Intellectual Disability, Mild to ModerateYA-IDDNCT07505121
Comparing the Impact of Peer Support vs. Staff-Delivered Transportation Interventions for Young Adults With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.
A study testing Ready to Ride - Standard Delivery and Ready to Ride - Peer Support Delivery in people with Intellectual Disability, Mild to Moderate and Developmental Disability, run by Temple University at 3 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This clinical trial will look at whether young adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities (YA-IDD) have better outcomes when a travel training intervention called Ready to Ride (R2R) is taught by a specially trained Peer Supporter (PS) who shares the lived experience of having an IDD than YA-IDD who are… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 27 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Intellectual Disability, Mild to Moderate, Developmental Disability
- What is being tested?
- Ready to Ride - Standard Delivery and Ready to Ride - Peer Support Delivery
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 325 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 21 May 2026to Jun 2030
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 27 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Between the ages of 18 to 27 years old during the start of the study
- Receives services at one of the eight community service organizations participating in the study.
- Meets the federal diagnosis of a developmental disability (DD)
- Qualifies for services related to their DD.
- Scores >28 on the Transportation Prescreening Assessment (indicating readiness for travel).
Who cannot join
- Independently uses public transportation >4 times/month.
- Is not able to independently mobilize through walking or use of a mobility device.
- Has significant non-corrected visual impairments.
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States3 sites
University of New Hampshire
Durham, New Hampshire, 03824
University of Florida
Gainesville, Florida, 32611
University of Minnesota Institute on Community Integration
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455
About this study
Official title: Comparing Peer Support and Staff-Delivered Transportation Interventions for Young Adults With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (YA-IDD) on Loneliness, Social Participation, and Transportation Skills
This clinical trial will look at whether young adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities (YA-IDD) have better outcomes when a travel training intervention called Ready to Ride (R2R) is taught by a specially trained Peer Supporter (PS) who shares the lived experience of having an IDD than YA-IDD who are taught Ready to Ride by staff at their community services organization. The aspects of life being looked at are loneliness, satisfaction with social activities, travel skills, service use and access, employment, and health related quality of life.
The researchers think the following things will happen.
- YA-IDD who learn from a Peer Supporter will report significantly higher satisfaction with social activities, increased social connectedness and significantly less loneliness compared to YA who are taught organization staff.
- Both groups will learn the same amount of travel skills.
- YA-IDD who learn from a Peer Supporter will show larger increases in access to community-based services, transportation use, employment and health related services after 4 months than the YA taught by organizational staff.
Read the detailed description
This clinical trial has 2 aims.
Aim 1. Compare the effectiveness of peer support (R2R-PS) or staff delivered (R2R-S) Ready to Ride (R2R) travel intervention on loneliness, satisfaction with social activities, and travel skills (primary outcomes), and service use/access, transportation use, employment, social connectedness, and health related quality of life (secondary outcomes) for YA with IDD.
Hypothesis 1.1: YA receiving R2R-PS will report significantly higher satisfaction with social activities, increased social connectedness, and significantly less loneliness compared to YA receiving R2R-S.
Hypothesis 1.2: The travel skills demonstrated by YA receiving R2R-PS will be no worse than travel skills demonstrated by YA receiving R2R-S. We use a non-inferiority approach in response to community service organizations' request for evidence that peer support delivery does not lead to poor outcomes.
Hypothesis 1.3: YA receiving R2R-PS will demonstrate significantly greater improvements in service use/access, transportation use, employment, and health related quality of life 4 months post intervention compared to YA receiving R2R-S.
Aim 2: Evaluate heterogeneity of treatment response by assessing differences in R2R outcomes across characteristics of groups (race and ethnicity, anxiety, adaptive behavior) and context (transportation availability).
Hypothesis 2.1. There will be no difference in treatment effect for YA who identify as white, non-Hispanic and those identifying as Black, Hispanic, Asian, or other race/ethnicity.
Hypothesis 2.2. There will be greater gains for YA with lower levels of adaptive behavior completing R2R, based on past research that identified that participants with intellectual disabilities (ID) with lower levels of adaptive behaviors demonstrated greater improvements in transportation skills than those with a developmental disability but without an ID after receiving the R2R intervention.37 Hypothesis 2.3. There will be no difference in primary outcomes for YA living in areas with less transportation availability, given R2R's individualized travel training approach.
Hypothesis 2.4. There will be greater gains for YA in transportation outcomes who report lower levels of anxiety, given that anxiety in linked with reduced transportation use.
- Being tested
- Ready to Ride - Standard Delivery, Ready to Ride - Peer Support Delivery
- Keywords
- Travel Training Intervention, Young Adults, Intellectual Disability, Developmental Disability, Transportation, Peer Support
- Medical subject headings
- Intellectual Disability, Developmental Disabilities
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Ready to Ride - Standard DeliveryBehavioural
The standard delivery will be implemented by non-peer staff serving as interventionists. These staff will deliver the Ready to Ride (R2R) training, an established evidence-based travel training program.
The intervention includes a total of 16 sessions. Six sessions consist of structured lessons focused on travel safety, awareness, preparedness, and skill development. The remaining sessions involve community-based learning, where participants practice travel skills in real-world settings with varying levels of support provided by the interventionist.
Ready to Ride - Peer Support DeliveryBehavioural
The peer support delivery will be implemented by trained peer interventionists. Peer interventionists are individuals with lived experience of disability who are trained to provide structured support while sharing their experiences. They will deliver the Ready to Ride (R2R) training, an established evidence-based travel training program.
The intervention includes a total of 16 sessions. Six sessions consist of structured lessons focused on travel safety, awareness, preparedness, and skill development. The remaining sessions involve community-based learning, where participants practice travel skills in real-world settings with varying levels of support. Peer interventionists will provide support through modeling, shared experience, encouragement, and guided practice.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Peer Support Delivery (R2R-PS) | Experimental | Not described Receives: Behavioral: Ready to Ride - Peer Support Delivery |
| Standard Delivery (R2R-S) | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Behavioral: Ready to Ride - Standard Delivery |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Progressive Evaluation of Travel Skills (PETS)
The Progressive Evaluation of Travel Skills (PETS) ) is a direct observation measure of independent travel, as rated by the level of support needed for participants to complete transportation-related skills. This tool has established content and construct validity with people with IDD. The PETS will be administered by research staff masked to group assignment who will evaluate each participant on a standardized route. The standardized routes have comparable difficulties across local public transportation systems.
Measured: Data will be collected at 3 time points: 1) pre-test (<14 days prior to R2R), 2) post-test 1 (within 4 days of R2R completion) and 3) post-test 2 (4 months after R2R completion).
NIH Toolbox® Item Bank v3.0 - Loneliness (Ages 18+) - Fixed Form (PROM)
Loneliness-NIH Toolbox® Item Bank v3.0 has 5 questions rated on a 5-point scale. This measure has acceptable psychometric properties in the general population and is used in clinical populations and with people with disabilities, including IDD. The tool includes questions that have detected differences in loneliness between individuals with and without IDD. A total standard T-score will be used to analyze the data.
Measured: Data will be collected at 3 time points: 1) pre-test (<14 days prior to R2R), 2) post-test 1 (within 4 days of R2R completion) and 3) post-test 2 (4 months after R2R completion).
PROMIS Short Form v1.0 - Satisfaction with Participation in Discretionary Social Activities 7a (PROM)
Satisfaction with Participation in Discretionary Social Activities-PROMIS Short Form v1.0 has 7 items that assess contentment with leisure interests and relationships with friends. It has been used with adults with a range of disabilities, including IDD. In a study with people with disabilities (including IDD), increased access to transportation predicted higher scores on this measure. A total standard T-score will be used to analyze the data.
Measured: Data will be collected at 3 time points: 1) pre-test (<14 days prior to R2R), 2) post-test 1 (within 4 days of R2R completion) and 3) post-test 2 (4 months after R2R completion).
Secondary outcomes (6)
Service attendance
Service attendance will be collected retrospectively at pre-test and then weekly after pre-testing through the post-test 2 time period. At pre-test, participants with assistance from family/staff or trusted adults/guardians when needed, will self-report the number of scheduled and missed primary, specialty, mental health, and dental appointments due to lack of transportation over the previous four months. Following the completion of pre-test data collection, participants (or trusted adults/guardians) will receive weekly emails, texts or phones calls to respond to a monitoring survey. From the weekly reports, we will calculate the total number of missed health and service appointments.
Measured: Data will be collected at pre-testing retrospectively and then weekly after pre-test (<14 days prior to R2R) through post-test 2 (4 months after R2R completion).
Accessibility Subscale of the Perceived Access of Health Care Services (PROM)
Accessibility Subscale of the Perceived Access of Health Care Services is a PROM that assesses the perceived distance, time, and ability to get to and from the place of services. The subscale has 4 items with response options on a 5-point Likert scale from "absolutely agree" to "absolutely disagree." It has established content and construct validity and strong internal consistency. Subscale total sum score will be used in analysis.
Measured: Data will be collected at 2 time points: 1) pre-test (<14 days prior to R2R) and 2) post-test 2 (4 months after R2R completion).
Transportation Use
Transportation Use data will be collected through weekly monitoring surveys that ask two brief questions about the use of public transportation in the past week. The questions ask about the: 1) Use of public transportation on the goal route in the past week, and if that trip was taken independently or not and 2) Use of other public transportation fixed routes in the past week, and if that trip was taken independently or not. This data will allow us to directly measure increased public transportation skills and use.
Measured: Data will be collected weekly during R2R intervention through post-test 2 (4 months after R2R completion).
Self-Reported Employment Data (status, hours/week, wages, percentage of missed work shifts)
Descriptive information on employment status in the last 4 months will be collected from participants with assistance from family/staff if needed. Data on employment status including working/maintaining work or not working/loss of work is collected at pre-test and post-test 2. If the participant is working, data will also be collected on number of hours worked weekly, hourly wage, and number of missed work shifts due to transportation. Percentages will be calculated for the total sessions/missed sessions.
Measured: Data will be collected at 2 time points: 1) pre-test (<14 days prior to R2R) and 2) post-test 2 (4 months after R2R completion).
Quality of Life Questionnaire (QOL-Q)
Quality of Life Questionnaire (QOL-Q) is a 40-item measure designed to assess subjective and objective aspects of quality of life among adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Items are organized into four domains based upon Schalock's conceptual framework for quality of life:
- Satisfaction,
- Competence/ Productivity,
- Empowerment/Independence, and
- Social Belonging/Community Integration. Items are rated on a 3-point Likert-type scale, with higher scores indicating higher perceived quality of life. Higher scores reflect greater perceived quality of life. The QOL-Q has demonstrated acceptable-to-strong psychometric properties in prior research. Reported internal consistency reliability coefficients range from approximately .80 - .90 for the total scale, with subscale reliabilities generally ranging from .65 - .85. Test-retest reliability estimates over short intervals have been reported in the .70 - .85 range, indicating adequate score stability.
Measured: Data will be collected at 3 time points: 1) pre-test (<14 days prior to R2R), 2) post-test 1 (within 4 days of R2R completion) and 3) post-test 2 (4 months after R2R completion).
Social Connectedness Measure
Social Connectedness Measure is designed to assess the level to which individuals who use Home and Community Based Services (HCBS), including people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD), form and maintain relationships with others as defined by the National Quality Forum. The measure consists of three global and 13 specific items. Questions address the presence and availability of others, which is not captured in the current measure of loneliness. The response scale ranges from never/rarely to almost always/always. The social connectedness measure is administered as an interview by a trained staff member.
Measured: Data will be collected at 3 time points: pre-test (<14 days prior to R2R), post-test 1 (within 4 days of R2R completion) and post-test 2 (4 months after R2R completion)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Apr 2026
- Study start21 May 2026
- Primary completionJun 2030 (estimated)
- Study completionJun 2030 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Intellectual Disability, Mild to ModerateStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- We will conduct a Hybrid Type 1, two-arm, clinical randomized trial while gathering information on implementation processes to inform strategies for adoption and sustainability.
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 325 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Temple University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Florida, University of New Hampshire, University of Minnesota
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Beth Pfeiffer, PhD, OTR/L, BCP, FAOTA, Principal investigator, Temple UniversityJessica Kramer, PhD, OTR/L, Principal investigator, University of Florida
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07505121
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IDD-2024C1-37368
- Other IDs
- IDD-2024C1-37368
- Acronym
- YA-IDD
- Status last verified
- Mar 2026
- First submitted
- 10 Mar 2026
- Last updated
- 10 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: We will submit de-identified IPD data and associated documentation to the Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR) within 24 months after the end date of the project, enabling other researchers in the field to analyze the data and publish from it following a 12-month embargo period. Specifically, we will be self-publishing the data through the openICPSR research data-sharing service (www.openicpsr.org), which assigns a persistent DOI and DDI-compliant metadata. This will enable independent reanalysis, verification, and secondary research.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparing Peer Support and Staff-Delivered Transportation Interventions for Young Adults With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (YA-IDD) on Loneliness, Social Participation, and Transportation Skills
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07505121
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- YA-IDD / IDD-2024C1-37368
- Keywords
- Travel Training Intervention, Young Adults, Intellectual Disability, Developmental Disability, Transportation, Peer Support
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Enrolling by invitation
- Enrolment
- 325 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Temple UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Florida, University of New Hampshire, University of Minnesota
- Study start
- 21 May 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jun 2030 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jun 2030 (estimated)
- First posted
- 1 Apr 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This clinical trial will look at whether young adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities (YA-IDD) have better outcomes when a travel training intervention called Ready to Ride (R2R) is taught by a specially trained Peer Supporter (PS) who shares the lived experience of having an IDD than YA-IDD who are taught Ready to Ride by staff at their community services organization. The aspects of life being looked at are loneliness, satisfaction with social activities, travel skills, service use and access, employment, and health related quality of life.
The researchers think the following things will happen.
- YA-IDD who learn from a Peer Supporter will report significantly higher satisfaction with social activities, increased social connectedness and significantly less loneliness compared to YA who are taught organization staff.
- Both groups will learn the same amount of travel skills.
- YA-IDD who learn from a Peer Supporter will show larger increases in access to community-based services, transportation use, employment and health related services after 4 months than the YA taught by organizational staff.
Detailed description
This clinical trial has 2 aims.
Aim 1. Compare the effectiveness of peer support (R2R-PS) or staff delivered (R2R-S) Ready to Ride (R2R) travel intervention on loneliness, satisfaction with social activities, and travel skills (primary outcomes), and service use/access, transportation use, employment, social connectedness, and health related quality of life (secondary outcomes) for YA with IDD.
Hypothesis 1.1: YA receiving R2R-PS will report significantly higher satisfaction with social activities, increased social connectedness, and significantly less loneliness compared to YA receiving R2R-S.
Hypothesis 1.2: The travel skills demonstrated by YA receiving R2R-PS will be no worse than travel skills demonstrated by YA receiving R2R-S. We use a non-inferiority approach in response to community service organizations' request for evidence that peer support delivery does not lead to poor outcomes.
Hypothesis 1.3: YA receiving R2R-PS will demonstrate significantly greater improvements in service use/access, transportation use, employment, and health related quality of life 4 months post intervention compared to YA receiving R2R-S.
Aim 2: Evaluate heterogeneity of treatment response by assessing differences in R2R outcomes across characteristics of groups (race and ethnicity, anxiety, adaptive behavior) and context (transportation availability).
Hypothesis 2.1. There will be no difference in treatment effect for YA who identify as white, non-Hispanic and those identifying as Black, Hispanic, Asian, or other race/ethnicity.
Hypothesis 2.2. There will be greater gains for YA with lower levels of adaptive behavior completing R2R, based on past research that identified that participants with intellectual disabilities (ID) with lower levels of adaptive behaviors demonstrated greater improvements in transportation skills than those with a developmental disability but without an ID after receiving the R2R intervention.37 Hypothesis 2.3. There will be no difference in primary outcomes for YA living in areas with less transportation availability, given R2R's individualized travel training approach.
Hypothesis 2.4. There will be greater gains for YA in transportation outcomes who report lower levels of anxiety, given that anxiety in linked with reduced transportation use.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- We will conduct a Hybrid Type 1, two-arm, clinical randomized trial while gathering information on implementation processes to inform strategies for adoption and sustainability.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Peer Support Delivery (R2R-PS) | Experimental | Behavioral: Ready to Ride - Peer Support Delivery |
| Standard Delivery (R2R-S) | Active comparator | Behavioral: Ready to Ride - Standard Delivery |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 27 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Between the ages of 18 to 27 years old during the start of the study
- Receives services at one of the eight community service organizations participating in the study.
- Meets the federal diagnosis of a developmental disability (DD)
- Qualifies for services related to their DD.
- Scores >28 on the Transportation Prescreening Assessment (indicating readiness for travel).
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Independently uses public transportation >4 times/month.
- Is not able to independently mobilize through walking or use of a mobility device.
- Has significant non-corrected visual impairments.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Ready to Ride - Standard DeliveryThe standard delivery will be implemented by non-peer staff serving as interventionists. These staff will deliver the Ready to Ride (R2R) training, an established evidence-based travel training program. The intervention includes a total of 16 sessions. Six sessions consist of structured lessons focused on travel safety, awareness, preparedness, and skill development. The remaining sessions involve community-based learning, where participants practice travel skills in real-world settings with varying levels of support provided by the interventionist. | Behavioural | Standard Delivery (R2R-S) |
| Ready to Ride - Peer Support DeliveryThe peer support delivery will be implemented by trained peer interventionists. Peer interventionists are individuals with lived experience of disability who are trained to provide structured support while sharing their experiences. They will deliver the Ready to Ride (R2R) training, an established evidence-based travel training program. The intervention includes a total of 16 sessions. Six sessions consist of structured lessons focused on travel safety, awareness, preparedness, and skill development. The remaining sessions involve community-based learning, where participants practice travel skills in real-world settings with varying levels of support. Peer interventionists will provide support through modeling, shared experience, encouragement, and guided practice. | Behavioural | Peer Support Delivery (R2R-PS) |
Primary outcome
Progressive Evaluation of Travel Skills (PETS)
Time frame: Data will be collected at 3 time points: 1) pre-test (<14 days prior to R2R), 2) post-test 1 (within 4 days of R2R completion) and 3) post-test 2 (4 months after R2R completion).
The Progressive Evaluation of Travel Skills (PETS) ) is a direct observation measure of independent travel, as rated by the level of support needed for participants to complete transportation-related skills. This tool has established content and construct validity with people with IDD. The PETS will be administered by research staff masked to group assignment who will evaluate each participant on a standardized route. The standardized routes have comparable difficulties across local public transportation systems.
NIH Toolbox® Item Bank v3.0 - Loneliness (Ages 18+) - Fixed Form (PROM)
Time frame: Data will be collected at 3 time points: 1) pre-test (<14 days prior to R2R), 2) post-test 1 (within 4 days of R2R completion) and 3) post-test 2 (4 months after R2R completion).
Loneliness-NIH Toolbox® Item Bank v3.0 has 5 questions rated on a 5-point scale. This measure has acceptable psychometric properties in the general population and is used in clinical populations and with people with disabilities, including IDD. The tool includes questions that have detected differences in loneliness between individuals with and without IDD. A total standard T-score will be used to analyze the data.
PROMIS Short Form v1.0 - Satisfaction with Participation in Discretionary Social Activities 7a (PROM)
Time frame: Data will be collected at 3 time points: 1) pre-test (<14 days prior to R2R), 2) post-test 1 (within 4 days of R2R completion) and 3) post-test 2 (4 months after R2R completion).
Satisfaction with Participation in Discretionary Social Activities-PROMIS Short Form v1.0 has 7 items that assess contentment with leisure interests and relationships with friends. It has been used with adults with a range of disabilities, including IDD. In a study with people with disabilities (including IDD), increased access to transportation predicted higher scores on this measure. A total standard T-score will be used to analyze the data.
6 secondary outcomes
Service attendance
Time frame: Data will be collected at pre-testing retrospectively and then weekly after pre-test (<14 days prior to R2R) through post-test 2 (4 months after R2R completion).
Accessibility Subscale of the Perceived Access of Health Care Services (PROM)
Time frame: Data will be collected at 2 time points: 1) pre-test (<14 days prior to R2R) and 2) post-test 2 (4 months after R2R completion).
Transportation Use
Time frame: Data will be collected weekly during R2R intervention through post-test 2 (4 months after R2R completion).
Self-Reported Employment Data (status, hours/week, wages, percentage of missed work shifts)
Time frame: Data will be collected at 2 time points: 1) pre-test (<14 days prior to R2R) and 2) post-test 2 (4 months after R2R completion).
Quality of Life Questionnaire (QOL-Q)
Time frame: Data will be collected at 3 time points: 1) pre-test (<14 days prior to R2R), 2) post-test 1 (within 4 days of R2R completion) and 3) post-test 2 (4 months after R2R completion).
Social Connectedness Measure
Time frame: Data will be collected at 3 time points: pre-test (<14 days prior to R2R), post-test 1 (within 4 days of R2R completion) and post-test 2 (4 months after R2R completion)
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Sep 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. We will submit de-identified IPD data and associated documentation to the Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR) within 24 months after the end date of the project, enabling other researchers in the field to analyze the data and publish from it following a 12-month embargo period. Specifically, we will be self-publishing the data through the openICPSR research data-sharing service (www.openicpsr.org), which assigns a persistent DOI and DDI-compliant metadata. This will enable independent reanalysis, verification, and secondary research.
Related trials for Intellectual Disability, Mild to Moderate
Recruiting
ICF-Based Interdisciplinary Case Management for Individuals With Disabilities
Intellectual Disability, Mild to Moderate, Developmental Disability
Active, not recruiting
Real-Time Pose Recognition Technology for Improving Tennis Learning in Individuals With Intellectual Disabilities
Intellectual Disability, Mild to Moderate, Adolescence
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Ultra-long-term EEG Monitoring in PwID
Epilepsy, Intellectual Disability, Mild to Moderate
Not yet recruitingObservational study
PGx Medication Safety Reviews of Persons With IDD
Intellectual Disability, Mild, Intellectual Disability, Mild to Moderate
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Beth Pfeiffer, PhD, OTR/L, BCP, FAOTA principal investigator
Temple University
Jessica Kramer, PhD, OTR/L principal investigator
University of Florida
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Ready to Ride - Standard Delivery and Ready to Ride - Peer Support Delivery in people with Intellectual Disability, Mild to Moderate and Developmental Disability, run by Temple University at 3 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: enrolling by invitation, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Progressive Evaluation of Travel Skills (PETS) (time frame: Data will be collected at 3 time points: 1) pre-test (<14 days prior to R2R), 2) post-test 1 (within 4 days of R2R completion) and 3) post-test 2 (4 months after R2R completion).). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Sep 2026.