MelorheostosisMELO-REHABNCT07521150
Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation in Melorheostosis: A Case Report
A study testing Assigned Interventions in people with Melorheostosis, run by Yeditepe University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of a structured physiotherapy and rehabilitation-based exercise program on clinical and functional parameters in a patient diagnosed with melorheostosis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Melorheostosis
- What is being tested?
- Assigned Interventions
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 18 Apr 2026to 22 Sep 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosed with melorheostosis by a physician.
- Voluntarily agreeing to participate in the study and providing written informed consent.
- Being under physician follow-up for the disease.
- Being 18 years of age or older.
- Having the cognitive level, communication skills, and physical capacity to perform the planned exercise program.
Who cannot join
- Presence of additional systemic, rheumatologic, or metabolic diseases that could affect bone metabolism, other than melorheostosis.
- Presence of cardiovascular, pulmonary, or neurological disease at a level that may restrict exercising.
- History of surgical intervention or severe trauma within the last six months.
- Presence of psychiatric or cognitive disorders that could interfere with evaluation and exercise applications.
- Failure to continue the 8-week exercise program.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: The Role of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation in a Patient Diagnosed With Melorheostosis: A Case Report
The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of a structured physiotherapy and rehabilitation-based exercise program on clinical and functional parameters in a patient diagnosed with melorheostosis.
This study specifically aims to assess the effects of a structured physiotherapy and rehabilitation-based intervention program, including patient education and therapeutic exercise, on lower extremity functional parameters, muscle strength, balance, and quality of life in a patient with melorheostosis.
Read more
The main hypotheses:
H0: A structured physiotherapy and rehabilitation-based exercise program has no effect on improvement in clinical and functional evaluation parameters in a patient with melorheostosis.
H1: A structured physiotherapy and rehabilitation-based exercise program leads to improvement in clinical and functional evaluation parameters in a patient with melorheostosis.
Read the detailed description
Melorheostosis is a rare, chronic, and progressive sclerosing bone disorder characterized by cortical bone thickening, pain, joint stiffness, restricted mobility, and functional impairment. Due to its low prevalence, the available literature is limited, and conservative management strategies, particularly physiotherapy interventions, remain insufficiently defined.
A patient diagnosed with melorheostosis who meets the inclusion criteria and is followed by an orthopedic specialist will be included in this prospective single-case study to investigate the effectiveness of a structured physiotherapy and rehabilitation-based exercise program.
The patient, who is under regular physician supervision and willing to participate in the rehabilitation program, will be included in the study. The intervention approach will be based on a non-invasive, exercise-oriented physiotherapy program.
The rehabilitation program will consist of patient education, diaphragmatic breathing training, and a structured exercise program including strength, flexibility, and balance components. The patient will participate in a total of 24 physiotherapy sessions, three days per week, for eight weeks.
Before starting the treatment program, the patient's sociodemographic characteristics, medical history, and disease-related clinical features will be recorded using a structured evaluation form. A baseline clinical evaluation will be performed prior to the intervention.
Following the baseline assessment, the individualized physiotherapy program will be implemented. Exercise intensity and progression will be adjusted according to the patient's pain level and functional capacity throughout the intervention period.
Clinical and functional parameters will be evaluated before the treatment, immediately after the 8-week intervention, and at a 6-month follow-up to assess both short-term and long-term effects.
Throughout the study, the patient will continue routine medical treatment and remain under physician supervision, and no changes will be made to the existing medical management.
- Conditions
- Melorheostosis
- Being tested
- Assigned Interventions
- Keywords
- Physical Therapy, Rehabilitation, Sclerosing Bone Disease, Case Report, Exercise
- Medical subject headings
- Melorheostosis, Motor Activity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Assigned InterventionsOther
Patient will receive patient education in addition to a structured exercise program. The exercise program will include progressive strengthening, flexibility, and balance-based exercises. Patient education will be delivered by targeting topics that encompass all components of the ICF framework. In addition, diaphragmatic breathing will be taught to patients prior to the exercise program.
The exercise program will be conducted three times per week for 8 weeks. Baseline assessments will be performed before the intervention, and post-intervention assessments will be repeated after completion of the program. Furthermore, evaluations will be conducted again during a 6-month follow-up period.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Structured Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Program Group (SPTR-G) | Experimental | The target population of the study consists of a 24-year-old female case diagnosed with melorheostosis by a relevant physician, who voluntarily meets the inclusion criteria. The study is designed as a single-case report and aims to evaluate the clinical and functional characteristics of the case. The participant is actively working as a physiotherapist in her professional life. Patient will receive patient education in addition to a structured exercise program. The exercise program will include progressive strengthening, flexibility, and balance-based exercises. Patient education will be delivered by targeting topics that encompass all components of the ICF framework. In addition, diaphragmatic breathing will be taught to patients prior to the exercise program. Receives: Other: Assigned Interventions |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pain Assessment
The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was used to evaluate pain intensity. The location and severity of the pain will be questioned. The individual's resting, activity, and nighttime pain levels were evaluated on a 10 cm horizontal line with the extremes of "0: no pain" and "10: unbearable pain". Higher values indicate severe pain. In this study, it is planned to be used to evaluate the pain intensity of the case.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Post-intervention (Week 8), and Follow-up (Month 6)
Secondary outcomes (12)
SF-12 Quality of Life Scale
The SF-12 is a self-reported questionnaire used to assess health-related quality of life. It evaluates both physical and mental health components, yielding two summary measures: the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS). Scores range from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate a better level of health and a higher quality of life.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 8, and Month 6.
Passive Knee Extension (PKE) Test
The PKE test is used to assess hamstring muscle flexibility. The participant is positioned supine, with the non-tested limb stabilized and the tested hip fixed at 90 degrees of flexion. As the knee is extended, the angle between the tibia and the vertical vector is measured using an inclinometer placed 15 cm distal to the tibial tuberosity. The measurement is recorded in degrees (°). A smaller angle relative to the vertical line indicates greater knee extension and better hamstring flexibility.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 8, and Month 6.
Ankle Active Range of Motion
Ankle AROM (dorsiflexion, plantarflexion, inversion, and eversion) is evaluated using a goniometer in standard anatomical positions. For dorsiflexion and plantarflexion, the participant is seated with knees slightly flexed; the axis of the goniometer is placed over the lateral malleolus, the stationary arm parallel to the fibular line, and the moving arm parallel to the lateral aspect of the 5th metatarsal. For inversion and eversion, the participant sits with legs hanging off the edge of the table; the axis is placed at the midpoint between the two malleoli, the stationary arm on the anterior surface of the tibia, and the moving arm parallel to the longitudinal axis of the 2nd metatarsal. All measurements are recorded in degrees (°), with higher values indicating a greater active range of motion.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 8, and Month 6.
Quadriceps Flexibility / Ely's Test
The Ely's test is used to assess the flexibility of the rectus femoris muscle. With the participant in a prone position and the pelvis stabilized, the examiner passively flexes the knee to its maximal limit just before compensatory pelvic flexion occurs. The maximum knee flexion angle is measured using a goniometer and recorded in degrees (°). A higher degree of knee flexion indicates greater quadriceps flexibility.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 8, and Month 6.
Gastrocnemius-Soleus Muscle Flexibility Tests
Flexibility of the calf muscles is assessed by measuring ankle dorsiflexion range of motion using a goniometer in standing positions. For the gastrocnemius, the participant stands facing a wall, keeps the tested knee fully extended, and shifts weight forward. For the soleus, the participant assumes a weight-bearing lunge position with the tested knee flexed, keeping both heels firmly on the floor. Measurements are recorded in degrees (°), with higher values representing greater muscle flexibility.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 8, and Month 6.
Weight-Bearing Lunge Test - WBLT
The WBLT evaluates closed kinetic chain ankle dorsiflexion under a loaded, functional condition. The participant performs a maximal forward lunge toward a wall, maintaining heel contact with the floor. The angle between the tibia and the vertical axis is measured using a digital inclinometer placed 15 cm distal to the tibial tuberosity. The measurement is recorded in degrees (°). Higher angle values indicate greater dorsiflexion mobility.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 8, and Month 6.
Quadriceps Muscle Strength Measurement
Quadriceps strength is evaluated using a digital handheld myometer (dynamometer). The participant is seated with legs hanging from the edge of the table, with both hip and knee positioned at 90 degrees of flexion. The myometer is placed on the anterior surface of the tibia, approximately 5 cm proximal to the lateral malleolus. The participant performs a maximal isometric knee extension for 5 seconds. The peak force is recorded. Higher values indicate greater quadriceps muscle strength.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 8, and Month 6.
Hamstring Muscle Strength Measurement
Hamstring strength is evaluated using a digital handheld myometer (dynamometer). The participant is in a prone position, and the tested knee is passively brought to an angle of 30° to 45° of flexion. The myometer is placed on the posterior surface of the tibia, just proximal to the heel (calcaneus). The peak force is recorded. Higher values indicate greater hamstring muscle strength.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 8, and Month 6.
Hip External Rotator Muscle Strength Measurement
Hip external rotator strength is evaluated using a digital handheld myometer. The participant is assessed in a side-lying position with the knees flexed at 90 degrees. The myometer is placed on the medial aspect of the leg, just proximal to the medial malleolus of the tested limb. The peak force is recorded. Higher values indicate greater hip external rotator muscle strength.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 8, and Month 6.
Y-Balance Test
The Y-Balance Test evaluates dynamic balance. The participant stands on one leg and reaches as far as possible with the contralateral leg in three directions: anterior, posteromedial, and posterolateral. To standardize the measurements, the reach distances are normalized to the participant's lower limb length, measured from the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) to the medial malleolus. Higher normalized composite scores indicate better dynamic balance and stability.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 8, and Month 6.
Feiss Line Test
The Feiss Line Test evaluates the height of the medial longitudinal arch and static foot posture. While the participant is seated (non-weight bearing) and then standing, the medial malleolus, navicular tubercle, and the center of the first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint are marked. An imaginary line (Feiss Line) is drawn between the medial malleolus and the first MTP joint. The position of the navicular tubercle relative to this line is examined to grade the arch height.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 8, and Month 6.
Navicular Drop Test
The Navicular Drop Test assesses excessive foot pronation and the dynamic stability of the medial longitudinal arch under load. With the participant seated (non-weight bearing) and the subtalar joint in a neutral position, the height of the navicular tubercle from the floor is measured in millimeters. The participant then stands with weight distributed evenly on both feet (weight-bearing position), and the measurement is repeated. The difference between the two measurements is recorded as the navicular drop (in mm). A higher drop value indicates greater dynamic foot pronation and reduced arch stability.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 8, and Month 6.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Apr 2026
- Study start18 Apr 2026
- Primary completion19 May 2026
- Study completion22 Sep 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (31)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for MelorheostosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 1 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Yeditepe University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Aslı Yeral, Asst. Prof. Dr., Study chair, Yeditepe University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07521150
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- yeditepe01
- Acronym
- MELO-REHAB
- Status last verified
- Jun 2026
- First submitted
- 16 Mar 2026
- Last updated
- 26 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared to protect the privacy of the single participant involved in this case report.
Publications
Shultz SJ, Nguyen AD, Windley TC, Kulas AS, Botic TL, Beynnon BD. Intratester and intertester reliability of clinical measures of lower extremity anatomic characteristics: implications for multicenter studies. Clin J Sport Med. 2006 Mar;16(2):155-61. doi: 10.1097/00042752-200603000-00012.
PubMed 16603886Sporndly-Nees S, Dasberg B, Nielsen RO, Boesen MI, Langberg H. The navicular position test - a reliable measure of the navicular bone position during rest and loading. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2011 Sep;6(3):199-205.
PubMed 21904698Westrick RB, Miller JM, Carow SD, Gerber JP. Exploration of the y-balance test for assessment of upper quarter closed kinetic chain performance. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Apr;7(2):139-47.
PubMed 22530188Kawaguchi K, Taketomi S, Mizutani Y, Inui H, Yamagami R, Kono K, Takagi K, Kage T, Sameshima S, Tanaka S, Haga N. Hip Abductor Muscle Strength Deficit as a Risk Factor for Inversion Ankle Sprain in Male College Soccer Players: A Prospective Cohort Study. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Jul 26;9(7):23259671211020287. doi: 10.1177/23259671211020287. eCollection 2021 Jul.
PubMed 34377718Cornwall MW, McPoil TG. Relationship between static foot posture and foot mobility. J Foot Ankle Res. 2011 Jan 18;4:4. doi: 10.1186/1757-1146-4-4.
PubMed 21244705Bennell KL, Talbot RC, Wajswelner H, Techovanich W, Kelly DH, Hall AJ. Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of a weight-bearing lunge measure of ankle dorsiflexion. Aust J Physiother. 1998;44(3):175-180. doi: 10.1016/s0004-9514(14)60377-9.
PubMed 11676731Dennis RJ, Finch CF, Elliott BC, Farhart PJ. The reliability of musculoskeletal screening tests used in cricket. Phys Ther Sport. 2008 Feb;9(1):25-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2007.09.004. Epub 2007 Nov 8.
PubMed 19083701Stott S. The Duncan-Ely test: time for standardization. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2015 Oct;57(10):895-6. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.12794. Epub 2015 May 6. No abstract available.
PubMed 25952692Olivencia O, Godinez GM, Dages J, Duda C, Kaplan K, Kolber MJ, Kaplan, Kolber. THE RELIABILITY AND MINIMAL DETECTABLE CHANGE OF THE ELY AND ACTIVE KNEE EXTENSION TESTS. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2020 Oct;15(5):776-782. doi: 10.26603/ijspt20200776.
PubMed 33110697Ball P, Johnson GR. Technique for the measurement of hindfoot inversion and eversion and its use to study a normal population. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 1996 Apr;11(3):165-169. doi: 10.1016/0268-0033(95)00059-3.
PubMed 11415615Konor MM, Morton S, Eckerson JM, Grindstaff TL. Reliability of three measures of ankle dorsiflexion range of motion. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Jun;7(3):279-87.
PubMed 22666642Reurink G, Goudswaard GJ, Oomen HG, Moen MH, Tol JL, Verhaar JA, Weir A. Reliability of the active and passive knee extension test in acute hamstring injuries. Am J Sports Med. 2013 Aug;41(8):1757-61. doi: 10.1177/0363546513490650. Epub 2013 Jun 4.
PubMed 23735425Liu H, Shen Y, Xiong Y, Zhou H, Mao Y, Shen Q, Hong W, Liu M, Liu Y, Qiu L, Zhang Z, Jia Y. Psychometric Properties of Four Common Clinical Tests for Assessing Hamstring Flexibility in Young Adults. Front Physiol. 2022 Jun 15;13:911240. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.911240. eCollection 2022.
PubMed 35784887Carlsson AM. Assessment of chronic pain. I. Aspects of the reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale. Pain. 1983 May;16(1):87-101. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(83)90088-X.
PubMed 6602967Shah CH, Brown JD. Reliability and Validity of the Short-Form 12 Item Version 2 (SF-12v2) Health-Related Quality of Life Survey and Disutilities Associated with Relevant Conditions in the U.S. Older Adult Population. J Clin Med. 2020 Feb 29;9(3):661. doi: 10.3390/jcm9030661.
PubMed 32121371
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Role of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation in a Patient Diagnosed With Melorheostosis: A Case Report
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07521150
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MELO-REHAB / yeditepe01
- Conditions
- Melorheostosis
- Keywords
- Physical Therapy, Rehabilitation, Sclerosing Bone Disease, Case Report, Exercise
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 1 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Yeditepe UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 18 Apr 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 19 May 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 22 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 9 Apr 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of a structured physiotherapy and rehabilitation-based exercise program on clinical and functional parameters in a patient diagnosed with melorheostosis.
This study specifically aims to assess the effects of a structured physiotherapy and rehabilitation-based intervention program, including patient education and therapeutic exercise, on lower extremity functional parameters, muscle strength, balance, and quality of life in a patient with melorheostosis.
The main hypotheses:
H0: A structured physiotherapy and rehabilitation-based exercise program has no effect on improvement in clinical and functional evaluation parameters in a patient with melorheostosis.
H1: A structured physiotherapy and rehabilitation-based exercise program leads to improvement in clinical and functional evaluation parameters in a patient with melorheostosis.
Detailed description
Melorheostosis is a rare, chronic, and progressive sclerosing bone disorder characterized by cortical bone thickening, pain, joint stiffness, restricted mobility, and functional impairment. Due to its low prevalence, the available literature is limited, and conservative management strategies, particularly physiotherapy interventions, remain insufficiently defined.
A patient diagnosed with melorheostosis who meets the inclusion criteria and is followed by an orthopedic specialist will be included in this prospective single-case study to investigate the effectiveness of a structured physiotherapy and rehabilitation-based exercise program.
The patient, who is under regular physician supervision and willing to participate in the rehabilitation program, will be included in the study. The intervention approach will be based on a non-invasive, exercise-oriented physiotherapy program.
The rehabilitation program will consist of patient education, diaphragmatic breathing training, and a structured exercise program including strength, flexibility, and balance components. The patient will participate in a total of 24 physiotherapy sessions, three days per week, for eight weeks.
Before starting the treatment program, the patient's sociodemographic characteristics, medical history, and disease-related clinical features will be recorded using a structured evaluation form. A baseline clinical evaluation will be performed prior to the intervention.
Following the baseline assessment, the individualized physiotherapy program will be implemented. Exercise intensity and progression will be adjusted according to the patient's pain level and functional capacity throughout the intervention period.
Clinical and functional parameters will be evaluated before the treatment, immediately after the 8-week intervention, and at a 6-month follow-up to assess both short-term and long-term effects.
Throughout the study, the patient will continue routine medical treatment and remain under physician supervision, and no changes will be made to the existing medical management.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Structured Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Program Group (SPTR-G) | Experimental | Other: Assigned InterventionsThe target population of the study consists of a 24-year-old female case diagnosed with melorheostosis by a relevant physician, who voluntarily meets the inclusion criteria. The study is designed as a single-case report and aims to evaluate the clinical and functional characteristics of the case. The participant is actively working as a physiotherapist in her professional life. Patient will receive patient education in addition to a structured exercise program. The exercise program will include progressive strengthening, flexibility, and balance-based exercises. Patient education will be delivered by targeting topics that encompass all components of the ICF framework. In addition, diaphragmatic breathing will be taught to patients prior to the exercise program. |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Diagnosed with melorheostosis by a physician.
- Voluntarily agreeing to participate in the study and providing written informed consent.
- Being under physician follow-up for the disease.
- Being 18 years of age or older.
- Having the cognitive level, communication skills, and physical capacity to perform the planned exercise program.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Presence of additional systemic, rheumatologic, or metabolic diseases that could affect bone metabolism, other than melorheostosis.
- Presence of cardiovascular, pulmonary, or neurological disease at a level that may restrict exercising.
- History of surgical intervention or severe trauma within the last six months.
- Presence of psychiatric or cognitive disorders that could interfere with evaluation and exercise applications.
- Failure to continue the 8-week exercise program.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Assigned InterventionsPatient will receive patient education in addition to a structured exercise program. The exercise program will include progressive strengthening, flexibility, and balance-based exercises. Patient education will be delivered by targeting topics that encompass all components of the ICF framework. In addition, diaphragmatic breathing will be taught to patients prior to the exercise program. The exercise program will be conducted three times per week for 8 weeks. Baseline assessments will be performed before the intervention, and post-intervention assessments will be repeated after completion of the program. Furthermore, evaluations will be conducted again during a 6-month follow-up period. | Other | Structured Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Program Group (SPTR-G) |
Primary outcome
Pain Assessment
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Post-intervention (Week 8), and Follow-up (Month 6)
The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was used to evaluate pain intensity. The location and severity of the pain will be questioned. The individual's resting, activity, and nighttime pain levels were evaluated on a 10 cm horizontal line with the extremes of "0: no pain" and "10: unbearable pain". Higher values indicate severe pain. In this study, it is planned to be used to evaluate the pain intensity of the case.
12 secondary outcomes
SF-12 Quality of Life Scale
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 8, and Month 6.
Passive Knee Extension (PKE) Test
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 8, and Month 6.
Ankle Active Range of Motion
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 8, and Month 6.
Quadriceps Flexibility / Ely's Test
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 8, and Month 6.
Gastrocnemius-Soleus Muscle Flexibility Tests
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 8, and Month 6.
Weight-Bearing Lunge Test - WBLT
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 8, and Month 6.
Quadriceps Muscle Strength Measurement
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 8, and Month 6.
Hamstring Muscle Strength Measurement
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 8, and Month 6.
Hip External Rotator Muscle Strength Measurement
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 8, and Month 6.
Y-Balance Test
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 8, and Month 6.
Feiss Line Test
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 8, and Month 6.
Navicular Drop Test
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 8, and Month 6.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Jun 2026.
- Results publication: PubMed 16603886Shultz SJ, Nguyen AD, Windley TC, Kulas AS, Botic TL, Beynnon BD. Intratester and intertester reliability of clinical measures of lower extremity anatomic characteristics: implications for multicenter studies. Clin J Sport Med. 2006 Mar;16(2):155-61. doi: 10.1097/00042752-200603000-00012.
- Results publication: PubMed 21904698Sporndly-Nees S, Dasberg B, Nielsen RO, Boesen MI, Langberg H. The navicular position test - a reliable measure of the navicular bone position during rest and loading. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2011 Sep;6(3):199-205.
- Results publication: PubMed 22530188Westrick RB, Miller JM, Carow SD, Gerber JP. Exploration of the y-balance test for assessment of upper quarter closed kinetic chain performance. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Apr;7(2):139-47.
- Results publication: PubMed 34377718Kawaguchi K, Taketomi S, Mizutani Y, Inui H, Yamagami R, Kono K, Takagi K, Kage T, Sameshima S, Tanaka S, Haga N. Hip Abductor Muscle Strength Deficit as a Risk Factor for Inversion Ankle Sprain in Male College Soccer Players: A Prospective Cohort Study. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Jul 26;9(7):23259671211020287. doi: 10.1177/23259671211020287. eCollection 2021 Jul.
- Results publication: PubMed 21244705Cornwall MW, McPoil TG. Relationship between static foot posture and foot mobility. J Foot Ankle Res. 2011 Jan 18;4:4. doi: 10.1186/1757-1146-4-4.
- Results publication: PubMed 11676731Bennell KL, Talbot RC, Wajswelner H, Techovanich W, Kelly DH, Hall AJ. Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of a weight-bearing lunge measure of ankle dorsiflexion. Aust J Physiother. 1998;44(3):175-180. doi: 10.1016/s0004-9514(14)60377-9.
- Results publication: PubMed 19083701Dennis RJ, Finch CF, Elliott BC, Farhart PJ. The reliability of musculoskeletal screening tests used in cricket. Phys Ther Sport. 2008 Feb;9(1):25-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2007.09.004. Epub 2007 Nov 8.
- Results publication: PubMed 25952692Stott S. The Duncan-Ely test: time for standardization. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2015 Oct;57(10):895-6. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.12794. Epub 2015 May 6. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 33110697Olivencia O, Godinez GM, Dages J, Duda C, Kaplan K, Kolber MJ, Kaplan, Kolber. THE RELIABILITY AND MINIMAL DETECTABLE CHANGE OF THE ELY AND ACTIVE KNEE EXTENSION TESTS. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2020 Oct;15(5):776-782. doi: 10.26603/ijspt20200776.
- Results publication: PubMed 11415615Ball P, Johnson GR. Technique for the measurement of hindfoot inversion and eversion and its use to study a normal population. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 1996 Apr;11(3):165-169. doi: 10.1016/0268-0033(95)00059-3.
- Results publication: PubMed 22666642Konor MM, Morton S, Eckerson JM, Grindstaff TL. Reliability of three measures of ankle dorsiflexion range of motion. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Jun;7(3):279-87.
- Results publication: PubMed 23735425Reurink G, Goudswaard GJ, Oomen HG, Moen MH, Tol JL, Verhaar JA, Weir A. Reliability of the active and passive knee extension test in acute hamstring injuries. Am J Sports Med. 2013 Aug;41(8):1757-61. doi: 10.1177/0363546513490650. Epub 2013 Jun 4.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared to protect the privacy of the single participant involved in this case report.
Related trials for Melorheostosis
RecruitingObservational study
Natural History, Pathogenesis and Outcome of Melorheostosis A Rare Osteosclerotic Disease
Rheumatic Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Aslı Yeral, Asst. Prof. Dr. study chair
Yeditepe University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Assigned Interventions in people with Melorheostosis, run by Yeditepe University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pain Assessment (time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Post-intervention (Week 8), and Follow-up (Month 6)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07521150, which also lists 31 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jun 2026.