Problem GamblingOTAJNCT07455981
Work Organization and Gambling Addiction
An observational study of Problem Gambling and Addiction Gambling, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
Problem gambling (PG) is influenced by environmental, psychological, and socioeconomic factors, including impulsivity, depression, anxiety, and characteristics such as marital status, age, and educational level. In France, approximately 5% of adults are affected by PG. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Problem Gambling, Addiction Gambling
- What is being tested?
- Completion of an online survey lasting approximately 25 minutes
- How many people
- 1,600 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- 1 Jul 2026to 1 Dec 2026
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: The primary analysis population will include all participants who meet the inclusion criteria and who have completed the ICJE (Indice Canadien du jeu excessif= Canadian Excessive Gambling Index) score and the primary variables of interest (working hours and perceived downtime).
Who may be able to join
- Employed patients
- Patients who have gambled at least once during the year
- Patients who are willing to participate in the survey.
Who cannot join
- Patients who cannot read the French language
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
France1 site
CHU de Nîmes
Nîmes, Gard, 30029
Anissa MEGZARI, + 33 4.66.68.30.09, drc@chu-nimes.fr
Amandine LUQUIENS, PU-PH
About this study
Official title: Assessment of the Interaction Between Atypical Working Hours and/or Periods of Inactivity on Risky Gambling Practices Among Adults Working Under These Conditions.
Problem gambling (PG) is influenced by environmental, psychological, and socioeconomic factors, including impulsivity, depression, anxiety, and characteristics such as marital status, age, and educational level. In France, approximately 5% of adults are affected by PG. Workers with atypical schedules or periods of inactivity at work are at risk of developing problematic gambling behavior. Stress, burnout, and boredom at work can exacerbate these risks. Working atypical hours, such as night shifts, is linked to mental health disorders such as depression and anxiety, which may increase the risk of PG. However, there is a lack of research on the impact of atypical schedules and periods of inactivity on PG. This research will explore the association between work schedules, periods of inactivity, and PG, particularly among workers who may be influenced by gambling norms and the specific characteristics of their jobs.
Read the detailed description
Problem gambling (PG) can have serious consequences for individuals, their loved ones, and society. It is influenced by environmental, psychological, and socioeconomic factors, including impulsivity, depression, anxiety, and characteristics such as marital status, age, and educational level. In France, approximately 5% of adults are affected by PG. Workers, particularly those with atypical schedules or periods of inactivity at work, are at risk of developing problematic gambling behavior. Stress, burnout, and boredom at work can exacerbate these risks. Working atypical hours, such as night shifts, is also linked to mental health disorders such as depression and anxiety, which could increase vulnerability to PG. However, there is a lack of research on the impact of atypical schedules and periods of inactivity on PG. This research project aims to explore the association between work schedules, periods of inactivity, and PG, particularly among workers who may be influenced by gambling norms and the specific characteristics of their jobs.
- Conditions
- Problem Gambling, Addiction Gambling
- Being tested
- Completion of an online survey lasting approximately 25 minutes
- Keywords
- Gambling, Impulsivity, Boredom, Addiction behavior, Shift work schedule
- Medical subject headings
- Gambling, Impulsive Behavior
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Completion of an online survey lasting approximately 25 minutesOther
Online survey lasting approximately 25 minutes
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Association between atypical working hours and time spent inactive at work and the ICJE (= Indice Canadien du jeu excessif = Canadian Problem Gambling Index) score
The Canadian Problem Gambling Index assesses the prevalence of gambling and problem gambling in the general population and has been used in France since the first epidemiological survey on gambling. It contains indicators of social context and degrees of severity and the risk levels of gamblers are estimated based on self-assessed criteria. The index consists of 9 questions covering the last 12 months, answered using a Likert scale (never, sometimes, most of the time, almost always).
Each player is assigned a score ranging from 0 to 27 points, depending on the severity of their gambling problems, which allows players to be categorized into four distinct groups: "low-risk gambler" (score = 0), "moderate-risk gambler" (score = 1-2), "moderate-risk gambler" (score = 3-7), and "excessive gambler" (score = 8 and above).
Measured: Over a period of 2 months
Secondary outcomes (7)
A. Links between boredom at work, atypical working hours, idle time, and problem gambling
The DUBS (Dutch Boredom Scale) score will be used to evaluate the link between the presence of atypical working hours (dichotomous variable "yes/no" + if "yes": categorical variable: working hour categories) and perceived inactivity time (continuous variable) on the Canadian Problem Gambling Index score (continuous variable). The DUBS consists of 8 questions to be answered according to frequency in which 0 =Never, 1 = Almost Never, 2 = Sometimes, 3 = Often, 4 = Very Often, 5= Always. The higher the score, the greater the amount of boredom experienced.
Measured: Over a period of 2 months
B. Links between impulsivity, atypical working hours, idle time, and problem gambling.
The UPPS-P (Urgency-Premeditation-Perseverance-Sensation Seeking-Positive) impulsive behavior scale score will be used to evaluate the link between atypical working hours (dichotomous variable "yes/no" + if "yes": categorical variable: working hour categories) and perceived downtime (continuous variable) on the ICJE score (continuous variable). The UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale is a 59-item self report scale to assess impulsive personality. The scale can be used with adults or adolescents (ages 13+) to identify the separate personality facets that have been previously lumped together under the term "impulsivity".
Measured: Over a period of 2 months
C. Links between emotional dysregulation, atypical working hours, idle time and problem gambling.
Interaction between the score on the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) scale, the presence of atypical working hours (dichotomous variable "yes/no" + if "yes": categorical variable: working hour categories) and perceived downtime (continuous variable) on the ICJE score (continuous variable).
The DERS is a 36-item a measure designed to assess clinically relevant difficulties in emotion regulation and provides valuable insights into an individual's ability to understand, accept, and manage emotions effectively. The 36 questions can be answered by Almost Never, Sometimes, About half the time, Most of the time or Almost always with scores ranging from 1 - 5 for each answer.
Measured: Over a period of 2 months
D. Links between anxiety, atypical working hours, idle time and problem gambling.
Interaction between the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) scale score, the presence of atypical working hours (dichotomous variable "yes/no" + if "yes": categorical variable: working hour categories) and perceived downtime (continuous variable) on the ICJE score (continuous variable). The GAD 7 is an easy-to-perform initial screening tool for generalized anxiety disorder. Comprising seven items, the GAD-7 measures the frequency of anxiety symptoms over the past two weeks, with respondents rating each item on a scale from "not at all" to "nearly every day."
Measured: Over a period of 2 months
E. Links between depression, atypical working hours, idle time and problem gambling.
Interaction between the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) 9 score, the presence of atypical working hours (dichotomous variable "yes/no" + if "yes": categorical variable: working hour categories) and perceived downtime (continuous variable) on the ICJE score (continuous variable)
Measured: Over a period of 2 months
F. Links between quality of life, atypical working hours, idle time and problem gambling.
Interaction between the Gambling Quality of Life Scale -brief (GQoLS-Brief) brief scale score, the presence of atypical working hours (dichotomous variable "yes/no" + if "yes": categorical variable: working hour categories) and perceived inactivity time (continuous variable) on the ICJE score (continuous variable). The GQoLS -brief assesses the impact of gambling disorder (GD) on quality of life (QoL) and contains questions scored on a 4-point Likert scale.
Measured: Over a period of 2 months
G. Links between perceived prescriptive gaming norms at work, atypical working hours, idle time and problem gambling.
- Interaction between the Gambling Attitudes and Injunctive Norms Scale scale score, the presence of atypical working hours (dichotomous variable "yes/no" + if "yes": categorical variable: working hour categories) and perceived inactivity time (continuous variable) on the ICJE score (continuous variable).The Gambling Attitudes and Injunctive Norms Scale (GAINS; Neighbors et al., 2007) was developed to examine relationships among injunctive norms and college student gambling. The 32-item scale consists of sixteen attitudinal items, asking participants about their approval or disapproval of students engaging in different gambling behaviors. Mean score for the sample on these items serves as the actual injunctive norms comparison. The remaining 16 perceived injunctive norms items ask "How do you think most college students feel about other students' gambling behavior?" The items consist of a 5-point Likert scale ranging from "Strongly Disapprove" to "Strongly Approve."
Measured: Over a period of 2 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Mar 2026
- Study start1 Jul 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion1 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Dec 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (23)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Problem GamblingStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 1,600 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Institut de Recherche en Santé Publique, France
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07455981
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRESP/OTAJ/2025/AL-01
- Acronym
- OTAJ
- Status last verified
- Jun 2026
- First submitted
- 3 Mar 2026
- Last updated
- 18 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Billieux J, Rochat L, Ceschi G, Carre A, Offerlin-Meyer I, Defeldre AC, Khazaal Y, Besche-Richard C, Van der Linden M. Validation of a short French version of the UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale. Compr Psychiatry. 2012 Jul;53(5):609-15. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2011.09.001. Epub 2011 Oct 27.
PubMed 22036009Binde P, Romild U. Risk of problem gambling among occupational groups: A population and registry study. Nordisk Alkohol Nark. 2020 Jun;37(3):262-278. doi: 10.1177/1455072519899779. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
PubMed 35308321Brodsky A, Amabile TM. The downside of downtime: The prevalence and work pacing consequences of idle time at work. J Appl Psychol. 2018 May;103(5):496-512. doi: 10.1037/apl0000294. Epub 2018 Jan 22.
PubMed 29355339Carballeira Y, Dumont P, Borgacci S, Rentsch D, de Tonnac N, Archinard M, Andreoli A. Criterion validity of the French version of Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) in a hospital department of internal medicine. Psychol Psychother. 2007 Mar;80(Pt 1):69-77. doi: 10.1348/147608306X103641.
PubMed 17346381Dixon MR, Marley J, Jacobs EA. Delay discounting by pathological gamblers. J Appl Behav Anal. 2003 Winter;36(4):449-58. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2003.36-449.
PubMed 14768665Fluharty M, Paul E, Fancourt D. Predictors and patterns of gambling behaviour across the COVID-19 lockdown: Findings from a UK cohort study. J Affect Disord. 2022 Feb 1;298(Pt A):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.10.117. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
PubMed 34744027Ioannidis K, Hook R, Wickham K, Grant JE, Chamberlain SR. Impulsivity in Gambling Disorder and problem gambling: a meta-analysis. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2019 Jul;44(8):1354-1361. doi: 10.1038/s41386-019-0393-9. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
PubMed 30986818Kasemi A, Grosemans E, Amanda R, Zaman B, De Cock R. Playing Sports, Placing Sports Bets? Sports Club Membership, Gambling Norms and Sports Gambling Behavior among Flemish Youth. J Gambl Stud. 2026 Mar;42(1):265-278. doi: 10.1007/s10899-025-10428-5. Epub 2025 Sep 29.
PubMed 41021183Knutsson A. Methodological aspects of shift-work research. Chronobiol Int. 2004;21(6):1037-47. doi: 10.1081/cbi-200038525.
PubMed 15646248Lee Y, Park H. Working Hours and Depressive and Anxiety Symptoms According to Shift Work and Gender. J Occup Environ Med. 2022 May 1;64(5):e316-e321. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000002515. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
PubMed 35166259Leso V, Fontana L, Caturano A, Vetrani I, Fedele M, Iavicoli I. Impact of Shift Work and Long Working Hours on Worker Cognitive Functions: Current Evidence and Future Research Needs. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 17;18(12):6540. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18126540.
PubMed 34204504Limmer A, Schutz A. Interactive effects of personal resources and job characteristics on mental health: a population-based panel study. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2021 Jan;94(1):43-53. doi: 10.1007/s00420-020-01555-0. Epub 2020 Jun 6.
PubMed 32506287Luquiens A, Panjo H, Bonnaire C, Pelletier-Fleury N. Developing a utility value set for the Gambling Quality of Life Scale-Brief (GQoLS-Brief) using a discrete choice experiment. Qual Life Res. 2025 Feb;34(2):457-469. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03835-5. Epub 2024 Nov 26.
PubMed 39592497Micoulaud-Franchi JA, Lagarde S, Barkate G, Dufournet B, Besancon C, Trebuchon-Da Fonseca A, Gavaret M, Bartolomei F, Bonini F, McGonigal A. Rapid detection of generalized anxiety disorder and major depression in epilepsy: Validation of the GAD-7 as a complementary tool to the NDDI-E in a French sample. Epilepsy Behav. 2016 Apr;57(Pt A):211-216. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.02.015. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
PubMed 26994447Moreira D, Azeredo A, Dias P. Risk Factors for Gambling Disorder: A Systematic Review. J Gambl Stud. 2023 Jun;39(2):483-511. doi: 10.1007/s10899-023-10195-1. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
PubMed 36884150
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Assessment of the Interaction Between Atypical Working Hours and/or Periods of Inactivity on Risky Gambling Practices Among Adults Working Under These Conditions.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07455981
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- OTAJ / IRESP/OTAJ/2025/AL-01
- Conditions
- Problem Gambling, Addiction Gambling
- Keywords
- Gambling, Impulsivity, Boredom, Addiction behavior, Shift work schedule
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 1,600 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NīmesUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Institut de Recherche en Santé Publique, France
- Study start
- 1 Jul 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 1 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 6 Mar 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Problem gambling (PG) is influenced by environmental, psychological, and socioeconomic factors, including impulsivity, depression, anxiety, and characteristics such as marital status, age, and educational level. In France, approximately 5% of adults are affected by PG. Workers with atypical schedules or periods of inactivity at work are at risk of developing problematic gambling behavior. Stress, burnout, and boredom at work can exacerbate these risks. Working atypical hours, such as night shifts, is linked to mental health disorders such as depression and anxiety, which may increase the risk of PG. However, there is a lack of research on the impact of atypical schedules and periods of inactivity on PG. This research will explore the association between work schedules, periods of inactivity, and PG, particularly among workers who may be influenced by gambling norms and the specific characteristics of their jobs.
Detailed description
Problem gambling (PG) can have serious consequences for individuals, their loved ones, and society. It is influenced by environmental, psychological, and socioeconomic factors, including impulsivity, depression, anxiety, and characteristics such as marital status, age, and educational level. In France, approximately 5% of adults are affected by PG. Workers, particularly those with atypical schedules or periods of inactivity at work, are at risk of developing problematic gambling behavior. Stress, burnout, and boredom at work can exacerbate these risks. Working atypical hours, such as night shifts, is also linked to mental health disorders such as depression and anxiety, which could increase vulnerability to PG. However, there is a lack of research on the impact of atypical schedules and periods of inactivity on PG. This research project aims to explore the association between work schedules, periods of inactivity, and PG, particularly among workers who may be influenced by gambling norms and the specific characteristics of their jobs.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- The primary analysis population will include all participants who meet the inclusion criteria and who have completed the ICJE (Indice Canadien du jeu excessif= Canadian Excessive Gambling Index) score and the primary variables of interest (working hours and perceived downtime).
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Employed patients
- Patients who have gambled at least once during the year
- Patients who are willing to participate in the survey.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients who cannot read the French language
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Completion of an online survey lasting approximately 25 minutesOnline survey lasting approximately 25 minutes | Other | – |
Primary outcome
Association between atypical working hours and time spent inactive at work and the ICJE (= Indice Canadien du jeu excessif = Canadian Problem Gambling Index) score
Time frame: Over a period of 2 months
The Canadian Problem Gambling Index assesses the prevalence of gambling and problem gambling in the general population and has been used in France since the first epidemiological survey on gambling. It contains indicators of social context and degrees of severity and the risk levels of gamblers are estimated based on self-assessed criteria. The index consists of 9 questions covering the last 12 months, answered using a Likert scale (never, sometimes, most of the time, almost always). Each player is assigned a score ranging from 0 to 27 points, depending on the severity of their gambling problems, which allows players to be categorized into four distinct groups: "low-risk gambler" (score = 0), "moderate-risk gambler" (score = 1-2), "moderate-risk gambler" (score = 3-7), and "excessive gambler" (score = 8 and above).
7 secondary outcomes
A. Links between boredom at work, atypical working hours, idle time, and problem gambling
Time frame: Over a period of 2 months
B. Links between impulsivity, atypical working hours, idle time, and problem gambling.
Time frame: Over a period of 2 months
C. Links between emotional dysregulation, atypical working hours, idle time and problem gambling.
Time frame: Over a period of 2 months
D. Links between anxiety, atypical working hours, idle time and problem gambling.
Time frame: Over a period of 2 months
E. Links between depression, atypical working hours, idle time and problem gambling.
Time frame: Over a period of 2 months
F. Links between quality of life, atypical working hours, idle time and problem gambling.
Time frame: Over a period of 2 months
G. Links between perceived prescriptive gaming norms at work, atypical working hours, idle time and problem gambling.
Time frame: Over a period of 2 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Jun 2026.
- Background: PubMed 22036009Billieux J, Rochat L, Ceschi G, Carre A, Offerlin-Meyer I, Defeldre AC, Khazaal Y, Besche-Richard C, Van der Linden M. Validation of a short French version of the UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale. Compr Psychiatry. 2012 Jul;53(5):609-15. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2011.09.001. Epub 2011 Oct 27.
- Background: PubMed 35308321Binde P, Romild U. Risk of problem gambling among occupational groups: A population and registry study. Nordisk Alkohol Nark. 2020 Jun;37(3):262-278. doi: 10.1177/1455072519899779. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
- Background: PubMed 29355339Brodsky A, Amabile TM. The downside of downtime: The prevalence and work pacing consequences of idle time at work. J Appl Psychol. 2018 May;103(5):496-512. doi: 10.1037/apl0000294. Epub 2018 Jan 22.
- Background: PubMed 17346381Carballeira Y, Dumont P, Borgacci S, Rentsch D, de Tonnac N, Archinard M, Andreoli A. Criterion validity of the French version of Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) in a hospital department of internal medicine. Psychol Psychother. 2007 Mar;80(Pt 1):69-77. doi: 10.1348/147608306X103641.
- Background: PubMed 14768665Dixon MR, Marley J, Jacobs EA. Delay discounting by pathological gamblers. J Appl Behav Anal. 2003 Winter;36(4):449-58. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2003.36-449.
- Background: PubMed 34744027Fluharty M, Paul E, Fancourt D. Predictors and patterns of gambling behaviour across the COVID-19 lockdown: Findings from a UK cohort study. J Affect Disord. 2022 Feb 1;298(Pt A):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.10.117. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
- Background: PubMed 30986818Ioannidis K, Hook R, Wickham K, Grant JE, Chamberlain SR. Impulsivity in Gambling Disorder and problem gambling: a meta-analysis. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2019 Jul;44(8):1354-1361. doi: 10.1038/s41386-019-0393-9. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
- Background: PubMed 41021183Kasemi A, Grosemans E, Amanda R, Zaman B, De Cock R. Playing Sports, Placing Sports Bets? Sports Club Membership, Gambling Norms and Sports Gambling Behavior among Flemish Youth. J Gambl Stud. 2026 Mar;42(1):265-278. doi: 10.1007/s10899-025-10428-5. Epub 2025 Sep 29.
- Background: PubMed 15646248Knutsson A. Methodological aspects of shift-work research. Chronobiol Int. 2004;21(6):1037-47. doi: 10.1081/cbi-200038525.
- Background: PubMed 35166259Lee Y, Park H. Working Hours and Depressive and Anxiety Symptoms According to Shift Work and Gender. J Occup Environ Med. 2022 May 1;64(5):e316-e321. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000002515. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
- Background: PubMed 34204504Leso V, Fontana L, Caturano A, Vetrani I, Fedele M, Iavicoli I. Impact of Shift Work and Long Working Hours on Worker Cognitive Functions: Current Evidence and Future Research Needs. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 17;18(12):6540. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18126540.
- Background: PubMed 32506287Limmer A, Schutz A. Interactive effects of personal resources and job characteristics on mental health: a population-based panel study. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2021 Jan;94(1):43-53. doi: 10.1007/s00420-020-01555-0. Epub 2020 Jun 6.
Related trials for Problem Gambling
Recruiting
Change 4 Better (C4B)
Problem Gambling
Recruiting
Effects of Proactive Call to Customers of Norsk Rikstoto (Horse Gambling Operator in Norway): A Randomized Controlled Study
Gambling Problem
Not yet recruiting
ACT-Based Intervention for Problem Gambling
Problem Gambling
Not yet recruiting
Brief ACT Intervention for Problem Gambling: A Pilot Study
Problem Gambling
Not yet recruiting
Contingency Management to Reinforce Attendance to Cognitive Behavioral Treatment for Gambling Disorder
Gambling Disorder, Gambling Problem
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Problem Gambling and Addiction Gambling, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Amandine Luquiens, Professor (+334.66.68.69.98, amandine.luquiens@chu-nimes.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Association between atypical working hours and time spent inactive at work and the ICJE (= Indice Canadien du jeu excessif = Canadian Problem Gambling Index) score (time frame: Over a period of 2 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07455981, which also lists 23 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Jun 2026.