EEGNCT07518745
TMS for iEEG Monitoring Recordings
A study testing Single Pulse TMS in people with EEG and TMS, run by University of Pennsylvania at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The current study presents a unique opportunity to measure the direct effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) by using intracranial electrodes to record neural activity in deep brain regions when TMS single pulses are delivered. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 to 75 years
- What is being tested?
- Single Pulse TMS
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 10 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 11 Nov 2025to 11 Nov 2029
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients who received (or are scheduled to receive) intracranial electrode implantation surgery as part of standard clinical care or as participation in an ongoing research study for the treatment of neurological and/or psychiatric conditions at Pennsylvania Hospital
- Adult patients, 21 to 75 years of age
- Patients considered to be in a stable medical condition, in the opinion of the PI
- Patients who are able to demonstrate comprehension of instructions in the English language, in the opinion of the PI
- Patients who are able to provide informed consent and fully comply with all study requirements, in the opinion of the PI
Who cannot join
- Patients with chronic alcohol abuse history
- Patients who are unable to have an MRI scan
- Patients who are unable to tolerate TMS
- Patients with additional implanted devices, such as an aneurysm clip or a cardiac pacemaker, that would increase the TMS risk profile
- Patients who are pregnant at the time of screening or patients who get pregnant during the course of the study
- Patients with any past or present medical condition, disease, disorder, or injury that, in the opinion of the PI, may reduce or hinder the participant's ability to fully comply with all study requirements or may impact, compromise, or affect the integrity of the data or the results of the study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States1 site
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107
About this study
Official title: Mapping Transcrnial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) Responses Within the Brain Using Intracranial Electrophysiological Monitoring Recordings
The current study presents a unique opportunity to measure the direct effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) by using intracranial electrodes to record neural activity in deep brain regions when TMS single pulses are delivered. If TMS can evoke downstream responses in neural networks of the human brain, it can be a feasible way to study circuit engagement and connectivity.
- Being tested
- Single Pulse TMS
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Single Pulse TMSDevice
single pulse TMS will be administered when participants have intracranial electrodes implanted to measure neuronal activity.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| TMS | Experimental | The study visit consists of a TMS single-pulse session when intracranial electrodes are implanted to record neural activity during the TMS session. Receives: Device: Single Pulse TMS |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Primary Endpoint #1 Brain Activity and Connectivity
Observation of effects in brain activity and connectivity within and across regions of interest before and after TMS, as measured by intracranial EEG. The evoked response magnitude from the EEG at all features of the time-frequency analysis are used.
Measured: From enrollment to the end of study participation at 5 weeks
Primary Endpoint #2: Safety Feasibility
Safety, as defined by the number of adverse events (AE)
Measured: From enrollment to end of study participation at 5 weeks.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Apr 2026
- Study start11 Nov 2025
- Primary completion11 Oct 2029 (estimated)
- Study completion11 Nov 2029 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (15)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for EEGStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of PennsylvaniaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- Adult Patients undergoing intracranial electrophysiological monitoring in an inpatient setting are invited to participate in a TMS session while implanted with electrodes.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Pennsylvania
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Katherine Scangos, University of Pennsylvania
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07518745
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 857667
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 1 Apr 2026
- Last updated
- 1 May 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Deng ZD, Lisanby SH, Peterchev AV. Electric field depth-focality tradeoff in transcranial magnetic stimulation: simulation comparison of 50 coil designs. Brain Stimul. 2013 Jan;6(1):1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2012.02.005. Epub 2012 Mar 21.
PubMed 22483681Trapp NT, Tsang EW, Bruss J, Russo S, Gander PE, Berger JI, Nourski KV, Rosanova M, Keller CJ, Oya H, Howard MA 3rd, Boes AD. TMS-associated auditory evoked potentials can be effectively masked: Evidence from intracranial EEG. Brain Stimul. 2024 May-Jun;17(3):616-618. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2024.05.002. Epub 2024 May 8. No abstract available.
PubMed 38729299Solomon EA, Wang JB, Oya H, Howard MA, Trapp NT, Uitermarkt BD, Boes AD, Keller CJ. TMS provokes target-dependent intracranial rhythms across human cortical and subcortical sites. bioRxiv [Preprint]. 2023 Nov 19:2023.08.09.552524. doi: 10.1101/2023.08.09.552524.
PubMed 37645954Boes AD, Kelly MS, Trapp NT, Stern AP, Press DZ, Pascual-Leone A. Noninvasive Brain Stimulation: Challenges and Opportunities for a New Clinical Specialty. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2018 Summer;30(3):173-179. doi: 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.17110262. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
PubMed 29685065Weiduschat N, Thiel A, Rubi-Fessen I, Hartmann A, Kessler J, Merl P, Kracht L, Rommel T, Heiss WD. Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in aphasic stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study. Stroke. 2011 Feb;42(2):409-15. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.597864. Epub 2010 Dec 16.
PubMed 21164121Fitzgerald PB, Hoy K, McQueen S, Maller JJ, Herring S, Segrave R, Bailey M, Been G, Kulkarni J, Daskalakis ZJ. A randomized trial of rTMS targeted with MRI based neuro-navigation in treatment-resistant depression. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2009 Apr;34(5):1255-62. doi: 10.1038/npp.2008.233. Epub 2009 Jan 14.
PubMed 19145228Lefaucheur JP, Aleman A, Baeken C, Benninger DH, Brunelin J, Di Lazzaro V, Filipovic SR, Grefkes C, Hasan A, Hummel FC, Jaaskelainen SK, Langguth B, Leocani L, Londero A, Nardone R, Nguyen JP, Nyffeler T, Oliveira-Maia AJ, Oliviero A, Padberg F, Palm U, Paulus W, Poulet E, Quartarone A, Rachid F, Rektorova I, Rossi S, Sahlsten H, Schecklmann M, Szekely D, Ziemann U. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): An update (2014-2018). Clin Neurophysiol. 2020 Feb;131(2):474-528. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2019.11.002. Epub 2020 Jan 1.
PubMed 31901449Zewdie E, Ciechanski P, Kuo HC, Giuffre A, Kahl C, King R, Cole L, Godfrey H, Seeger T, Swansburg R, Damji O, Rajapakse T, Hodge J, Nelson S, Selby B, Gan L, Jadavji Z, Larson JR, MacMaster F, Yang JF, Barlow K, Gorassini M, Brunton K, Kirton A. Safety and tolerability of transcranial magnetic and direct current stimulation in children: Prospective single center evidence from 3.5 million stimulations. Brain Stimul. 2020 May-Jun;13(3):565-575. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2019.12.025. Epub 2019 Dec 30.
PubMed 32289678Chervyakov AV, Chernyavsky AY, Sinitsyn DO, Piradov MA. Possible Mechanisms Underlying the Therapeutic Effects of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Jun 16;9:303. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00303. eCollection 2015.
PubMed 26136672Varnerin N, Mirando D, Potter-Baker KA, Cardenas J, Cunningham DA, Sankarasubramanian V, Beall E, Plow EB. Assessment of Vascular Stent Heating with Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017 May;26(5):1121-1127. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.12.030. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
PubMed 28117211Shimojima Y, Morita H, Nishikawa N, Kodaira M, Hashimoto T, Ikeda S. The safety of transcranial magnetic stimulation with deep brain stimulation instruments. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2010 Feb;16(2):127-31. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2009.09.006. Epub 2009 Oct 6.
PubMed 19811944Wang JB, Hassan U, Bruss JE, Oya H, Uitermarkt BD, Trapp NT, Gander PE, Howard MA 3rd, Keller CJ, Boes AD. Effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation on the human brain recorded with intracranial electrocorticography. Mol Psychiatry. 2024 May;29(5):1228-1240. doi: 10.1038/s41380-024-02405-y. Epub 2024 Feb 5.
PubMed 38317012Rossi S, Hallett M, Rossini PM, Pascual-Leone A; Safety of TMS Consensus Group. Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Dec;120(12):2008-2039. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.016. Epub 2009 Oct 14.
PubMed 19833552Phielipp NM, Saha U, Sankar T, Yugeta A, Chen R. Safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with implanted cortical electrodes. An ex-vivo study and report of a case. Clin Neurophysiol. 2017 Jun;128(6):1109-1115. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.01.021. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
PubMed 28259678Kuncel AM, Grill WM. Selection of stimulus parameters for deep brain stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol. 2004 Nov;115(11):2431-41. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2004.05.031.
PubMed 15465430
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Mapping Transcrnial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) Responses Within the Brain Using Intracranial Electrophysiological Monitoring Recordings
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07518745
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 857667
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Enrolling by invitation
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of PennsylvaniaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 11 Nov 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 11 Oct 2029 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 11 Nov 2029 (estimated)
- First posted
- 9 Apr 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The current study presents a unique opportunity to measure the direct effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) by using intracranial electrodes to record neural activity in deep brain regions when TMS single pulses are delivered. If TMS can evoke downstream responses in neural networks of the human brain, it can be a feasible way to study circuit engagement and connectivity.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- Adult Patients undergoing intracranial electrophysiological monitoring in an inpatient setting are invited to participate in a TMS session while implanted with electrodes.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| TMS | Experimental | Device: Single Pulse TMSThe study visit consists of a TMS single-pulse session when intracranial electrodes are implanted to record neural activity during the TMS session. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients who received (or are scheduled to receive) intracranial electrode implantation surgery as part of standard clinical care or as participation in an ongoing research study for the treatment of neurological and/or psychiatric conditions at Pennsylvania Hospital
- Adult patients, 21 to 75 years of age
- Patients considered to be in a stable medical condition, in the opinion of the PI
- Patients who are able to demonstrate comprehension of instructions in the English language, in the opinion of the PI
- Patients who are able to provide informed consent and fully comply with all study requirements, in the opinion of the PI
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Patients with chronic alcohol abuse history
- Patients who are unable to have an MRI scan
- Patients who are unable to tolerate TMS
- Patients with additional implanted devices, such as an aneurysm clip or a cardiac pacemaker, that would increase the TMS risk profile
- Patients who are pregnant at the time of screening or patients who get pregnant during the course of the study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Single Pulse TMSsingle pulse TMS will be administered when participants have intracranial electrodes implanted to measure neuronal activity. | Device | TMS |
Primary outcome
Primary Endpoint #1 Brain Activity and Connectivity
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of study participation at 5 weeks
Observation of effects in brain activity and connectivity within and across regions of interest before and after TMS, as measured by intracranial EEG. The evoked response magnitude from the EEG at all features of the time-frequency analysis are used.
Primary Endpoint #2: Safety Feasibility
Time frame: From enrollment to end of study participation at 5 weeks.
Safety, as defined by the number of adverse events (AE)
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 May 2026.
- Background: PubMed 22483681Deng ZD, Lisanby SH, Peterchev AV. Electric field depth-focality tradeoff in transcranial magnetic stimulation: simulation comparison of 50 coil designs. Brain Stimul. 2013 Jan;6(1):1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2012.02.005. Epub 2012 Mar 21.
- Background: PubMed 38729299Trapp NT, Tsang EW, Bruss J, Russo S, Gander PE, Berger JI, Nourski KV, Rosanova M, Keller CJ, Oya H, Howard MA 3rd, Boes AD. TMS-associated auditory evoked potentials can be effectively masked: Evidence from intracranial EEG. Brain Stimul. 2024 May-Jun;17(3):616-618. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2024.05.002. Epub 2024 May 8. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 37645954Solomon EA, Wang JB, Oya H, Howard MA, Trapp NT, Uitermarkt BD, Boes AD, Keller CJ. TMS provokes target-dependent intracranial rhythms across human cortical and subcortical sites. bioRxiv [Preprint]. 2023 Nov 19:2023.08.09.552524. doi: 10.1101/2023.08.09.552524.
- Background: PubMed 29685065Boes AD, Kelly MS, Trapp NT, Stern AP, Press DZ, Pascual-Leone A. Noninvasive Brain Stimulation: Challenges and Opportunities for a New Clinical Specialty. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2018 Summer;30(3):173-179. doi: 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.17110262. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
- Background: PubMed 21164121Weiduschat N, Thiel A, Rubi-Fessen I, Hartmann A, Kessler J, Merl P, Kracht L, Rommel T, Heiss WD. Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in aphasic stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study. Stroke. 2011 Feb;42(2):409-15. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.597864. Epub 2010 Dec 16.
- Background: PubMed 19145228Fitzgerald PB, Hoy K, McQueen S, Maller JJ, Herring S, Segrave R, Bailey M, Been G, Kulkarni J, Daskalakis ZJ. A randomized trial of rTMS targeted with MRI based neuro-navigation in treatment-resistant depression. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2009 Apr;34(5):1255-62. doi: 10.1038/npp.2008.233. Epub 2009 Jan 14.
- Background: PubMed 31901449Lefaucheur JP, Aleman A, Baeken C, Benninger DH, Brunelin J, Di Lazzaro V, Filipovic SR, Grefkes C, Hasan A, Hummel FC, Jaaskelainen SK, Langguth B, Leocani L, Londero A, Nardone R, Nguyen JP, Nyffeler T, Oliveira-Maia AJ, Oliviero A, Padberg F, Palm U, Paulus W, Poulet E, Quartarone A, Rachid F, Rektorova I, Rossi S, Sahlsten H, Schecklmann M, Szekely D, Ziemann U. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): An update (2014-2018). Clin Neurophysiol. 2020 Feb;131(2):474-528. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2019.11.002. Epub 2020 Jan 1.
- Background: PubMed 32289678Zewdie E, Ciechanski P, Kuo HC, Giuffre A, Kahl C, King R, Cole L, Godfrey H, Seeger T, Swansburg R, Damji O, Rajapakse T, Hodge J, Nelson S, Selby B, Gan L, Jadavji Z, Larson JR, MacMaster F, Yang JF, Barlow K, Gorassini M, Brunton K, Kirton A. Safety and tolerability of transcranial magnetic and direct current stimulation in children: Prospective single center evidence from 3.5 million stimulations. Brain Stimul. 2020 May-Jun;13(3):565-575. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2019.12.025. Epub 2019 Dec 30.
- Background: PubMed 26136672Chervyakov AV, Chernyavsky AY, Sinitsyn DO, Piradov MA. Possible Mechanisms Underlying the Therapeutic Effects of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Jun 16;9:303. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00303. eCollection 2015.
- Background: PubMed 28117211Varnerin N, Mirando D, Potter-Baker KA, Cardenas J, Cunningham DA, Sankarasubramanian V, Beall E, Plow EB. Assessment of Vascular Stent Heating with Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017 May;26(5):1121-1127. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.12.030. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
- Background: PubMed 19811944Shimojima Y, Morita H, Nishikawa N, Kodaira M, Hashimoto T, Ikeda S. The safety of transcranial magnetic stimulation with deep brain stimulation instruments. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2010 Feb;16(2):127-31. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2009.09.006. Epub 2009 Oct 6.
- Background: PubMed 38317012Wang JB, Hassan U, Bruss JE, Oya H, Uitermarkt BD, Trapp NT, Gander PE, Howard MA 3rd, Keller CJ, Boes AD. Effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation on the human brain recorded with intracranial electrocorticography. Mol Psychiatry. 2024 May;29(5):1228-1240. doi: 10.1038/s41380-024-02405-y. Epub 2024 Feb 5.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for EEG
RecruitingObservational study
Comparison of Hemodynamic Responses During Anesthesia Induction Using Eleveld and Schnider
Spinal (Fusion) Surgery, Total Intravenous Anesthesia
Not yet recruiting
Neuroergonomic Analysis of a Brain-Computer Interface Device (BCI)
Healthy Volunteers - Male and Female
RecruitingObservational study
Locus Coeruleus and CCHS (Congenital Central Hypoventilation Syndrome)
Ondine Syndrome (Congenital Central Hypoventilation Syndrome)
RecruitingObservational study
Distinguishing Tics and Functional Tics Using Clinical Neurophysiological Techniques
Tics, Functional Tics
Recruiting
Biomarkers of Paired VNS
Stroke, Ischemic
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Single Pulse TMS in people with EEG and TMS, run by University of Pennsylvania at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: enrolling by invitation, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Primary Endpoint #1 Brain Activity and Connectivity (time frame: From enrollment to the end of study participation at 5 weeks). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07518745, which also lists 15 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 May 2026.