AzTrials
AzTrials

Heterotopic Gastric Mucosa of the Proximal EsophagusSYM-HGMNCT07510984

Symptoms and Quality of Life in Patients With Heterotopic Gastric Mucosa (HGM)

An observational study of Heterotopic Gastric Mucosa of the Proximal Esophagus and Gastric Inlet Patches, run by Knappschaft Kliniken GmbH at 1 site in Germany.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this observational study is to learn whether heterotopic gastric mucosa (HGM) in the upper esophagus is associated with swallowing difficulties (dysphagia) in adults undergoing a medically indicated gastroscopy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
How many people
721 participants
Where
1 siteGermany
Study dates
24 Mar 2026to Jul 2027
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Adults (≥18 years) undergoing clinically indicated upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (gastroscopy) at a single center will be consecutively screened and invited to participate over a 12-month period. After informed consent, participants complete symptom and health-related quality-of-life questionnaires prior to endoscopy. During routine gastroscopy, the presence or absence of heterotopic gastric mucosa (HGM) in the proximal esophagus is assessed based on endoscopic appearance (and histology from routine care if available). Participants are grouped as HGM present vs no HGM for comparative analyses.

Who may be able to join

  • Planned upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (gastroscopy) for clinical reasons (any indication)
  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Written informed consent
  • Ability to complete the study questionnaires prior to endoscopy

Who cannot join

  • Previously known heterotopic gastric mucosa (HGM)
  • Previously diagnosed dysphagia with prior therapeutic intervention (including pre-established diet modification, partial oral/enteral nutrition, steroid therapy, botulinum toxin injection, etc.)
  • Mechanical ventilation
  • Presence of a tracheostomy
  • Inadequate endoscopic assessability of the proximal esophagus, including:
  • General condition insufficient for careful endoscopic inspection (investigator's judgement)
Show all 16Show fewer
  • Increased risk of aspiration
  • Inadequate visibility during the procedure (e.g., bleeding, food residue)
  • Complications preventing careful inspection of the proximal esophagus
  • History of surgery involving the pharynx or esophagus
  • Relevant severe neurological disorder (e.g., ALS, stroke)
  • Severe dementia
  • Severe depressive disorder
  • Lack of cooperation / inability to comply with study procedures
  • Planned PEG placement
  • Emergency endoscopy

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Germany1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bottrop

    Bottrop, North Rhine-Westphalia, 46240

    Felix Horstmann, MD, +492041151501, felix.horstmann@kjnappschft-kliniken.de

    Thorsten Brechmann, Priv.-Doz. Dr.med, MD, +492041151500, thorsten.brechmann@rub.de

    Recruiting

Other trials in Germany

About this study

Official title: Prevalence and Characterization of Dysphagia and Dyspepsia Symptoms and Assessment of Quality of Life in Heterotopic Gastric Mucosa (HGM)

The goal of this observational study is to learn whether heterotopic gastric mucosa (HGM) in the upper esophagus is associated with swallowing difficulties (dysphagia) in adults undergoing a medically indicated gastroscopy. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Is the presence of HGM associated with dysphagia?
  • Is the presence of HGM associated with dyspepsia and reduced health-related quality of life? Among participants reporting dysphagia, what is the distribution of oropharyngeal versus esophageal dysphagia, and is this related to the presence of HGM? If there is a comparison group: Researchers will compare participants with endoscopically confirmed HGM to participants without HGM to determine whether dysphagia, dyspepsia symptoms, and quality-of-life measures differ between groups.
Read more

Participants will:

Complete pseudonymised questionnaires about dysphagia, dyspepsia symptoms, and quality of life before the gastroscopy.

Undergo the medically indicated gastroscopy as planned; the endoscopist will assess whether HGM is present based on the endoscopic appearance, and routine endoscopy findings will be documented.

Read the detailed description

Heterotopic gastric mucosa (HGM) consists of islands of gastric-type mucosa located in the proximal esophagus, typically just below the upper esophageal sphincter. HGM is frequently detected incidentally during upper GI endoscopy, and its clinical relevance remains incompletely understood. Retrospective data suggest that HGM may be associated with symptoms such as dysphagia and dyspepsia; however, prospective data and information on health-related quality of life are limited.

This is a prospective, observational, single-center study conducted in adults (≥18 years) undergoing clinically indicated gastroscopy for any indication. The primary objective is to investigate the association between HGM and dysphagia. Secondary objectives are to evaluate associations between HGM and dyspepsia and impairment of quality of life, and to differentiate oropharyngeal versus esophageal dysphagia. An additional exploratory objective is to assess whether symptom patterns vary by histological subtype when histology is available from routine care.

After informed consent, participants complete paper-based, pseudonymised questionnaires prior to endoscopy (estimated completion time ~30-45 minutes). Oropharyngeal dysphagia is assessed using the Sydney Swallowing Questionnaire (SSQ, German version), and esophageal dysphagia using the Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10, German version). Dysphagia-related quality of life is assessed with the M.D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI, German validated version/D-ADI). Dyspepsia symptom burden and related quality of life are assessed using the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) and Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD). The endoscopist is blinded to questionnaire results. During routine gastroscopy, the proximal esophagus is carefully inspected (preferably using Narrow Band Imaging) and the presence or absence of HGM is documented; participants are assigned to HGM or control (no HGM) groups. No additional procedures are mandated by the study; routine endoscopy and any clinically indicated histology are recorded as available.

Data are collected and stored in pseudonymised form and analyzed statistically (planned recruitment period ~12 months). The anticipated total sample size is 731 participants.

Keywords
Cervical Esophagus, Proximal Esophagus, Upper Endoscopy, Oropharyngeal Dysphagia, Eophageal Dysphagia, Sidney Swallowing Questionnaire, EAT-10, MDADI, GSRS, QOLRAD, Narrow Band Imaging, Quality of Life
Medical subject headings
Deglutition Disorders, Dyspepsia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT07510984
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
HGM presentParticipants with endoscopic evidence of heterotrophic gastric mucosa
No HGMParticipants without endoscopic evidence of heterotrophic gastric mucosa

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Dysphagia Symptom Burdon (EAT-10 und SSQ)

    Dysphagia symptom burden is assessed using two patient-reported questionnaires completed prior to medically indicated gastroscopy: (1) the Sydney Swallow Questionnaire (SSQ/SSQ-G) and (2) the Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10). The SSQ total score ranges from 0 to 1700 (higher scores indicate worse swallowing-related symptoms); for descriptive/binary analyses, an SSQ-G total score >234 is considered outside the normative range (pathological). The EAT-10 total score ranges from 0 to 40 (10 items scored 0-4; higher scores indicate greater dysphagia burden); an EAT-10 total score ≥3 is considered abnormal (indicative of dysphagia). Comparative analyses will be performed between participants with endoscopically detected heterotopic gastric mucosa (HGM) and participants without HGM.

    Measured: Baseline (prior to gastroscopy; single assessment at enrollment)

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. HGM & Dyspepsia (GSRS)

    Dyspepsia symptom burden assessed using the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS), a 15-item patient-reported questionnaire referring to symptoms during the past week. Items are rated on a 7-point Likert scale from 1 (no discomfort) to 7 (very severe discomfort); higher scores indicate worse symptoms. GSRS domain scores (mean of items within the domain) will be analyzed, focusing on the Indigestion and Abdominal Pain domains as dyspepsia-related measures. As there is no universally defined clinical cut-off for GSRS, a score ≥4 (at least moderate symptom severity) may be used for descriptive/binary analyses. Comparison between participants with endoscopically detected HGM vs participants without HGM.

    Measured: Baseline (prior to gastroscopy; single assessment at enrollment)

  2. Type of Dysphagia (Oropharyngeal vs Esophageal)

    Classification of dysphagia phenotype as oropharyngeal versus esophageal based on participant-reported symptom patterns captured in the Sydney Swallow Questionnaire (SSQ/SSQ-G) and the Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10), completed prior to medically indicated gastroscopy. The distribution of dysphagia type (oropharyngeal vs esophageal) will be compared between participants with endoscopically detected heterotopic gastric mucosa (HGM) and participants without HGM. Abnormal dysphagia symptom burden is defined as SSQ-G total score >234 and/or EAT-10 total score ≥3.

    Measured: Baseline (prior to gastroscopy; single assessment at enrollment)

  3. Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)

    Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is assessed using two disease-specific patient-reported questionnaires completed prior to medically indicated gastroscopy: (1) the German version of the M.D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI-D / A-ADI) to quantify swallowing-related quality of life, and (2) the German version of the Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia questionnaire (QOLRAD) to quantify reflux/dyspepsia-related quality of life. The MDADI-D/A-ADI composite score is linearly transformed to a scale of 20-100, with higher scores indicating better swallowing-related HRQoL; for descriptive/binary analyses, MDADI-D/A-ADI composite score <60 may be considered poor (moderate-to-severe impairment). QOLRAD items are rated on a 7-point Likert scale (1-7), with lower scores indicating worse HRQoL; domain scores (mean of items within each domain) and/or an overall mean score will be analyzed. As there is no universally established clinical cut-off for QOLRAD, a pragmatic threshold of QOL

    Measured: Baseline (prior to gastroscopy; single assessment at enrollment)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Apr 2026
  2. Study start24 Mar 2026
  3. Primary completion24 Mar 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJul 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
721 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07510984
Sponsor's protocol ID
SYM-HGM-01
Other IDs
DRKS00039148
Acronym
SYM-HGM
Status last verified
Apr 2026
First submitted
29 Mar 2026
Last updated
14 Apr 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared. Only aggregated results will be published; data access is restricted due to data protection requirements and the wording of the informed consent.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Heterotopic Gastric Mucosa of the Proximal Esophagus and Gastric Inlet Patches, run by Knappschaft Kliniken GmbH at 1 site in Germany.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Felix Horstmann, MD (02041151500, felix.horstmann@knappschaft-kliniken.de), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Dysphagia Symptom Burdon (EAT-10 und SSQ) (time frame: Baseline (prior to gastroscopy; single assessment at enrollment)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Apr 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in