AzTrials
AzTrials

Psychological StressSPARNCT07488169

The Role of Physical Ardor in Triggering State Anattā and Psychophysiological Recovery

A study testing Continuous Aerobic Exercise (Treadmill-based) and Intermittent Aerobic Exercise (Ball Games) in people with Psychological Stress and Mental Fatigue, run by Lincoln University College at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study investigates how different types of aerobic exercise-specifically continuous treadmill running versus intermittent ball games-influence mental restoration in university students. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 30 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Continuous Aerobic Exercise (Treadmill-based) and Intermittent Aerobic Exercise (Ball Games)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
671 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
1 Apr 2025to 15 Jan 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 30 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Healthy adults aged 18 to 30 years. University students or individuals with equivalent educational background.
  • Normal or corrected-to-normal vision and hearing.
  • Willingness to comply with all study procedures and sign the informed consent form.

Who cannot join

  • History of cardiovascular disease, respiratory illness, or chronic pain that may affect Heart Rate Variability (HRV).
  • Diagnosis of clinical depression, anxiety disorders, or other psychiatric conditions.
  • Current smokers or individuals with a history of alcohol or drug abuse. Recent use of medications affecting the autonomic nervous system or endocrine function (e.g., steroids, beta-blockers, or hormonal medications) within the past month.
  • Any disability preventing walking for 30 minutes or completing the Digit Span cognitive task.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Wuhan Technical University

    Wuhan, Hubei, 430074

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Mechanisms of Exercise-Induced Psychophysiological Reset: The Role of Physical Ardor in Mediating State Anattā and Mental Restoration

This study investigates how different types of aerobic exercise-specifically continuous treadmill running versus intermittent ball games-influence mental restoration in university students. The research introduces the concept of "Physical Ardor" (PA), a state of high-intensity physical engagement that may act as a "circuit breaker" for persistent self-narrative and stress.

A total of 600 participants were assigned to four experimental groups to compare the effects of exercise intensity (moderate vs. high) and modality (continuous vs. intermittent). The study aims to determine whether high-intensity physical ardor can trigger a "State Anattā Experience" (a psychological state of "no-self" and tranquility) and subsequently enhance psychophysiological release and recovery. Results from this study will provide new insights into how structured exercise can be used as an effective intervention for academic stress and mental fatigue.

Being tested
Continuous Aerobic Exercise (Treadmill-based), Intermittent Aerobic Exercise (Ball Games)
Keywords
Physical Ardor, State Anatta Experience, Psychophysiological Recovery, Mental Restoration, Academic Stress
Medical subject headings
Stress, Psychological, Mental Fatigue

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Continuous Aerobic Exercise (Treadmill-based)Other

    Participants engage in continuous running on a motorized treadmill. The protocol is designed to evaluate the psychological and physiological effects of steady-state exercise. Group A: 15 minutes of continuous running at a moderate intensity of 40-50% HRmax. Group C: 30 minutes of continuous running at a moderate intensity of 40-50% HRmax.

    Heart rate is monitored throughout to ensure compliance with the prescribed intensity zone.

  • Intermittent Aerobic Exercise (Ball Games)Other

    Participants participate in high-intensity intermittent ball games (such as basketball or volleyball). This intervention focuses on the impact of "Physical Ardor" (PA) generated through high-intensity, fluctuating physical engagement. Group B: 30 minutes of intermittent activity at a high intensity exceeding 70% HRmax. Group C: 15 minutes of intermittent activity at a high intensity exceeding 70% HRmax.

    Exercise intensity is verified through both %HRmax data and the Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE).

Study groups in NCT07488169
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group A: Low-Duration / Low-Intensity - The Baseline ControlActive comparatorGroup A serves as the negative control, evaluating psychophysiological states where physical intensity and duration are insufficient to disrupt self-narrative circuits. Participants perform a 15-minute steady-state walk on a motorized treadmill at 40%-50% %HRmax. From an ontological perspective, this condition is characterized by high cognitive resource availability. The rhythmic, low-demand movement allows the "Narrative Self" to remain hyper-active, facilitating sustained internal dialogues regarding academic stressors or social identity. Consequently, Group A is expected to yield the lowest scores on the State Anattā Experience Index (SAEI), as participants fail to reach the threshold for "Social Role Suspension" or "Narrative Label Offline". Without a significant "unburdening" of the egoic structure, this group is hypothesized to show minimal subsequent effects in the Psychophysiological Release and Recovery Index (PRRI).
Receives: Other: Continuous Aerobic Exercise (Treadmill-based)
Group B: Low-Duration / High-Intensity - The Acute Congestion PathExperimentalGroup B tests the "Acute Congestion" hypothesis: whether high-intensity physical pressure can trigger an instantaneous "circuit-breaking" of the egoic narrative within 15 minutes. To eliminate "social loafing," this protocol employs 3-on-3 Basketball and Volleyball HFMD (12-15 balls/minute), maintaining intensity at > 70% %HRmax via real-time ECG.Neuro-philosophically, unpredictable, high-velocity movements demand total cognitive recruitment. As resources shift to somatic-motor demands, the "Narrative Self" is forced offline, inducing the Cessation of Self-Narrative. Consequently, Group B is expected to yield a significant spike in the SAEI, marked by Social Role Suspension and Narrative Label Offline. This state is corroborated by sharp increases in sympathetic markers, specifically $\Delta$sAA and heart rate metrics.
Receives: Other: Intermittent Aerobic Exercise (Ball Games)
Group C: High-Duration / Low-Intensity - The Rhythmic Wear PathExperimentalGroup C investigates "monotony-induced decoupling" of the self-narrative through extended duration rather than acute pressure. Participants perform a 30-minute steady-state treadmill session at low intensity (40%-45% %HRmax). Unlike Group B, this protocol leverages the repetitive, predictable nature of aerobic exercise. Ontologically, this path tests whether persistent rhythmic habituation of sensory input triggers an involuntary fading of ego-boundaries. Over 30 minutes, the "Narrative Self" undergoes gradual exhaustion as the brain habituates to static environmental stimuli. While intensity remains low, Group C is hypothesized to facilitate "Passive Anattā", characterized by a subtle Cessation of Self-Narrative. In this state, "stressed student" identities and narrative labels dissolve into Pure Existential Awareness, providing a baseline for understanding how duration alone contributes to the psychological unburdening and recovery measured by the PRRI.
Receives: Other: Continuous Aerobic Exercise (Treadmill-based)
Group D: High-Duration / High-Intensity - The Sustained Flow PathExperimentalGroup D examines the synergistic effects of temporal depth and physiological ardor. Due to musculoskeletal injury risks identified in preliminary trials, the high-frequency drills of Group B were deemed unsustainable for 30 minutes. Conversely, standard competitive formats required more than 15 minutes to reliably reach the $> 70\%$ %HR$_{max}$ threshold.Consequently, Group D utilizes 5-on-5 basketball and 6-on-6 volleyball, allowing for a distributed physical load and tactical pauses suitable for an extended session. While this introduction of modality heterogeneity is acknowledged as a limitation, Group D is hypothesized to trigger the most profound State Anattā Experience (SAEI). The combination of high intensity and sustained duration is expected to induce a comprehensive Cessation of Self-Narrative, facilitating a deep transition into Pure Existential Awareness and maximizing the subsequent PRRI recovery effect.
Receives: Other: Intermittent Aerobic Exercise (Ball Games)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Rating of Perceived Exertion

    The Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) scale is a subjective measure of the intensity of physical effort. Participants rate their perceived exertion during exercise on a numerical scale ranging from 6 to 20. 6 represents "no exertion at all" (resting state). 20 represents "maximal exertion" (absolute limit). This scale provides a subjective counterpart to physiological heart rate. In this study, RPE is used to quantify the "mental volitional engagement" component of the Physical Ardor (PA) construct.

    Measured: Immediately post-intervention (0-2 minutes after the end of exercise)

  2. %HRmax

    %HRmax is an objective physiological metric used to quantify the relative cardiovascular intensity of the exercise intervention. It is calculated by dividing the heart rate measured during exercise by the participant's predicted or measured maximum heart rate (HRmax). Estimated Maximum Heart Rate (HRmax) = 220 - Age (years). %HRmax = [Average Heart Rate during Exercise / HRmax] × 100%. Throughout the entire intervention session, participants' heart rate is monitored in real-time using a professional-grade wearable device (e.g., Polar H10 heart rate strap). The final reported value is the average %HRmax recorded across the full duration of the active exercise phase.

    Measured: Continuously during the active intervention session (average of approximately 15/30 minutes, from start to completion of exercise)

  3. Salivary Alpha-Amylase

    Salivary Alpha-Amylase (sAA) is a sensitive biochemical marker used to assess the response of the Sympathetic-Adrenomedullary (SAM) system to acute physical stress. In this study, sAA activity serves as an objective physiological validator of Physical Ardor (PA). The enzyme activity is measured in Units per Milliliter (U/mL). This marker helps validate the physiological stress level of the participant and its relationship with the State Anattā Experience (SAE).

    Measured: Baseline (collected 8-10 minutes prior to intervention, following an 8-minute quiet rest period) and Post-intervention (collected 5-6 minutes after the end of exercise).

  4. Heart Rate Variability

    Heart Rate Variability (HRV) is used to assess the cardiac autonomic regulation and the parasympathetic reactivation following physical exertion. HRV is recorded via a high-resolution wearable heart rate monitor (e.g., Polar H10). The primary metric reported is the Root Mean Square of Successive Differences (RMSSD), which reflects vagal tone. To ensure data quality, measurements are taken in a controlled, seated position. This marker serves to evaluate the physiological recovery component of the Psychophysiological Release and Recovery Index (PRRI).

    Measured: Baseline (collected 8-10 minutes prior to intervention, following a quiet rest period) and Post-intervention recovery (collected 12-20 minutes after the end of exercise).

  5. De-identification

    De-identification measures the cognitive shift where an individual temporarily detaches from their personal identity and social roles during high-intensity physical activity. This scale assesses three key psychological facets: 1.Social Role Suspension: The cessation of awareness regarding specific social labels (e.g., "student," "professional"). 2.Narrative Label Offline: The perceived meaninglessness of personal history, past achievements, or failures in the moment of exertion.

    3.Pure Existential Awareness: The transition from a social-defined persona to a state of pure existential being.This process is hypothesized to facilitate psychophysiological recovery by "silencing" self-referential stress and narrative-driven anxiety. Average score on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = Strongly Disagree to 5 = Strongly Agree).

    Measured: Immediately post-intervention (collected 2-5 minutes after the end of exercise, reflecting on the moment of maximum intensity).

  6. Cessation of Self-Narrative

    Cessation of Self-Narrative (Subscale of State Anattā Experience Index). This subscale measures the temporary suspension of internal dialogue and self-evaluative thoughts during peak physical exertion. The scale evaluates the "cognitive silencing" effect across three domains: 1.Silence of Inner Voice: The reduction of internal monologue due to high task demands. 2.Absence of Self-Observation: The cessation of self-judgment and the "observer self." 3.Present-Moment Locking: The narrowing of attentional focus solely to immediate physical movement. The significance of this measure lies in identifying the threshold at which physical intensity overrides the brain's default mode network (DMN), effectively halting the self-referential narratives that often sustain psychological stress. Average score on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = Strongly Disagree to 5 = Strongly Agree).

    Measured: Immediately post-intervention (collected 2-5 minutes after the end of exercise, reflecting on the moment of maximum intensity).

  7. Loss of Agency

    The Loss of Agency subscale of the State Anattā Experience Index (SAEI) operationalizes the phenomenological transition from volitional motor control to perceived automaticity during peak physical exertion. This construct delineates the emergence of "autonomic flow" via three dimensions: Automatic Movement (instinctive response to intensity), Withdrawal of the 'Commander' (cessation of explicit motor commands), and Being an Observer (detached witnessing of action). Centrally, this scale captures the dissolution of the "executive self," a shift that optimizes psychophysiological recovery by attenuating the cognitive load inherent in volitional control, thereby fostering mental release and neural efficiency. Data are quantified via a 5-point Likert scale (1 = Strongly Disagree; 5 = Strongly Agree).

    Measured: Immediately post-intervention (collected 2-5 minutes after the end of exercise, reflecting on the moment of maximum intensity).

  8. Dissolution of Boundaries

    The Dissolution of Boundaries subscale of the State Anattā Experience Index (SAEI) operationalizes the sensory-spatial integration of self, body, and environment during peak exertion. This construct delineates a phenomenological collapse across three strata: Instrumental Integration (erasure of the body-equipment gap), Environmental Permeability (loss of somatic-spatial demarcation), and Subject-Object Synthesis (unification of self and surroundings). Representing the apex of the "Anattā" (Non-Self) state, this dimension replaces ego-centered spatial frames with holistic awareness. By attenuating the cognitive load of spatial monitoring, this shift fosters profound mental release. Data are quantified via a 5-point Likert scale (1 = Strongly Disagree; 5 = Strongly Agree).

    Measured: Immediately post-intervention (collected 2-5 minutes after the end of exercise, reflecting on the moment of maximum intensity).

  9. Loss of Time Perception

    Loss of Time Perception (Subscale of State Anattā Experience Index). This subscale measures the subjective distortion and suspension of temporal awareness during peak physical exertion. The scale assesses the phenomenological shift in time perception through three specific facets: 1.Loss of Temporal Tracking: The complete loss of the ability to monitor the duration of the exercise. 2.Time Compression: The sensation that time is "shrinking" or passing significantly faster compared to normal daily life. 3.Absolute Presence: The dissolution of the distinction between "past" and "future," replaced by a continuous sense of the "now." This dimension is significant because it indicates a deep immersion in the task where the brain's executive monitoring of time is bypassed, facilitating a psychological release from the pressure of duration and contributing to the overall State Anattā Experience. Average score on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = Strongly Disagree to 5 = Strongly Agree).

    Measured: Immediately post-intervention (collected 2-5 minutes after the end of exercise, reflecting on the moment of maximum intensity).

  10. Sense of Relief

    Sense of Relief (Subscale of Psychophysiological Release and Recovery Index, PRRI). This subscale assesses the immediate psychological and physical release experienced during the post-exercise recovery phase. The measure evaluates three facets of post-stress recovery: 1.Mental Space: The perception of a refreshed and clear mind, characterized by the "purging" of mental clutter. 2.Stress Detachment: A subjective sense of detachment from prior stressors, where they are no longer perceived as immediate threats. 3.Physical Release: A profound sensation of tension release throughout the body, described as the lifting of a physical burden. This dimension serves as a primary outcome to quantify the recovery efficacy of the State Anattā Experience (SAE). Average score on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = Strongly Disagree to 5 = Strongly Agree).

    Measured: Post-rest recovery (collected 10-12 minutes after the end of exercise, following the secondary HRV measurement window).

  11. Equanimity & Pliability

    Equanimity and Physical Pliability (Subscale of Psychophysiological Release and Recovery Index, PRRI). This subscale assesses the functional quality of recovery, focusing on emotional resilience and physical suppleness following the intervention. The measure evaluates three key facets of the recovered state: 1.Emotional Stability: The perception of being emotionally resilient and centered, characterized by a "grounded" state of mind resulting from physical exertion. 2.Physical Pliability: The sensation of the body being remarkably supple and fluid, where post-exercise relaxation has successfully replaced previous tension. 3.Inner Stillness: A state of profound inner quietness where thoughts remain undisturbed and still. This dimension quantifies the "rehabilitation" quality of the State Anattā Experience, moving beyond simple relief to a state of enhanced psychophysiological readiness. Average score on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = Strongly Disagree to 5 = Strongly Agree).

    Measured: Post-rest recovery (collected 10-12 minutes after the end of exercise, following the secondary HRV measurement window).

  12. Cognitive Openness & Flexibility

    Cognitive Openness and Flexibility (Subscale of Psychophysiological Release and Recovery Index, PRRI). This subscale measures the cognitive expansion and psychological flexibility attained during the post-intervention recovery phase. The assessment focuses on three cognitive domains: 1.Open Awareness: The feeling of being more mentally receptive and less driven by habitual defensive reactions toward others or the environment. 2.Perspective Shift: The ability to view life or personal problems from a broader perspective, transcending narrow self-concerns. 3.Cognitive Fluidity and Novelty: The reduction of mental rigidity, facilitating the embrace of new solutions or creative ideas. This dimension quantifies the "psychological growth" aspect of the recovery, indicating that the State Anattā Experience (SAE) leads to a more adaptive and less rigid cognitive state. Average score on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = Strongly Disagree to 5 = Strongly Agree).

    Measured: Post-rest recovery (collected 10-12 minutes after the end of exercise, following the secondary HRV measurement window).

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Mar 2026
  2. Study start1 Apr 2025
  3. Primary completion1 Jun 2025
  4. Study completion15 Jan 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
671 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07488169
Sponsor's protocol ID
LUC-IRB-2025-0311
Acronym
SPAR
Status last verified
Mar 2026
First submitted
12 Mar 2026
Last updated
23 Mar 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: There is no plan to share individual participant data to protect the privacy of the participants and ensure data security.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Continuous Aerobic Exercise (Treadmill-based) and Intermittent Aerobic Exercise (Ball Games) in people with Psychological Stress and Mental Fatigue, run by Lincoln University College at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Rating of Perceived Exertion (time frame: Immediately post-intervention (0-2 minutes after the end of exercise)). The study lists 12 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Mar 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in