AzTrials
AzTrials

Brest CancerPALLAS-IRAQNCT07493291

Effectiveness and Safety of Palbociclib: Brand vs. Generic in Iraqi Stage IV Breast Cancer Patients

An observational study of Brest Cancer and CDK4/6 Inhibitor, run by Al-Mustansiriyah University at 1 site in Iraq.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of branded palbociclib (Ibrance®) compared to available local generic formulations (Palbociclib-IPI) in Iraqi patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer (HR+ HER2- BC). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women only
Conditions the study is for
Brest Cancer, CDK4/6 Inhibitor
What is being tested?
Palbociclib (Brand vs Generic) compartive
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteIraq
Study dates
7 Sep 2025to 20 Apr 2026
How long will I take part?
4 Months
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: The study involved women who are adults with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and negative (HER2-) advanced or metastatic breast cancer patients who received systemic therapy that comprised palbociclib combined with endocrine therapy (e.g., letrozole or fulvestrant).

Inclusion Criteria: 1. Females ≥ 18 years. 2. Histological or cytological confirmation of HR+/HER2- advanced or metastatic breast cancer according to international criteria for pathology.

  1. Patients evaluated prior to treatment with letrozole or fulvestrant having had at least 1 cycle of palbociclib (retrospectively, Ibrance® or prospectively, Palbociclib-IPI) for HR+/HER2- advanced or metastatic breast cancer.
  2. Availability of a complete history and physical examination, laboratory tests, and imaging studies of the patients, including baseline and follow-up tests and examinations.
  3. For the prospective group, the patients had to be willing to give informed consent for evaluation of quality of life and for evaluation of medical data.

Exclusion Criteria: 1. Male breast cancer patients, due to a different biology and small population proportion in Iraq.

  1. Patients with HER2-positive or triple-negative breast cancer, due to different algorithms for treatment and prognosis.
  2. Patients previously receiving CDK4/6 inhibition apart from palbociclib (ribociclib or abemaciclib) so as to not have biased results.
  3. Patients without complete medical history or follow-up sufficient to evaluate reliable outcomes.
  4. Patients with other cancers or severe comorbidities which had a direct impact on survival results independent of breast cancer per criteria done in other real-world observational cohorts

-

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Iraq1 site
  • Anbar cancer center

    Ramadi, Al-Anbar Governorate, 10003

Other trials in Iraq

About this study

Official title: Effectiveness and Safety of Palbociclib: Brand vs. Generic in Iraqi Stage IV Hormone Receptor-positive / Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Negative Breast Cancer Patients: A Comparative Study

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of branded palbociclib (Ibrance®) compared to available local generic formulations (Palbociclib-IPI) in Iraqi patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer (HR+ HER2- BC). This research aims to provide evidence

Read the detailed description

The main problem, though, is that there is no local study performed that evaluates the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of palbociclib in Iraqi patients. Although conducted worldwide, the clinical benefit established with palbociclib may not apply to the outcomes in Iraq, due to the difference in patients, the health care system, and continuity of treatment, which do not resemble those present in countries of high income.

Another equally urgent problem is the absence of comparative studies performed on the branded palbociclib (Ibrance®) and the versions that are now entering the Iraqi market. The high cost of branded forms of palbociclib and the out-of-pocket payment in the bulk of them make it necessary for patients to resort to the generic forms, in view of the absence of comparative data showing clinical equivalence. The oncologists, at the same time, lack data that show whether substitution leads to any loss of efficacy or safety, and the information is lacking to determine the consequences of procurement and reimbursement policies.

Thus, the problem addressed in this thesis is two-fold in nature: (1) the absence of real-world data on the outcome of palbociclib therapy in Iraqi breast cancer patients and the absence of comparative studies on branded versus generic evaluations in Iraq. In the absence of local data, treatment will have to be based on result extrapolation from foreign studies instead of local data, which may lead to undesirable results in the way of results and efficiency of administration of limited health care resources.

Being tested
Palbociclib (Brand vs Generic) compartive
Keywords
Comparative study, Drug effectiveness, Brand-name drug, Palbociclib, Stage IV breast cancer, Safety drug
Medical subject headings
Breast Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Palbociclib (Brand vs Generic) compartiveDrug

    Participants will receive palbociclib, either the brand-name formulation (Ibrance) or a locally manufactured generic equivalent, in combination with standard endocrine therapy. The study compares the effectiveness and safety of the brand versus generic formulations in patients with stage IV hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.

Study groups in NCT07493291
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
• Prospective arm for patients currently receiving generic Palbociclib• Group B (n=30-50): Currently receiving Palbociclib-IPI (prospective follow-up for at least 3 months)
Receives: Drug: Palbociclib (Brand vs Generic) compartive
Retrospective arm for patients treated with branded Palbociclib (Ibrance®)Group A (n=30-50): Received Ibrance® (retrospective data from oncology centers' archives)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The primary efficacy endpoint is defined as progression free survival (PFS)

    which is referred to as the time from initiation of treatment which is recorded to the time that documented disease progression occurs or death post treatment for any cause.

    Measured: two years

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Secondary efficacy endpoints used include overall response rate (ORR)

    which has been defined as the proportion of patients achieving either complete or partial tumor response

    Measured: two years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Mar 2026
  2. Study start7 Sep 2025
  3. Primary completion1 Mar 2026
  4. Study completion20 Apr 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
100 participants (estimated)
Target duration
4 Months
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07493291
Sponsor's protocol ID
110
Other IDs
2025053, 97
Acronym
PALLAS-IRAQ
Status last verified
Mar 2026
First submitted
19 Mar 2026
Last updated
30 Mar 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: De-identified individual participant data will be shared upon reasonable request."

Publications

  • Benitez Fuentes JD, Morgan E, de Luna Aguilar A, Mafra A, Shah R, Giusti F, Vignat J, Znaor A, Musetti C, Yip CH, Van Eycken L, Jedy-Agba E, Pineros M, Soerjomataram I. Global Stage Distribution of Breast Cancer at Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JAMA Oncol. 2024 Jan 1;10(1):71-78. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.4837.

    PubMed 37943547

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Brest Cancer and CDK4/6 Inhibitor, run by Al-Mustansiriyah University at 1 site in Iraq.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Iraq. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The primary efficacy endpoint is defined as progression free survival (PFS) (time frame: two years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07493291, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Mar 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in