AzTrials
AzTrials

ArrhythmiaRADIANCENCT07458724

Radiation-free Anatomical Direct Imaging Approach for No-fluoroscopy Cardiac Electrode Implantation

A study testing Permanent Pacemaker Implantation in people with Arrhythmia, run by Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Fuwai Hospital at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Permanent pacemaker implantation is traditionally performed under fluoroscopic (X-ray) guidance. Although effective, fluoroscopy exposes patients and medical staff to ionizing radiation. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Arrhythmia
What is being tested?
Permanent Pacemaker Implantation
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
31 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
1 Sep 2024to 1 Feb 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Indication for permanent pacemaker implantation according to current ESC or ACC/AHA guidelines
  • Adequate transthoracic echocardiographic acoustic window allowing visualization of right atrium, right ventricle, and interventricular septum
  • Ability to provide written informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Inadequate transthoracic acoustic window precluding reliable visualization of right-sided cardiac structures
  • Severe tricuspid regurgitation (moderate-to-severe or greater)
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction <35% without indication for cardiac resynchronization therapy
  • Documented malignant ventricular arrhythmia requiring implantable cardioverter-defibrillator as primary indication
  • Intrinsic heart rate <40 beats per minute with hemodynamic instability requiring emergent pacing
  • Active systemic infection
  • Pregnancy
  • Life expectancy less than 12 months due to non-cardiac comorbidities

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences

    Beijing, 100037

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Feasibility and Safety of Transthoracic Echocardiography-Guided Permanent Pacemaker Implantation Without Fluoroscopy

Permanent pacemaker implantation is traditionally performed under fluoroscopic (X-ray) guidance. Although effective, fluoroscopy exposes patients and medical staff to ionizing radiation. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is a non-invasive ultrasound imaging technique that allows real-time visualization of cardiac structures without radiation exposure. However, its role in guiding permanent pacemaker implantation has not been systematically evaluated.

This study aims to assess the feasibility and safety of performing permanent pacemaker implantation under sole TTE guidance. In the first phase, eligible patients will undergo pacemaker implantation guided only by transthoracic echocardiography. In the second phase, outcomes of patients treated with TTE guidance will be compared with matched patients undergoing conventional fluoroscopy-guided implantation. The study will evaluate procedural success, lead positioning accuracy, electrical performance, complication rates, and elimination of radiation exposure. The overall goal is to determine whether a radiation-free imaging strategy can safely replace conventional fluoroscopic guidance in selected patients requiring pacemaker implantation.

Read the detailed description

Fluoroscopy-guided permanent pacemaker implantation has been the standard imaging strategy for decades. While fluoroscopy provides reliable projection-based visualization of lead advancement, it exposes patients and medical personnel to ionizing radiation and does not allow direct visualization of myocardial tissue contact or early structural complications. Increasing awareness of cumulative radiation exposure has led to the exploration of alternative imaging strategies in structural and electrophysiological interventions.

Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) provides real-time, radiation-free visualization of cardiac chambers, septal structures, valvular anatomy, and the pericardial space. TTE has been successfully applied in selected structural heart procedures; however, its use in guiding permanent pacemaker implantation has not been systematically studied. The principal challenges of TTE-guided pacing include limited visualization of the entire lead shaft, difficulty in assessing three-dimensional orientation, and uncertainty regarding fixation mechanics. With procedural refinements and structured imaging protocols, these limitations may be overcome.

This study is designed to evaluate a radiation-free implantation strategy using sole transthoracic echocardiographic guidance. The first component prospectively assesses procedural feasibility and safety in consecutively enrolled patients. The second component compares outcomes of the TTE-guided cohort with a matched cohort undergoing conventional fluoroscopy-guided implantation. The same prospectively enrolled TTE cohort will serve both feasibility assessment and comparative analysis.

The central hypothesis is that TTE-guided pacemaker implantation can achieve high procedural success and acceptable electrical performance while eliminating radiation exposure and maintaining safety comparable to conventional fluoroscopic guidance. By leveraging direct septal visualization and continuous structural monitoring, this approach may provide mechanistic advantages in lead positioning accuracy and complication detection.

If validated, this strategy could represent an important step toward fully radiation-free electrophysiological and structural cardiac interventions.

Conditions
Arrhythmia
Being tested
Permanent Pacemaker Implantation
Keywords
arrhythmia
Medical subject headings
Arrhythmias, Cardiac

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Permanent Pacemaker ImplantationProcedure or surgery

    Permanent pacemaker implantation performed under sole transthoracic echocardiographic (TTE) guidance without the use of fluoroscopy. Venous access, lead advancement, positioning, and fixation are guided by real-time transthoracic imaging. Ventricular leads are positioned at the interventricular septum under direct echocardiographic visualization. In dual-chamber systems, atrial leads are positioned at the atrial septum due to limitations in visualizing the right atrial appendage under transthoracic imaging. Lead position, septal contact, and potential procedural complications (e.g., pericardial effusion, valvular interference) are continuously assessed using multi-plane echocardiographic views. Fluoroscopy is reserved only for bailout situations if adequate lead positioning cannot be achieved under TTE guidance.

Study groups in NCT07458724
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
TTE-guided armExperimentalTransthoracic Echocardiography-Guided Pacemaker Implantation
Receives: Procedure: Permanent Pacemaker Implantation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Procedural Feasibility and Success Rate

    Feasibility phase: Successful completion of permanent pacemaker implantation under sole transthoracic echocardiographic (TTE) guidance without fluoroscopic conversion and with acceptable acute electrical parameters (capture threshold ≤1.5 V at 0.4 ms, stable sensing amplitude, and lead impedance within manufacturer-recommended range).

    Comparative phase: Successful device implantation without major procedural complications and with acceptable acute electrical parameters.

    Measured: From initiation of vascular access to hospital discharge, assessed up to 5 days after the index procedure.

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Total Procedure Time

    Total procedure time measured from skin preparation to wound dressing completion.

    Measured: During the index procedure (single-day assessment at Day 0).

  2. Lead Positioning Time

    Time required to achieve stable ventricular septal lead positioning and atrial septal lead positioning under imaging guidance.

    Measured: During the index procedure (single-day assessment at Day 0).

  3. Radiation Exposure

    Total fluoroscopy time (minutes) and cumulative radiation dose (mGy). For the TTE-guided group, fluoroscopy time is expected to be zero unless bailout conversion is required.

    Measured: During the index procedure (single-day assessment at Day 0).

  4. Acute Electrical Performance

    Atrial and ventricular pacing thresholds, sensing amplitude, and lead impedance measured at implantation.

    Measured: Immediately post-implantation (Day 0, within 24 hours after device placement).

  5. Electrical Stability at 3 Months

    Maintenance of acceptable pacing thresholds and absence of lead dislodgement.

    Measured: Assessed at 3 months (±14 days) after implantation.

  6. Major Procedural Complications

    Composite of cardiac perforation, pericardial tamponade, pneumothorax, major vascular injury, pocket hematoma requiring intervention, device infection, or procedure-related mortality.

    Measured: From the date of the index procedure until the first occurrence of a major procedural complication or completion of 12-month follow-up, whichever occurs first.

  7. Structural Cardiac Impact

    New pericardial effusion or significant progression of tricuspid regurgitation assessed by transthoracic echocardiography.

    Measured: Assessed at discharge (≤5 days), 3 months (±14 days), 6 months (±30 days), and 12 months (±30 days) after implantation.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Mar 2026
  2. Study start1 Sep 2024
  3. Primary completion1 Sep 2025
  4. Study completion1 Feb 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
31 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07458724
Sponsor's protocol ID
2025-2617
Other IDs
BRWEP2024W014030105
Acronym
RADIANCE
Status last verified
Mar 2026
First submitted
25 Feb 2026
Last updated
9 Mar 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No: Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared due to institutional data protection policies and the relatively small sample size, which may increase the risk of participant re-identification. De-identified aggregate data will be reported in peer-reviewed publications.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Permanent Pacemaker Implantation in people with Arrhythmia, run by Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Fuwai Hospital at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Procedural Feasibility and Success Rate (time frame: From initiation of vascular access to hospital discharge, assessed up to 5 days after the index procedure.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Mar 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in