Cleft PalateNCT07514091
MRI Assessment of Velopharyngeal Anatomy After Modified Furlow-Buccinator Flap in Late Primary Palate Repair
A study testing Modified Furlow Palatoplasty combined with buccinator myomucosal flap in people with Cleft Palate and Cleft Palate, Unilateral, Complete, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
The goal of this case series study is to learn if magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can show how well the palate and throat muscles work at rest and during speech after late cleft palate repair. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 5 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Cleft Palate, Cleft Palate, Unilateral, Complete, Cleft Lip, Cleft Alveolus and Cleft Palate
- What is being tested?
- Modified Furlow Palatoplasty combined with buccinator myomucosal flap
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 10 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- Jun 2026to Jun 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 5 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Non-syndromic cleft palate (La Veau I-IV)
- No prior palatal surgery
- Consent for MRI and follow-up
Who cannot join
- Syndromic clefts or associated craniofacial anomalies.
- Systemic co-morbidities
- Previous palatal surgery.
- Contraindications to MRI.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
About this study
Official title: MRI Assessment of Velopharyngeal Anatomy in Late Primary Cleft Palate Repair Using Modified Furlow With Buccinator Myomucosal Flap: A Case Series Study
The goal of this case series study is to learn if magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can show how well the palate and throat muscles work at rest and during speech after late cleft palate repair. The surgery uses a technique in which the muscle from the cheek is used to close the gap and repair the cleft and therefore improve speech. The study will answer the question of whether this technique will provide better closure and improved speech in the participants who have not received early treatment. The participants will have the surgery and then have MRI scans 6 months after surgery while resting and speaking specific sounds. Complete speech assessments will also be done 6 months after surgery.
Read the detailed description
This study will include about 10 children, age 5 years and older, with cleft palate who have not had previous palate surgery. All participants will have surgery using the modified Furlow palatoplasty with a buccinator myomucosal flap. This method is designed to improve muscle function and speech outcomes in children who have late cleft palate repair.
Six months after surgery, participants will have MRI scans. The scans will take pictures of the palate and throat muscles while resting and while saying sounds such as "EEE" and "SSS." These images will help researchers see how well the muscles close the gap between the nose and mouth during speech.
Participants will also have a speech evaluation six months after surgery. This will include articulation tests and scoring of speech clarity and nasal resonance.
The study will take place at Cairo University and New Giza University Hospital. By combining MRI results with speech assessments, researchers aim to show whether MRI is a useful tool for evaluating muscle function after this type of cleft palate repair. The findings may help guide future treatment for children who cannot have early surgery.
- Conditions
- Cleft Palate, Cleft Palate, Unilateral, Complete, Cleft Lip, Cleft Alveolus and Cleft Palate, Cleft Palate Repair
- Being tested
- Modified Furlow Palatoplasty combined with buccinator myomucosal flap
- Keywords
- cleft palate, cleft palate repair, velopharyngeal insufficiency, magnetic resonance imaging
- Medical subject headings
- Cleft Palate, Cleft Lip, Velopharyngeal Insufficiency
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Modified Furlow Palatoplasty combined with buccinator myomucosal flapProcedure or surgery
The procedure is performed under general anesthesia. After marking a palatal Z-plasty and infiltrating local anesthetic, the parotid duct and buccinator flap donor site are identified. On the left side, a posteriorly based oral myomucosal flap and an anteriorly based nasal flap are created by incising from the uvula to the hard-soft palate junction and laterally toward the hamulus. The levator muscle is fully detached. A small anteriorly based nasal flap is added. On the right side, an anteriorly based oral flap and a posteriorly based nasal myomucosal flap are raised with complete muscle disinsertion. The nasal Z-plasty is interdigitated and sutured, and the oral Z-plasty is closed with minimal muscle overlap. The remaining defect is filled with a right buccal myomucosal flap, which is elevated, tunneled to the palate, inset, and the donor site closed.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cleft palate group | Experimental | Patients undergoing late primary cleft palate repair with Modified Furlow Palatoplasty combined with buccinator myomucosal flap Receives: Procedure: Modified Furlow Palatoplasty combined with buccinator myomucosal flap |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Velopharyngeal assessment
The points measured to assess velopharyngeal anatomy are: Velar Length Pharyngeal Depth, Effective Velar length, Velar thickness, VP Gap. All measurements will be in mm. 3D T2-weighted sequence is used to capture high-resolution anatomical details at rest. Rapid 2D sequences assess velopharyngeal closure during sustained phonation. Sagittal and oblique coronal views will be captured. The sagittal plane provides an overall view of velopharyngeal structures, while the oblique coronal plane is specifically designed to visualize the LVP and assess closure pattern. Measurements on the MRI will be taken by primary and secondary raters to examine the intra- and inter-observer reliability. All patients will have their MRI taken with the same machine with uniform MRI acquisition parameters
Measured: 6 Months
VP ratio
this is a ratio calculated by dividing Velar length/Pharyngeal depth.
Measured: 6 months
EVP ratio
This is a ratio calculated by dividing Effective Velar length/Pharyngeal depth
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (3)
Speech intelligibility
By Standardized articulation tests, speech intelligibility will be scored according to speech intelligibility scale, ranged from 0 to 3 (0 = within normal limits, 1 = mild speech intelligibility, 2 = moderate speech intelligibility, 3 = severe speech
Measured: 6 months after surgery
Hypernasality
By Perceptual speech evaluation which will be done by the same speech pathologist for all patients. Perceptual speech assessment will be performed by recording the repeated different syllables, sentences and counting from 1 to 10 by the patients in a soundproof room. All the used sentences will be in Arabic language. The records will be assessed by the phoniatrician to detect the speech disorders as the severity of nasal resonance. the severity of nasal resonance will be scored according to the hypernasality scale ranged from 0 to 3 (0 = no hyper nasality, 1 = mild hypernasality, 2 = moderate hypernasality, 3 = severe hypernasality)
Measured: 6 months after surgery
Nasal emission
By Perceptual speech evaluation and will be evaluated qualitatively as absent or present.
Measured: 6 months after surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Apr 2026
- Study startJun 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completionDec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completionJun 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cleft PalateStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Cairo UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Cairo University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- NewGiza University
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dina Adel, Cairo University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07514091
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MRI-VPI-FURL-BMF
- Status last verified
- Oct 2025
- First submitted
- 28 Mar 2026
- Last updated
- 7 Apr 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: The study will share individual participant data that underlie the primary and secondary outcomes reported in the final publication. This includes de-identified demographic data, baseline characteristics, surgical details, and outcome measures collected throughout the study period. Only data necessary to reproduce the analyses and results will be shared, with all direct identifiers removed to protect participant confidentiality.
Publications
MacIsaac MF, Elsamna SL, Quintana JF, Rottgers SA, Halsey JN. MRI assessment of velopharyngeal dysfunction: A comprehensive primer for radiologists. Pediatr Radiol. 2025 May;55(6):1088-1104. doi: 10.1007/s00247-025-06180-y. Epub 2025 Feb 14.
PubMed 39953298Perry JL, Snodgrass TD, Gilbert IR, Sutton BP, Baylis AL, Weidler EM, Tse RW, Ishman SL, Sitzman TJ. Establishing a Clinical Protocol for Velopharyngeal MRI and Interpreting Imaging Findings. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2024 May;61(5):748-758. doi: 10.1177/10556656221141188. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
PubMed 36448363Haenssler AE, Fang X, Perry JL. Effective Velopharyngeal Ratio: A More Clinically Relevant Measure of Velopharyngeal Function. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 Nov 13;63(11):3586-3593. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00305. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
PubMed 32976083Aboulhassan MA, Aly TM, Akram Khodir MM, Moussa HM, Hussein MA. Quantitative Evaluation of Palatal Lengthening After Cleft Palate Repair When a Buccal Flap Is Routinely Combined With Furlow's Z-Plasty. Ann Plast Surg. 2022 Mar 1;88(3):288-292. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002964.
PubMed 34393194
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Apr 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- MRI Assessment of Velopharyngeal Anatomy in Late Primary Cleft Palate Repair Using Modified Furlow With Buccinator Myomucosal Flap: A Case Series Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07514091
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MRI-VPI-FURL-BMF
- Conditions
- Cleft Palate, Cleft Palate, Unilateral, Complete, Cleft Lip, Cleft Alveolus and Cleft Palate, Cleft Palate Repair
- Keywords
- cleft palate, cleft palate repair, velopharyngeal insufficiency, magnetic resonance imaging
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Cairo UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- NewGiza University
- Study start
- Jun 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jun 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 7 Apr 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this case series study is to learn if magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can show how well the palate and throat muscles work at rest and during speech after late cleft palate repair. The surgery uses a technique in which the muscle from the cheek is used to close the gap and repair the cleft and therefore improve speech. The study will answer the question of whether this technique will provide better closure and improved speech in the participants who have not received early treatment. The participants will have the surgery and then have MRI scans 6 months after surgery while resting and speaking specific sounds. Complete speech assessments will also be done 6 months after surgery.
Detailed description
This study will include about 10 children, age 5 years and older, with cleft palate who have not had previous palate surgery. All participants will have surgery using the modified Furlow palatoplasty with a buccinator myomucosal flap. This method is designed to improve muscle function and speech outcomes in children who have late cleft palate repair.
Six months after surgery, participants will have MRI scans. The scans will take pictures of the palate and throat muscles while resting and while saying sounds such as "EEE" and "SSS." These images will help researchers see how well the muscles close the gap between the nose and mouth during speech.
Participants will also have a speech evaluation six months after surgery. This will include articulation tests and scoring of speech clarity and nasal resonance.
The study will take place at Cairo University and New Giza University Hospital. By combining MRI results with speech assessments, researchers aim to show whether MRI is a useful tool for evaluating muscle function after this type of cleft palate repair. The findings may help guide future treatment for children who cannot have early surgery.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cleft palate group | Experimental | Procedure: Modified Furlow Palatoplasty combined with buccinator myomucosal flapPatients undergoing late primary cleft palate repair with Modified Furlow Palatoplasty combined with buccinator myomucosal flap |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 5 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Non-syndromic cleft palate (La Veau I-IV)
- No prior palatal surgery
- Consent for MRI and follow-up
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Syndromic clefts or associated craniofacial anomalies.
- Systemic co-morbidities
- Previous palatal surgery.
- Contraindications to MRI.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Modified Furlow Palatoplasty combined with buccinator myomucosal flapThe procedure is performed under general anesthesia. After marking a palatal Z-plasty and infiltrating local anesthetic, the parotid duct and buccinator flap donor site are identified. On the left side, a posteriorly based oral myomucosal flap and an anteriorly based nasal flap are created by incising from the uvula to the hard-soft palate junction and laterally toward the hamulus. The levator muscle is fully detached. A small anteriorly based nasal flap is added. On the right side, an anteriorly based oral flap and a posteriorly based nasal myomucosal flap are raised with complete muscle disinsertion. The nasal Z-plasty is interdigitated and sutured, and the oral Z-plasty is closed with minimal muscle overlap. The remaining defect is filled with a right buccal myomucosal flap, which is elevated, tunneled to the palate, inset, and the donor site closed. | Procedure or surgery | Cleft palate group |
Primary outcome
Velopharyngeal assessment
Time frame: 6 Months
The points measured to assess velopharyngeal anatomy are: Velar Length Pharyngeal Depth, Effective Velar length, Velar thickness, VP Gap. All measurements will be in mm. 3D T2-weighted sequence is used to capture high-resolution anatomical details at rest. Rapid 2D sequences assess velopharyngeal closure during sustained phonation. Sagittal and oblique coronal views will be captured. The sagittal plane provides an overall view of velopharyngeal structures, while the oblique coronal plane is specifically designed to visualize the LVP and assess closure pattern. Measurements on the MRI will be taken by primary and secondary raters to examine the intra- and inter-observer reliability. All patients will have their MRI taken with the same machine with uniform MRI acquisition parameters
VP ratio
Time frame: 6 months
this is a ratio calculated by dividing Velar length/Pharyngeal depth.
EVP ratio
Time frame: 6 months
This is a ratio calculated by dividing Effective Velar length/Pharyngeal depth
3 secondary outcomes
Speech intelligibility
Time frame: 6 months after surgery
Hypernasality
Time frame: 6 months after surgery
Nasal emission
Time frame: 6 months after surgery
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Apr 2026.
- Background: PubMed 39953298MacIsaac MF, Elsamna SL, Quintana JF, Rottgers SA, Halsey JN. MRI assessment of velopharyngeal dysfunction: A comprehensive primer for radiologists. Pediatr Radiol. 2025 May;55(6):1088-1104. doi: 10.1007/s00247-025-06180-y. Epub 2025 Feb 14.
- Background: PubMed 36448363Perry JL, Snodgrass TD, Gilbert IR, Sutton BP, Baylis AL, Weidler EM, Tse RW, Ishman SL, Sitzman TJ. Establishing a Clinical Protocol for Velopharyngeal MRI and Interpreting Imaging Findings. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2024 May;61(5):748-758. doi: 10.1177/10556656221141188. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
- Background: PubMed 32976083Haenssler AE, Fang X, Perry JL. Effective Velopharyngeal Ratio: A More Clinically Relevant Measure of Velopharyngeal Function. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 Nov 13;63(11):3586-3593. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00305. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
- Background: PubMed 34393194Aboulhassan MA, Aly TM, Akram Khodir MM, Moussa HM, Hussein MA. Quantitative Evaluation of Palatal Lengthening After Cleft Palate Repair When a Buccal Flap Is Routinely Combined With Furlow's Z-Plasty. Ann Plast Surg. 2022 Mar 1;88(3):288-292. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002964.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. The study will share individual participant data that underlie the primary and secondary outcomes reported in the final publication. This includes de-identified demographic data, baseline characteristics, surgical details, and outcome measures collected throughout the study period. Only data necessary to reproduce the analyses and results will be shared, with all direct identifiers removed to protect participant confidentiality.
Related trials for Cleft Palate
Not yet recruiting
Comparative Study of Regional Nerve Blocks in Primary Cleft Palate Repair
Cleft Lip, Cleft Palate +/- Lip
Not yet recruiting
Quadratus Lumborum Block for Iliac Bone Harvest in Pediatric Cleft Alveolus Repair
Cleft Lip Palate
Not yet recruiting
Furlow With Buccinator and Fistula Formation
Cleft Palate
RecruitingPhase 3
Nebulized Bupivacaine Analgesia for Cleft Palate Repair
Cleft Palate
RecruitingObservational study
Perceptions of High and Low Intensity Speech Intervention in Children With a Cleft Palate
Cleft Lip and Palate, Cleft Palate Children
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Modified Furlow Palatoplasty combined with buccinator myomucosal flap in people with Cleft Palate and Cleft Palate, Unilateral, Complete, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Dina Adel Thaalab (+201285568850, dinaadelta3lab@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Velopharyngeal assessment (time frame: 6 Months). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07514091, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Apr 2026.