Breast Cancer, HR+/HER2- Early-StageNCT07484763
Predicting Recurrence in HR+/HER2- Early Breast Cancer
An observational study of Breast Cancer, HR+/HER2- Early-Stage, run by Shengjing Hospital.
Trial summary
Hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) breast cancer constitutes approximately 70% of all breast cancer cases. Although early-stage patients generally have favorable outcomes following standard surgery and adjuvant endocrine therapy, long-term follow-up data reveal a… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Breast Cancer, HR+/HER2- Early-Stage
- How many people
- 500 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Apr 2026to 1 Apr 2027
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: We retrospectively collected data from patients with primary breast cancer who underwent surgical treatment at our center between July 2014 and June 2024.
Who may be able to join
- Histopathologically confirmed invasive breast ductal carcinoma or lobular carcinoma;
- Molecular subtype of HR+/HER2- (ER ≥ 10%, and HER2 immunohistochemistry 0/1+ or 2+ without amplification confirmed by FISH);
- Received standardized surgical treatment and postoperative adjuvant (or preoperative neoadjuvant) endocrine therapy;
- Complete follow-up data available.
Who cannot join
- Presence of distant metastasis (Stage IV) at diagnosis
- Male breast cancer
- Missing key clinicopathological data or loss to follow-up
- HER2 immunohistochemistry 3+ or 2+ with amplification confirmed by FISH
- Triple-negative breast cancer
About this study
Official title: A Single-Center Retrospective Study to Develop a Nomogram for Predicting Recurrence in HR+/HER2- Early Breast Cancer Using Real-World Data
Hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) breast cancer constitutes approximately 70% of all breast cancer cases. Although early-stage patients generally have favorable outcomes following standard surgery and adjuvant endocrine therapy, long-term follow-up data reveal a distinct "bimodal" or "long-tail" recurrence pattern, with risks persisting for decades. Recent landmark trials (e.g., NATALEE, MonarchE) have established that combining CDK4/6 inhibitors with endocrine therapy significantly improves invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) in high-risk populations. However, the stringent enrollment criteria of these randomized controlled trials may not fully capture the heterogeneity of real-world patients. Reliance on binary cut-off values (e.g., nodal status alone) risks misclassifying biologically high-risk individuals with low anatomical burden, leading to either undertreatment or overtreatment. There is an urgent clinical need for a multidimensional, individualized risk assessment tool to guide escalated therapy decisions.
Read the detailed description
Detailed Description Background and Rationale
Hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) breast cancer constitutes approximately 70% of all breast cancer cases. Although early-stage patients generally have favorable outcomes following standard surgery and adjuvant endocrine therapy, long-term follow-up data reveal a distinct "bimodal" or "long-tail" recurrence pattern, with risks persisting for decades. Recent landmark trials (e.g., NATALEE, MonarchE) have established that combining CDK4/6 inhibitors with endocrine therapy significantly improves invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) in high-risk populations. However, the stringent enrollment criteria of these randomized controlled trials may not fully capture the heterogeneity of real-world patients. Reliance on binary cut-off values (e.g., nodal status alone) risks misclassifying biologically high-risk individuals with low anatomical burden, leading to either undertreatment or overtreatment. There is an urgent clinical need for a multidimensional, individualized risk assessment tool to guide escalated therapy decisions.
Objective
To develop and internally validate a nomogram integrating clinicopathological and lifestyle factors for predicting disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with HR+/HER2- early breast cancer, and to evaluate its clinical utility using decision curve analysis (DCA).
Study Design
This is a single-center, retrospective cohort study based on real-world data. The study protocol has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Liaoning Cancer Hospital \& Institute, and the requirement for informed consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of the study. All data will be de-identified prior to analysis to protect patient confidentiality.
Study Population
Patients with histologically confirmed HR+/HER2- early-stage breast cancer who received surgical treatment at Liaoning Cancer Hospital \& Institute between July 2014 and June 2024 will be enrolled.
Data Collection and Variables
Demographic, clinicopathological, and treatment-related variables will be extracted from the electronic medical record system. Variables to be collected include:
Demographic characteristics: age, menopausal status
Pathological features: tumor size (T stage), lymph node status (N stage), histological grade, Ki-67 proliferation index, lymphovascular invasion (LVI)
Treatment-related data: surgical procedure (breast-conserving surgery vs. mastectomy), chemotherapy (yes/no, regimen), endocrine therapy type (tamoxifen, aromatase inhibitor, etc.), radiotherapy (yes/no)
Lifestyle factors: duration of breastfeeding (months)
Follow-up data: recurrence events (locoregional, distant), second primary cancers, vital status, and date of last follow-up
The primary endpoint is disease-free survival (DFS), defined as time from surgery to first recurrence (locoregional or distant), second primary cancer, or death from any cause.
Quality Assurance and Data Validation
A comprehensive quality assurance plan will be implemented to ensure data accuracy and completeness:
Data Verification: All data entered into the electronic case report form (eCRF) will be independently double-checked by two trained research assistants. Discrepancies will be resolved by consensus or by referral to a third reviewer.
Range and Consistency Checks: Data will be validated against predefined rules (e.g., date consistency: diagnosis date ≤ surgery date ≤ last follow-up date; value ranges: Ki-67 0-100%, age >18 years). Automated logic checks will be programmed into the data entry system to flag outliers or inconsistencies.
Source Data Verification: A random sample of 10% of patient records will be selected for source data verification against original medical records (paper or electronic) to assess accuracy and completeness. This will be performed by an independent data monitor not involved in primary data extraction.
Data Dictionary: A comprehensive data dictionary will be developed, containing detailed descriptions of each variable, including variable name, definition, source (e.g., pathology report, operative note), coding guidelines (e.g., AJCC 8th edition for TNM staging), permissible values, and normal ranges where applicable. This dictionary will be maintained and updated throughout the study.
Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs)
The following SOPs will govern study operations:
Patient Screening and Enrollment: SOP for identifying eligible patients from hospital databases and reviewing medical records.
Data Extraction and Entry: SOP detailing procedures for manual data abstraction, coding, and entry into the secure study database.
Data Management and Security: SOP for data storage, backup, access control, and de-identification to ensure compliance with institutional and national privacy regulations.
Adverse Event Reporting: Although this is a retrospective observational study with no intervention, any serious adverse events identified during data collection that require reporting will follow institutional guidelines.
Change Management: Any modifications to the protocol, data collection procedures, or analysis plan will be documented with version control and approved by the principal investigator.
Sample Size Assessment
The sample size for this study is determined by the availability of eligible patients diagnosed during the 10-year study period (July 2014 - June 2024). Based on institutional case volume, an estimated total of approximately 500-600 patients is expected.
Statistical Analysis Plan
All statistical analyses will be performed using R software (version 4.1.0 or higher) and SPSS (version 24.0).
Descriptive Analysis: Baseline characteristics will be summarized using frequencies and percentages for categorical variables, and means (with standard deviations) or medians (with interquartile ranges) for continuous variables, as appropriate. Comparisons between training and validation cohorts will be performed using chi-square tests (or Fisher's exact test) for categorical variables and t-tests (or Mann-Whitney U tests) for continuous variables.
Variable Screening and Model Development:
Univariate Cox proportional hazards regression will be performed in the training cohort to screen potential predictors. Variables with P < 0.10 will be considered for inclusion in the multivariate model to avoid excluding potentially important factors.
Multivariate Cox regression with backward stepwise selection (based on Akaike Information Criterion, AIC) will be used to identify independent prognostic factors. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) will be reported.
A nomogram will be constructed based on the final multivariate Cox model, assigning points to each predictor proportional to its regression coefficient.
Model Validation:
Discrimination: Model performance will be assessed using the concordance index (C-index) and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis with area under the curve (AUC) at 3 and 5 years.
Calibration: Calibration plots will be generated comparing predicted versus observed survival probabilities at 3 and 5 years, using 1000 bootstrap resamples to estimate optimism.
Clinical Utility: Decision curve analysis (DCA) will be performed to evaluate the net clinical benefit of using the nomogram across a range of threshold probabilities for guiding escalated therapy decisions (e.g., recommending CDK4/6 inhibitors), compared to "treat-all" or "treat-none" strategies.
Sensitivity Analyses: Subgroup analyses may be performed based on menopausal status or nodal status to explore model performance in clinically relevant subgroups.
All statistical tests will be two-sided, and a P-value < 0.05 will be considered statistically significant unless otherwise specified.
Study Status
The study is currently in the protocol stage and has not yet begun data collection. Institutional ethics approval has been obtained. Data extraction and analysis are expected to commence upon registration.
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer, HR+/HER2- Early-Stage
- Keywords
- Breast Cancer, HR+/HER2-, Nomogram, Recurrence
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms, Recurrence
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Disease-free survival
Disease-free survival refers to the period from breast cancer excision to local recurrence, distant metastasis confirmed by clinical evidence, diagnosis of the second primary tumor or death of the patient.
Measured: 5 years
Secondary outcomes (1)
Overall survival
Overall survival refers to the time from breast cancer excision to death due to any cause
Measured: 5 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Mar 2026
- Study start1 Apr 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion1 Jul 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Apr 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Breast Cancer, HR+/HER2- Early-StageStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Shengjing HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 500 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Shengjing Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jianyi Li, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07484763
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- LNSZL-LJY01
- Status last verified
- Mar 2026
- First submitted
- 16 Mar 2026
- Last updated
- 20 Mar 2026
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Mar 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Single-Center Retrospective Study to Develop a Nomogram for Predicting Recurrence in HR+/HER2- Early Breast Cancer Using Real-World Data
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07484763
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- LNSZL-LJY01
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer, HR+/HER2- Early-Stage
- Keywords
- Breast Cancer, HR+/HER2-, Nomogram, Recurrence
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 500 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Shengjing HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Apr 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jul 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Apr 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 20 Mar 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) breast cancer constitutes approximately 70% of all breast cancer cases. Although early-stage patients generally have favorable outcomes following standard surgery and adjuvant endocrine therapy, long-term follow-up data reveal a distinct "bimodal" or "long-tail" recurrence pattern, with risks persisting for decades. Recent landmark trials (e.g., NATALEE, MonarchE) have established that combining CDK4/6 inhibitors with endocrine therapy significantly improves invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) in high-risk populations. However, the stringent enrollment criteria of these randomized controlled trials may not fully capture the heterogeneity of real-world patients. Reliance on binary cut-off values (e.g., nodal status alone) risks misclassifying biologically high-risk individuals with low anatomical burden, leading to either undertreatment or overtreatment. There is an urgent clinical need for a multidimensional, individualized risk assessment tool to guide escalated therapy decisions.
Detailed description
Detailed Description Background and Rationale
Hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) breast cancer constitutes approximately 70% of all breast cancer cases. Although early-stage patients generally have favorable outcomes following standard surgery and adjuvant endocrine therapy, long-term follow-up data reveal a distinct "bimodal" or "long-tail" recurrence pattern, with risks persisting for decades. Recent landmark trials (e.g., NATALEE, MonarchE) have established that combining CDK4/6 inhibitors with endocrine therapy significantly improves invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) in high-risk populations. However, the stringent enrollment criteria of these randomized controlled trials may not fully capture the heterogeneity of real-world patients. Reliance on binary cut-off values (e.g., nodal status alone) risks misclassifying biologically high-risk individuals with low anatomical burden, leading to either undertreatment or overtreatment. There is an urgent clinical need for a multidimensional, individualized risk assessment tool to guide escalated therapy decisions.
Objective
To develop and internally validate a nomogram integrating clinicopathological and lifestyle factors for predicting disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with HR+/HER2- early breast cancer, and to evaluate its clinical utility using decision curve analysis (DCA).
Study Design
This is a single-center, retrospective cohort study based on real-world data. The study protocol has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Liaoning Cancer Hospital \& Institute, and the requirement for informed consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of the study. All data will be de-identified prior to analysis to protect patient confidentiality.
Study Population
Patients with histologically confirmed HR+/HER2- early-stage breast cancer who received surgical treatment at Liaoning Cancer Hospital \& Institute between July 2014 and June 2024 will be enrolled.
Data Collection and Variables
Demographic, clinicopathological, and treatment-related variables will be extracted from the electronic medical record system. Variables to be collected include:
Demographic characteristics: age, menopausal status
Pathological features: tumor size (T stage), lymph node status (N stage), histological grade, Ki-67 proliferation index, lymphovascular invasion (LVI)
Treatment-related data: surgical procedure (breast-conserving surgery vs. mastectomy), chemotherapy (yes/no, regimen), endocrine therapy type (tamoxifen, aromatase inhibitor, etc.), radiotherapy (yes/no)
Lifestyle factors: duration of breastfeeding (months)
Follow-up data: recurrence events (locoregional, distant), second primary cancers, vital status, and date of last follow-up
The primary endpoint is disease-free survival (DFS), defined as time from surgery to first recurrence (locoregional or distant), second primary cancer, or death from any cause.
Quality Assurance and Data Validation
A comprehensive quality assurance plan will be implemented to ensure data accuracy and completeness:
Data Verification: All data entered into the electronic case report form (eCRF) will be independently double-checked by two trained research assistants. Discrepancies will be resolved by consensus or by referral to a third reviewer.
Range and Consistency Checks: Data will be validated against predefined rules (e.g., date consistency: diagnosis date ≤ surgery date ≤ last follow-up date; value ranges: Ki-67 0-100%, age >18 years). Automated logic checks will be programmed into the data entry system to flag outliers or inconsistencies.
Source Data Verification: A random sample of 10% of patient records will be selected for source data verification against original medical records (paper or electronic) to assess accuracy and completeness. This will be performed by an independent data monitor not involved in primary data extraction.
Data Dictionary: A comprehensive data dictionary will be developed, containing detailed descriptions of each variable, including variable name, definition, source (e.g., pathology report, operative note), coding guidelines (e.g., AJCC 8th edition for TNM staging), permissible values, and normal ranges where applicable. This dictionary will be maintained and updated throughout the study.
Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs)
The following SOPs will govern study operations:
Patient Screening and Enrollment: SOP for identifying eligible patients from hospital databases and reviewing medical records.
Data Extraction and Entry: SOP detailing procedures for manual data abstraction, coding, and entry into the secure study database.
Data Management and Security: SOP for data storage, backup, access control, and de-identification to ensure compliance with institutional and national privacy regulations.
Adverse Event Reporting: Although this is a retrospective observational study with no intervention, any serious adverse events identified during data collection that require reporting will follow institutional guidelines.
Change Management: Any modifications to the protocol, data collection procedures, or analysis plan will be documented with version control and approved by the principal investigator.
Sample Size Assessment
The sample size for this study is determined by the availability of eligible patients diagnosed during the 10-year study period (July 2014 - June 2024). Based on institutional case volume, an estimated total of approximately 500-600 patients is expected.
Statistical Analysis Plan
All statistical analyses will be performed using R software (version 4.1.0 or higher) and SPSS (version 24.0).
Descriptive Analysis: Baseline characteristics will be summarized using frequencies and percentages for categorical variables, and means (with standard deviations) or medians (with interquartile ranges) for continuous variables, as appropriate. Comparisons between training and validation cohorts will be performed using chi-square tests (or Fisher's exact test) for categorical variables and t-tests (or Mann-Whitney U tests) for continuous variables.
Variable Screening and Model Development:
Univariate Cox proportional hazards regression will be performed in the training cohort to screen potential predictors. Variables with P < 0.10 will be considered for inclusion in the multivariate model to avoid excluding potentially important factors.
Multivariate Cox regression with backward stepwise selection (based on Akaike Information Criterion, AIC) will be used to identify independent prognostic factors. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) will be reported.
A nomogram will be constructed based on the final multivariate Cox model, assigning points to each predictor proportional to its regression coefficient.
Model Validation:
Discrimination: Model performance will be assessed using the concordance index (C-index) and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis with area under the curve (AUC) at 3 and 5 years.
Calibration: Calibration plots will be generated comparing predicted versus observed survival probabilities at 3 and 5 years, using 1000 bootstrap resamples to estimate optimism.
Clinical Utility: Decision curve analysis (DCA) will be performed to evaluate the net clinical benefit of using the nomogram across a range of threshold probabilities for guiding escalated therapy decisions (e.g., recommending CDK4/6 inhibitors), compared to "treat-all" or "treat-none" strategies.
Sensitivity Analyses: Subgroup analyses may be performed based on menopausal status or nodal status to explore model performance in clinically relevant subgroups.
All statistical tests will be two-sided, and a P-value < 0.05 will be considered statistically significant unless otherwise specified.
Study Status
The study is currently in the protocol stage and has not yet begun data collection. Institutional ethics approval has been obtained. Data extraction and analysis are expected to commence upon registration.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- We retrospectively collected data from patients with primary breast cancer who underwent surgical treatment at our center between July 2014 and June 2024.
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Histopathologically confirmed invasive breast ductal carcinoma or lobular carcinoma;
- Molecular subtype of HR+/HER2- (ER ≥ 10%, and HER2 immunohistochemistry 0/1+ or 2+ without amplification confirmed by FISH);
- Received standardized surgical treatment and postoperative adjuvant (or preoperative neoadjuvant) endocrine therapy;
- Complete follow-up data available.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Presence of distant metastasis (Stage IV) at diagnosis
- Male breast cancer
- Missing key clinicopathological data or loss to follow-up
- HER2 immunohistochemistry 3+ or 2+ with amplification confirmed by FISH
- Triple-negative breast cancer
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Disease-free survival
Time frame: 5 years
Disease-free survival refers to the period from breast cancer excision to local recurrence, distant metastasis confirmed by clinical evidence, diagnosis of the second primary tumor or death of the patient.
1 secondary outcome
Overall survival
Time frame: 5 years
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Mar 2026.
Related trials for Breast Cancer, HR+/HER2- Early-Stage
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Phase IIIb Study of Ribociclib + ET in Early Breast Cancer
Early Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
A Prospective, Phase II, Exploratory Study Protocol of a Chemotherapy Sensitivity-based Culmerciclib Combination Regimen in Neoadjuvant Therapy for HR+/HER2- Breast Cancer.
Breast Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Neoadjuvant Pyrotinib in HR-positive and HER2-low High-risk Early Breast Cancer
Breast Cancer Invasive, Hormone-receptor-positive Breast Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study of a Medicine Called Atirmociclib in Combination With Giredestrant in Adult Participants With ER-positive, HER2-negative Early-stage Breast Cancer
Early Breast Cancer, Estrogen Receptor Positive (ER+), Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Negative (HER2-)
RecruitingPhase 2
Serplulimab Combined With Chemotherapy for Early-stage HR+/HER2- Breast Cancer
HR+/HER2- Breast Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Breast Cancer, HR+/HER2- Early-Stage, run by Shengjing Hospital.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Disease-free survival (time frame: 5 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Mar 2026.