AzTrials
AzTrials

Breast CancerBCT AidNCT07497256

Decision Aid for Women Newly Diagnosed With Breast Cancer

A study testing BCT Aid in people with Breast Cancer and Decision Aid, run by Xiamen University at 3 sites in China.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this multi-center randomized controlled trial is to determine if the clinical decision aid (BCT Aid) works to help breast cancer patients participate in decision-making and make high-quality decisions, thereby improving the rate of breast-conserving surgery and quality of life. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women only
What is being tested?
BCT Aid
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
160 participants
Where
3 sitesChina
Study dates
1 Apr 2026to Oct 2027
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age ≥ 18 years.
  • Newly diagnosed with breast cancer, with clinical stage 0-II, or stage III eligible for breast-conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
  • Clinically eligible for breast-conserving surgery and considering one of the following surgical options: breast-conserving surgery, mastectomy, or mastectomy with reconstruction.
  • Clinically eligible for adjuvant therapy after surgery.
  • Able to access the internet via smartphone.
  • Able to read, speak, and understand Mandarin.

Who cannot join

  • Male breast cancer patients.
  • Clinically eligible for only one surgical option or not candidates for surgery.
  • Have a history of other malignancies, except adequately treated cervical carcinoma in situ and basal cell carcinoma of the skin.
  • Presence of psychiatric disorders, visual or hearing impairments, or cognitive impairment.

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

China3 sites
  • The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University

    Xiamen, Fujian, 361003

    Anqi Qiu, +86 15319783286, qiuanqi66@163.com

    Anqi Qiu

  • Women and Children's Hospital Affiliated to Xiamen University

    Xiamen, Fujian, 361003

    Ying Hua, +86 15027022676, huaying@stu.xmu.edu.cn

    Ying Hua

  • Xiang'an Hospital Affiliated to Xiamen University

    Xiamen, Fujian, 361102

    Xiaojing Su, +86 13023925784, suxiaojing@stu.xmu.edu.cn

    Xiaojing Su

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of a Multimodal Shared Decision-Making Decision Aid ( BCT Aid) for Women Newly Diagnosed With Breast Cancer

The goal of this multi-center randomized controlled trial is to determine if the clinical decision aid (BCT Aid) works to help breast cancer patients participate in decision-making and make high-quality decisions, thereby improving the rate of breast-conserving surgery and quality of life. The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does the BCT Aid significantly increase the rate of breast-conserving surgery compared to usual care? Does the BCT Aid reduce decision conflict and decision regret, while improving shared decision-making and quality of life? Does the BCT Aid demonstrate better cost-effectiveness in terms of health resource utilization? Researchers will compare the BCT Aid to usual care (standard clinical consultation) to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of BCT Aid.

Read more

Participants will:

Be randomly assigned to either the intervention group (receiving the BCT Aid intervention for 6 months) or the control group (usual care).

Complete assessments including decision conflict and shared decision-making at baseline (T0), post-consultation with the surgeon (T1), 6 months (T2, post-intervention), and 12 months (T3, 6 months post-intervention), decision regret at T2 and T3, and quality of life at T0, T2, and T3, with additional EQ-5D-5L measurements at baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months for cost-effectiveness analysis.

Have clinical outcomes (breast-conserving surgery rate) and health resource utilization data collected from medical records.

Read the detailed description

Breast cancer is one of the most common cancers among women in China. More than 90% of breast cancer patients undergo either modified radical mastectomy (mastectomy with or without reconstruction) or breast-conserving surgery (lumpectomy with radiation therapy), with no significant difference in survival outcomes between the two approaches for patients with early-stage breast cancer. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Clinical Practice Guidelines for Breast Cancer recommend breast-conserving surgery as the preferred surgical option for early-stage breast cancer in the absence of clinical contraindications. However, while the breast-conserving surgery rate ranges from 56.4% to 64.5% in Western countries, it remains only 22% in China. Common reasons for the low rate of breast-conserving surgery in China include fear of cancer recurrence, limited healthcare resources, information asymmetry between patients and healthcare providers, and distrust toward breast-conserving surgery.

A preliminary study conducted by the research team found that patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery had significantly lower levels of decision conflict, decision regret, and stigma compared with those undergoing modified radical mastectomy, and these three factors together explained 32.6% of the variance in quality of life. In a further study by the same team, data from 1,592 breast cancer patients were collected from two hospitals affiliated with Xiamen University between 2009 and 2017, and these data were linked with mortality records from the Xiamen Center for Disease Control and Prevention. The results showed that patients who underwent modified radical mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery had similar survival rates, and endocrine therapy was associated with improved survival. Based on these findings, the research team developed a survival predict model for breast cancer.

The World Health Organization has proposed that breast cancer patients should be fully informed about their diagnosis and the risks and benefits of available treatment options, and should be involved in making clinical treatment decisions together with healthcare providers, taking into account their personal values and preferences. In recent years, awareness of shared decision-making has increased among breast cancer patients in China, but the actual level of patient participation remains lower than their desired level of involvement.

Decision Aids (DAs) are tools designed to facilitate shared decision-making between patients and healthcare providers, particularly in situations where multiple treatment options are available. Currently, there is a lack of accessible, continuous, and cost-effective DAs to support shared decision-making for breast cancer patients in China. Globally, few randomized controlled trials of web-based DAs have been conducted. Due to limitations such as small sample sizes, single-center designs, and inconsistent outcome measures, the effectiveness of breast cancer DAs remains inconclusive, with no reported cost-effectiveness analyses to date.

In this study, a decision aid (BCT Aid) for newly diagnosed breast cancer patients was developed based on the shared decision-making model, integrating a patient values module, , a survival predict module, and a information module. A multi-center, assessor-blind, randomized controlled trial will then be conducted at three hospitals (Women and Children's Hospital Affiliated to Xiamen University, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, and Xiang'an Hospital Affiliated to Xiamen University) to evaluate the effectiveness of the BCT Aid and perform a cost-effectiveness analysis. If the trial demonstrates its effectiveness, the BCT Aid can be directly implemented in clinical practice. Patients can use the BCT Aid to access survival predictions for different treatment options, weigh the benefits and harms, and make better-informed clinical decisions. When physicians discuss surgical options with patients, they can input patient demographic information (e.g., age), clinical information (e.g., breast cancer stage and subtype), and different treatment options into the BCT Aid, which will present survival prediction for each option in a simple and intuitive graphical format. In the values module, patients' values and preferences will be clarified through human-computer interaction to help guide treatment recommendations. The BCT Aid is designed to support patient participation in and facilitate high-quality clinical decision-making.

Being tested
BCT Aid, Usual Care
Keywords
breast cancer, decision aid, decision conflict, shared decision making, cost effectiveness
Medical subject headings
Breast Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • BCT AidBehavioural

    Also called decision aid

    The BCT Aid is a multimodal shared decision-making decision aid for newly diagnosed breast cancer patients, designed to support patient participation in clinical decision-making and to improve the quality of decisions regarding surgical treatment. It consists of three core components: (1) a values module to elicit patient preferences for surgical options; (2) a personalized survival prediction module to provide individualized prognostic information; and (3) an information module offering evidence-based knowledge on breast cancer treatment, recovery, and rehabilitation. The intervention will be delivered to the BCT Aid intervention group for 6 months, with breast cancer patients receiving the tool at diagnosis and having access to it throughout the decision-making process.

  • Usual CareBehavioural

    Also called Standard Care

    Usual care consists of standard clinical consultation and routine information provision as per hospital practice. Patients receive standard care from their healthcare providers, including routine discussions regarding diagnosis, treatment options, and follow-up plans. No additional decision aid or structured shared decision-making intervention will be provided.

Study groups in NCT07497256
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
BCT Aid Intervention GroupExperimentalParticipants in this arm will receive a multimodal shared decision-making decision aid (BCT Aid) for 6 months. The BCT Aid includes three module: value model, personalized survival prediction module, and information module.
Receives: Behavioral: BCT Aid
Usual Care GroupActive comparatorParticipants in this arm receive usual care, which consists of standard clinical consultation and routine information provision as per hospital practice.
Receives: Behavioral: Usual Care

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Decision conflict

    Decision conflict is measured using the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS), a 16-item instrument that assesses uncertainty in decision-making, factors contributing to uncertainty, and perceived effectiveness of decision-making. Higher scores indicate greater decisional conflict.

    Measured: At baseline (T0), post-consultation with the surgeon (T1), 6 months (T2, post-intervention), and 12 months (T3, 6 months post-intervention).

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Decision regret

    Decision regret is measured using the Decision Regret Scale (DRS), a 5-item instrument that assesses distress or remorse associated with a healthcare decision. Higher scores indicate greater regret.

    Measured: At 6 months (T2, post-intervention), and 12 months (T3, 6 months post-intervention).

  2. Shared Decision-Making

    Shared decision-making is measured using the 9-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9), which assesses the patient's perceived involvement in the decision-making process. Higher scores indicate a higher level of shared decision-making.

    Measured: At post-consultation with the surgeon (T1), 6 months (T2, post-intervention), and 12 months (T3, 6 months post-intervention).

  3. Quality of life measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B)

    Quality of life is measured using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B), a 37-item instrument that assesses physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being, as well as breast cancer-specific concerns. Higher scores indicate better quality of life.

    Measured: At baseline (T0), 6 months (T2, post-intervention), and 12 months (T3, 6 months post-intervention).

  4. Health-related quality of life

    Health-related quality of life is measured using the EQ-5D-5L, a standardized instrument that assesses five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression, each rated on five levels. The EQ-5D-5L also includes a visual analog scale (EQ-VAS) for self-rated health. Scores are converted into utility values for cost-effectiveness analysis.

    Measured: At baseline (T0), 3 months, 6 months (T2, post-intervention), 9 months, and 12 months (T3, 6 months post-intervention).

  5. Breast-conserving surgery rate

    Breast-conserving surgery rate is defined as the proportion of participants who undergo breast-conserving surgery. Data on the type of surgery will be collected from medical records.

    Measured: At 6 months (post-intervention)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Mar 2026
  2. Study start1 Apr 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionApr 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completionOct 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
160 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07497256
Sponsor's protocol ID
KY-2024-049-H01
Other IDs
7231101009
Acronym
BCT Aid
Status last verified
Apr 2026
First submitted
22 Mar 2026
Last updated
30 Apr 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Sharing of individual participant data is not planned due to patient confidentiality concerns and institutional data protection policies.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing BCT Aid in people with Breast Cancer and Decision Aid, run by Xiamen University at 3 sites in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Jiemin Zhu (+86 15960212649, jieminzhu@xmu.edu.cn), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Decision conflict (time frame: At baseline (T0), post-consultation with the surgeon (T1), 6 months (T2, post-intervention), and 12 months (T3, 6 months post-intervention).). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Apr 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in