InfectionNCT07458763
Rapid Response Home Care as an Alternative to Acute Admission
A study testing Admission avoidance Hospital at Home in people with Infection, run by Copenhagen University Hospital at Herlev at 1 site in Denmark.
Trial summary
This single-center, randomized, unblinded quality-improvement study evaluates whether a structured home-based rapid response team (RRT) intervention can safely reduce total hospital days among adults referred to the emergency department with suspected infection. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Infection
- What is being tested?
- Admission avoidance Hospital at Home
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 500 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDenmark
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2025to Dec 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 18 years or older
- Referred with suspected infection
- Patients must be able to provide informed consent
- Category C or D transports (non-emergency patient transport) and self-transported patients
Who cannot join
- Category A and B transport (emergency and urgent patient transport)
- Suspected meningitis
- Suspected sepsis
- Suspected tropical disease
- Suspected other time-critical infection
- Immunodeficiency
- Ongoing treatment with immunosuppressive/immunomodulating/chemotherapy treatment
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Home-Based Rapid Response Team Assessment and Treatment as an Alternative to Acute Hospital Admission for Adults Referred With Suspected Infection: A Single-Center Randomized Study
This single-center, randomized, unblinded quality-improvement study evaluates whether a structured home-based rapid response team (RRT) intervention can safely reduce total hospital days among adults referred to the emergency department with suspected infection. Patients referred from general practitioners or the regional medical helpline (1813) between 09:00 and 22:00 are randomized 1:1 using Zelen's design to either standard in-hospital evaluation or a home-based assessment pathway delivered by a mobile clinical response team.
Read the detailed description
Background and Rationale:
Infections are among the most common causes of acute hospital admissions. Evidence and clinical experience suggest that a substantial proportion of patients referred with suspected infection could be safely assessed and treated in their home environment, thereby avoiding unnecessary inpatient stays. At Herlev-Gentofte Hospital, approximately 40 patients per day are referred by primary care physicians or the regional medical helpline (1813) due to suspected infection. Many of these patients require only basic diagnostics, focused clinical evaluation, or short-course treatment - services that may be feasible to deliver outside the hospital setting.
The rationale for this study is to determine whether a structured home-based intervention pathway - implemented by trained mobile healthcare personnel and supervised remotely by hospital physicians - can reduce hospital bed-days without compromising patient safety or clinical outcomes.
Study Design:
This is a single-center, randomized (1:1), non-blinded study using Zelen's design. Randomization is conducted at the time of referral by an independent coordinating unit (CVI) via a computer-generated algorithm. Participants are allocated to the home-based intervention or to standard hospital-based evaluation. Patients randomized to the intervention arm are contacted by phone and offered a home visit; if they decline, they will be managed conventionally in the hospital emergency department. All analyses will follow the intention-to-treat principle.
Intervention (Home-Based Care Program):
Participants randomized to the intervention arm will receive a visit from a mobile clinical response team within one hour of randomization. The team consists of trained, non-physician healthcare personnel who perform a structured assessment, including an ABCDE evaluation, vital-sign measurement, and diagnostic tests such as venous blood sampling, point-of-care CRP measurement, and blood gas analysis when indicated. Following the initial assessment, the team initiates a real-time video consultation with a hospital-based senior physician, who provides diagnostic guidance and treatment decisions.
Possible outcomes of the home visit include:
- Hospital admission
- Home-based treatment with scheduled follow-up visits by the mobile team
- Subacute outpatient evaluation at the hospital
- Discharge with or without treatment
The mobile team may deliver intravenous antibiotics via infusion pump, oxygen therapy, repeated monitoring of vital parameters, and follow-up assessments as required. All delegated treatments are ordered by the hospital physician, and the hospital retains full medical responsibility for care decisions and treatment oversight.
Control Group:
Participants in the control group will receive standard acute evaluation and management in the hospital emergency department, with no deviations from usual clinical practice.
Data Collection and Analysis:
Data will be collected by medical doctors employed by the participating hospital. Analyses will be conducted by these medical doctors in collaboration with statisticians at Amager and Hvidovre Hospital. Study results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed scientific journals.
Sample Size and Power Calculation:
Based on an estimated average of 27 days alive outside the hospital (SD 5) within 30 days in the control group, detecting a 1.5-day increase (to 28.5 days) requires 176 participants in both groups (α=0.05, β=0.2). To account for potential drop-outs or missing data, we aim to include 220 participants in each group.
Ethical Considerations:
The study has been assessed by the National Committee on Health Research Ethics, which determined that it does not require formal approval (Reference F-24054107). The project has instead been approved by the Legal Office (Sundhedsjura) in the Capital Region of Denmark (Region H) as a quality-improvement initiative (case no. p-2025-19264). Patients may decline home-based assessment at any time and will instead undergo standard hospital evaluation.
- Conditions
- Infection
- Being tested
- Admission avoidance Hospital at Home
- Keywords
- hospital at home, admission avoidance, rapid response team, home-based treatment, acute hospital-level care at home, infection
- Medical subject headings
- Infections
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Admission avoidance Hospital at HomeOther
The intervention group is evaluated in their homes by a mobile rapid response team to determine whether they can be safely treated at home instead of being admitted to the hospital. If deemed suitable, the patient receives treatment at home.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Home-based treatment | Experimental | The intervention group Receives: Other: Admission avoidance Hospital at Home |
| Standard care | No intervention | The control group |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Days Alive Outside of Hospital
Number of days alive outside of hospital 30 days after initial referral (time of inclusion), including days receiving treatment at home.
Measured: 30 days from inclusion
Secondary outcomes (41)
Suspected infection focus
Evaluated for both groups. The anatomical focus of infection is categorized as one of the following: eyes, ears, upper respiratory tract, lower respiratory tract, gastrointestinal tract, urinary tract, genital/sexually transmitted disease (STD), bones/joints, skin and soft tissue, unclear focus, or other.
Measured: At initial clinical assessment (baseline, prior to initiation of treatment), day 0.
Early Warning Score, initial assessment
Calculated Early Warning Score (EWS or cEWS) derived from the recorded vital parameters according to a standardized algorithm (i.e. multiple measurements will be aggregated to arrive at one reported value):
Highest measured body temperature (°C, decimal), heart rate (beats per minute), respiratory rate (breaths per minute), peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO₂, %, measured at rest on room air if possible; otherwise oxygen supplementation specified), blood pressure (mmHg, systolic/diastolic, automated or manual), level of consciousness assessed using the AVPU (Alert, verbal, pain, unresponsive) scale
Measured: At initial clinical assessment (baseline, prior to initiation of treatment), day 0
Contact from CTU to the patient (Intervention-group)
For the intervention group, important events and related timestamps will be collected, indcluding "contact attempted by Central Triage Unit (CTU)" (yes/no)
Measured: Index home visit (day 0)
Intitial assesment at home accepted by patient (Intervention-group)
For the intervention group, important events and related timestamps will be collected, including "home-visit with clinical assesment accepted by the patient" (yes/no; analyzed by intention-to-treat)
Measured: Index home visit (day 0)
Response-time for inititial contact (Intervention-group)
For the intervention group, important events and related timestamps will be collected, including response-time by the Rapid response team, calculated as the difference between "time of call" from the CTU to the patient and "time of arrival" of the rapid response team at the patients home (hh:mm)
Measured: Index home visit (day 0)
Video consultation during initial assessment (intervention group)
Video consultation with emergency physician performed during initial assessment? (yes/no).
Measured: index home visit (day 0)
Physician decision during initial assessment (intervention group)
Physician decision during initial assessment, with the following categorical options: hospital admission; home-based treatment; subacute hospital evaluation; General Practitioner follow-up; or discharge.
Measured: index home visit (day 0)
First treatment initiated at home (intervention group)
First treatment initiated at home, with the following categorical options: IV antibiotics; PO antibiotics; oxygen; IV fluids; inhaled bronchodilators (SABA+SAMA); analgesics; antiemetics; laxatives; glucocorticoids (IV/PO); urinary catheter; airway suctioning; wound care; or other.
Measured: index home visit (day 0)
Number of diagnostics performed during home-based treatment
Diagnostics performed during the index episode (expected up to three days, but potentially during the entire follow-up period)
- vital signs
- blood tests
- blood gas
- ECG
- other
Measured: from day 0 up until day 30
Hospitalization during index episode (Both Groups)
Clinical course outcomes will be collected for both intervention and control groups:
- hospital admission during the initial episode (yes/no)
- date and time of first admission (related to index episode) (dd-mm-yyyy hh:mm);
- date and time of corresponding discharge
Measured: From index (treatment initiation, day 0) through 30 days of follow-up.
Readmission rates (Both Groups)
Clinical course outcomes will be collected for both intervention and control groups:
- number of acute readmissions within 30 days,
- time of admission and discharge (dd-mm-yyyy hh:mm)
Measured: From index (treatment initiation, day 0) through 30 days of follow-up.
Readmissions related to infection (Both Groups)
For each readmission, primary diagnosis will be registered for both intervention and control groups, and it will be assessed whether it was associated with the infection in the index event (yes/no)
Measured: From index (treatment initiation, day 0) through 30 days of follow-up.
Duration of Antibiotic Treatment
Total duration of therapy (integer; continuous days from start date (date of first documented dose), until end date (date of last documented dose) for all episodes with antibiotic treatment from day 0 until day 30)
Measured: From index (treatment initiation, day 0) through 30 days of follow-up
Type of Antibiotic Treatment
Type of antibiotic treatment for all episodes with antibiotic treatment from day 0 until day 30), including primary route of administration (intravenous [IV] or oral [PO]), antibiotic agent (name and, if available, dose)
Measured: From index (treatment initiation, day 0) through 30 days of follow-up
Number of complications/adverse events
Patient Safety: complications/adverse events during index episode (yes/no, with description; e.g., sepsis, clinical deterioration, new diagnoses)
Measured: From index (treatment initiation, day 0) through 30 days of follow-up.
Number of emergency contacts
Patient safety: number of emergency contacts (112/1813) after first contact
Measured: Day 0 until day 30
Escalation of care
For the intervention group, incidents of escalation of care (including transfer to hospital during home-based treatment) will be recorded, including:
Event: yes/no; date and time [dd-mm-yyyy hh:mm]; and reason in free text,
Measured: Day 0 until day 30
Total healthcare cost per patient
Economic evaluation comparing the intervention and control groups based on the mean total cost per patient (DKK) during the follow-up period. Multiple resource utilization measures will be collected and aggregated to estimate the total cost per patient. These include:
- number of home visits by the mobile team
- time spent per visit (minutes; from departure to completion)
- number of video consultations per patient
- DRG-based costs (DKK) for hospital admissions and outpatient contacts
- team-related costs (DKK; calculated from time × salary and transportation costs)
- laboratory costs (DKK; analyses and materials)
- imaging procedures (type and number)
- specialist consultations (ordered yes/no; number and type).
All resource use will be valued using relevant unit costs and summed to calculate a total cost per patient (DKK). The reported outcome will be the mean total cost per patient in each study group.
Measured: From day 0 until day 30
Microbiological sampling
recorded as:
- performed (yes/no)
- type of specimen (e.g., blood cultures, urine culture, sputum, throat swab, wound swab)
Measured: First available value following initial clinical assessment (baseline, day 0)
C-reactive protein (CRP) at Initial Assessment
First available laboratory values obtained at initial clinical assessment. Unit mg/L, integer.
Measured: First available value following initial clinical assessment (baseline, day 0).
total leukocyte count at Initial Assessment (value)
First available laboratory values obtained at initial clinical assessment. Total leukocyte count (×10⁹/L, decimal)
Measured: First available value following initial clinical assessment (baseline, day 0).
differential counts at Initial Assessment (value)
First available laboratory values obtained at initial clinical assessment. Differential counts including lymphocytes, neutrophils, monocytes, eosinophils, and basophils (all ×10⁹/L, decimal)
Measured: First available value following initial clinical assessment (baseline, day 0).
hemoglobin at Initial Assessment (value)
First available laboratory values obtained at initial clinical assessment. Hemoglobin (mmol/L, decimal)
Measured: First available value following initial clinical assessment (baseline, day 0).
platelet count at Initial Assessment (value)
First available laboratory values obtained at initial clinical assessment. Platelet count (×10⁹/L, integer)
Measured: First available value following initial clinical assessment (baseline, day 0).
creatinine at Initial Assessment (value)
First available laboratory values obtained at initial clinical assessment. Creatinine (µmol/L, integer)
Measured: First available value following initial clinical assessment (baseline, day 0).
Urea at Initial Assessment (value)
First available laboratory values obtained at initial clinical assessment. Urea (mmol/L, decimal)
Measured: First available value following initial clinical assessment (baseline, day 0).
sodium at Initial Assessment (value)
First available laboratory values obtained at initial clinical assessment. Sodium [Na⁺] (mmol/L)
Measured: First available value following initial clinical assessment (baseline, day 0).
Potassium at Initial Assessment (value)
First available laboratory values obtained at initial clinical assessment. Potassium [K⁺] (mmol/L)
Measured: First available value following initial clinical assessment (baseline, day 0).
Chloride at Initial Assessment (value)
First available laboratory values obtained at initial clinical assessment. Chloride [Cl-] (mmol/L)
Measured: First available value following initial clinical assessment (baseline, day 0).
calcium at Initial Assessment (value)
First available laboratory values obtained at initial clinical assessment. Ionized and total calcium [Ca²⁺] (mmol/L)
Measured: First available value following initial clinical assessment (baseline, day 0).
Phosphate at Initial Assessment (value)
First available laboratory values obtained at initial clinical assessment. Phosphate (mmol/L)
Measured: First available value following initial clinical assessment (baseline, day 0).
Plasma glucoseat Initial Assessment (value)
First available laboratory values obtained at initial clinical assessment. Plasma glucose (mmol/L)
Measured: First available value following initial clinical assessment (baseline, day 0).
Alanine aminotransferase at Initial Assessment (value)
First available laboratory values obtained at initial clinical assessment. Alanine aminotransferase (ALAT, U/L)
Measured: First available value following initial clinical assessment (baseline, day 0).
Albumin at Initial Assessment (value)
First available laboratory values obtained at initial clinical assessment. Albumin (g/L).
Measured: First available value following initial clinical assessment (baseline, day 0).
pH, Blood gas analysis (value)
pH in arterial or venous blood gas according to local clinical practice.
Measured: First available value following initial clinical assessment (baseline, day 0)
partial pressure of carbon dioxide, blood gas analysis (value)
partial pressure of carbon dioxide (pCO₂) in arterial or venous blood gas according to local clinical practice.
Measured: First available value following initial clinical assessment (baseline, day 0)
partial pressure of oxygen, Blood gas analysis (value)
partial pressure of oxygen (pO₂) in arterial or venous blood gas according to local clinical practice.
Measured: First available value following initial clinical assessment (baseline, day 0)
bicarbonate, Blood gas analysis (value)
bicarbonate (HCO₃-) in arterial or venous blood gas according to local clinical practice.
Measured: First available value following initial clinical assessment (baseline, day 0)
base excess, Blood gas analysis (value)
base excess (BE), in arterial or venous blood gas according to local clinical practice.
Measured: First available value following initial clinical assessment (baseline, day 0)
anion gap, Blood gas analysis (value)
anion gap (AG) in arterial or venous blood gas according to local clinical practice.
Measured: First available value following initial clinical assessment (baseline, day 0)
lactate, Blood gas analysis (value)
lactate in arterial or venous blood gas according to local clinical practice.
Measured: First available value following initial clinical assessment (baseline, day 0)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Mar 2026
- Study start1 Sep 2025
- Primary completion1 Jun 2026
- Study completionDec 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for InfectionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- This study is a randomized clinical non-blinded trial. Participants will be randomized in the ratio 1:1 using Zelen's design.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 500 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Copenhagen University Hospital at Herlev
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Josephine Lund Nielsen, Copenhagen University Hospital at Herlev
- Investigators
- Kasper K Iversen, MD, Prof., Study chair, University Hospital of Copenhagen Herlev
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07458763
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Hospital at Home: 1
- Status last verified
- Aug 2026
- First submitted
- 20 Feb 2026
- Last updated
- 12 Aug 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Aug 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Home-Based Rapid Response Team Assessment and Treatment as an Alternative to Acute Hospital Admission for Adults Referred With Suspected Infection: A Single-Center Randomized Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07458763
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Hospital at Home: 1
- Conditions
- Infection
- Keywords
- hospital at home, admission avoidance, rapid response team, home-based treatment, acute hospital-level care at home, infection
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 500 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Copenhagen University Hospital at HerlevUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jun 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 9 Mar 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This single-center, randomized, unblinded quality-improvement study evaluates whether a structured home-based rapid response team (RRT) intervention can safely reduce total hospital days among adults referred to the emergency department with suspected infection. Patients referred from general practitioners or the regional medical helpline (1813) between 09:00 and 22:00 are randomized 1:1 using Zelen's design to either standard in-hospital evaluation or a home-based assessment pathway delivered by a mobile clinical response team.
Detailed description
Background and Rationale:
Infections are among the most common causes of acute hospital admissions. Evidence and clinical experience suggest that a substantial proportion of patients referred with suspected infection could be safely assessed and treated in their home environment, thereby avoiding unnecessary inpatient stays. At Herlev-Gentofte Hospital, approximately 40 patients per day are referred by primary care physicians or the regional medical helpline (1813) due to suspected infection. Many of these patients require only basic diagnostics, focused clinical evaluation, or short-course treatment - services that may be feasible to deliver outside the hospital setting.
The rationale for this study is to determine whether a structured home-based intervention pathway - implemented by trained mobile healthcare personnel and supervised remotely by hospital physicians - can reduce hospital bed-days without compromising patient safety or clinical outcomes.
Study Design:
This is a single-center, randomized (1:1), non-blinded study using Zelen's design. Randomization is conducted at the time of referral by an independent coordinating unit (CVI) via a computer-generated algorithm. Participants are allocated to the home-based intervention or to standard hospital-based evaluation. Patients randomized to the intervention arm are contacted by phone and offered a home visit; if they decline, they will be managed conventionally in the hospital emergency department. All analyses will follow the intention-to-treat principle.
Intervention (Home-Based Care Program):
Participants randomized to the intervention arm will receive a visit from a mobile clinical response team within one hour of randomization. The team consists of trained, non-physician healthcare personnel who perform a structured assessment, including an ABCDE evaluation, vital-sign measurement, and diagnostic tests such as venous blood sampling, point-of-care CRP measurement, and blood gas analysis when indicated. Following the initial assessment, the team initiates a real-time video consultation with a hospital-based senior physician, who provides diagnostic guidance and treatment decisions.
Possible outcomes of the home visit include:
- Hospital admission
- Home-based treatment with scheduled follow-up visits by the mobile team
- Subacute outpatient evaluation at the hospital
- Discharge with or without treatment
The mobile team may deliver intravenous antibiotics via infusion pump, oxygen therapy, repeated monitoring of vital parameters, and follow-up assessments as required. All delegated treatments are ordered by the hospital physician, and the hospital retains full medical responsibility for care decisions and treatment oversight.
Control Group:
Participants in the control group will receive standard acute evaluation and management in the hospital emergency department, with no deviations from usual clinical practice.
Data Collection and Analysis:
Data will be collected by medical doctors employed by the participating hospital. Analyses will be conducted by these medical doctors in collaboration with statisticians at Amager and Hvidovre Hospital. Study results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed scientific journals.
Sample Size and Power Calculation:
Based on an estimated average of 27 days alive outside the hospital (SD 5) within 30 days in the control group, detecting a 1.5-day increase (to 28.5 days) requires 176 participants in both groups (α=0.05, β=0.2). To account for potential drop-outs or missing data, we aim to include 220 participants in each group.
Ethical Considerations:
The study has been assessed by the National Committee on Health Research Ethics, which determined that it does not require formal approval (Reference F-24054107). The project has instead been approved by the Legal Office (Sundhedsjura) in the Capital Region of Denmark (Region H) as a quality-improvement initiative (case no. p-2025-19264). Patients may decline home-based assessment at any time and will instead undergo standard hospital evaluation.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- This study is a randomized clinical non-blinded trial. Participants will be randomized in the ratio 1:1 using Zelen's design.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Home-based treatment | Experimental | Other: Admission avoidance Hospital at HomeThe intervention group |
| Standard care | No intervention | –The control group |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Age 18 years or older
- Referred with suspected infection
- Patients must be able to provide informed consent
- Category C or D transports (non-emergency patient transport) and self-transported patients
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Category A and B transport (emergency and urgent patient transport)
- Suspected meningitis
- Suspected sepsis
- Suspected tropical disease
- Suspected other time-critical infection
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Admission avoidance Hospital at HomeThe intervention group is evaluated in their homes by a mobile rapid response team to determine whether they can be safely treated at home instead of being admitted to the hospital. If deemed suitable, the patient receives treatment at home. | Other | Home-based treatment |
Primary outcome
Days Alive Outside of Hospital
Time frame: 30 days from inclusion
Number of days alive outside of hospital 30 days after initial referral (time of inclusion), including days receiving treatment at home.
41 secondary outcomes
Suspected infection focus
Time frame: At initial clinical assessment (baseline, prior to initiation of treatment), day 0.
Early Warning Score, initial assessment
Time frame: At initial clinical assessment (baseline, prior to initiation of treatment), day 0
Contact from CTU to the patient (Intervention-group)
Time frame: Index home visit (day 0)
Intitial assesment at home accepted by patient (Intervention-group)
Time frame: Index home visit (day 0)
Response-time for inititial contact (Intervention-group)
Time frame: Index home visit (day 0)
Video consultation during initial assessment (intervention group)
Time frame: index home visit (day 0)
Physician decision during initial assessment (intervention group)
Time frame: index home visit (day 0)
First treatment initiated at home (intervention group)
Time frame: index home visit (day 0)
Number of diagnostics performed during home-based treatment
Time frame: from day 0 up until day 30
Hospitalization during index episode (Both Groups)
Time frame: From index (treatment initiation, day 0) through 30 days of follow-up.
Readmission rates (Both Groups)
Time frame: From index (treatment initiation, day 0) through 30 days of follow-up.
Readmissions related to infection (Both Groups)
Time frame: From index (treatment initiation, day 0) through 30 days of follow-up.
Duration of Antibiotic Treatment
Time frame: From index (treatment initiation, day 0) through 30 days of follow-up
Type of Antibiotic Treatment
Time frame: From index (treatment initiation, day 0) through 30 days of follow-up
Number of complications/adverse events
Time frame: From index (treatment initiation, day 0) through 30 days of follow-up.
Number of emergency contacts
Time frame: Day 0 until day 30
Escalation of care
Time frame: Day 0 until day 30
Total healthcare cost per patient
Time frame: From day 0 until day 30
Microbiological sampling
Time frame: First available value following initial clinical assessment (baseline, day 0)
C-reactive protein (CRP) at Initial Assessment
Time frame: First available value following initial clinical assessment (baseline, day 0).
total leukocyte count at Initial Assessment (value)
Time frame: First available value following initial clinical assessment (baseline, day 0).
differential counts at Initial Assessment (value)
Time frame: First available value following initial clinical assessment (baseline, day 0).
hemoglobin at Initial Assessment (value)
Time frame: First available value following initial clinical assessment (baseline, day 0).
platelet count at Initial Assessment (value)
Time frame: First available value following initial clinical assessment (baseline, day 0).
creatinine at Initial Assessment (value)
Time frame: First available value following initial clinical assessment (baseline, day 0).
Urea at Initial Assessment (value)
Time frame: First available value following initial clinical assessment (baseline, day 0).
sodium at Initial Assessment (value)
Time frame: First available value following initial clinical assessment (baseline, day 0).
Potassium at Initial Assessment (value)
Time frame: First available value following initial clinical assessment (baseline, day 0).
Chloride at Initial Assessment (value)
Time frame: First available value following initial clinical assessment (baseline, day 0).
calcium at Initial Assessment (value)
Time frame: First available value following initial clinical assessment (baseline, day 0).
Phosphate at Initial Assessment (value)
Time frame: First available value following initial clinical assessment (baseline, day 0).
Plasma glucoseat Initial Assessment (value)
Time frame: First available value following initial clinical assessment (baseline, day 0).
Alanine aminotransferase at Initial Assessment (value)
Time frame: First available value following initial clinical assessment (baseline, day 0).
Albumin at Initial Assessment (value)
Time frame: First available value following initial clinical assessment (baseline, day 0).
pH, Blood gas analysis (value)
Time frame: First available value following initial clinical assessment (baseline, day 0)
partial pressure of carbon dioxide, blood gas analysis (value)
Time frame: First available value following initial clinical assessment (baseline, day 0)
partial pressure of oxygen, Blood gas analysis (value)
Time frame: First available value following initial clinical assessment (baseline, day 0)
bicarbonate, Blood gas analysis (value)
Time frame: First available value following initial clinical assessment (baseline, day 0)
base excess, Blood gas analysis (value)
Time frame: First available value following initial clinical assessment (baseline, day 0)
anion gap, Blood gas analysis (value)
Time frame: First available value following initial clinical assessment (baseline, day 0)
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Aug 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Infection
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Phase I Open-Label Safety Trial of Pembrolizumab for Neurological Post- Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PD1-PASC I)
Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome
RecruitingObservational study
Effectiveness and Clinical Outcomes of Long-term Bulevirtide Monotherapy in Patients With HDV-related Compensated Cirrhosis
Hepatitis D
RecruitingObservational study
VIRal Pulmonary Infections in Older AGE
Viral Pulmonary Infections
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
A Pivotal Safety and Immunogenicity GBS-NN/NN2 Vaccine Maternal Immunisation Trial
Streptococcus Agalactiae Infection, Neonatal Sepsis
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Safety and Immunogenicity Trial of OCU500, ChAd36 Vector Encoding SARS-CoV-2 Spike Vaccine Via Intranasal and Inhalational Routes in Previously Vaccinated Adults
COVID-19
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Kasper K Iversen, MD, Prof. study chair
University Hospital of Copenhagen Herlev
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Admission avoidance Hospital at Home in people with Infection, run by Copenhagen University Hospital at Herlev at 1 site in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Days Alive Outside of Hospital (time frame: 30 days from inclusion). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Aug 2026.