluated before the treatment, immediately after the 8-week intervention, and at a 6-month follow-up to assess both short-term and long-term effects.

Throughout the study, the patient will continue routine medical treatment and remain under physician supervision, and no changes will be made to the existing medical management.

Conditions
Melorheostosis
Being tested
Assigned Interventions
Keywords
Physical Therapy, Rehabilitation, Sclerosing Bone Disease, Case Report, Exercise
Medical subject headings
Melorheostosis, Motor Activity

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Assigned InterventionsOther

    Patient will receive patient education in addition to a structured exercise program. The exercise program will include progressive strengthening, flexibility, and balance-based exercises. Patient education will be delivered by targeting topics that encompass all components of the ICF framework. In addition, diaphragmatic breathing will be taught to patients prior to the exercise program.

    The exercise program will be conducted three times per week for 8 weeks. Baseline assessments will be performed before the intervention, and post-intervention assessments will be repeated after completion of the program. Furthermore, evaluations will be conducted again during a 6-month follow-up period.

Study groups in NCT07521150
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Structured Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Program Group (SPTR-G)ExperimentalThe target population of the study consists of a 24-year-old female case diagnosed with melorheostosis by a relevant physician, who voluntarily meets the inclusion criteria. The study is designed as a single-case report and aims to evaluate the clinical and functional characteristics of the case. The participant is actively working as a physiotherapist in her professional life. Patient will receive patient education in addition to a structured exercise program. The exercise program will include progressive strengthening, flexibility, and balance-based exercises. Patient education will be delivered by targeting topics that encompass all components of the ICF framework. In addition, diaphragmatic breathing will be taught to patients prior to the exercise program.
Receives: Other: Assigned Interventions

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pain Assessment

    The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was used to evaluate pain intensity. The location and severity of the pain will be questioned. The individual's resting, activity, and nighttime pain levels were evaluated on a 10 cm horizontal line with the extremes of "0: no pain" and "10: unbearable pain". Higher values indicate severe pain. In this study, it is planned to be used to evaluate the pain intensity of the case.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Post-intervention (Week 8), and Follow-up (Month 6)

Secondary outcomes (12)
  1. SF-12 Quality of Life Scale

    The SF-12 is a self-reported questionnaire used to assess health-related quality of life. It evaluates both physical and mental health components, yielding two summary measures: the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS). Scores range from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate a better level of health and a higher quality of life.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 8, and Month 6.

  2. Passive Knee Extension (PKE) Test

    The PKE test is used to assess hamstring muscle flexibility. The participant is positioned supine, with the non-tested limb stabilized and the tested hip fixed at 90 degrees of flexion. As the knee is extended, the angle between the tibia and the vertical vector is measured using an inclinometer placed 15 cm distal to the tibial tuberosity. The measurement is recorded in degrees (°). A smaller angle relative to the vertical line indicates greater knee extension and better hamstring flexibility.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 8, and Month 6.

  3. Ankle Active Range of Motion

    Ankle AROM (dorsiflexion, plantarflexion, inversion, and eversion) is evaluated using a goniometer in standard anatomical positions. For dorsiflexion and plantarflexion, the participant is seated with knees slightly flexed; the axis of the goniometer is placed over the lateral malleolus, the stationary arm parallel to the fibular line, and the moving arm parallel to the lateral aspect of the 5th metatarsal. For inversion and eversion, the participant sits with legs hanging off the edge of the table; the axis is placed at the midpoint between the two malleoli, the stationary arm on the anterior surface of the tibia, and the moving arm parallel to the longitudinal axis of the 2nd metatarsal. All measurements are recorded in degrees (°), with higher values indicating a greater active range of motion.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 8, and Month 6.

  4. Quadriceps Flexibility / Ely's Test

    The Ely's test is used to assess the flexibility of the rectus femoris muscle. With the participant in a prone position and the pelvis stabilized, the examiner passively flexes the knee to its maximal limit just before compensatory pelvic flexion occurs. The maximum knee flexion angle is measured using a goniometer and recorded in degrees (°). A higher degree of knee flexion indicates greater quadriceps flexibility.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 8, and Month 6.

  5. Gastrocnemius-Soleus Muscle Flexibility Tests

    Flexibility of the calf muscles is assessed by measuring ankle dorsiflexion range of motion using a goniometer in standing positions. For the gastrocnemius, the participant stands facing a wall, keeps the tested knee fully extended, and shifts weight forward. For the soleus, the participant assumes a weight-bearing lunge position with the tested knee flexed, keeping both heels firmly on the floor. Measurements are recorded in degrees (°), with higher values representing greater muscle flexibility.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 8, and Month 6.

  6. Weight-Bearing Lunge Test - WBLT

    The WBLT evaluates closed kinetic chain ankle dorsiflexion under a loaded, functional condition. The participant performs a maximal forward lunge toward a wall, maintaining heel contact with the floor. The angle between the tibia and the vertical axis is measured using a digital inclinometer placed 15 cm distal to the tibial tuberosity. The measurement is recorded in degrees (°). Higher angle values indicate greater dorsiflexion mobility.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 8, and Month 6.

  7. Quadriceps Muscle Strength Measurement

    Quadriceps strength is evaluated using a digital handheld myometer (dynamometer). The participant is seated with legs hanging from the edge of the table, with both hip and knee positioned at 90 degrees of flexion. The myometer is placed on the anterior surface of the tibia, approximately 5 cm proximal to the lateral malleolus. The participant performs a maximal isometric knee extension for 5 seconds. The peak force is recorded. Higher values indicate greater quadriceps muscle strength.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 8, and Month 6.

  8. Hamstring Muscle Strength Measurement

    Hamstring strength is evaluated using a digital handheld myometer (dynamometer). The participant is in a prone position, and the tested knee is passively brought to an angle of 30° to 45° of flexion. The myometer is placed on the posterior surface of the tibia, just proximal to the heel (calcaneus). The peak force is recorded. Higher values indicate greater hamstring muscle strength.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 8, and Month 6.

  9. Hip External Rotator Muscle Strength Measurement

    Hip external rotator strength is evaluated using a digital handheld myometer. The participant is assessed in a side-lying position with the knees flexed at 90 degrees. The myometer is placed on the medial aspect of the leg, just proximal to the medial malleolus of the tested limb. The peak force is recorded. Higher values indicate greater hip external rotator muscle strength.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 8, and Month 6.

  10. Y-Balance Test

    The Y-Balance Test evaluates dynamic balance. The participant stands on one leg and reaches as far as possible with the contralateral leg in three directions: anterior, posteromedial, and posterolateral. To standardize the measurements, the reach distances are normalized to the participant's lower limb length, measured from the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) to the medial malleolus. Higher normalized composite scores indicate better dynamic balance and stability.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 8, and Month 6.

  11. Feiss Line Test

    The Feiss Line Test evaluates the height of the medial longitudinal arch and static foot posture. While the participant is seated (non-weight bearing) and then standing, the medial malleolus, navicular tubercle, and the center of the first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint are marked. An imaginary line (Feiss Line) is drawn between the medial malleolus and the first MTP joint. The position of the navicular tubercle relative to this line is examined to grade the arch height.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 8, and Month 6.

  12. Navicular Drop Test

    The Navicular Drop Test assesses excessive foot pronation and the dynamic stability of the medial longitudinal arch under load. With the participant seated (non-weight bearing) and the subtalar joint in a neutral position, the height of the navicular tubercle from the floor is measured in millimeters. The participant then stands with weight distributed evenly on both feet (weight-bearing position), and the measurement is repeated. The difference between the two measurements is recorded as the navicular drop (in mm). A higher drop value indicates greater dynamic foot pronation and reduced arch stability.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 8, and Month 6.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Apr 2026
  2. Study start18 Apr 2026
  3. Primary completion19 May 2026
  4. Study completion22 Sep 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
1 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07521150
Sponsor's protocol ID
yeditepe01
Acronym
MELO-REHAB
Status last verified
Jun 2026
First submitted
16 Mar 2026
Last updated
26 Jun 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared to protect the privacy of the single participant involved in this case report.

Publications

  • Shultz SJ, Nguyen AD, Windley TC, Kulas AS, Botic TL, Beynnon BD. Intratester and intertester reliability of clinical measures of lower extremity anatomic characteristics: implications for multicenter studies. Clin J Sport Med. 2006 Mar;16(2):155-61. doi: 10.1097/00042752-200603000-00012.

    PubMed 16603886
  • Sporndly-Nees S, Dasberg B, Nielsen RO, Boesen MI, Langberg H. The navicular position test - a reliable measure of the navicular bone position during rest and loading. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2011 Sep;6(3):199-205.

    PubMed 21904698
  • Westrick RB, Miller JM, Carow SD, Gerber JP. Exploration of the y-balance test for assessment of upper quarter closed kinetic chain performance. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Apr;7(2):139-47.

    PubMed 22530188
  • Kawaguchi K, Taketomi S, Mizutani Y, Inui H, Yamagami R, Kono K, Takagi K, Kage T, Sameshima S, Tanaka S, Haga N. Hip Abductor Muscle Strength Deficit as a Risk Factor for Inversion Ankle Sprain in Male College Soccer Players: A Prospective Cohort Study. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Jul 26;9(7):23259671211020287. doi: 10.1177/23259671211020287. eCollection 2021 Jul.

    PubMed 34377718
  • Cornwall MW, McPoil TG. Relationship between static foot posture and foot mobility. J Foot Ankle Res. 2011 Jan 18;4:4. doi: 10.1186/1757-1146-4-4.

    PubMed 21244705
  • Bennell KL, Talbot RC, Wajswelner H, Techovanich W, Kelly DH, Hall AJ. Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of a weight-bearing lunge measure of ankle dorsiflexion. Aust J Physiother. 1998;44(3):175-180. doi: 10.1016/s0004-9514(14)60377-9.

    PubMed 11676731
  • Dennis RJ, Finch CF, Elliott BC, Farhart PJ. The reliability of musculoskeletal screening tests used in cricket. Phys Ther Sport. 2008 Feb;9(1):25-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2007.09.004. Epub 2007 Nov 8.

    PubMed 19083701
  • Stott S. The Duncan-Ely test: time for standardization. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2015 Oct;57(10):895-6. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.12794. Epub 2015 May 6. No abstract available.

    PubMed 25952692
  • Olivencia O, Godinez GM, Dages J, Duda C, Kaplan K, Kolber MJ, Kaplan, Kolber. THE RELIABILITY AND MINIMAL DETECTABLE CHANGE OF THE ELY AND ACTIVE KNEE EXTENSION TESTS. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2020 Oct;15(5):776-782. doi: 10.26603/ijspt20200776.

    PubMed 33110697
  • Ball P, Johnson GR. Technique for the measurement of hindfoot inversion and eversion and its use to study a normal population. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 1996 Apr;11(3):165-169. doi: 10.1016/0268-0033(95)00059-3.

    PubMed 11415615
  • Konor MM, Morton S, Eckerson JM, Grindstaff TL. Reliability of three measures of ankle dorsiflexion range of motion. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Jun;7(3):279-87.

    PubMed 22666642
  • Reurink G, Goudswaard GJ, Oomen HG, Moen MH, Tol JL, Verhaar JA, Weir A. Reliability of the active and passive knee extension test in acute hamstring injuries. Am J Sports Med. 2013 Aug;41(8):1757-61. doi: 10.1177/0363546513490650. Epub 2013 Jun 4.

    PubMed 23735425
  • Liu H, Shen Y, Xiong Y, Zhou H, Mao Y, Shen Q, Hong W, Liu M, Liu Y, Qiu L, Zhang Z, Jia Y. Psychometric Properties of Four Common Clinical Tests for Assessing Hamstring Flexibility in Young Adults. Front Physiol. 2022 Jun 15;13:911240. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.911240. eCollection 2022.

    PubMed 35784887
  • Carlsson AM. Assessment of chronic pain. I. Aspects of the reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale. Pain. 1983 May;16(1):87-101. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(83)90088-X.

    PubMed 6602967
  • Shah CH, Brown JD. Reliability and Validity of the Short-Form 12 Item Version 2 (SF-12v2) Health-Related Quality of Life Survey and Disutilities Associated with Relevant Conditions in the U.S. Older Adult Population. J Clin Med. 2020 Feb 29;9(3):661. doi: 10.3390/jcm9030661.

    PubMed 32121371

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Assigned Interventions in people with Melorheostosis, run by Yeditepe University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pain Assessment (time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Post-intervention (Week 8), and Follow-up (Month 6)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07521150, which also lists 31 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jun 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in