AzTrials
AzTrials

COPDPhase 4NCT07508644

RSV Vaccination to Reduce Recurrent AECOPD

A Phase 4 study testing RSV vaccination (Arexvy, GlaxoSmithKline) in people with COPD and RSV, run by Chinese University of Hong Kong at 1 site in Hong Kong.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Objectives: To determine whether respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccination reduces the rate of all-cause moderate-to-severe acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD) in high-risk patients, and to characterise RSV-specific infection and immune responses in this population. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 50 years and older
Conditions the study is for
COPD, RSV
What is being tested?
RSV vaccination (Arexvy, GlaxoSmithKline)
Type of treatment
Vaccines
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
320 participants
Where
1 siteHong Kong
Study dates
1 Jul 2027to 31 Dec 2030
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 50 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age 50 years or older
  • Spirometry evidence of airflow obstruction (post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC <0.70)
  • Current or former smoker who had accrued a ≥10 pack-year smoking history
  • Frequent COPD exacerbator, as defined by at least ≥2 moderate or ≥1 severe AECOPD in the 12 months prior to screening [31,32]
  • On dual LABD (LABA and LAMA) using the same inhaler/device for ≥8 weeks
  • Up-to-date influenza and pneumococcal vaccination received at least 1 month prior to screening

Who cannot join

  • Coexisting significant pulmonary disease predominating the respiratory symptoms (e.g. asthma, bronchiectasis)
  • Life expectancy shorter than 1 year due to serious or unstable chronic illness (e.g. advanced lung cancer)
  • Refused to receive RSV vaccine (for the RSV group only)
  • Received RSV vaccine of any brand before
  • Immunocompromised or long-term steroid user (≥10mg/day prednisolone or equivalent for ≥2 weeks), which may affect the RSV vaccine efficacy
  • History of any reaction or hypersensitivity likely to be exacerbated by any component of the vaccine
  • Pregnant or lactating (females not yet menopausal must have a negative pregnancy test before receiving the RSV vaccination)
  • Unable to provide informed consent

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Ka Pang Chan, MBChB contact

35052211

chankapang@cuhk.edu.hk

Hong Kong1 site
  • Prince of Wales Hospital

    Shatin

    Ka Pang Chan, MBChB, chankapang@cuhk.edu.hk

    Karen Yiu, 35053532, ysyiu@cuhk.edu.hk

Other trials in Hong Kong

About this study

Official title: Open-label, Multicenter Trial of RSV Vaccination to Reduce Moderate-to-severe Exacerbations in COPD Frequent Exacerbators: Clinical Effectiveness and RSV-specific Immune Responses

Objectives: To determine whether respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccination reduces the rate of all-cause moderate-to-severe acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD) in high-risk patients, and to characterise RSV-specific infection and immune responses in this population.

Hypothesis: RSV vaccination in COPD frequent exacerbators receiving dual long-acting bronchodilators will reduce all-cause moderate-to-severe AECOPD by at least 20-25% over 12 months.

Read more

Design and subjects: This multicentre, two-arm, open-label, prospective study will recruit 320 COPD patients with 2 moderate or severe AECOPD in the prior year despite dual long-acting bronchodilator therapy. Eligible subjects will be allocated 1:1 to receive RSV vaccination plus standard care or standard care alone and followed for 12 months.

Interventions: Participants in the vaccine arm will receive a single dose of a licensed RSV vaccine in addition to usual COPD management. Controls will receive usual care without RSV vaccination during the study period.

Main outcome measures: The primary outcome is the rate of all-cause moderate-to-severe AECOPD per patient-year. Secondary outcomes include RSV-positive AECOPD, RSV infection incidence confirmed by virological testing, severe AECOPD requiring hospitalisation, time to first moderate-to-severe AECOPD, and changes in plasma RSV-specific antibody titres over 12 months.

Data analysis and expected results: Exacerbation rates will be compared between groups using negative binomial regression with adjustment for key covariates on an intention-to-treat basis. The investigators expect RSV vaccination to achieve a clinically meaningful (20%) reduction in all-cause moderate-to-severe AECOPD and to provide mechanistic insights linking RSV immunity, RSV infection, and exacerbation risk in COPD frequent exacerbators.

Read the detailed description

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is one of the most prevalent chronic respiratory diseases worldwide and a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Global estimates suggest 212.3 million prevalent cases of COPD and 3.3 million deaths due to COPD globally in 2019. It is the fourth leading cause of death worldwide in 2021. In Hong Kong, COPD contributes significantly to respiratory morbidity, accounting for a yearly 20,000 to 23,000 hospital admissions between 2006 and 2014 in Hong Kong.

Acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) represents the most important adverse event in the natural history of COPD. Exacerbations cause acute lung function deterioration, prolonged recovery, impaired quality of life, cardiovascular events, and increased mortality. Recurrent exacerbations accelerate lung function decline and define the "frequent exacerbator" phenotype, which persists over time and predicts worse outcomes. Prior exacerbation history is the strongest predictor of future events and forms the basis of GOLD risk stratification. Preventing AECOPD is thus critical for both individual prognosis and healthcare sustainability.

Despite guideline-directed therapy, AECOPD occurs in 0.5-3.5 events/patient/year. Respiratory infections trigger around 50-80% of exacerbations. Respiratory viruses predominate in up to 40% of events, especially for hospitalized and winter-clustered exacerbations. Common pathogens include rhinovirus/enterovirus (17.3%), influenza (7.4%), RSV (respiratory syncytial virus, 5.3%), and coronaviruses (3.1%). AECOPD associated with viral infection shows greater systemic inflammation and more severe courses compared to non infective events.

Community COPD cohorts report RSV in 8.7% of outpatient events over multiple seasons, with serology detecting twice as many cases as PCR alone. Hospital series show even higher impact in older COPD patients, where RSV typically causes lower respiratory disease and AECOPD rather than URTI. RSV-associated AECOPD is associated with worse outcomes than other viral triggers, including influenza. Systematic reviews confirm COPD prevalence of 30.8% among RSV inpatients, with ≥83.0% of RSV-infected COPD cases presenting as exacerbations. Adults with COPD were more likely to be hospitalized following RSV infection than those without these conditions, with an adjusted incidence rate ratio of hospitalization was 9.6-9.7 for COPD. Case fatality rates range 2.8-17.8% across studies.

No approved RSV antivirals exist for adults. Management of RSV associated AECOPD therefore remains supportive and indistinguishable from the management of non RSV exacerbations, relying on bronchodilators, systemic corticosteroids, antibiotics when indicated, and ventilatory support. In this context, prevention is the most promising strategy to reduce RSV related disease burden. Recent landmark trials published in 2023 demonstrated that RSV vaccines reduce lower respiratory tract disease (LRTD) by 80-90% in the first RSV season, and sustained 60 to 80% over two to three RSV seasons. These pivotal trials included adults with chronic lung diseases, including COPD, and subgroup analyses suggest that vaccine efficacy against RSV-related LRTD is preserved in these high risk groups. Reflecting these data, the Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) committee and several national advisory bodies (e.g. US ACIP, UK NHS) now recommend RSV vaccination for adults with chronic lung disease, including COPD. However, COPD patients have been underrepresented in phase 3 trial populations (5-9%), and these pivotal trials measured RSV-LRTD, not AECOPD. No direct evidence exists that RSV vaccination reduces the burden of AECOPD, despite biological plausibility.

The situation contrasts with the more mature evidence base for influenza and pneumococcal vaccination in COPD. Only a few studies have evaluated exacerbations. A systematic review showed that influenza vaccination reduces AECOPD by 36% and hospitalizations by 49%, primarily by preventing late exacerbations and influenza-like illness. Pneumococcal vaccination reduces the risk of community-acquired pneumonia (OR 0.62) and AECOPD (OR 0.60), although no evidence indicates that vaccination reduced the risk of confirmed pneumococcal pneumonia, which was a relatively rare event. Therefore, AECOPD benefits exceed pathogen-specific reductions, suggesting that vaccines attenuate broader respiratory infection burden or inflammation that triggers exacerbations. By analogy, RSV vaccination may reduce all-cause AECOPD via preventing RSV-LRTD, secondary bacterial events, and inflammatory amplification. No trial has tested this hypothesis, particularly in frequent exacerbators who drive most healthcare costs.

Policy recommendations for RSV vaccination in COPD are currently extrapolated from overall vaccine efficacy against RSV LRTD and from the recognized high burden of RSV disease in COPD, rather than from direct data demonstrating a reduction in AECOPD rates. For payers and guideline panels, particularly in health systems like Hong Kong's where RSV vaccination is not subsidized and must be self funded, robust data on AECOPD reduction, hospital utilization, and safety in real world COPD populations would greatly strengthen the case for prioritizing RSV vaccination in this group.

The investigators propose a pragmatic trial in frequent COPD exacerbators (≥2 moderate or ≥1 severe AECOPD in prior year) to test if RSV vaccination and standard-of-care (SOC) reduces all-cause moderate-severe AECOPD versus SOC over 12 months. The investigators target patients with recent AECOPD and a high baseline risk of future exacerbations, in whom any preventive effect of RSV vaccination is most likely to translate into clinically meaningful reductions in events and hospitalizations. The investigators hypothesize that RSV vaccination, when added to guideline-directed COPD therapy (SOC) in frequent exacerbators, will reduce the rate of all-cause moderate-to-severe AECOPD over one year compared with SOC without RSV vaccination.

Conditions
COPD, RSV
Being tested
RSV vaccination (Arexvy, GlaxoSmithKline)
Keywords
AECOPD, RSV, Vaccine
Medical subject headings
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • RSV vaccination (Arexvy, GlaxoSmithKline)Biological

    A single dose of RSV vaccination (Arexvy, GlaxoSmithKline) at the start of study

Study groups in NCT07508644
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
RSV groupActive comparatorPatients who will receive RSV vaccination and standard of care
Receives: Biological: RSV vaccination (Arexvy, GlaxoSmithKline)
Standard of care (SOC) groupNo interventionPatients who will receive standard of care (no RSV vaccination)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of all-cause moderate-to-severe AECOPD

    Comparison of the number of all-cause moderate-to-severe AECOPD between the RSV and SOC groups over 1 year

    Measured: 1 year

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Number of all-cause severe AECOPD

    Comparison of the number of all-cause AECOPD between the RSV and SOC groups over 1 year

    Measured: 1 year

  2. Number of moderate-to-severe and severe AECOPD with RSV infection

    Comparison of the number of moderate-to-severe AECOPD with RSV infection between the RSV and SOC groups over 1 year

    Measured: 1 year

  3. Time to first all-cause moderate-to-severe and severe AECOPD

    Comparison of the time to first all-cause moderate-to-severe AECOPD between the RSV and SOC groups over 1 year

    Measured: 1 year

  4. Time to first moderate-to-severe and severe AECOPD with RSV infection

    Comparison of the time to first moderate-to-severe AECOPD with RSV infection between the RSV and SOC groups over 1 year

    Measured: 1 year

  5. Change in post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1)

    Comparison of the change in post-bronchodilator FEV1 between the RSV and SOC groups over 1 year

    Measured: 1 year

  6. Change of RSV-specific antibody titer in the plasma

    Comparison of the change of RSV-specific antibody titer in the plasma between the RSV and SOC groups over 1 year

    Measured: 1 year

  7. Adverse events due to RSV vaccination

    Evaluation of adverse events due to RSV vaccination over 1 year (for vaccine group only)

    Measured: 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Apr 2026
  2. Study start1 Jul 2027 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion30 Jun 2030 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2030 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
This is a multi-center, two-arm, open-label, prospective study including COPD frequent exacerbators despite dual long-acting bronchodilators (LABD). Eligible patients will be allocated in a 1:1 ratio to receive either RSV vaccination or no RSV vaccination, in addition to guideline-directed standard COPD care. The occurrence of AECOPD will be recorded according to predefined criteria. The incidence of RSV infection will be captured by objective virological testing. RSV-specific antibody in the plasma will be measured throughout the study period. This study will follow patients for 1 year after recruitment. Important endpoints include reductions in all-cause and RSV-specific moderate-to-severe AECOPD, and changes in plasma RSV-specific antibody over 1 year.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
320 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07508644
Sponsor's protocol ID
RSVVaccine_AECOPD
Status last verified
Apr 2026
First submitted
27 Mar 2026
Last updated
13 Apr 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing RSV vaccination (Arexvy, GlaxoSmithKline) in people with COPD and RSV, run by Chinese University of Hong Kong at 1 site in Hong Kong.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Hong Kong. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Ka Pang Chan, MBChB (35052211, chankapang@cuhk.edu.hk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of all-cause moderate-to-severe AECOPD (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Apr 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in
RSV Vaccination to Reduce Recurrent AECOPD | AzTrials