AzTrials
AzTrials

Lumbar Spinal StenosisNCT07489001

Opioid Free and Opioid Based Anesthesia in Elective Lumbar Spine Surgery

An observational study of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Lumbar Disc Herniation With Radiculopathy, run by Marmara University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This prospective, observational, non-randomized clinical study aims to evaluate the intraoperative and postoperative effects of opioid-free multimodal anesthesia compared with opioid-containing anesthesia methods in adult patients undergoing lumbar spinal surgery. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
What is being tested?
Opioid-free Anesthesia, Erector Spinae Plane Block and Opioid based Anesthesia
How many people
75 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
9 Dec 2025to 10 Dec 2026
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Adult patients aged 18 to 75 years undergoing elective lumbar spine surgery for conditions such as lumbar spinal stenosis, lumbar disc herniation, degenerative spondylolisthesis, or lumbar disc degeneration at Marmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital. All participants are surgical patients who meet the clinical indication for lumbar spinal procedures. No healthy volunteers are included. Patients are assigned to one of three observational cohorts based on the anesthesia technique chosen by the attending anesthesiologist in routine clinical practice.

Who may be able to join

  • Adults aged 18 to 75 years
  • Elective surgery only
  • Scheduled for elective lumbar spinal surgery (lumbar spinal stenosis and/or lumbar disc herniation)
  • ASA physical status I-III
  • No previous lumbar spine surgery
  • Able to provide written informed consent
Show all 9Show fewer
  • BIS monitoring available and recorded
  • Ability to comply with postoperative pain assessment (NRS/VAS)
  • Stable hemodynamic status preoperatively

Who cannot join

  • Age younger than 18 or older than 75
  • Inability or unwillingness to provide informed consent
  • Severe psychiatric disease or cognitive impairment
  • Emergency surgery cases
  • BMI > 40 kg/m²
  • Pregnancy
Show all 19Show fewer
  • Uncontrolled hypertension, arrhythmia, or severe cardiac disease
  • Renal failure
  • Chronic beta-blocker use
  • Coagulation disorders
  • Chronic alcohol dependence or substance use
  • Neurological deficits affecting perception of pain
  • Chronic pain syndrome (fibromyalgia, chronic LBP > 3 months)
  • Chronic gabapentinoid use
  • Anemia
  • Known allergy to any anesthetic or analgesic agents used in the study
  • Local infection at the intended ESP block injection site
  • Intraoperative change in anesthetic technique that deviates from initial planned management
  • Pediatric patients (<18 years)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Burcu Akyüz Irfanoğlu, MD contact

900-555-725-9649

brcakyz1@gmail.com

Seniyye Ulgen zengin, MD contact

900-505-714-2443

ulgen_t@yahoo.com

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Marmara university hospital

    Istanbul, Maltepe, 34722

    BURCU Akyüz İrfanoğlu, MD, 900-505-714-2443, brcakyz1@gmail.com

    Seniyye Ulgen zengin, MD, 900-505-714-24-43, ulgen_t@yahoo.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: Prospective Comparative Evaluation of Intra-operative and Postoperative Outcomes Associated With Opioid Free Versus Opioid Based Anesthesia Techniques in Patients Undergoing Elective Lumbar Spinal Surgery

This prospective, observational, non-randomized clinical study aims to evaluate the intraoperative and postoperative effects of opioid-free multimodal anesthesia compared with opioid-containing anesthesia methods in adult patients undergoing lumbar spinal surgery. Patients will be managed according to routine clinical practice and assigned to one of three groups based on the analgesic strategy used by the attending anesthesiologist: (1) opioid-free anesthesia using multimodal agents and/or erector spinae plane (ESP) block; (2) ESP block plus intraoperative opioids; or (3) opioid-based anesthesia without regional blocks.

The primary objective is to compare postoperative pain control and opioid requirements within the first 48 hours after surgery. Secondary objectives include evaluating opioid-related side effects such as nausea, vomiting, pruritus, constipation, delayed mobilization, urinary retention, and postoperative complications classified according to the Clavien-Dindo system. Standard postoperative analgesia, including intravenous morphine patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), acetaminophen, and NSAIDs, will be provided for all patients.

The study aims to determine whether an opioid-free multimodal analgesic approach can reduce opioid consumption and related adverse effects while maintaining adequate analgesia in patients undergoing lumbar spinal surgery.

Read the detailed description

Lumbar spinal surgery, including lumbar canal stenosis and lumbar disc herniation procedures, is frequently associated with significant postoperative pain. Opioids are commonly used for perioperative analgesia; however, they may lead to several adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, pruritus, constipation, urinary retention, delayed mobilization, and, less commonly, respiratory depression. In recent years, opioid-sparing and opioid-free multimodal analgesia strategies have gained increasing interest in an effort to minimize these side effects while maintaining effective pain control.

This prospective, observational, non-randomized study will evaluate the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of three different anesthetic approaches routinely used in clinical practice for adult patients undergoing lumbar spinal surgery. Patients will be allocated into groups based on the independent decision of the attending anesthesiologist; the research team will not influence the anesthesia plan.

Group 1 (Opioid-free anesthesia): Patients receive multimodal analgesia (including agents such as acetaminophen, lidocaine, magnesium sulfate, ketamine, esmolol, and dexmedetomidine) and may undergo an erector spinae plane (ESP) block or other trunk blocks. No intraoperative opioids are administered.

Group 2 (ESP + opioid group): Patients receive an ESP block and multimodal analgesia, with the addition of intraoperative opioids such as remifentanil or morphine, as determined by the anesthesiologist.

Group 3 (Opioid-based anesthesia): Patients receive opioid-containing analgesia without the use of ESP or other truncal regional blocks.

All patients will receive standardized postoperative analgesia according to institutional guidelines, including intravenous morphine via patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), acetaminophen, and NSAIDs. Rescue analgesia will be provided as needed with intravenous morphine, acetaminophen, or tramadol.

Data will be collected regarding demographics, intraoperative hemodynamic parameters, anesthesia medications, intraoperative opioid and non-opioid consumption, urine output, depth of anesthesia (BIS), and surgery duration. Postoperative assessments will include pain scores (VAS and NRS at 0, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours), total opioid consumption, time to first analgesic request, patient satisfaction, postoperative complications, bowel function, mobilization time, urine output, vital signs, and length of stay. Complications will be classified using the Clavien-Dindo system to allow standardized comparison of postoperative morbidity across groups.

The primary objective of the study is to determine whether an opioid-free multimodal analgesia regimen provides effective postoperative pain control and reduces opioid requirements compared with opioid-containing strategies. Secondary objectives include evaluating the incidence of opioid-related adverse effects and the overall quality of recovery. By systematically comparing these three routinely used anesthetic approaches, the study aims to clarify the potential benefits of opioid-free anesthesia in lumbar spine surgery and support evidence-based perioperative analgesia strategies.

Being tested
Opioid-free Anesthesia, Erector Spinae Plane Block, Opioid based Anesthesia, Intraoperative ANI Monitoring, Bispectral Index Monitoring
Keywords
Opioid-Free Anesthesia, Multimodal Analgesia, Erector Spinae Plane Block, ESP Block, Postoperative Pain, Opioid-Related Adverse Effects, Opioid Consumption, Lumbar Spine Surgery, Regional Anesthesia
Medical subject headings
Spinal Stenosis, Intervertebral Disc Degeneration, Pain, Postoperative

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Opioid-free AnesthesiaDrug

    Also called OFA

    A multimodal opioid-free anesthetic regimen including ESP block and agents such as acetaminophen, lidocaine, dexmedetomidine, ketamine, magnesium sulfate, and esmolol. No intraoperative opioids are given.

    Applies to Groups:Group 1 (Opioid-Free Anesthesia Group)

  • Erector Spinae Plane BlockProcedure or surgery

    Also called ESP, ESPB, L-ESPB, L-ESP

    Before surgery, after endotracheal intubation of the patient in the prone position, a bilateral ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block was performed at the vertebral level above the surgical site, using 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine per side in the lumbar region."

    Applies to Groups:

    • Group 2 (for patients who receive ESP)
    • Group 3 (ESP + Opioid Group)
  • Opioid based AnesthesiaDrug

    Also called OBA, Conventional opioid anesthesia

    Intraoperative opioid analgesia (e.g., remifentanil infusion and/or morphine) administered according to standard clinical practice.

    Applies to Groups:

    • Group 3 (ESP + Opioid Group)
    • Group 1 (Opioid-Based Anesthesia Group)
  • Intraoperative ANI MonitoringDevice

    Also called ANI, ANI monitoring

    The Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) device is used intraoperatively to continuously assess autonomic nervous system responses to nociceptive stimuli. ANI values are recorded in all participants and compared across anesthetic cohorts for evaluation of intraoperative analgesic adequacy.

  • Bispectral Index MonitoringDevice

    Also called BIS, BIS Monitoring

    Continuous intraoperative depth of anesthesia monitoring using the Bispectral Index (BIS) device. BIS values are recorded throughout the procedure to assist in titration of anesthetic agents and to standardize anesthesia depth across study cohorts. The BIS device is used for monitoring only, and no device-related investigational procedures are performed.

Study groups in NCT07489001
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group 1- Opioid-Based Anesthesia GroupPatients receiving intraoperative opioid-based analgesia without ESP or other truncal regional anesthesia techniques.
Receives: Drug: Opioid based Anesthesia; Device: Intraoperative ANI Monitoring; Device: Bispectral Index Monitoring
Group 2- Opioid-Free Anesthesia GroupPatients receiving opioid-free multimodal anesthesia, with or without ESP block, and non-opioid agents such as acetaminophen, lidocaine, ketamine, dexmedetomidine, magnesium sulfate, and esmolol.
Receives: Drug: Opioid-free Anesthesia; Procedure: Erector Spinae Plane Block; Device: Intraoperative ANI Monitoring; Device: Bispectral Index Monitoring
Group 3- ESP Block + Opioid GroupPatients receiving ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane (ESP) block plus intraoperative opioid analgesia such as remifentanil or morphine.
Receives: Procedure: Erector Spinae Plane Block; Drug: Opioid based Anesthesia; Device: Intraoperative ANI Monitoring; Device: Bispectral Index Monitoring

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Postoperative Opioid Consumption in the First 48 Hours

    Total cumulative opioid consumption (morphine equivalents) within the first 48 postoperative hours, recorded via intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) and rescue opioid boluses. This measure evaluates the analgesic effectiveness of opioid-free versus opioid-containing intraoperative anesthesia strategies.

    Measured: 0-48 hours after surgery

Secondary outcomes (15)
  1. Postoperative Pain Intensity Assessed by Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)

    Pain intensity will be measured using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). Assessments will be recorded at predefined postoperative time points.

    Measured: 0, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively

  2. Incidence of Opioid-Related Adverse Effects

    Presence of nausea, vomiting, pruritus, constipation, urinary retention, sedation, and respiratory depression. Adverse effects will be compared among the three anesthesia groups.

    Measured: 0-48 hours

  3. Postoperative Complications According to the Clavien-Dindo Classification

    Postoperative complications will be graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification system (Grade I-V). Any deviation from the normal postoperative course will be recorded and classified, and the highest Clavien-Dindo grade observed during the follow-up period will be used for analysis.Complications were prospectively recorded and classified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification.

    Measured: Within 30 days after surgery

  4. Time to First Analgesic Request

    Time elapsed from arrival in the recovery unit to the first patient request for additional analgesia, with analgesic requests recorded at 6-hour intervals over a 48-hour postoperative period.

    Measured: Postoperative period (assessed every 6 hours during the first 48 hours after arrival in the recovery unit)

  5. Total Non-Opioid Analgesic Consumption

    Total amount of non-opioid analgesics administered postoperatively (e.g., acetaminophen, NSAIDs), including rescue doses.

    Measured: 0-48 hours

  6. Time to First Mobilization

    Time from the end of surgery to the patient's first ambulation, as documented by the clinical team, measured in postoperative hours.

    Measured: From the end of surgery until the first documented ambulation, assessed within the first 48 postoperative hours

  7. Return of Bowel Function

    Time to the first documented bowel movement measured in postoperative hours and the presence or absence of constipation during the postoperative period.

    Measured: Time from the end of surgery to the first documented bowel movement, assessed within the first 48 postoperative hours

  8. Intraoperative Heart Rate

    Heart rate measured in beats per minute (bpm), recorded at predefined intraoperative intervals (baseline before induction, after induction, after intubation and every 30 minutes thereafter until the end of surgery).

    Measured: Intraoperative period

  9. Patient Satisfaction Score

    Patient-reported satisfaction with postoperative analgesia evaluated on a 0-3 scale (poor, moderate, good, very good).

    Measured: At 48 hours postoperatively

  10. Length of Post-operative Hospital Stay

    Total duration of postoperative hospitalization measured in days.

    Measured: Length of postoperative hospital stay, defined as the time from the end of surgery to hospital discharge, assessed up to 30 days postoperatively

  11. Intraoperative Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) Values

    Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) values recorded intraoperatively to assess autonomic response to nociceptive stimuli. ANI values will be compared between groups and correlated with intraoperative hemodynamic parameters and postoperative pain scores (NRS/VAS). This outcome evaluates the potential predictive value of ANI monitoring in differentiating analgesic effectiveness across anesthesia strategies.T

    Measured: hroughout the intraoperative period

  12. Intraoperative Blood Pressure

    Systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial blood pressure measured in mmHg, recorded at predefined intraoperative intervals (baseline before induction,after induction, after intubation, and every 30 minutes thereafter until the end of surgery).

    Measured: Intraoperative Period

  13. Intraoperative Oxygenation and Ventilation Parameters

    Oxygen saturation (SpO₂) and end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO₂) values recorded at predefined intraoperative intervals.

    Measured: Intraoperative period

  14. Intraoperative Bispectral Index (BIS) Values

    BIS values recorded at predefined intraoperative intervals.(baseline before induction, after induction, after intubation, and every 30 minutes thereafter until the end of surgery).

    Measured: Intraoperative period

  15. Intraoperative Urine Output

    Urine output measured in milliliters (mL) at predefined 30-minute intraoperative intervals following induction of anesthesia, as an indicator of intraoperative renal perfusion and fluid balance.

    Measured: Intraoperative period (from induction of anesthesia, assessed every 30 minutes until the end of surgery)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Mar 2026
  2. Study start9 Dec 2025
  3. Primary completion9 Dec 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion10 Dec 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
75 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07489001
Sponsor's protocol ID
09.2025.403
Status last verified
Mar 2026
First submitted
11 Dec 2025
Last updated
23 Mar 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No: Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared. The study involves clinical information collected under institutional ethical approval, and no consent was obtained for external sharing of identifiable or de-identified participant-level data.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Lumbar Disc Herniation With Radiculopathy, run by Marmara University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 19 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Burcu Akyüz Irfanoğlu, MD (900-555-725-9649, brcakyz1@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Postoperative Opioid Consumption in the First 48 Hours (time frame: 0-48 hours after surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Mar 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in