Elderly InpatientsNCT07510035
Prevalence and Influencing Factors of Frailty in Elderly Patients With Heart Failure
An observational study of Elderly Inpatients and Frail, run by Zhejiang Hospital at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
The goal of this observational study is to investigate the prevalence and associated factors of frailty in hospitalized elderly patients with heart failure. The main questions it aims to answer are:(1) To clarify differences in demographic characteristics and test results (including CGA, BNP, and echocardiography)… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 60 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Elderly Inpatients, Frail, Heart Failure Hospitalization
- How many people
- 298 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2023to 31 Dec 2023
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 60 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: The study population consists of hospitalized patients aged ≥60 years with a confirmed diagnosis of heart failure, admitted to the Geriatrics Department of Zhejiang Hospital between January 2023 and December 2023.
Who may be able to join
- Age≥60 years
- Patients with complete data(Patients who have completed the comprehensive geriatric assessment,BNP testing, electrocardiogram and echocardiography).
- Patients meeting the diagnostic criteria for heart failure (as defined in the "Chinese Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Heart Failure 2024")
Who cannot join
- Patients with incomplete data
- Patients with severe physical or cognitive impairments that prevent them from completing the assessment.
- Acute Infections or cerebrovascular diseases
- Terminal illnesses
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study:Prevalence and Associated Factors of Frailty in Hospitalized Elderly Patients With Heart Failure
The goal of this observational study is to investigate the prevalence and associated factors of frailty in hospitalized elderly patients with heart failure. The main questions it aims to answer are:(1) To clarify differences in demographic characteristics and test results (including CGA, BNP, and echocardiography) among different frail populations (2) What demographic, clinical, and geriatric assessment factors are independently associated with frailty in elderly patients with heart failure?
- Conditions
- Elderly Inpatients, Frail, Heart Failure Hospitalization, CGA
- Keywords
- elderly inpatients, Frail Elderly people hospitalized, heart failure, clinical geriatric assessment
- Medical subject headings
- Heart Failure
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Non-frail Group | Participants with a Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) score ranging from 0 to 4. | |
| Moderate Frailty Group | Participants with a Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) score ranging from 5 to 6. | |
| Severe Frailty Group | Participants with a Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) score of 7 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Clinical Frail Scale (CFS) score
The CFS is assessed through clinical judgment based on a patient's functional status, mobility, activity tolerance, comorbidities, and cognitive function in the preceding two weeks. The scale classifies patients into nine levels based on their degree of frailty: 1 - Very Fit, 2 - Well, 3 - Managing Well, 4 - Vulnerable, 5 - Mildly Frail, 6 - Moderately Frail, 7 - Severely Frail, 8 - Very Severely Frail, and 9 - Terminally Ill. The higher the CFS score, the greater the degree of frailty. Excluding those with scores of 8-9, patients with scores of 0-4 are classified into the non-frail group, while those with scores of 5 or higher are classified into the frail group. Frailty Severity Grading Criteria: Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) score: non-frail (CFS 0-4), moderate frailty (CFS 5-6), and severe frailty (CFS 7).
Measured: Baseline
brain natriuretic peptide (BNP)
Assessed using a blood sample analyzed by an immunoassay. This biomarker reflects ventricular wall stress and is widely used for diagnosing and monitoring heart failure. BNP levels are reported in ng/L. According to clinical guidelines, a BNP <100 ng/L is considered normal in untreated patients; levels >400 ng/L are strongly suggestive of heart failure, while values between 100 and 400 ng/L are considered intermediate and should be interpreted in the clinical context. Higher BNP levels indicate greater cardiac stress and correlate with worse outcomes.
Measured: Baseline
left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) value
Assessed using echocardiography (transthoracic echocardiography is the standard method), or alternatively by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging or nuclear imaging. This imaging parameter quantifies the percentage of blood ejected from the left ventricle during systole and is the primary measure of systolic function. LVEF is reported as a percentage (%). According to clinical guidelines, a normal LVEF is ≥50%; a mildly reduced LVEF is 40-49%; a moderately reduced LVEF is 30-39%; and a severely reduced LVEF is <30%. Lower LVEF values indicate worse systolic dysfunction and are associated with increased risk of heart failure and adverse outcomes.
Measured: Baseline
Secondary outcomes (9)
body mass index (BMI)
Calculated from measured height (meters) and weight (kilograms) using the formula: weight (kg) / [height (m)]2. Unit: kg/m2.
Measured: Baseline
activities of daily living (ADL) score
Assessed using the Barthel Index. This scale evaluates ten activities: feeding, bathing, grooming, dressing, bowel control, bladder control, toileting, chair/bed transfer, ambulation, and stair climbing. The Activities of Daily Living (ADL) scale based on the Barthel Index score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicate greater independence.
Measured: Baseline
instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) score
This scale evaluates evaluates eight domains of function: ability to use a telephone, shopping, food preparation, housekeeping, laundry, mode of transportation, responsibility for own medications, and ability to handle finances. The total score ranges from 0 (low function, dependent) to 8 (high function, independent) . A higher score on the IADL scale indicates a greater level of independence in performing these instrumental activities of daily living.
Measured: Baseline
short physical performance battery (SPPB) score
Comprises three components: balance tests (side-by-side, semi-tandem, and tandem stands), 4-meter walk speed test, and five times sit-to-stand test. Each component is scored from 0 to 4, yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 12. The Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) score ranges from 0 to 12 and higher scores reflect better lower extremity function.
Measured: Baseline
performance-oriented mobility assessment (POMA) score
Assessed using the Tinetti Balance and Gait Evaluation. The scale consists of a balance section (9 items, max 16 points) and a gait section (7 items, max 12 points). Total scores range from 0 to 28, with higher scores indicating better balance and gait, and lower fall risk.
Measured: Baseline
mini nutritional assessment-short form(MNA-SF) score
Assessed using the Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form. This 6-item tool screens for malnutrition risk by evaluating weight loss, food intake, mobility, psychological stress, body mass index, and disease. Total scores range from 0 to 14, with scores ≤7 indicating malnutrition, 8-11 indicating at risk of malnutrition, and ≥12 indicating normal nutritional status. The Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form (MNA-SF) score ranges from 0 to 14, with higher scores indicating better nutritional status.
Measured: Baseline
grip strength
Measured using a handheld electronic dynamometer. The participant is seated or standing with the elbow flexed at 90°, forearm and wrist in a neutral position. Maximum force is applied with the dominant hand. The best of two attempts is recorded. Unit: kilograms (kg).
Measured: Baseline
skeletal muscle mass index (SMI)
Assessed using bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) with the InBody device. This method calculates the skeletal muscle mass index (SMI) as appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASM) divided by height squared (kg/m²). SMI values are sex-specific; according to the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia (AWGS) 2019 criteria, SMI <7.0 kg/m² for men and <5.4 kg/m² for women indicates low muscle mass. When low muscle mass is accompanied by low muscle strength and/or low physical performance, the diagnosis is sarcopenia or severe sarcopenia. The SMI is reported in kg/m², with lower values reflecting lower relative skeletal muscle mass.
Measured: Baseline
dominant calf circumference
Assessed using the dominant calf circumference measured with a non-elastic tape. This simple anthropometric indicator screens for low muscle mass by measuring the maximum circumference of the calf, typically on the dominant leg (or the leg with the larger circumference). Values are reported in centimeters. According to the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia (AWGS) criteria, calf circumference <34 cm in men and <33 cm in women indicates low muscle mass, which is suggestive of sarcopenia when combined with low muscle strength or poor physical performance. Higher calf circumference values reflect greater skeletal muscle mass relative to the lower limb.
Measured: Baseline
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Apr 2026
- Study start1 Jan 2023
- Primary completion31 Dec 2023
- Study completion31 Dec 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (12)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Elderly InpatientsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 298 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Zhejiang Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Xiufang Hong, Zhejiang Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07510035
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ZJHIRB-2026-036K
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 20 Mar 2026
- Last updated
- 8 Apr 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: De-identified individual participant data (IPD) that underlie the results reported in the primary publication (including baseline characteristics, outcome measures, and analysis data sets) will be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author, beginning 9 months after article publication and ending 5 years thereafter. Proposals for data use will be reviewed by the study investigators. Requestors will need to sign a data access agreement specifying the intended use of the data, commitment to using it only for the agreed purpose, and agreement not to attempt to re-identify participants.
Publications
Yang X, Zhao ZP, Shi Y, Han GY, Xu Y, Li YC, Zhou MG. The evolving burden of heart failure in China: a 34-year subnational analysis of trends and causes from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2023. Mil Med Res. 2025 Oct 9;12(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s40779-025-00650-y.
PubMed 41068970Leng X. Concepts and practices of geriatric medicine in the United States[J]. Chinese Journal of Practical Internal Medicine, 2011, 31(1): 31-33.
Uchida S, Kamiya K, Yamashita M, Noda T, Kagiyama N, Matsue Y. Current findings and challenges on frailty, sarcopenia, and cachexia in older patients with heart failure: insights from the FRAGILE-HF study. J Cardiol. 2026 Jan;87(1):10-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2025.05.013. Epub 2025 May 28.
PubMed 40447042Denfeld QE, Jha SR, Fung E, Jaarsma T, Maurer MS, Reeves GR, Afilalo J, Beerli N, Bellumkonda L, De Geest S, Gorodeski EZ, Joyce E, Kobashigawa J, Mauthner O, McDonagh J, Uchmanowicz I, Dickson VV, Lindenfeld J, Macdonald P. Assessing and managing frailty in advanced heart failure: An International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation consensus statement. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2023 Nov 29:S1053-2498(23)02028-4. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2023.09.013. Online ahead of print.
PubMed 38099896Kitai T, Kohsaka S, Kato T, Kato E, Sato K, Teramoto K, Yaku H, Akiyama E, Ando M, Izumi C, Ide T, Iwasaki YK, Ohno Y, Okumura T, Ozasa N, Kaji S, Kashimura T, Kitaoka H, Kinugasa Y, Kinugawa S, Toda K, Nagai T, Nakamura M, Hikoso S, Minamisawa M, Wakasa S, Anchi Y, Oishi S, Okada A, Obokata M, Kagiyama N, Kato NP, Kohno T, Sato T, Shiraishi Y, Tamaki Y, Tamura Y, Nagao K, Nagatomo Y, Nakamura N, Nochioka K, Nomura A, Nomura S, Horiuchi Y, Mizuno A, Murai R, Inomata T, Kuwahara K, Sakata Y, Tsutsui H, Kinugawa K; Japanese Circulation Society and the Japanese Heart Failure Society Joint Working Group. JCS/JHFS 2025 Guideline on Diagnosis and Treatment of Heart Failure. Circ J. 2025 Jul 25;89(8):1278-1444. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-25-0002. Epub 2025 Jun 25. No abstract available.
PubMed 40159241Lai HY, Huang ST, Anker SD, von Haehling S, Akishita M, Arai H, Chen LK, Hsiao FY. The burden of frailty in heart failure: Prevalence, impacts on clinical outcomes and the role of heart failure medications. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2024 Apr;15(2):660-670. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.13412. Epub 2024 Jan 30.
PubMed 38291000Kaufmann CC, Ahmed A, Harbich PF, Auer L, Propst L, Weltler P, Burger AL, Zweiker D, Geppert A, Huber K, Jager B. Prognostic impact of frailty at admission and in-hospital changes of frailty status in elderly patients with acute heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2025 Nov;27(11):2501-2511. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.3779. Epub 2025 Jul 25.
PubMed 40711891Goyal P, Zainul O, Sharma Y, Reich A, Osma P, Lau JD, Massou E, Turchioe M, Russell D, Creber RM, Deaton C. Geriatric Vulnerabilities Among Adults With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Cross-Continent Evaluation. JACC Adv. 2025 Mar;4(3):101602. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101602.
PubMed 40155186Galati G, Germanova O, Dacquino G, Bravo FF, Genovese L, Pedretti RFE. Cardiovascular Diseases Epidemiology and Management in the Elderly and very Elderly. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2025 Sep 22:zwaf470. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwaf470. Online ahead of print.
PubMed 40977495Maeda D, Fujimoto Y, Nakade T, Abe T, Ishihara S, Jujo K, Matsue Y. Frailty, Sarcopenia, Cachexia, and Malnutrition in Heart Failure. Korean Circ J. 2024 Jul;54(7):363-381. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2024.0089. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
PubMed 38767446Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, Seeman T, Tracy R, Kop WJ, Burke G, McBurnie MA; Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001 Mar;56(3):M146-56. doi: 10.1093/gerona/56.3.m146.
PubMed 11253156Chinese Society of Cardiology, Chinese Medical Association; Chinese College of Cardiovascular Physician; Chinese Heart Failure Association of Chinese Medical Doctor Association; Editorial Board of Chinese Journal of Cardiology. [Chinese guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of heart failure 2024]. Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2024 Mar 24;52(3):235-275. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20231101-00405. Chinese.
PubMed 38514328
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Apr 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Cross-Sectional Observational Study:Prevalence and Associated Factors of Frailty in Hospitalized Elderly Patients With Heart Failure
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07510035
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ZJHIRB-2026-036K
- Conditions
- Elderly Inpatients, Frail, Heart Failure Hospitalization, CGA
- Keywords
- elderly inpatients, Frail Elderly people hospitalized, heart failure, clinical geriatric assessment
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 298 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Zhejiang HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 Apr 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this observational study is to investigate the prevalence and associated factors of frailty in hospitalized elderly patients with heart failure. The main questions it aims to answer are:(1) To clarify differences in demographic characteristics and test results (including CGA, BNP, and echocardiography) among different frail populations (2) What demographic, clinical, and geriatric assessment factors are independently associated with frailty in elderly patients with heart failure?
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Non-frail Group | – | –Participants with a Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) score ranging from 0 to 4. |
| Moderate Frailty Group | – | –Participants with a Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) score ranging from 5 to 6. |
| Severe Frailty Group | – | –Participants with a Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) score of 7 |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 60 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- The study population consists of hospitalized patients aged ≥60 years with a confirmed diagnosis of heart failure, admitted to the Geriatrics Department of Zhejiang Hospital between January 2023 and December 2023.
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Age≥60 years
- Patients with complete data(Patients who have completed the comprehensive geriatric assessment,BNP testing, electrocardiogram and echocardiography).
- Patients meeting the diagnostic criteria for heart failure (as defined in the "Chinese Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Heart Failure 2024")
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients with incomplete data
- Patients with severe physical or cognitive impairments that prevent them from completing the assessment.
- Acute Infections or cerebrovascular diseases
- Terminal illnesses
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Clinical Frail Scale (CFS) score
Time frame: Baseline
The CFS is assessed through clinical judgment based on a patient's functional status, mobility, activity tolerance, comorbidities, and cognitive function in the preceding two weeks. The scale classifies patients into nine levels based on their degree of frailty: 1 - Very Fit, 2 - Well, 3 - Managing Well, 4 - Vulnerable, 5 - Mildly Frail, 6 - Moderately Frail, 7 - Severely Frail, 8 - Very Severely Frail, and 9 - Terminally Ill. The higher the CFS score, the greater the degree of frailty. Excluding those with scores of 8-9, patients with scores of 0-4 are classified into the non-frail group, while those with scores of 5 or higher are classified into the frail group. Frailty Severity Grading Criteria: Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) score: non-frail (CFS 0-4), moderate frailty (CFS 5-6), and severe frailty (CFS 7).
brain natriuretic peptide (BNP)
Time frame: Baseline
Assessed using a blood sample analyzed by an immunoassay. This biomarker reflects ventricular wall stress and is widely used for diagnosing and monitoring heart failure. BNP levels are reported in ng/L. According to clinical guidelines, a BNP <100 ng/L is considered normal in untreated patients; levels >400 ng/L are strongly suggestive of heart failure, while values between 100 and 400 ng/L are considered intermediate and should be interpreted in the clinical context. Higher BNP levels indicate greater cardiac stress and correlate with worse outcomes.
left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) value
Time frame: Baseline
Assessed using echocardiography (transthoracic echocardiography is the standard method), or alternatively by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging or nuclear imaging. This imaging parameter quantifies the percentage of blood ejected from the left ventricle during systole and is the primary measure of systolic function. LVEF is reported as a percentage (%). According to clinical guidelines, a normal LVEF is ≥50%; a mildly reduced LVEF is 40-49%; a moderately reduced LVEF is 30-39%; and a severely reduced LVEF is <30%. Lower LVEF values indicate worse systolic dysfunction and are associated with increased risk of heart failure and adverse outcomes.
9 secondary outcomes
body mass index (BMI)
Time frame: Baseline
activities of daily living (ADL) score
Time frame: Baseline
instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) score
Time frame: Baseline
short physical performance battery (SPPB) score
Time frame: Baseline
performance-oriented mobility assessment (POMA) score
Time frame: Baseline
mini nutritional assessment-short form(MNA-SF) score
Time frame: Baseline
grip strength
Time frame: Baseline
skeletal muscle mass index (SMI)
Time frame: Baseline
dominant calf circumference
Time frame: Baseline
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Apr 2026.
- Background: PubMed 41068970Yang X, Zhao ZP, Shi Y, Han GY, Xu Y, Li YC, Zhou MG. The evolving burden of heart failure in China: a 34-year subnational analysis of trends and causes from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2023. Mil Med Res. 2025 Oct 9;12(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s40779-025-00650-y.
- BackgroundLeng X. Concepts and practices of geriatric medicine in the United States[J]. Chinese Journal of Practical Internal Medicine, 2011, 31(1): 31-33.
- Background: PubMed 40447042Uchida S, Kamiya K, Yamashita M, Noda T, Kagiyama N, Matsue Y. Current findings and challenges on frailty, sarcopenia, and cachexia in older patients with heart failure: insights from the FRAGILE-HF study. J Cardiol. 2026 Jan;87(1):10-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2025.05.013. Epub 2025 May 28.
- Background: PubMed 38099896Denfeld QE, Jha SR, Fung E, Jaarsma T, Maurer MS, Reeves GR, Afilalo J, Beerli N, Bellumkonda L, De Geest S, Gorodeski EZ, Joyce E, Kobashigawa J, Mauthner O, McDonagh J, Uchmanowicz I, Dickson VV, Lindenfeld J, Macdonald P. Assessing and managing frailty in advanced heart failure: An International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation consensus statement. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2023 Nov 29:S1053-2498(23)02028-4. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2023.09.013. Online ahead of print.
- Background: PubMed 40159241Kitai T, Kohsaka S, Kato T, Kato E, Sato K, Teramoto K, Yaku H, Akiyama E, Ando M, Izumi C, Ide T, Iwasaki YK, Ohno Y, Okumura T, Ozasa N, Kaji S, Kashimura T, Kitaoka H, Kinugasa Y, Kinugawa S, Toda K, Nagai T, Nakamura M, Hikoso S, Minamisawa M, Wakasa S, Anchi Y, Oishi S, Okada A, Obokata M, Kagiyama N, Kato NP, Kohno T, Sato T, Shiraishi Y, Tamaki Y, Tamura Y, Nagao K, Nagatomo Y, Nakamura N, Nochioka K, Nomura A, Nomura S, Horiuchi Y, Mizuno A, Murai R, Inomata T, Kuwahara K, Sakata Y, Tsutsui H, Kinugawa K; Japanese Circulation Society and the Japanese Heart Failure Society Joint Working Group. JCS/JHFS 2025 Guideline on Diagnosis and Treatment of Heart Failure. Circ J. 2025 Jul 25;89(8):1278-1444. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-25-0002. Epub 2025 Jun 25. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 38291000Lai HY, Huang ST, Anker SD, von Haehling S, Akishita M, Arai H, Chen LK, Hsiao FY. The burden of frailty in heart failure: Prevalence, impacts on clinical outcomes and the role of heart failure medications. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2024 Apr;15(2):660-670. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.13412. Epub 2024 Jan 30.
- Background: PubMed 40711891Kaufmann CC, Ahmed A, Harbich PF, Auer L, Propst L, Weltler P, Burger AL, Zweiker D, Geppert A, Huber K, Jager B. Prognostic impact of frailty at admission and in-hospital changes of frailty status in elderly patients with acute heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2025 Nov;27(11):2501-2511. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.3779. Epub 2025 Jul 25.
- Background: PubMed 40155186Goyal P, Zainul O, Sharma Y, Reich A, Osma P, Lau JD, Massou E, Turchioe M, Russell D, Creber RM, Deaton C. Geriatric Vulnerabilities Among Adults With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Cross-Continent Evaluation. JACC Adv. 2025 Mar;4(3):101602. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101602.
- Background: PubMed 40977495Galati G, Germanova O, Dacquino G, Bravo FF, Genovese L, Pedretti RFE. Cardiovascular Diseases Epidemiology and Management in the Elderly and very Elderly. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2025 Sep 22:zwaf470. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwaf470. Online ahead of print.
- Background: PubMed 38767446Maeda D, Fujimoto Y, Nakade T, Abe T, Ishihara S, Jujo K, Matsue Y. Frailty, Sarcopenia, Cachexia, and Malnutrition in Heart Failure. Korean Circ J. 2024 Jul;54(7):363-381. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2024.0089. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
- Background: PubMed 11253156Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, Seeman T, Tracy R, Kop WJ, Burke G, McBurnie MA; Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001 Mar;56(3):M146-56. doi: 10.1093/gerona/56.3.m146.
- Background: PubMed 38514328Chinese Society of Cardiology, Chinese Medical Association; Chinese College of Cardiovascular Physician; Chinese Heart Failure Association of Chinese Medical Doctor Association; Editorial Board of Chinese Journal of Cardiology. [Chinese guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of heart failure 2024]. Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2024 Mar 24;52(3):235-275. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20231101-00405. Chinese.
- The official website of Zhejiang HospitalLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. De-identified individual participant data (IPD) that underlie the results reported in the primary publication (including baseline characteristics, outcome measures, and analysis data sets) will be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author, beginning 9 months after article publication and ending 5 years thereafter. Proposals for data use will be reviewed by the study investigators. Requestors will need to sign a data access agreement specifying the intended use of the data, commitment to using it only for the agreed purpose, and agreement not to attempt to re-identify participants.
Related trials for Elderly Inpatients
RecruitingPhase 2
Targeting Muscle Strength Loss Due to Hospitalization in Older Adults by Blood-flow Restriction Combined With an Electromyography-driven Serious Game.
Hospital Associated Disability, Immobility
Not yet recruiting
Virtual Reality to Advance Dementia Care and Quality of Life
Dementia, Agitation
Not yet recruitingObservational study
ELderly REspiratory VIral Cohort
Influenza Viruses, Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV)
Recruiting
Preoperative Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) and Postoperative Delirium
CGA
RecruitingObservational study
Delirium and Cognitive Impairment Development in Hospitalized Older Adults Under Isolation Conditions
Delirium, Dementia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Elderly Inpatients and Frail, run by Zhejiang Hospital at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Clinical Frail Scale (CFS) score (time frame: Baseline). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07510035, which also lists 12 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Apr 2026.