Breast CancerBCT AidNCT07497256
Decision Aid for Women Newly Diagnosed With Breast Cancer
A study testing BCT Aid in people with Breast Cancer and Decision Aid, run by Xiamen University at 3 sites in China.
Trial summary
The goal of this multi-center randomized controlled trial is to determine if the clinical decision aid (BCT Aid) works to help breast cancer patients participate in decision-making and make high-quality decisions, thereby improving the rate of breast-conserving surgery and quality of life. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Breast Cancer, Decision Aid, Shared Decision Making
- What is being tested?
- BCT Aid
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 160 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesChina
- Study dates
- 1 Apr 2026to Oct 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age ≥ 18 years.
- Newly diagnosed with breast cancer, with clinical stage 0-II, or stage III eligible for breast-conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
- Clinically eligible for breast-conserving surgery and considering one of the following surgical options: breast-conserving surgery, mastectomy, or mastectomy with reconstruction.
- Clinically eligible for adjuvant therapy after surgery.
- Able to access the internet via smartphone.
- Able to read, speak, and understand Mandarin.
Who cannot join
- Male breast cancer patients.
- Clinically eligible for only one surgical option or not candidates for surgery.
- Have a history of other malignancies, except adequately treated cervical carcinoma in situ and basal cell carcinoma of the skin.
- Presence of psychiatric disorders, visual or hearing impairments, or cognitive impairment.
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
China3 sites
The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University
Xiamen, Fujian, 361003
Anqi Qiu, +86 15319783286, qiuanqi66@163.com
Anqi Qiu
Women and Children's Hospital Affiliated to Xiamen University
Xiamen, Fujian, 361003
Ying Hua, +86 15027022676, huaying@stu.xmu.edu.cn
Ying Hua
Xiang'an Hospital Affiliated to Xiamen University
Xiamen, Fujian, 361102
Xiaojing Su, +86 13023925784, suxiaojing@stu.xmu.edu.cn
Xiaojing Su
About this study
Official title: Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of a Multimodal Shared Decision-Making Decision Aid ( BCT Aid) for Women Newly Diagnosed With Breast Cancer
The goal of this multi-center randomized controlled trial is to determine if the clinical decision aid (BCT Aid) works to help breast cancer patients participate in decision-making and make high-quality decisions, thereby improving the rate of breast-conserving surgery and quality of life. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Does the BCT Aid significantly increase the rate of breast-conserving surgery compared to usual care? Does the BCT Aid reduce decision conflict and decision regret, while improving shared decision-making and quality of life? Does the BCT Aid demonstrate better cost-effectiveness in terms of health resource utilization? Researchers will compare the BCT Aid to usual care (standard clinical consultation) to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of BCT Aid.
Read more
Participants will:
Be randomly assigned to either the intervention group (receiving the BCT Aid intervention for 6 months) or the control group (usual care).
Complete assessments including decision conflict and shared decision-making at baseline (T0), post-consultation with the surgeon (T1), 6 months (T2, post-intervention), and 12 months (T3, 6 months post-intervention), decision regret at T2 and T3, and quality of life at T0, T2, and T3, with additional EQ-5D-5L measurements at baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months for cost-effectiveness analysis.
Have clinical outcomes (breast-conserving surgery rate) and health resource utilization data collected from medical records.
Read the detailed description
Breast cancer is one of the most common cancers among women in China. More than 90% of breast cancer patients undergo either modified radical mastectomy (mastectomy with or without reconstruction) or breast-conserving surgery (lumpectomy with radiation therapy), with no significant difference in survival outcomes between the two approaches for patients with early-stage breast cancer. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Clinical Practice Guidelines for Breast Cancer recommend breast-conserving surgery as the preferred surgical option for early-stage breast cancer in the absence of clinical contraindications. However, while the breast-conserving surgery rate ranges from 56.4% to 64.5% in Western countries, it remains only 22% in China. Common reasons for the low rate of breast-conserving surgery in China include fear of cancer recurrence, limited healthcare resources, information asymmetry between patients and healthcare providers, and distrust toward breast-conserving surgery.
A preliminary study conducted by the research team found that patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery had significantly lower levels of decision conflict, decision regret, and stigma compared with those undergoing modified radical mastectomy, and these three factors together explained 32.6% of the variance in quality of life. In a further study by the same team, data from 1,592 breast cancer patients were collected from two hospitals affiliated with Xiamen University between 2009 and 2017, and these data were linked with mortality records from the Xiamen Center for Disease Control and Prevention. The results showed that patients who underwent modified radical mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery had similar survival rates, and endocrine therapy was associated with improved survival. Based on these findings, the research team developed a survival predict model for breast cancer.
The World Health Organization has proposed that breast cancer patients should be fully informed about their diagnosis and the risks and benefits of available treatment options, and should be involved in making clinical treatment decisions together with healthcare providers, taking into account their personal values and preferences. In recent years, awareness of shared decision-making has increased among breast cancer patients in China, but the actual level of patient participation remains lower than their desired level of involvement.
Decision Aids (DAs) are tools designed to facilitate shared decision-making between patients and healthcare providers, particularly in situations where multiple treatment options are available. Currently, there is a lack of accessible, continuous, and cost-effective DAs to support shared decision-making for breast cancer patients in China. Globally, few randomized controlled trials of web-based DAs have been conducted. Due to limitations such as small sample sizes, single-center designs, and inconsistent outcome measures, the effectiveness of breast cancer DAs remains inconclusive, with no reported cost-effectiveness analyses to date.
In this study, a decision aid (BCT Aid) for newly diagnosed breast cancer patients was developed based on the shared decision-making model, integrating a patient values module, , a survival predict module, and a information module. A multi-center, assessor-blind, randomized controlled trial will then be conducted at three hospitals (Women and Children's Hospital Affiliated to Xiamen University, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, and Xiang'an Hospital Affiliated to Xiamen University) to evaluate the effectiveness of the BCT Aid and perform a cost-effectiveness analysis. If the trial demonstrates its effectiveness, the BCT Aid can be directly implemented in clinical practice. Patients can use the BCT Aid to access survival predictions for different treatment options, weigh the benefits and harms, and make better-informed clinical decisions. When physicians discuss surgical options with patients, they can input patient demographic information (e.g., age), clinical information (e.g., breast cancer stage and subtype), and different treatment options into the BCT Aid, which will present survival prediction for each option in a simple and intuitive graphical format. In the values module, patients' values and preferences will be clarified through human-computer interaction to help guide treatment recommendations. The BCT Aid is designed to support patient participation in and facilitate high-quality clinical decision-making.
- Being tested
- BCT Aid, Usual Care
- Keywords
- breast cancer, decision aid, decision conflict, shared decision making, cost effectiveness
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
BCT AidBehavioural
Also called decision aid
The BCT Aid is a multimodal shared decision-making decision aid for newly diagnosed breast cancer patients, designed to support patient participation in clinical decision-making and to improve the quality of decisions regarding surgical treatment. It consists of three core components: (1) a values module to elicit patient preferences for surgical options; (2) a personalized survival prediction module to provide individualized prognostic information; and (3) an information module offering evidence-based knowledge on breast cancer treatment, recovery, and rehabilitation. The intervention will be delivered to the BCT Aid intervention group for 6 months, with breast cancer patients receiving the tool at diagnosis and having access to it throughout the decision-making process.
Usual CareBehavioural
Also called Standard Care
Usual care consists of standard clinical consultation and routine information provision as per hospital practice. Patients receive standard care from their healthcare providers, including routine discussions regarding diagnosis, treatment options, and follow-up plans. No additional decision aid or structured shared decision-making intervention will be provided.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| BCT Aid Intervention Group | Experimental | Participants in this arm will receive a multimodal shared decision-making decision aid (BCT Aid) for 6 months. The BCT Aid includes three module: value model, personalized survival prediction module, and information module. Receives: Behavioral: BCT Aid |
| Usual Care Group | Active comparator | Participants in this arm receive usual care, which consists of standard clinical consultation and routine information provision as per hospital practice. Receives: Behavioral: Usual Care |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Decision conflict
Decision conflict is measured using the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS), a 16-item instrument that assesses uncertainty in decision-making, factors contributing to uncertainty, and perceived effectiveness of decision-making. Higher scores indicate greater decisional conflict.
Measured: At baseline (T0), post-consultation with the surgeon (T1), 6 months (T2, post-intervention), and 12 months (T3, 6 months post-intervention).
Secondary outcomes (5)
Decision regret
Decision regret is measured using the Decision Regret Scale (DRS), a 5-item instrument that assesses distress or remorse associated with a healthcare decision. Higher scores indicate greater regret.
Measured: At 6 months (T2, post-intervention), and 12 months (T3, 6 months post-intervention).
Shared Decision-Making
Shared decision-making is measured using the 9-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9), which assesses the patient's perceived involvement in the decision-making process. Higher scores indicate a higher level of shared decision-making.
Measured: At post-consultation with the surgeon (T1), 6 months (T2, post-intervention), and 12 months (T3, 6 months post-intervention).
Quality of life measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B)
Quality of life is measured using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B), a 37-item instrument that assesses physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being, as well as breast cancer-specific concerns. Higher scores indicate better quality of life.
Measured: At baseline (T0), 6 months (T2, post-intervention), and 12 months (T3, 6 months post-intervention).
Health-related quality of life
Health-related quality of life is measured using the EQ-5D-5L, a standardized instrument that assesses five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression, each rated on five levels. The EQ-5D-5L also includes a visual analog scale (EQ-VAS) for self-rated health. Scores are converted into utility values for cost-effectiveness analysis.
Measured: At baseline (T0), 3 months, 6 months (T2, post-intervention), 9 months, and 12 months (T3, 6 months post-intervention).
Breast-conserving surgery rate
Breast-conserving surgery rate is defined as the proportion of participants who undergo breast-conserving surgery. Data on the type of surgery will be collected from medical records.
Measured: At 6 months (post-intervention)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Mar 2026
- Study start1 Apr 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completionApr 2027 (estimated)
- Study completionOct 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Breast CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 160 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Xiamen University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jiemin Zhu, Xiamen University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07497256
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- KY-2024-049-H01
- Other IDs
- 7231101009
- Acronym
- BCT Aid
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 22 Mar 2026
- Last updated
- 30 Apr 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Sharing of individual participant data is not planned due to patient confidentiality concerns and institutional data protection policies.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Apr 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of a Multimodal Shared Decision-Making Decision Aid ( BCT Aid) for Women Newly Diagnosed With Breast Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07497256
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BCT Aid / KY-2024-049-H01
- Keywords
- breast cancer, decision aid, decision conflict, shared decision making, cost effectiveness
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 160 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Xiamen UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Apr 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Apr 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Oct 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 27 Mar 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this multi-center randomized controlled trial is to determine if the clinical decision aid (BCT Aid) works to help breast cancer patients participate in decision-making and make high-quality decisions, thereby improving the rate of breast-conserving surgery and quality of life. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Does the BCT Aid significantly increase the rate of breast-conserving surgery compared to usual care? Does the BCT Aid reduce decision conflict and decision regret, while improving shared decision-making and quality of life? Does the BCT Aid demonstrate better cost-effectiveness in terms of health resource utilization? Researchers will compare the BCT Aid to usual care (standard clinical consultation) to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of BCT Aid.
Participants will:
Be randomly assigned to either the intervention group (receiving the BCT Aid intervention for 6 months) or the control group (usual care).
Complete assessments including decision conflict and shared decision-making at baseline (T0), post-consultation with the surgeon (T1), 6 months (T2, post-intervention), and 12 months (T3, 6 months post-intervention), decision regret at T2 and T3, and quality of life at T0, T2, and T3, with additional EQ-5D-5L measurements at baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months for cost-effectiveness analysis.
Have clinical outcomes (breast-conserving surgery rate) and health resource utilization data collected from medical records.
Detailed description
Breast cancer is one of the most common cancers among women in China. More than 90% of breast cancer patients undergo either modified radical mastectomy (mastectomy with or without reconstruction) or breast-conserving surgery (lumpectomy with radiation therapy), with no significant difference in survival outcomes between the two approaches for patients with early-stage breast cancer. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Clinical Practice Guidelines for Breast Cancer recommend breast-conserving surgery as the preferred surgical option for early-stage breast cancer in the absence of clinical contraindications. However, while the breast-conserving surgery rate ranges from 56.4% to 64.5% in Western countries, it remains only 22% in China. Common reasons for the low rate of breast-conserving surgery in China include fear of cancer recurrence, limited healthcare resources, information asymmetry between patients and healthcare providers, and distrust toward breast-conserving surgery.
A preliminary study conducted by the research team found that patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery had significantly lower levels of decision conflict, decision regret, and stigma compared with those undergoing modified radical mastectomy, and these three factors together explained 32.6% of the variance in quality of life. In a further study by the same team, data from 1,592 breast cancer patients were collected from two hospitals affiliated with Xiamen University between 2009 and 2017, and these data were linked with mortality records from the Xiamen Center for Disease Control and Prevention. The results showed that patients who underwent modified radical mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery had similar survival rates, and endocrine therapy was associated with improved survival. Based on these findings, the research team developed a survival predict model for breast cancer.
The World Health Organization has proposed that breast cancer patients should be fully informed about their diagnosis and the risks and benefits of available treatment options, and should be involved in making clinical treatment decisions together with healthcare providers, taking into account their personal values and preferences. In recent years, awareness of shared decision-making has increased among breast cancer patients in China, but the actual level of patient participation remains lower than their desired level of involvement.
Decision Aids (DAs) are tools designed to facilitate shared decision-making between patients and healthcare providers, particularly in situations where multiple treatment options are available. Currently, there is a lack of accessible, continuous, and cost-effective DAs to support shared decision-making for breast cancer patients in China. Globally, few randomized controlled trials of web-based DAs have been conducted. Due to limitations such as small sample sizes, single-center designs, and inconsistent outcome measures, the effectiveness of breast cancer DAs remains inconclusive, with no reported cost-effectiveness analyses to date.
In this study, a decision aid (BCT Aid) for newly diagnosed breast cancer patients was developed based on the shared decision-making model, integrating a patient values module, , a survival predict module, and a information module. A multi-center, assessor-blind, randomized controlled trial will then be conducted at three hospitals (Women and Children's Hospital Affiliated to Xiamen University, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, and Xiang'an Hospital Affiliated to Xiamen University) to evaluate the effectiveness of the BCT Aid and perform a cost-effectiveness analysis. If the trial demonstrates its effectiveness, the BCT Aid can be directly implemented in clinical practice. Patients can use the BCT Aid to access survival predictions for different treatment options, weigh the benefits and harms, and make better-informed clinical decisions. When physicians discuss surgical options with patients, they can input patient demographic information (e.g., age), clinical information (e.g., breast cancer stage and subtype), and different treatment options into the BCT Aid, which will present survival prediction for each option in a simple and intuitive graphical format. In the values module, patients' values and preferences will be clarified through human-computer interaction to help guide treatment recommendations. The BCT Aid is designed to support patient participation in and facilitate high-quality clinical decision-making.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| BCT Aid Intervention Group | Experimental | Behavioral: BCT AidParticipants in this arm will receive a multimodal shared decision-making decision aid (BCT Aid) for 6 months. The BCT Aid includes three module: value model, personalized survival prediction module, and information module. |
| Usual Care Group | Active comparator | Behavioral: Usual CareParticipants in this arm receive usual care, which consists of standard clinical consultation and routine information provision as per hospital practice. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Age ≥ 18 years.
- Newly diagnosed with breast cancer, with clinical stage 0-II, or stage III eligible for breast-conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
- Clinically eligible for breast-conserving surgery and considering one of the following surgical options: breast-conserving surgery, mastectomy, or mastectomy with reconstruction.
- Clinically eligible for adjuvant therapy after surgery.
- Able to access the internet via smartphone.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Male breast cancer patients.
- Clinically eligible for only one surgical option or not candidates for surgery.
- Have a history of other malignancies, except adequately treated cervical carcinoma in situ and basal cell carcinoma of the skin.
- Presence of psychiatric disorders, visual or hearing impairments, or cognitive impairment.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| BCT AidAlso: decision aidThe BCT Aid is a multimodal shared decision-making decision aid for newly diagnosed breast cancer patients, designed to support patient participation in clinical decision-making and to improve the quality of decisions regarding surgical treatment. It consists of three core components: (1) a values module to elicit patient preferences for surgical options; (2) a personalized survival prediction module to provide individualized prognostic information; and (3) an information module offering evidence-based knowledge on breast cancer treatment, recovery, and rehabilitation. The intervention will be delivered to the BCT Aid intervention group for 6 months, with breast cancer patients receiving the tool at diagnosis and having access to it throughout the decision-making process. | Behavioural | BCT Aid Intervention Group |
| Usual CareAlso: Standard CareUsual care consists of standard clinical consultation and routine information provision as per hospital practice. Patients receive standard care from their healthcare providers, including routine discussions regarding diagnosis, treatment options, and follow-up plans. No additional decision aid or structured shared decision-making intervention will be provided. | Behavioural | Usual Care Group |
Primary outcome
Decision conflict
Time frame: At baseline (T0), post-consultation with the surgeon (T1), 6 months (T2, post-intervention), and 12 months (T3, 6 months post-intervention).
Decision conflict is measured using the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS), a 16-item instrument that assesses uncertainty in decision-making, factors contributing to uncertainty, and perceived effectiveness of decision-making. Higher scores indicate greater decisional conflict.
5 secondary outcomes
Decision regret
Time frame: At 6 months (T2, post-intervention), and 12 months (T3, 6 months post-intervention).
Shared Decision-Making
Time frame: At post-consultation with the surgeon (T1), 6 months (T2, post-intervention), and 12 months (T3, 6 months post-intervention).
Quality of life measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B)
Time frame: At baseline (T0), 6 months (T2, post-intervention), and 12 months (T3, 6 months post-intervention).
Health-related quality of life
Time frame: At baseline (T0), 3 months, 6 months (T2, post-intervention), 9 months, and 12 months (T3, 6 months post-intervention).
Breast-conserving surgery rate
Time frame: At 6 months (post-intervention)
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Apr 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Sharing of individual participant data is not planned due to patient confidentiality concerns and institutional data protection policies.
Related trials for Breast Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 2
Gene Signatures to Guide HR+MBC Therapy in a Diverse Cohort
Invasive Mammary Carcinoma, Metastatic Breast Cancer
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Comparison of Reliability, Time Cost, and Participant Comfort of Lymphedema Assessments in Upper Extremity
Lymphedema, Upper Extremity Lymphedema
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Combination With or Without Famitinib as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Participants With Triple Negative Breast Cancer (BCTOP-T-N01)
TNBC - Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
Testing Whether Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib is as Effective as Chemotherapy Followed by Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib for the Treatment of High Anatomic Stage Breast Cancer With Low Recurrence Risk, The RxFINE-Low Trial
Anatomic Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage IIIA Breast Cancer AJCC v8
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing BCT Aid in people with Breast Cancer and Decision Aid, run by Xiamen University at 3 sites in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Jiemin Zhu (+86 15960212649, jieminzhu@xmu.edu.cn), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Decision conflict (time frame: At baseline (T0), post-consultation with the surgeon (T1), 6 months (T2, post-intervention), and 12 months (T3, 6 months post-intervention).). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Apr 2026.