AzTrials
AzTrials

ErgonomicsNCT07493863

Feasibility and Ergonomic Impact of A Virtual Reality Headset in Endoscopic Procedures

A study testing Virtual reality headset and MYSELF checklist in people with Ergonomics and Virtual Reality Headset, run by The Cleveland Clinic at 1 site in United States.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility of using a virtual reality headset (VRH) during endoscopy and its impact on the endoscopist ergonomics. We will use the Apple Vision Pro during approximately 140 endoscopic procedures during which ergonomics will be assessed. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Virtual reality headset and MYSELF checklist
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
140 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
10 Mar 2026to Dec 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Endoscopist: endoscopist at Cleveland Clinic Weston who consent to participate in the study and are performing either colonoscopy, EUS, or ERCP.
  • Patient: patient undergoing colonoscopy, EUS, or ERCP

Who cannot join

  • Exclude the following procedures: Device-assisted colonoscopy (e.g.- double balloon, pathfinder, etc)
  • ERCP in native papilla
  • Cholangioscopy
  • Therapeutic EUS procedures (FNA/FNB, Stent Placement)
  • Planned Mucosal Resection of Polyps > 20 mm
  • Inpatient procedures
  • Aborted procedures

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

United States1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Cleveland Clinic Weston

    Weston, Florida, 33331

    Tilak Shah, MD, 877.463.2010, SHAHT3@ccf.org

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility of using a virtual reality headset (VRH) during endoscopy and its impact on the endoscopist ergonomics. We will use the Apple Vision Pro during approximately 140 endoscopic procedures during which ergonomics will be assessed.

Being tested
Virtual reality headset, MYSELF checklist
Keywords
ergonomics, virtual reality, virtual reality headset, endoscopy

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Virtual reality headsetDevice

    Use of the virtual reality headset during endoscopic procedures.

  • MYSELF checklistOther

    A preprocedural timeout to improve ergonomics.

Study groups in NCT07493863
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
NonVRHActive comparatorEndoscopic procedure without virtual reality headset (VRH)
Receives: Other: MYSELF checklist
VRHActive comparatorEndoscopic procedure completed with virtual reality headset (VRH)
Receives: Device: Virtual reality headset; Other: MYSELF checklist

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Risk Reduction of endoscopy related musculoskeletal injury by VRH as assessed by rapid entire body assessment (REBA) score.

    The REBA score is an ergonomic assessment tool used to identify potential risks of musculoskeletal disorders in the workplace by evaluating posture and movements. The score ranges from 0-15 with 0 being the lowest risk and 15 being the highest risk. A two point decrease pre-intervention will be considered significant.

    Measured: From the start until the end of an endoscopic procedure.

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Endoscopist experience with VRH assess via subjective survey scored on a 5-point Likert scale.

    The survey includes six questions on ergonomics, technical feasibility, visual clarity, workflow, mental demands, and overall experience. Each question is scored 1-5 with the higher score being outcome.

    Measured: From the start until the end of an endoscopic procedure.

  2. Risk reduction of endoscopic related musculoskeletal injury in specific subgroups (colonoscopy, EUS, ERCP) by VRH as assessed by rapid entire body assessment (REBA) score.

    The REBA score is an ergonomic assessment tool used to identify potential risks of musculoskeletal disorders in the workplace by evaluating posture and movements. The score ranges from 0-15 with 0 being the lowest risk and 15 being the highest risk. A two point decrease pre-intervention will be considered significant.

    Measured: From the start until the end of an endoscopic procedure.

  3. risk reduction of endoscopy related musculoskeletal injury due to pre-procedural checklist as assessed by rapid entire body assessment (REBA) score.

    The REBA score is an ergonomic assessment tool used to identify potential risks of musculoskeletal disorders in the workplace by evaluating posture and movements. The score ranges from 0-15 with 0 being the lowest risk and 15 being the highest risk. A two point decrease pre-intervention will be considered significant.

    Measured: From the start until the end of an endoscopic procedure.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Mar 2026
  2. Study start10 Mar 2026
  3. Primary completionSep 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Sequential
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
140 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07493863
Sponsor's protocol ID
26-072
Status last verified
Mar 2026
First submitted
11 Mar 2026
Last updated
25 Mar 2026
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Virtual reality headset and MYSELF checklist in people with Ergonomics and Virtual Reality Headset, run by The Cleveland Clinic at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Risk Reduction of endoscopy related musculoskeletal injury by VRH as assessed by rapid entire body assessment (REBA) score. (time frame: From the start until the end of an endoscopic procedure.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Mar 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in